970°

Splinter Cell Conviction 5 hour claims are Bull****

There's a lot more than 5 hours worth of entertainment in Ubisoft's Splinter Cell Conviction: "What's wrong with gamers today? If a game is too long a vast number of gamers simply don't finish it, although hardcore gamers (the very small minority in the grand scheme of things) will undoubtedly finish every game they play. If it's too short, then the same hardcore gamers moan and complain like there is no tomorrow. In some instances, dropping $60 or £40 on a game which seemingly can be beaten in an afternoon might be considered poor value for money, and if a game is only playable once then sure we'd have to agree. However, it seems since IGN posted their review of Ubisoft's Splinter Cell Conviction on Friday, the hardcore masses are in uproar. It's perhaps easy for them to ignore the fact that many casual gamers do not have the time to pump hours upon hours into a game, and this is possibly why game lengths have become shorter in general compared to times past. It's a known fact as already mentioned that many casuals (more than you would think) don't finish games.

Differences between casual and hardcore gamers aside, it appears the comments from the IGN review have been blown all out of proportion, and as the hardcore fraternity are the most vocal with the moaning, they are seemingly forgetting that Splinter Cell Conviction doesn't end once the credits roll for the story mode."

Read Full Story >>
msxbox-world.com
Tompkins5144d ago

I played the 10 minute demo like 40 times because of the replay value. The full game is going to be even better. These 5 hour claims have been taken the wrong way (as usual yawn!).

Jamie Foxx5144d ago (Edited 5144d ago )

The author of the article also talks about the 'add-ons' which as nice as they maybe still doesn't detract that you may finish the single player in five hours.

I'm an old skool gamer...I'm single player foremost as that's what gamings all about,multiplayer whilst in games can be amazing I also feel it let's lazy developers make short player games thus using the argument 'well it has multiplayer'

I havnt played sc:c so cannot comment on the length,but it seems it has a lot of content,and heavenly sword was short but one of the most fun games I've played,so if you love the splinter cell series and don't hate the changes too much jump in and have fun I think the game looks kool.

97gsx5144d ago

Too much hypocrisy in the gaming world nowadays. The length doesnt mean the game is crap but it should be considered in the reviews since people will be spending $60 and up for it. I enjoyed the hell out of shadow complex but I wouldn't pay $60 for it.

LukaX235144d ago

just... LOL.... how low can you be to make up these sort of rumors? I'm all for Conviction. The game is awesome, Splinter Cell is awesome.

Cold 20005144d ago

I'll be getting Convivtion day one...but one has to wonder what the heck have Ubi been doing for the last 4 years or so with this game.

I know it was scrapped and stuff but come on...whats up with the average graphics and the 5-7h campaign ?

Luckily it has multiplayer unlike some other 7-8h single player games with no multi. Otherwise it would have been a no buy.

sid4gamerfreak5144d ago (Edited 5144d ago )

"Splinter Cell Conviction 5 hour claims are Bull****"

HA, i knew it!! Love it when the ps3 fanboys get dissed by these articles...

Anyway, im not gonna buy the game cause of all that drm nonsense, im not gonna give a cent to ubisoft ever again...

Edit: I LOL at the disagrees.

caladbolg7775144d ago

If you pay full price for this pile, you're a goddamn retard.

Hellsvacancy5144d ago (Edited 5144d ago )

Like ive said b-4, if SC:C cums 2 the PS3 (which it will) ill rent it, complete it and send it back, and thats y i shall rent it, soon as ive beat the game itll end up sittin there on the shelf collectin dust, Alan Wake (which has NO multiplayer) falls in-2 that catagory aswell (and so does God Of War 3 but i bought that coz of the epicness) but say with Red Dead 2 its gonna b the total opposite, its gonna hav a lengthy (and great appealin) story, kick ass multiplayer, more then likely hav co-op, tons of replay value and its gonna cost the same price as SC:C/Alan Wake

I know wot id rather (and will) b playin

HolyOrangeCows5143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

So you add co-op to a game that already has dimwit AI that would only take one monkey to overcome and suddenly it doesn't have a short campaign?

I suppose if you spend a lot of time fighting over who gets to hit the execute button in this room, it may take longer.

Christopher5143d ago

While I don't think 5 hours is bad for a good game, I think the writer's attempts to use 'replay' of the content as a reason why it's not so bad is way off. All games have the ability for replay and the 'replayability' of content is highly subjective. Perhaps some enjoy replaying it on a higher difficulty, while others don't see the point.

Be happy with your game, ignore the people who want to just find any reason to criticize the game, and move on.

BrutallyBlunt5143d ago

Some games like MAG can be viewed as having terrible value but I've put in over 50 hours of playtime in that thing. How many can say that about most games? I also put in almost 40 hours into Mass Effect 2 and it has no online play. It does have DLC but those 40 hours are not even including that. Plus I want to play it over again because there are so many ways of playing that game.

So right there are two big examples of value. One has a lot of length to the single player experience while the other has none at all. Splinter Cell: Conviction sounds to be right in the middle. So if you don't want to go online then maybe it doesn't have great value for you. Same can be said about Halo: ODST. However with this game you can also play Deniable Ops offline which adds more value.

It's sad that kids these days just read something and run with it. A review comes out and says the single player game is only 5 hours and they go running on the forums and shout, "Hey, that new Splinter Cell is only 5 hours long!" Or they read a review and it only gets a 7/10 and they never even bother reading the actual review and flog the forums saying the game is only a 7.

Bigpappy5143d ago

But SC:C has more than 1 game mode. I am sure I will get more than 20 hrs out of it with out replaying the story. I also expect to die a few time in the story as I will be playing the realistic setting and taking a lot of risk. SC is not and action game for me, it is a play ground. If it can be completed in 5 hours, it will take me 12-15 for the campaign. The co-op and spy vs spy online could be and extra month or more of play for me, depending on how engaging it is. I am a SC fan so. They got me.

Inside_out5143d ago

M$ delivers again...This game gonna be an instant classic...wow...Great article...this man KNOWS what he is talking about...every gamer should have a chance to play a game like this...incredible...Surprising how many PS3 guys know so much about a 360 exclusive...I guess they'll play it on there 1000$ PC....

StanLee5143d ago

The complaints aren't valid but when every PS3 exclusive is bemoaned for being too short or not offering enough content you can see how the PSTrihards would look for any opportunity to criticize Splinter Cell Conviction's single play campaign length, not noting or forgetting completely that the reviewer had played said campaign 3 times.

IdleLeeSiuLung5143d ago

This game has received stellar scores from 3 publications, it's only con is the length which is in many ways mitigated because of the co-op mode that also has multiplayer.

That means, it could be anywhere from 5, 10 or way more hours of quality gaming. However, if you are going to let the length from stopping you from enjoying this game then too bad for you.

I think then you should go play some other repetitive, long and boring game. I'm sure it will feel like it lasted many many many many... hours!!!

2Spock5143d ago

While i would agree 5 hours is way short for single player but i also take co-op and multiplayer into consideration, which does help ease some of the short length. That's why i am glad i did not buy Heavy Rain due to only a short single player experience with only a decent amount of replay value in the later half of the game. So i think this SC might be just a rent considering i will only play single and co-op.

vhero5143d ago

an xbox fansite saying its gonna be more than 5 hours?? Yeah it must be true.. Lets move on..

ProjectVulcan5143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

IGN never said it was 5 hours entertainment. They said the single player was about 5 hours long. This it seems, is TRUE. Whichever way you spin it and turn it and defend it as replay this and online that, thats still short for a game that has built up its reputation from single player. Period.

Course that doesnt make it a bad game or even bad value. Personally though its not good enough for a game that has spent 4 years in development so i will be picking it up cheap maybe secondhand rather than paying up full whack straight into ubi's pockets

The Time Reaper5143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

Stan - "not noting or forgetting completely that the reviewer had played said campaign 3 times."

I'm all for quality over quantity, and SCC looks to have as solid package which I'll certainly buy... but I don't get your statement here? I mean, I've replayed Super Metroid at least 20 times, but it doesn't make it a 50 hour game, does it? It makes it 50 hours worth of entertainment, but those are different things.

I just think if reviewers are going to be "bemoan" anything like length/replayability as the fanboys do, they should at least be consistent with it. If we add replays by the reviewer into said review for one game, should we not do it for all games on every platform? That easily can turn God of War 3 into a 40 hour game, or Gears of War 2 into a 90 hour game. Slippery slope, IMHO.

Consoldtobots5143d ago

let me translate what "Stan Lee" just said..

"LMAO @ 360 fanbrats getting a taste of their own medicine"

there fixed.

DelbertGrady5143d ago

Has anyone here played it, and if so can you verify its length? How many reviewers claimed it was 5 hours long?

4Sh0w5143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

If the single player is 5hrs then that's a shame because despite replay value and multiplayer I believe that a dev's basic thought process should start with first and foremost on delivering a quality SP campaign that will last quite a few hrs, 5-7hrs imo is waaay too short.

If this game were single player only I would definitely make it a rental, but fortunately with the co-op modes I will no doubt get my money's worth because I know I'll likely play those missions quite a few times with multiple friends. I also think that any game with a multiplayer usually will deliver plenty of hrs to make a game worth $60, but with that said developers still need to remember the basic principle of delivering enough content in the SP campaign that will satisfy SP only type gamers, YES although rare these days they still do exist.

Montrealien5143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

not trying to sugar coat this short single player campaign, but this is an industry norm latetly, all my favorite games last year are all sub 15hr single player games, this is a new low.

yeah, more at 11.

I am ejoying splinter cell conviction up until now, I am about 2 hours in and its great however I am also very dissapointed if it is infact just a 5 hour single player campaign. Like GoW3, this game is fun as hell, to bad they are short.

Pika-pie5143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

Its all about the single player for me. I couldnt really care about co-op/multiplayer.

I would rather sit through a 60+hour RPG than play endless multiplayer matches.

I would expect 12 hours of story based single player gameplay out of a game like this.

otherZinc5143d ago

PS3 owners are mad they're not getting a game thats not linear & repetitive like Uncharted 2. For the stupid, that means ONE WAY to play the campaign!

Splinter Cell:Conviction has several ways to complete the game. This 5hour crap is fanboyism anger & foolish, period!

sikbeta5143d ago

@StanLee

Same way x360 owners were "complaining" about God of War 3 length, right?

[Both Ways]

ThanatosDMC5143d ago

Now the question is, how much of that 5hours is cinematics, verbal story, etc. that retracts away from actual gameplay?

MGS4 is 5hours during a speed run when the person knows exactly where and when an enemy is going to be while skipping the all those verbal stories and cinematics.

I'm surprise those people that whined and complained about MGS4's so-called 5hr gameplay is adamantly defending this multiplat. Also, MGS4 had multiplayer and a lot of replay value due to guns and unlockables how come that wasnt brought up?

N4Flamers5143d ago

the author claims that this game is shorter because of casual gamers and their lifestyle. The blaring mistake he made is that SC.C is not a casual game.

+ Show (24) more repliesLast reply 5143d ago
xaviertooth5144d ago

my intelligent guess is the DVD capacity has something to do with that.

ElementX5144d ago

My intelligent guess is that you have 1 bubble for a reason

clarkjudo5144d ago

"So to conclude, that for your $60 a five hour experience is simply not good enough, yet what gamers need to look at is the entire package, and remember that there's far more than 5 hours worth of entertainment with this game." Posted by: Robert Cram/ MSXBOX WORLD.COM

Some people need to learn how to read. And give intelligent information or go back to playing their one time play through "movies" on their PS3 Blu Ray Player.

xaviertooth5143d ago

bots cannot even count correctly.

i have 2 bubbles see i was able to post another comment. please bots, go back to elementary math.

ElementX5143d ago

When I commented you only had 1 bubble, then everyone who disagreed with me bubbled you up, now you have 2. I'm not a bot, I don't own a 360, I have a PS3. Your bot "insult" is unfounded.

kevinx10005143d ago

"my intelligent guess"

YOUR 'intelligent' guess... that really means a lot to us...

i'd like you to meet gears 3 in a few hours :)

Greywulf5143d ago

Do not pass go

Your flop ass game is 5 hours on a normal play through.

fullmetal2975143d ago

"my intelligent guess...". Oh god the irony xDDDD

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5143d ago
Omega45144d ago

The game has multiplayer AND co-op so playtime is limitless, unlike some games which last 7 hours and have no multiplayer.

Plus IGN said its really replayable too.

Lucreto5144d ago (Edited 5144d ago )

The 5 hours are upsetting the people who play games for the single player and don't have live. I for one prefer the single player experience and should be the main focus of the game. I don't care for deathmatch or co-op so this game is looking like a budget price if I wasn't getting it for free.

I usually get bored of multiplayer very quickly and it get really repetitive after a few hours. Hey thats just me.

The reviewing system should be changed as well. The single player and the multiplayer should be scored individually. So single player people will know they will get the bang for their buck and the muliplayer people would be able to see it is it just tacked on and shallow or a rewarding experience.
It will also make the developers to work harder on both aspects.

My example I game will a 15-20 single player would get 8/10 and the multiplayer aspect gets 6/10 for lets say poor implementation. that wold be 14/20 or 7/10. If it is just an single player game there will be no marks taken away for not having multiplayer.

kancerkid5143d ago

@Lucreto

READ. THE. ARTICLE.

There are modes besides just the story which can all be played SOLO adding at least a dozen hours if not more to the game. Some of these can also be played in multiplayer, but that is not the point.

Almost everything on the disc (far more than just the story) is singleplayer, adding hours and hours to the 5 hour story

2Spock5143d ago

I am not knocking your opinion or how you like to play games but....You say multiplayer and co-op is boring and repetitive, but you really only like single player. If that's not calling the kettle black i don't know what is. So you can play single player over and over and it stays fresh? Most of my hours gaming have come from multiplayer, i have put 40 hours into BBC2 mutli. There is no way i could put that replaying the single player over and over. Don't get me wrong nothing like a great single player experience but a great multiplayer goes a long ways in fun and replayability.

Lucreto5143d ago

I know it seems odd but that how it seems to work for me.

I played FF XIII for 80 hour and enjoy it but I can't play multiplayer at all. I played Uncharted 2 for 3 hours max and the same as Resistance with 4 hours. I played Bioshock 2 for 20 hours online to level 40 I was bored by level 25 and was just grinding through it from there.

@ kancerkid - They can be played offline but designed be be online. So more than likely it will be hard on single player.

nycredude5143d ago

MS got a great scheme here and everyone who pays is falling for it. Make short as& single player games with lots oaf mp and coop stuff so you have to pay for Live. Simple as that. Case close. WTF has Ubisoft been doing all this time. I was hyped for this but I don't pay for Live so now this games is a pass. With games like Uncharted 2 out this game seems like a rip off!

UC2
12 hour campaign
coop
mp
Free online

SC:C
5 hour campaign
coop
mp
Pay for live

corneliuscrust5143d ago

If you dont feel you got your money's worth. Completely personal experience.

I love how everyone here has already beaten the campaign so they can come in and let us all know how worth it or not the game is...

n4g: sinking to new lows each and every day

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5143d ago
5144d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (142)
330°

Watch Ninja Gaiden II, Fable 2, Fable 3, and Splinter Cell Games Enhanced for Xbox One X in Action

Microsoft presented a new batch of Xbox 360 games that received Xbox One X enhancements via Xbox One backward compatibility, and here you can watch how they run.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
RizBiz1852d ago

Nothing wrong with more games. As someone who just fundamentally hates xbox, I am pretty jelly that xbox gamers get real BC.

1852d ago Replies(2)
1851d ago Replies(1)
Gaming4Life19811852d ago (Edited 1852d ago )

Finally ninja gaiden 2 is BC, I've been waiting on this since they announced BC.

Bane351852d ago (Edited 1852d ago )

Yeah i thought ninja gaiden was gonna get remaster because it wasnt announced for backwards compatible til just now tho i would've been up for joy if they announced max payne 3 for backwards compatible today instead

hiawa231852d ago

I am so wanting MP3 on BC and X1X enhanced

Bane351852d ago (Edited 1852d ago )

@hiawa23 i think R* has plans to remaster MP3 at this point

Z5011852d ago

You couldn't play your copy of NG2 before this announcement?

Bane351852d ago (Edited 1852d ago )

No it just became backwards compatible today

Movefasta19931851d ago

not everybody still has their 360, that's why

Z5011851d ago

Kept your game, but no console to play it on?
No one sells 360's anymore?

EddieNX 1852d ago ShowReplies(1)
bluebenjamin1852d ago

Ninja Gaiden 2 is the main game I wanted bcthen alone one x enchanced is this game is more fun than bloodborne

Gwiz1852d ago

No contest,souls games are overhyped for difficulty.

bluebenjamin1852d ago

Very overhyped just because of difficulty not because of fun

1851d ago
Movefasta19931851d ago

facts, once you beat a souls game and do ng plus, you have the game downloaded. Once you return to ng1 and 2 you still can get your ass handed to you lol, the regular enemies are a threat, still attacking even when they are on the ground dismembered.

Gaming4Life19811851d ago

Agreed dark souls, bloodborne, and sekiro are overhyped games and dont compare to ninja gaiden 1 & , ninja gaiden 3 sucks.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1851d ago
Z5011852d ago

What does BB have to do with NG2?
Why not insert Contra Shattered Soldier while you're at it.

bluebenjamin1852d ago

Ninja gaiden was once considered one of the hardest games ninja gaiden 2 has rpg elements so does bloodborn they have similar combat but ninja gaiden 2 just looks better doing it plus its fast pace and flashy combos removing limbs of foes remember 360 put more enemies on screen than ps3 on this game 360 had more dismemberment of limbs than the ps3 vs.360 had a better gpu but ps3 still to this day has an awesome cpu the ps3 had the prettiest ninja gaiden because of native 720 p while 360 pushed 640p now the one X has both higher rez and 360 style dismemberment But Ok for you contra ps2 version and nes

1852d ago
1852d ago
Movefasta19931851d ago

I do think ninja gaiden 1 and 2 are better than souls games, but they aren't even comparable

Z5011851d ago

Again. Why'd you pick BB?
Ninja Gaiden has ninja dog mode = easy
NG2 has a jump and block button
BB has none of those.

You could've picked a Devil May Cry or Bayonetta game. They're more similar to NG2 than BB.

What does PS3 have to do with this announcement? Your insecurities are showing.

Gaming4Life19811851d ago

I think they are being compared because of difficulty but I dont even think that is comparable imo. Ninja gaiden games are better though that's just facts.

Hungryalpaca1851d ago

And Forza is Better than MARIO Kart!!!!!

See how stupid that sounds?

bluebenjamin1851d ago

No Mario Kart is the best racer ever almost anyone can play

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1851d ago
timotim1852d ago (Edited 1852d ago )

Amazing news! NG2!?!? Three Splinter Cell games!!! Fable 2&3 (the first is already enhanced)!!! This is what separates Microsoft's version of BC from others...its that they enhance both the performance and visual quality of these titles to keep them current in a lot of cases, instead of playing them exactly how they played and performed back in the day. Whats even better...I don't need to do ANYTHING but download the new patch...amazing.👏

Keep it coming Xbox!

Show all comments (53)
220°

Are the free Xbox Games With Gold titles for July 2018 any good?

Neil writes: "Every single month we hear the same old thing about the Xbox Games With Gold titles. "We don't want that rubbish - we want decent games, we want AAA blockbusters, we want something different". Well, the free Xbox 360 and Xbox One titles being given away during the month of July pretty much tick those boxes. What's the chances there will still be complaints?"

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
AG1002141d ago

Tom clancy and virtua fighter are great death sqaured is pretty cool idk about assualt

lxeasy2141d ago

Splinter cell conviction is great, vf 5 is fun. Haven't played the other two so I'm excited to try them out.

ApexWolf222141d ago

Great month for 360 titles, X1 titles remind me of early days when all they gave away were indies, I hope they dont start doing that again.

AG1002141d ago

at least you can play the 360 games on xb1 too lol

Goldby2141d ago

Now that there's gamepass, expect bugger AAA to have priority in that, more money for both the dev and Ms more likely

yomfweeee2141d ago

I though Plus was lackluster this month. Gold is way worse.

BQ322141d ago

Vf5 fs is the best fighting game of all time abd backwards compatible, so it is a huge win in my book.

annoyedgamer2141d ago

No these are pretty awful. Virtua Fighter is great and so is Splinter Cell but those are 360 titles.

lxeasy2141d ago

so what if there 360 titles it's still awesome

Show all comments (11)
240°

A new Tom Clancy adventure can be enjoyed on Xbox One due to Back Compat – Is it worth the return?

Carlos writes: "Xbox Backwards Compatibility has shown a strong start to 2018 with a number of top titles being made available to play on Xbox One, but whilst this week doesn’t bring quite as many new arrivals as the past few weeks, there is still one addition for us to get stuck into once more... and it’s one that’s sure to prove a popular addition."

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
NotanotherReboot2281d ago

god bless backwards compatability

TheSplooge2281d ago

And thank god we dont have to pay for it.

2281d ago
Gman322281d ago

yeah Microsoft get points for that

TheOttomatic912281d ago

I’m still waiting for Blacklist

PlayStation_52281d ago

Don't confuse the Xbox gamers. They have enough problems to deal with... : P'

Mister_Wolf2281d ago

I AM an Xbox gamer aswell as other systems lol.

TheRealHeisenberg2281d ago

No confusion at all. Just another game added to the list if anyone gets nostalgic.

Vectrexer2281d ago

Are we confused? We get games that we've been enjoyed before at no cost to us!

C-H-E-F2281d ago

"new"? an "old" Tom Clancy Adventure can be enjoyed on xbox one due to back capat is worth the return"

*Fixed*

zerocarnage2281d ago

Yes, I loved conviction the co op was ace.

Show all comments (21)