"And why do you think it's getting panned? An open letter to the role-playing gamer community." - VideoGamesDaily
Grab your longsword, shield and round up the fantasy archetypes - there are Ice Dragons afoot!
Chalgyr's Game Room writes:
I am kicking things off by going back to a familiar well here - with a song from the Neverwinter Nights soundtrack. This is still arguably one of my favorite music scores in a video game ever, but I decided to lead off with it and then create something of a theme as I decided to pull all of this edition's songs from RPG games.
Neverwinter Nights (PC) - Battle - Forest Boss
I touched on the somewhat mystical quality of another Neverwinter Nights song last week when discussing City Docks Day. There were a lot of really good battle tunes in this one, but the Forest Boss song always stood out in my mind. The battle itself was not even the most memorable one, but right around the one minute mark, it reaches an epic level that just stuck with me.
Digitally Downloaded writes: "Below are the ten games we'd like to see make their way to the new generation of consoles this year. Or, perhaps, game collections that could be pulled together into a single disc package for even better value as we have seen other recent HD/ Remaster releases."
B-But FFXII isn't last-gen. I'd love to see it remastered regardless though. Brilliantly fun game, I just disliked the story unfortunately.
I really would like to see a HD Remaster of both Twilight Princess & Skyward Sword. Those games deserve to be in HD
Are you saying that they could make Ni no Kuni look even better, because I would like to see that.
Georama and the GeoNet system as a whole are the main things I love about White Knight Chronicles.
i love my rpgs lol
I don't know why but it brings me back to the good old days of JRPG's. Grinding for levels, short but sweet story line and the best part there is no Marumaro characters in this game. Yes there are weird anime type characters, but they aren't annoying like in every other JRPG this gen.
If your intent was to express an opinion on: "the ways I feel WKC fails and the ways in which it shows promise," then you failed, wretchedly.
There were no real merits or accolades in your piece, none at all (a weak nod at a character creation system that was quickly dismissed, maybe). There was a great deal of personal pandering and reflection on what you thought (in your omnipotent wisdom) the game should have had. Grand spectacles that, had you the sense to realize, are simply not possible on a 4 year old piece of tech with 512 megs of RAM.
As a writer who has been published in several magazines, fitness circulars and sports-journals, let me offer some advice to a burgeoning member of the craft.
1.) Get yourself an editor ffs (or a better one). Had you said in one page what you ambled on with in four, your point would have been much more succinct, palatable and open for interpretation. But as it was, there was nothing left to analyze, nothing to debate, for you had said it all.
2.) While this article (the first one) was by your own admission, an editorial/ review, it hastily devolved into the realm of an opinion piece. If you are trying to present a factual argument, a weighing of 'pros' and 'cons', no one cares what you think. You should be as jurisprudent as possible, so that people can see the reason behind your argument. And the story of you, a bumbling Otaku, freshly birthed from post-secondary school tied into another string of verbal nonsense, adds little to the article; and in fact, illuminates your inexperience, making it difficult to take you seriously.
3.) Verbosity does not equate intelligence, nor obfuscate ignorance. Having a well-developed vocabulary is wonderful, but leads to diarrhea of the mouth more-often than Harvard wit. Again, a solid editor would work wonders here for you.
4.) A terrier? That's the best that you can come up with? He who posts a story, writes a retraction of sorts, obsessively monitors the threads related to said story and displays all the fortitude of an insecure school-girl towards people who contest with her? What would be your moniker then? Emma, Sally? Eustice, maybe.
I'm really not trying to be an as$hole, but you're making it difficult, dear Eustice. I suggest that you get outside today instead of emotionally festering over your work. Part of writing, of life, is criticism. If you can't take that, I question how far you'll make it.
"If your intent was to express an opinion on: "the ways I feel WKC fails and the ways in which it shows promise," then you failed, wretchedly" [incorrect colon usage]
There were no real merits or accolades [simply "merits" - don't indulge your taste for rhetorical amplification - and "accolades" isn't the right word. Look it up.] in your piece, none at all (a weak nod at a character creation system that was quickly dismissed, maybe) [flesh this out - how exactly would you take issue with my point about "participatory" players?] There was a great deal of personal pandering [to what?] and reflection on what you thought (in your omnipotent wisdom) the game should have had [or rather, on the strength of my 20 hours of playtime]. Grand spectacles that, had you the sense to realize, [bad grammar - perhaps "you should have had the sense to realise"] are simply not possible on a 4 year old piece of tech with 512 megs of RAM. [What about God of War 3? Killzone 2? Uncharted 2? Dante's Inferno? To name but a few...]
As a writer who has been published in several magazines, fitness circulars and sports-journals, let me offer some advice to a burgeoning member of the craft. [How generous you are. Perhaps a few personal health tips while you're at it? In return, I'm happy to share what I've learned from editing and proofing MA theses, localising articles from Greek and Polish and managing a writing journal.]
1.) Get yourself an editor ffs (or a better one). Had you said in one page what you ambled on with in four, your point would have been much more succinct, palatable and open for interpretation [loose and affected usage of these terms - how is the food metaphor appropriate? Aren't "succinct" and "open for interpretation" mildly contradictory?Deploying trios of adjectives or adjectival phrases for the sake of it is one of the worst journalistic sins]. But as it was, there was nothing left to analyze, nothing to debate, for you had said it all. [Good god, do you really believe that I've said *everything* there is to say on WKC? I suggest you play on a bit more.]
2.) While this article (the first one) was by your own admission, an editorial/ review, it hastily devolved into the realm of an opinion piece. If you are trying to present a factual argument, a weighing of 'pros' and 'cons', no one cares what you think. [<< The connection between this sentence and the preceding one is unclear. As is your phrasing - are you arguing against pro-and-con pieces? Or against opinion pieces that give pros and cons?] You should be as jurisprudent [Why the contrived recourse to legal terminology? Do you mean "clear" or "transparent"?] as possible, so that people can see the reason behind your argument. [Indeed.] And the story of you, a bumbling Otaku, freshly birthed from post-secondary school tied into another string of verbal nonsense [without specifics, this so much empty posturing], adds little to the article; [other than a brief history of the JRPG's fortunes in the past five years, you mean - quite relevant, one might have thought; questionable semi-colon usage here] and in fact, illuminates your inexperience, making it difficult to take you seriously.
3.) Verbosity does not equate intelligence [incorrect, affected usage of "equate" - try "equal"], nor obfuscate ignorance. Having a well-developed vocabulary is wonderful, but leads to diarrhea of the mouth more-often than Harvard wit [Yes, and you've proved this admirably]. Again, a solid editor would work wonders here for you. [Why have you made the point about getting an editor twice?]
4.) A terrier? That's the best that you can come up with? He who posts a story, writes a retraction of sorts, obsessively monitors the threads related to said story and displays all the fortitude of an insecure school-girl towards people who contest with her? What would be your moniker then? Emma, Sally? Eustice, maybe. [I prefer Ellen, personally. Though hadn't we already decided that I was a paedophillic old lady?]
I'm not trying to be an asshole either, believe it or not. Well, maybe a little. I freely admit to monitoring these threads, though in my defence I find this is good practice if you want to raise an article's temperature, and sure, I've been a little over-the-top or "schoolgirlish" in my responses :) But it takes two to tango. Perhaps if you'd troubled to engage with the specifics of my arguments, to actually *dispute* them, rather than block their publication in the name of your hard-on for a fairly bland game, we might have spent the past 24 hours a little more productively. Perhaps if you'd bother to actually *criticise* rather than jam your fingers in your ears and scream "TROLL", we'd have gotten along famously.
Anyway. I have better things to do and I sincerely hope you do too. So this is me signing off. If you want to have the last word (of course you do), knock yourself out. Till we meet again...