Approvals 12/10 ▼
cain141 (3) - 5334d ago Cancel
Ziriux (3) - 5334d ago Cancel
gameseveryday (2) - 5334d ago Cancel
D4RkNIKON (2) - 5334d ago Cancel
TheGrimBunny (1) - 5334d ago Cancel
williamkenny (1) - 5334d ago Cancel
970°

Will Playstation Survive Till the Next Generation?

"This console generation so far has by far been the bloodiest one, in terms of sheer fanboyism. Lines have been drawn since early and gamers have been moving back and forth crossing the line depending on their preferences. Well personally for me Playstation had been a preferred platform of choice up until 2005, when Microsoft made the all so important decision and released the Xbox 360, one full year ahead of PS3, meaning the start of healthy new competition."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

Lame
pathetic attempt
sunil5333d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
napoleon_ist5333d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
FAT MAN GO BOOM5333d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Spam
FAT MAN GO BOOM5333d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Other
Flambait
FAT MAN GO BOOM5333d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
I don't even know why I'm reporting this article. The reports system does NOTHING. This "site" is a f*cking joke.
thereapersson5333d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
NightVyper5333d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Spam
willie62895333d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
TheDeadMetalhead5333d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Spam
TheDeadMetalhead5333d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Other
Who approves this crap?
TheDeadMetalhead5333d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
PS3ALLDAY1225333d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Fake
There isn't a single ounce of truth to this entire article. The author clearly didn't do any research before writing this poorly informed opinion piece. It's just spreading misinformation.
Anon19745334d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
Flamebait. Uses the term "fanboy" when referring to PS3 users. Similar situation against calling XBox users: Xbots.
thorstein5334d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Old
veeeeeeeeery old.
beavis4play5334d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
biggame9015334d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
Try harder.
Pain5334d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Spam
flamebait
Lavitz19895334d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
Myzer5334d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
For someone to even ask this question is not only ignorant, but more than likely totally misinformed...
NJShadow5334d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
Stupidity.
UltimateSin5334d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
Kain815334d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Lame
Dawn_Of_Ashes5334d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Other
LtSkittles5334d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
5334d ago
LtSkittles5334d ago

No way MGR, and PenisWagon in anti-ps3 article what a surprise.

ThanatosDMC5334d ago

Dont be mean to him... he's waiting for it come back from the shop.

Shadow Flare5334d ago

i think he'll turn 11 by that time

UnwanteDreamz5334d ago

What did you say? Couldn't see it cause you only got 1 bubble ; )

snipermk05334d ago

Funniest comment of the day. :P

gaffyh5334d ago

Of course PlayStation will survive till next generation. Gamecube failed miserably last gen, and here Nintendo are kicking everyone's ass. Don't underestimate Sony, they have the most first party devs and second party devs than Nintendo and MS combined.

DarkTower8055334d ago

Don't be asking him questions when you know he doesn't have enought bubbles to respond, lmao.

SL1M DADDY5334d ago

What kind of question is that? Sorry, but this article is proof that even monkeys with plant sized IQ's can write. Stuff like this is the bane of the video game industry and should be nuked.

Cenobia5334d ago

Not by the end of today he won't

CptBach5334d ago

Why do these articles get here??

sikbeta5334d ago

Turn 10 Favourite Game is not forza, he loves the new xbox franchise

fishd5334d ago

AAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!!!

Thanks for the laugh gamingbolt.com

Take care!

presto7175334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

A fully optimized ps3 with a couple more years to go could hold its own against any console MS might rush to put out.

Maddens Raiders5334d ago

Sarcasm, did you write this? 8D

darthv725334d ago

I got allot of money riding on this horse.

dragunrising5334d ago

I hate these articles...

It doesn't matter which console is the focus, they're all stupid. Opinions are great and all, but I don't think anyone can predict the future. Unless we're talking about the "Great" Michael PatchER (sarcasm). Did anyone think the Wii would go on to sell 54 million consoles? No. That's why any similar article should never be approved in the first place.

Saaking5334d ago

WTF? IS this a joke? The pS3 just DESTROYED the 360 yet there's still doom articles? IF the PS3 isn't gonna make it then neither is the 360. After all, the PS3 HAS been selling at a FASTER RATE than the 360. If anyone isn't gonna make it's the 360.

boodybandit5334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

It's just another site desperate for hits.

Persistantthug5334d ago

With Sony's Playstation history, PS1 and PS2,

I see no reason to doubt them.

jke825334d ago

so lets say that ms does what the article says releases a new console 2yrs ahead of sony now sure they have a jump on the next gen but, gamingbolt fails to look at the other side..2yrs pass and ms has their next gen console out and its been competing with the ageing ps3 (and on a side note sony would be rakeing in the money after that long with the ps3 on the market)...then sony releases ps4....2yrs after ms releases the new xbox console...how will ms compete with the better tech that it will inevitably have..

there ya have it food for though ms looking at the now and short term while sony plays the market like a chess game...

Anon19745334d ago

First off, do multiconsole games always sell better on the 360? If so, how come often when companies like Activision, EA and Ubisoft report their revenue, the PS3 and 360 are usually neck and neck?

Article fail.

The article talks about struggling PS3 sales compared to 360 sales. The truth is the PS3 has outsold the 360 since it launched worldwide according to official numbers.

Another fail for this article.

"After all it’s all about the sales and profits in the end." The 360 hasn't made a dime yet. It's still in the hole about 3 billion.

Article fail.

"Everyone was doubtful, even the hardcorest of the PS3 fans, up until 2010" Says you.

Article fail.

"Multiplatform titles also tend to sell better on Xbox 360 mainly due to superior online service" See point about EA, Ubisoft and Activision.

Fail.

The article states PS3 game sales are mediocre? Excuse me? 90% of titles never break one million sales in their entire lifetime. Are PS3 sales struggling? Maybe in this guys fantasy land.

Fail.

Wow. This article is so full of fail, you actually have to wonder if the guy is lying on purpose or just that ignorant. Either way, this trash should have never been approved. Flamebait without a single valid point.

The lesson, boys and girls? Do your research before writing an opinion piece such as this.

glennc5333d ago

what i don't understand is why people feel the need to click on the BS article and then comment about how ridiculous it is even though any moron can see that without reading it. well done guys you did what they wanted you to do, weak minded fools

The Dude5333d ago

@gaffyh

Too bad sony's 1st and 2nd party developers produce 85% of the mediocre games on the ps3.

Mr Logic5333d ago

"Everyone was doubtful, even the hardcorest of the PS3 fans, up until 2010, when games like Killzone2, Infamous and all so important Uncharted 2 were released"

Awesome... just awesome "journalism" right there.

jadenkorri5333d ago

just wow, really, god i don't even know what to say about this article let alone comment on such trash. I felt my brain melting and losing intelligence reading word after word..

Darkstorn5333d ago

The PS3 has an insane amount of momentum behind it right now. While I don't think it will ever catch up to the 360 in terms of sales, there is no doubt that the PS3 has the better games lineup at this point. Not to mention the better hardware.

hay5333d ago

Let me cite Eddie Riggs partially.

* Points at the "article" *
What's this "Motherf**king piece of sh*t"!?

Sarcasm5333d ago

"Sarcasm, did you write this? 8D "

Whoa I had nothing to do with this article. There's nothing funny about it lol

Raz5333d ago

"After all it’s all about the sales and profits in the end.."

Really? Here I thought it was about enjoying great games, and all this time I should've been focusing on the sales figures and profit margins.

Silly me.

+ Show (28) more repliesLast reply 5333d ago
gameseveryday5334d ago

Remember PS3 has blu ray and it will survive for atleast 3 years more.

Assassin Nawabi5334d ago

ya true but a will ps3 be able to compete with a next gen console? with possibly a blu-ray add on too?

josuttis5334d ago

3 more years?

The PS3 will be selling for at least another 7 years.

Not that it really matters, this idiotic and rambling garbage being passed off as game journalism is just embarrassing to read. It is mind boggling that there are people that F-ing stupid with access to a platform to spew their moronic babble.

5334d ago
StanLatMarveldotCom5334d ago

I'm convinced these GamingBolt articles are just for hits. They're so poorly written and ill conceived.

rockleex5334d ago

The PS3 sold 1.2 million in September.

No, I don't think it will survive. It is obviously the second coming of Titanic. Sinking ship. DOOMED!

/sarcasm

sikbeta5334d ago

Who wrote this article?

Now I now who was

nycredude5334d ago

What? PS3 is next gen. The 360 is this gen. The question should be the other way around. How else can you explain a console not having built in Wifi, Blutooth and Bluray? I haven't even mention the lack of great graphics.

ABizzel15334d ago

The article isn't bad, but it really doesn't have a purpose.

Anywho the PS3 is going to be just fine. I for one was never worried about the PS3, I enjoyed it and the games on it, and that's what a GAMER should care about most. Not what their consoles maker can do to kill off the competition.

The 1 year head start helped the 360 a lot, and to I still believe it's the only reason the 360 is in the place it is now (2nd place, and RROD). If the 360 came out at the same time the PS3 and Wii did it would be in last place, but as they say it didn't.

Resistance was a great launch game, and 2007 tinkled out some hits as well (Warhawk, Heavenly Sword, Folklore, Ratchet, and Uncharted). 2008 was also a good year MGS4, Resistance 2, GT5: Pro, LBP, and former 360 exclusive began making their way to the PS3 (Bioshock). And now 2009 of course Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, Infamous, Demon's Souls, another Ratchet, and more 360 exclusives so I never understand why people said the PS3 didn't have any games especially when you throw in the multiplatform titles.

But to the main point yeah PS3 gamers need to buy more games, no other way around it. PS3 games like Uncharted 2 need to be hitting the 1 million week easy. But most PS3 gamers sit and fully enjoy one game until their ready to move on whereas 360 gamers hope from game to game.

Oh and if the Xbox 720 come out 2 years earlier than the PS4 then that gives the PS4 a chance to be without a doubt more powerful than the 720 just becuase technology would have evolved by then. Which brings up another debate. What will multiplatform developers do if the PS4 has twice as much RAM, and a much faster processor than the 720 due to a 2 year launch gap?

And if the Xbox 720 launches with the PS3 then the early adopters will pick up the 720 (which won't be me EVER again for any console), and the PS3 will continue to sell since it'll probably be $199 or less by then (unless the 720 comes out in 2010).

FACTUAL evidence5334d ago

That's like saying, "Will nintendo make another mario game?"

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5334d ago
gameseveryday5334d ago

I am not too sure about it. Its a good question. But may be cell processor will have upgrades too?

Assassin Nawabi5334d ago

cell processor can last long, but can its gpu too? thats a question

williamkenny5334d ago

I think that the graphics are good enough to last it a while. Unless MS pull something ridiculous out of the hat.

Fishy Fingers5334d ago

The PS2s hardware specs are disgraceful in this day and age, yet here it is, still selling and producing great games. By the time the PS3 is technically inferior, it will be selling to those who dont care for such things (like the PS2 now) and a new PS4 will be released.

MNicholas5333d ago

will the Xbox division survive?

Xbox 1: 2nd in sales, mainly appeals to fans of shooters, significant net losses

Xbox 2: 3rd in sales, mainly appeals to fans of shooters, significant net losses

Xbox 3: Will there be one?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5333d ago
gameseveryday5334d ago

I have heard its GPU is inferior though, so not sure whether it will last or no.

Vicodin5334d ago

"I have heard its GPU is inferior though"

That was sarcasm...right...?

Fishy Fingers5334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

The PS3 does have an ever so slightly weaker GPU than the 360. But in terms of modern tech, both are very out dated. A consoles saving grace is it's unified hardware, which developers can continue to push as it doesnt change. When you look at a consoles potential you have to look at the complete package, not component to component.

I dont want to come over all fanboy, but the 360 doesnt have a game that can come close to Uncharted or the technical prowess of Killzone 2. So you can say the 360 may have a more powerful GPU, but it obviously isn't showing it. Perhaps through development, or perhaps the overall package doesnt stack up to the Playstation.

Shadow Flare5334d ago

Looking at ps3 exclusives, they say you're wrong

5334d ago
Fishy Fingers5334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

Excuse me? Are you confused, my point is while the 360 does have a slightly more powerful GPU (which it does) it hasnt been shown in it's games, because it comes down to the complete hardware package, not a single component. Not really difficult to understand.

Thanks for the polite reply though. I do enjoy conversing with N4Gs user base. I assume your upset I said something which could appear negative towards the PS3, which if read correctly, I havent.

Shadow Flare5334d ago

In all seriousness Fishy Fingers is right. Apparently 360 does have a slightly better GPU. What makes ps3 more capable of producing better graphics and physics is the Cell Processor. The cell actually handles some of the jobs the GPU does. Its because the cell is so powerful that it slaps the 360 upside its head

josuttis5334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

"Are you confused, my point is while the 360 does have a slightly more powerful GPU (which it does) it hasnt been shown in it's games"

This is the stupid crap you end up spouting when you fill your head with fanboy BS that turns out to, surprise!, complete and utter garbage.

Just like there are pathetic little punks who even if you threatened to torture them to death would never admit they were completely and utterly wrong about the Dreamcast and the PS2 and are still trying to convince the world 'teh Dreamcast was just as/more powerful than teh PS2' and they 'have specs that prove it'.

The abject graphic humiliation Sony has dished out to Microsoft this gen and the hilarious if it wasn't so sad clinging to the 'teh 360 has teh better GPU' fanboy meme is a shocking example of just how powerful the mind is able to delude itself when you desperately want something to be true. Or in this case admit that you were incredibly stupid to fall for obviously absurd claims by Microsoft about 'teh 360 GPU'.

Fishy Fingers5334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

Your calling me a fanboy? Ha, thats hillarious to begin with, but if I were to be a fanboy of any console it would be the PS3, which is easily my console of choice. Which I'm sure many at N4G know.

Clearly if anyone here is a fanboy it's you. There is nothing wrong with excepting the fact that theroretically the 360 does have the better GPU. The PS3 is still easily deliever the most viseral and technically impressive games and will continue to do so, because like I've had to say, 3 bloody times, a console is not the sum of a single component, it's the whole package which is important, here the PS3 has a clear edge over the 360.

I'm praising the complete processing power of the PS3 here and you still think I'm some 360 fanboy because I dare to say a single aspect of the console may be better than the PS3. Your clearly not reading and understanding my comments, just noticing a single part you dislike.

Rigmaster5334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

Don't waste your time on him.

There really is some borderline mental illness with a certain segment of console owners absolutely refusing to face up to the fact that they weren't just wrong, they were laughably wrong about the relative power of the PS3 and 360.

One might try to be generous and give them that most of are clueless and can't see any piece of graphics hardware as anything but the horrible and wildly inefficient desktop computer. A modern piece of graphics hardware is obviously beyond their grasp. The same people failed to grasp the 139 million selling PS2 and for 9 years kept trying to view it as a badly designed desktop PC.

But even if you look at the PS3 through their ignorant and pointless view as having a "GPU" like any old desktop computer, even then the PS3 is so totally destroying the 360 in performance in tasks the Broadband Engine for the most part isn't helping with like fill rate where the PS3 is cranking out games like GT5 that are double the rez of similar games on the 360 like Forza 3 while cranking out vastly better car geometry and lighting model.

The absolute refusal to face up to reality and just flat out admit they are wrong shows why there was the absolute foaming at the mouth hatred and fear of the Killzone 2 realtime graphics demo at E3. Sony with that one demo completely made a mockery of those stupid claims about 'which system had a better graphics card'.

rockleex5334d ago

But I can't really say the 360 has a better GPU.

Both systems' GPUs have their ups and downs. While the PS3's Cell Processor clearly beats the 360's 3 cores.

Its obvious which system is overall more powerful, especially when you consider that the Cell can do GPU tasks too.

INehalemEXI5334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

This was a pretty decent article on pro's and con's of each gpu.

RSX: pushed a higher resolution , and higher detailed textures in NGS2.

Xenos: pushed more poly's , sub HD though and not as great textures but had a few more enemies on screen in NG2.

This is a good example of what the gpu's can do IMO , if you look at 1st party titles like U2 they are using cell to assist the gpu so thats unfair when looking at gpu vs gpu.

Looking at the architecture as a whole, the PS3 no doubt has proven to push the most amazing visuals IMO. RSX is no slouch , Xenos has the eDRAM but that seems to be a resolution limiter too due to the 10mb limit.

SuperM5334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

josuttis you are a disgrace to the PS3 comunity, please stfu and gtfo

btw dont give hits to articles like this, just dont.

Rigmaster5334d ago

"Both systems' GPUs have their ups and downs."

Please.

Console graphics hardware isn't the Special Olympics where everyone is a winner.

There isn't a single area the PS3 doesn't absolutely outperform the 360:

Resolution
Geometry/poly counts
Materials
Lighting models
Animation
and on and on and on

there isn't a SINGLE AREA, let alone an entire game, the 360 can show for the four years its been on the market that comes close to what the PS3 is putting out in its first three years. NOT ONE.

This remains the 360 and it "mighty GPU"'s graphical highpoint:

http://kineticninja.blogspo...

Persistantthug5334d ago

Hopefully some of you finally get it.

The PS3's GPU (550mhz) is NOT weaker than the XBOX 360's GPU (500mhz). However, the XBOX 360's GPU (called XENOS) has a few extra features that the PS3's GPU (called RSX) does not.

But if you talk about GPU power and/or Graphical capabilities, then you MUST include the CELL PROCESSOR in your discussion because unlike almost any other CPU on the market today, PC included, The CELL Processor can graphics process AND graphics render BY ITSELF.
So in a rudimentary explaination, the PS3 has 2 acting GPU's while the XBOX 360 has 1. That is why the PS3 has a higher ceiling and more technical/graphical potential than the XBOX 360.

SuperM5334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

The cell processor does graphics rendering in both Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2, and probably several other PS3 exclusives. So while these games look better then anything on 360 it doesnt tell us how the GPU stacks up to the one in the 360. And yes its true that there are ups and downs with both 360 and PS3 GPUs. generally though developers will say that the 360 GPU has a slight edge. If this bothers you then you are the very definition of a fanboy.

The PS3 is shining and have by far the best games graphically. But thats mainly thanks to the cell processor and not the GPU. The PS3 doesnt have to be the best at every single little detail, as long as the complete package comes out on top. And it does. So please stfu with the whining, and the "everyone who says anything on 360 is slightly better then anything on PS3 are fanboys and totally out of their mind" attitude.

btw @ guy above me, hope you are not indicating that how many mhz the gpu has tells you how powefull it is.

5334d ago
TheBand1t5334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

Dude, wow, holy crap. Chill the frigging hell out.

It's like I've walked into a bar fight between some drunk guy who misunderstood what the other was saying.

5334d ago
Persistantthug5334d ago

I hope you don't take offense to this, but you start out progressing with the known knowledge of the Cell Processor,
And then you totally revert back to the "uninformed" stage.

Why do you keep talking about the PS3's SLIGHTLY less featured GPU when you apparently know that the CELL PROCESSOR works IN CONJUNCTION with its GPU (RSX)?

It seems as if you are having a quite a bridge to cross in trying to understand and/or cope with the fact that the PS3 is NOT like traditional PC architecture and can't be compared, specifically in this case, GPU for GPU.

Once more, THE CELL PROCESSOR Graphics processes AND Graphics renders BY ITSELF, whereas, PC CPU's and XBOX 360's CPU's do not.

SuperM, you cannot discuss the PS3 GPU without discussing the CELL Processor....to do so would show ignorance of the technology or disingenuous motives.

You trying to compare GPU for GPU, is equivalent to articles comparing them back in 2005 and 2006 when no one knew what the Cell Processor could do. Clearly you know better now, so I don't understand your point or reasoning here.

INehalemEXI5334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

I played both and can see that for NGS2 there where a lot of redundant poly's removed , the game runs smoother you got more content etc. They may of exaggerated on the # of enemy's but otherwise it's pretty decent analysis of the gpu's pro's/con's though the article does seem to slant to 360's side I admit.

5334d ago
frostypants5334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

Good lord, people.

Look...technically, the 360 has the slightly more powerful GPU. This is an engineering FACT. It is not a point that is open to subjective reasoning. It is a (again, SLIGHTLY) more powerful piece of hardware than the PS3's GPU. Period. End of story. It's a numbers game, and it wins.

However, as has been pointed out, good PS3 developers have learned to offload a lot of graphics processing onto the Cell (i.e. the main processor) because it is more than powerful enough to do so, drastically easing the burden on the GPU. The original PS3 specs, in fact, called for TWO Cell processors, one of which would actually be used as the fulltime GPU, rather than utilizing a traditional GPU chipset. Assuming proper development, the Cell absolutely dusts the 360's PowerPC main processor in raw power.

The net result is that the total package of the PS3, i.e. the GPU PLUS the main processor, is simply capable of pushing more 1s and 0s than the 360. End of story.

Edit: Disagree with what? It's fact. Find proof of otherwise.

A lot of what some people assume is being handled by the RSX is likely being made possible by the Cell either handling it directly, or freeing up the RSX enough so it can. The 360's CPU isn't powerful enough to take on as much burden. In short, the Cell can viably act as its own GPU. It could even be implemented as a dedicated GPU.

psiom5334d ago

I really don't see the point in having a purely academic argument about which console as the most power when looking at the numbers on paper.

The only thing that really matters is what gets done and released.

There absolutely no two ways about it - the PS3's first party games having been running rings around the 360's top offerings in terms of graphics.

You can argue all you want about potential, but it's a fact that the PS3 has better graphics -THAT ACTUALLY EXIST-. It's just the way it is.

josuttis5334d ago

"Good lord, people.

Look...technically, the 360 has the slightly more powerful GPU. This is an engineering FACT. It is not a point that is open to subjective reasoning. It is a (again, SLIGHTLY) more powerful piece of hardware than the PS3's GPU. Period. End of story. It's a numbers game, and it wins. "

My god. Can't stop laughing. It's like watching some little kid whose favorite sports team just got knocked out in a series sweep SCREAMING AND CRYING about how it doesn't change the FACT THAT THEIR LOSING TEAM IS STILL THE BEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!

LOL!

Someone get the damn straight jackets out. This isn't console fanboyism it is mental illness.

frostypants, honestly guy, go run to your bed and have a good cry. Kick and scream until you get it out of your system and move on with your life. No one cares what brain damage leads someone like to sit around in forums spewing the crap you just did.

Eventually people will stop being amused by people like you and just start banning you out of pity like they do old hardcore Dreamcast fans who still think they are going to convince the world of the TRUE POWER of the Dreamcast's graphics hardware superiority over the PS2. IT'S A FACT!!!!!!

On the one hand you do have to be amazed with the damage control meme about 'the poor liddle RSX being 'helped out' by the Cell'. It is a valiant effort to avoid having to admit everything you ever claimed about the relative power of the PS3 and 360 was a farce. Might have actually gotten somewhere if it wasn't for the fact that the PS3's rendering system and the way engines are written is almost identical to the way the most popular console of all time, the PS2's.

In short, frostypants, get a life. Google a guy that goes by Lazy8s to see what people like you turn out like. Honestly do you really want to be the pathetic guy sitting around in gaming forums still spouting garbage about THE TRUE SPECS OF THE PS3 AND 360!!!

frostypants5334d ago (Edited 5334d ago )

@0.7: Edit: just realized you're pro-360.

Dude...point to a single 360 game that is graphically approaching any 1st party PS3 release in the last 2 years...

It's not open to debate, son.

"the way engines are written is almost identical to the [PS2]"

No. Fail.

EDIT #2: Wait...are you arguing FOR the ps3? I have no idea where you're even coming from...

Sarcasm5334d ago

I thought the RSX specs were never released? So how can anyone really argue which GPU is stronger than the other if you only knows the specs of the 360 GPU?

All in all it really doesn't matter, the games speak for themselves.

+ Show (23) more repliesLast reply 5334d ago
Ninji5334d ago

The real question is if the Wii or 360 will be able to survive that long. Microsoft will probably just release another console and try to call it the next generation of consoles when in reality it will be nothing but a last gen console with dated tech just like the 360.

Kill Crow5333d ago

it will last 10 years ... but will be behind the xbox ALL the way :-)

Show all comments (188)
90°

15 Great Games Where Every Minute of the Experience Feels Earned

GB: "We take a look at 15 amazing games that had the perfect length."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community10d ago
10d ago
coolbeans9d ago

Pretty good list. Botany Manor would be the newest addition that encapsulates that title.

400°

Anyone else not blown away with graphics these days? Me neither

Talal writes: "I'm talking about having that rush of excitement - that feeling you get when you know you've just made a memory for a lifetime."

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community13d ago
OptimusDK13d ago

There are different games. Some have gamplay at it highest priority, some have the story, some have the replay value and choices... There are a lot of different game experiences.

It is laughable that just now graphics does not have anything to do with that experiene. We have had many games of that type over time. This is just the one that have come closest to feel like playing an actual movie. Just look the the Digital foundry walkthrough it is a masterpiece in that perspective and hence wrth trying. But yes do not do it for the gameplay - but that was never the goal of this experience.

GamerRN12d ago

It's because it's on Xbox. When Xbox has amazing graphics, they don't matter. When PlayStation does, it's a game changer!

Lightning7712d ago

Pretty much my thoughts. They were technical marvel's on PS and still are. The moment Xbox puts out a graphically intense game is doesn't matter suddenly.

4 years ago this month would the UE5 tech demo debut with the girl flying (tech demo said it was only possible on PS5 because of the SSD. Glad to finally see it in its glory.

fr0sty12d ago

FFS, gaming journalism has really gone downhill. At least hire people with a basic grasp of grammar... "Me neither" means the exact opposite of what the "author" is trying to say. That's like saying "I could care less"... lol.

S2Killinit12d ago

Maybe because the gameplay being dull allowed it to have the amazing graphics and people are not as impressed by graphics alone anymore? I mean there is a lot of sites saying the story and the gameplay are lackluster. So what are we supposed to enjoy then? Cgi graphics are beautiful but since they arent interactive, they dont impress me as much as they used to. Thats an extreme example, but you get my drift.

Terry_B12d ago

When Playstation (Sony) does it..its usually a great game and not a cinematic experience..or at least something new at the time..like Until Dawn back in 2015.

1Victor12d ago

@gamer:” It's because it's on Xbox. When Xbox has amazing graphics, they don't matter. When PlayStation does, it's a game changer!”

The game looks as good as any other PlayStation game in my eyes why can’t you and the other hardcore Xbox be happy about it and drag PlayStation into every conversation and force PlayStation hardcore to look into the game and find flaw that most games have in one way or another.
@light: “ 4 years ago this month would the UE5 tech demo debut with the girl flying (tech demo said it was only possible on PS5 because of the SSD. ”
Yes at that time it was only possible on PlayStation SSD how ignorant of you to think that after 4 years the technology wouldn’t evolved and move to a industry standard 🤦🏿I wish your mentality wasn’t so naive and narrow to post stuff like that 😩 in a year or 2 a new game will come out that might look better, it’s the nature of the industry.

Now that the distraction is gone I feel that is a good thing that the graphics in games are starting to hit the rooftop and hopefully the developers will put more thoughts into story and gameplay mechanics than just the next shiny oily skin of old.

Reaper22_12d ago

So true. Not surprised by all the negativity. It's a really good game and looks better than any game I've ever seen. GOTY nominee for sure. Like I said before, sony screwed up big time by not purchasing Ninja Theory.

Asplundh12d ago

Pretty much. It's like how the Switch and Steam controller using haptic feedback in their controllers wasn't a big deal but then Sony did it and it was then a "game changer".

fr0sty12d ago

The game runs at as low as 21fps... That isn't much to brag about no matter how good it looks.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
MajorLazer12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

We've had graphical gamechangers before, such as Crysis but those games still had gameplay to compliment it. Hellblade pretty much has none, and only achieved such graphics through being incredibly linear and having very small, closed off environments where very little is happening.

Vx_12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

GFX does not mean anything if the game is boring. It is simple like that and these major companies need to understand this simple concept.

Games are like your lady, she may be beautiful to look at for a while but then it gets boring if her character isn't interesting and fun to be with.

13d ago Replies(7)
Kneetos13d ago

Mario kart 8 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Sonic188113d ago

Horizon forbidden West has great graphics and great gameplay

GamerRN12d ago

Yeah but graphics don't matter, remember?

anast12d ago

@RN

I've been pretty consistent in saying that we need both.

GamerRN10d ago

So until dawn, too human, or whatever those series of games were... Graphic masterpieces it garbage with no gameplay?

VincentVanBro12d ago

I agree and I actually think Forbidden West looks better than Hellblade 2. I easily prefer looking at it at least.

Sonic188112d ago

It does look better in my opinion as well. I don't know why it looks better but there's something about the Decima engine or that guerrilla games is using tricks that we don't know of

Abear2112d ago

Can you fly a mount under water in Hellblade 2? I think not! One of the best moments this Gen

Show all comments (111)
90°

Two Decades Later, the Original Splinter Cell is Still a Masterpiece

They don't make games like this anymore.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community21d ago
vgvill21d ago

Too dated in my book. The AI is way too unpredictable to be acceptable today. It's definitely a game of its time.

Jingsing21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Agreed with those sentiments. The quality of the CPU controlled characters make or break a stealth game and they are pretty poor in all the Splinter Cell games by today's standard. This is what led me to playing Spies vs Mercs all the time in later games just to get a better stealth experience from a real person. Arguably Sony are making better stealth games albeit not Tom Clancy stuff.

TheProfessional21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

You should stick with fortnite or one of the countless bloodborne style games then. What a joke.

rlow121d ago

I had a good time with the game. It is a product of its time. But when it came out it was a must have game for a lot of people. I wish Ubisoft would make another game in the series or at least a reboot.

vgvill21d ago

They are making a remake, I think. I loved the original game when it was released, but I tried to play it again in recent years and just couldn't get on with it. The same with the older Hitman games.

PrecursorOrb21d ago

Yeah chaos theory still holds up though I gotta say. If you’re a fan of the series I highly suggest you go back to that one. Ubi has said they are remaking sc for “modern audiences”. I don’t have a lot of faith for the future of that company

Chocoburger20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Due to the lack of modern stealth games, and me constantly playing the MGS series, I've been looking for alternative stealth games to play, and went back and re-played the SC series recently. I wouldn't call SC1 or SC:PT masterpieces, there are AI issues, they're very much trial-and-error games, and that can lead to a lot of frustration. I also found the stories in this series to be boring, uninteresting, and just sloppily told. Cinematics are also of poor quality for both in-game scenes and CG cut-scenes, the soundtrack didn't leave any impression on me either.

Chaos Theory is better, but there was still a lot of room for improvement, and Double Agent (old gen ver.) was a sloppy mess that ended up a regression from CT. But still, at least they tried back then, these days Ubi-junk doesn't even try to make good games!

HvNzSoul12d ago

Everyone needs to quit with all of the unnessacery Ubi-hate. SC Conviction and Blacklist are both still good games.

HvNzSoul12d ago

Everyone needs to quit with all of the unnecessary Ubi-hate. SC Conviction and Blacklist are both still good games, they just weren't 100% focused on stealth with Conviction and they remedied that in Blacklist. The only thing they have released recently that I was disappointed with was Watch Dogs Legion, and Skull & Bones. Everyone seems to be salty about the misleading trailer for the original Watch Dogs and The Division. Which are also, both good games, and actually Watch Dogs seems like it was ahead of its time even with all the trailer drama (having gone back and played recently, can say the game didnt deserve all the flak). Yeah the misleading E3 trailer that had better graphics than release is understandable to a very small degree, when most Teaser Trailers, or Game Demo's only have that portion of the game developed so they use the highest quality assets of w/e they have being showed, or what they are showing was made purely for the showing, allowing for extra polish . As to the gripes about minor game design changes, or cut features upon a games release just goes to show how unknowledgeable most gamers are in terms of how game development works or to even understand what what the hell a WIP, let alone titles still in early development.

Good games from Ubi since 2014 (Year that SC Blacklist Released) include:

Watch Dogs 1 & 2
The Division 1 & 2 (Although I had a hard time getting into The Division 2 at first)
R6 Siege
Ghost Recon Wildlands & Breakpoint
Immortals Fenyx Rising
AC Origins, Odyssey, MIrage (Haven't finished Valhalla games too damn long)
Far Cry Primal, and 5 (6 also has a length issue)
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora
Prince Of Persia The Lost Crown

Haven't played a couple of titles those being For Honor (played at launch but didn't honestly give it an actual go), The Crew, R6 Extraction and at the time of writing this xDefiant.

Even if you absolutely hated any of the above titles, they aren't inherently bad games, they're just good, but not always top quality either.

I say give Ubi credit where credit is due, they at least fix games post launch if they start out rough, Breakpoint is an excellent example this and is such an enjoyable experience now compared to it's launch.