Starfield Review | Game Craves

Starfield is an open-world space exploration game where you join up with a group trying to find artifacts that hide a big secret. Here is our Starfield Review.

[Jin_Sakai]

Seems the non cherry picked reviews are finally hitting.

[Workshyskiver]

Or no name websites know they'll get loads of clicks posting a 4 to 6 score...

[RupeeHoarder]

Or maybe some people just don't like it. Which is a very realistic possibility....this isn't a 12 hour action packed banger..... it's a 40 hour sludge. Not for everyone.

[BehindTheRows]

But the Xbox-centric sites get a pass for perfect scores, yes?

[Obscure_Observer]

"Or no name websites know they'll get loads of clicks posting a 4 to 6 score..."

Exactly. Just sorry losers that were not granted with a review code.

[Jin_Sakai]

“Or no name websites know they'll get loads of clicks posting a 4 to 6 score...“

As I stated.

“Starfield Review Copies Have Been “Heavily Restricted” in Certain Regions“

https://www.thefpsreview.co...

[pintar32]

or no names are triggered because their favorite game didn't get a 10. Grow up.

[Army_of_Darkness]

@workshy

No name or not, I visited their website to see their other reviews in order to compare their criticism and come to an observation as to whether or not they're reputable and it appears that they are because most of their other big name reviews are on point in my opinion. So I came to the conclusion that this review is not click bait but rather an honest review, meaning this game is just mediocre at best.

[Stuart5756]

gamecraves is great

[SixFrvgz]

It's actually quite scary that you Midfield fangirls live in a world of delusion, where bad scores are only because of "hAtErS" or "cLiCkbAiT".

Lord only knows how else your guys' warped minds work.

[neomahi]

It's actually easier to side on the favorable side. Takes more guts (IGN who usually suck) to be honest and go against the grain

[IamFrasierCrane]

That doesn’t make sense. They’d get way more clicks if they posted at release. Perhaps they actually took time to review the game?

[mkis007]

Im not one to give a game more credit than is due...but this reviewer seems to have given up too soon. The powers can make enemies way easier. Just one point, but valid.

[GameCraves]

I played for 40 hours and completed the whole story and all the faction missions and a bunch of sidequests. Wanted to quit 10 hours in but was really pushing myself to complete 😅

[Fishy Fingers]

That's fair and each to their own.

But self submitting your self written, self run "website" reviews, might as well be a N4G blog post/comment.

[Eonjay]

@Fishy Fingers

A huge number of the stories are submitted by the article writers. Our greatest contributor works for Tech Radar (previously Dual Schockers) and submits his own stories. How do you think he got number 1 contributor?

[Fishy Fingers]

Tech radar established in 2008 with 30 employees?

You can read why I think that's slightly different on www.fishyfingersgaming.com.

[Mr_cheese]

Come on Fishy.

Self submitting happens across the board. You're just choosing to focus on it since they took the time to engage in a conversation when realistically, you should focus on the points you made and those that were countered.

[execution17]

I wanted to love the game but it's just not clicking for me which which sucks cause I've put hundreds to thousands of hours on their previous games

[Stuart5756]

When did gaming and the gaming community become so toxic? Was it the anonymity of the internet or something else? If all the commenters on N4G were in a room together would it be the worst bunch of people ever? Or would you all mess yourselves because of the presence of actual people, not just a username. That would be great wouldn't it, or would you all pretend that you don't know what N4G is and say that you don't waste your time 'commenting'. Very intresting thought.

[GameCraves]

People like defending the company they love, some people just take it a bit too far imo. Everyone can have an opinion, but the way people tell it can sometimes just be annoying by people being too loud about it, especially if it is about games being dragged into the useless console wars

[neomahi]

Maybe this would've worked better as a VR game with more emersion. Having a society that's actually suffering from some kind of illness that requires building technology to see other worlds and travel to distant planets in search of a cure. Some planets you find resources and life on to help you discover a cure while some planets have nothing. It sounds like exploration isn't as fun if there's not much you have to do to earn it, but maybe most people would have had a better experience in VR. It's a really divided game. Some people love it, maybe the fanboys that just want to see Xbox have some success over such a long drought since the Xbox 360s success and they've got rose colored glasses on but, there's a lot that say it's really quite boring so. Who knows