No, it’s not hypocritical to enjoy Tears of the Kingdom and criticise Redfall when they have the same frame rate
The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom reveals massive "Master Works" art book for Japan and worldwide pre-orders are open.
Zelda fans, get ready to immerse yourself in the enchanting melodies of the Tears of the Kingdom soundtrack.
The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom has already cemented its legacy through its sprawling open world and commitment to player freedom.
Yesterday I was playing and there was a puzzle with two gears, (one moving and one stationary) and I couldn’t figure out how to get the stationary gear moving .
I took my spear and stuck it against moving gear and it transferred the motion to the stationary gear and that solved the puzzle.
I was so shocked I went online to see what was the intended way to solve this and I didn’t see anyone solve it quite the way I did (from the few videos I watched).
I definitely believe that this “intuitive” gameplay is the future of game design.
got bored in 3 hours; felt like i was playing the same exact game as Botw; and when my brother told me he doesnt learn even one new slash, i lost all motivation to play. Tired of fighting goblins with the same old attacks, even though i loved BOTW, this kinda rehash lazy gameplay isnt good, and no just adding some gadgets isn't enough
I been finishing this up, had plenty of backlog I caught up on recently finished robocop, ac mirage, ac valhalla, spiderman 2, metro exodus all were so mf fun definitely still enjoying this
Obviously, one is running on a prehistoric handheld while the other is on a powerful 12tf home console. There’s simply no excuse for Redfall being only 30fps.
No shit.
One is an absolutely amazing game that I just sunk in atleast 20 hrs over the weekend lol and had to force myself to put down.
The other is 💩 💩 💩 played a decent amount of redfall just to give it a proper chance and have an informed opinion about it.
Redfall isn't bad because of 30 fps, hell it could get patched for 120fps and it would still be a turd!!
Nothing wrong with 30 fps as that how I play all my games, give me the fidelity, in saying that though I do expect a rock solid 30 with no dips.
I don't think zelda should get a free pass completely for its frame drops but they are very easily overlooked when the game is this good.
Redfall has zero redeeming qualities about it, I actually can't believe just how bad it is on every metric I could rate a game by.
Iv seen a lot of people on here though that all of sudden say 30fps and zelda is awesome when previously they said they can't play games at 30 anymore lol
No, it is hypocritical, stop with the mental gymnastics. Yes, one is an old hardware and other is brand new SSD machine. But:
a) It's Nintendo problem that their hardware can't handle the game and they don't release the next console/revision yet;
b) Both games are exclusives and should show the best the console can perform.
I can kinda agree that Redfall should be criticized more (because of how much extra power they can use). But Zelda must be criticized as well, don't act like low FPS doesn't matter or doesn't affect the score.
Either performance issues for all games should affect the score or the other way around. I prefer the former. Double standarts are bad, period.
That's why i wouldn't trust any of those 10/10 reviews.
P. S.: It's not even stable 30 FPS. It's much better with the patch, but still it drops to 20-25-ish periodically in busy places.
"Gamers" (fanboys) are BS hypocrites. What else is new?
Because redfall would be such good game with 60 fps .... lol