280°

Gran Turismo 7 Always Online to Fight Cheats Is Not Needed and Here's an Explanation Why

Gran Turismo 7 always online requirement to play all of its content is there to combat cheaters, but it's not even needed and MP1st explains why.

Christopher779d ago

Aren't the results used for competitions as well? It's not just "a solo" game is my understanding, but they use race results to get people into competitions and whatnot as well per their agreements with various racing associations.

Right?

I'd definitely love to see a completely solo option that is completely disconnected from online for those that want it. But, don't then complain about lacking online features if they do it. The fact this doesn't exist annoys me as when those servers go offline, the game is practically gone forever. No bueno.

779d ago
779d ago
Nitrowolf2779d ago

There really wouldn’t be anything stopping them from offering offline and online though. Even for competition, they simply don’t count offline scoring. Other games have done online/offline just fine, and myself playing through 7 I didn’t have any real interaction going against other players. Played it as if it were an offline game, there were just some things that were online focus like the shop having those YouTube videos, but even then it’s not a deal breaker if those weren’t available while offline.

The reasoning just doesn’t make any sense, and time will tell if that holds true when a GT is fully exclusive to the PS5, a console that has no means for legit users to move their PS5 saves off it

fr0sty778d ago

Simple solution: Arcade and Sim modes that do not store any race data online, no leaderboards. Local storage of results only (or cloud if you use your PS+ cloud save transfers).

Competition mode: same races, but online required, results are monitored for cheats.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 778d ago
778d ago Replies(3)
Father__Merrin778d ago

The only way is to do a separate online and separate offline mode. Forza you can cheat on pc using wemod then just use it connected online. So for a GT game it's a must to be connected

Magog778d ago

Except you're wrong. Every game without online saves has cheaters.

plmkoh778d ago

All GT veterans know how much cheaters there were in GT5 because you can manipulate the save files. These guys are quick to forget.

Firebird360778d ago

Thats the typical answer when anything bad happens, blame the innocent and we suffer the consequences instead of addressing the problem and the people in the wrong.

Spartacus10777d ago

Most developers split the save data and game data for multiplayer/esports modes with the save data and game data for single player / offline modes. It shouldnt really be that hard for a Sony developer.

Nitrowolf2778d ago (Edited 778d ago )

tell me, where are the save modifications for Returnal? Ratchet and Clank? Death Loop? Ghostwire? (PS5 specific, so not counting PC which is an open platform)

You can't modify a save that's bound to the hardware.

The answer isn't always online when there are alternatives.
Why not bring the option to let developers lock game saves to the console like they did on the PS3? why must the answer to combat save editing be online always when they have had solutions before, and have reinstated that with the PS5?

@plmkoh

It's mentioned in the story, and the reasoning why it was such a major issue back then

Teflon02778d ago

The fact people are liking this stack of miss information lol.

Returnal, Ratchet, Deathloop, ghostwire... They're all single player games that don't affect anyone else if you cheat. I can also tell you 100% theirs easy ways to mod saves for those games, you just need to modify the authenticators as saves are tied to accounts through code. You're not on a level to speak on that if you're saying such false info.

You can always modify saved data, even if bound to hardware. But even so, that's also false information. It's bound to a PSN account that's ran through software. Hardware has nothing to do with bounding savings lol. Maybe on switch where you gotta give permission to a new console to access it specifically. Nut not PS.

Also, there's ways to get to a locked save.
Even worse, the only way you can ever transfer that save now is by paying for ps plus. that's creating new problems. The amount of times I had to start games over because of that stupidness... no game save should be locked ever. Having to start over is way more of a issues than having to be online tbh

SurgicalMenace778d ago

@Nitrowolf2

How many digital albums, games, pictures, movies, etc fade in your memory, naturally? You see, all forms of mediums, no matter their format age. This has little, if anything, to do with wear and tear. The human mind often hones in on future endeavors, making many experiences fade with time and distance. This is just a fact, when applying the same understanding to business it makes sense to let products fade or revitalize them through NEW innovations. How many people are lining up outside to purchase an Atari 2600, 8 track audio system, NES, or more recently DVDs? These all WERE popular and supported in their time but faded inevitably. Companies have to focus on sustainability over creation right now, as there are restraints on employment, finances, production, and resources. This is the main reason that they need to collect as much data as possible, so they know when to either pull the plug or channel focus.

I'm behind the closed doors of the industry and often do not see things as a consumer, there are far too many moving parts to allow for it. We just see things from different vantage points, which is understandable.

GT7 will be online only, as many games will be going forward, as the single player gamers aren't a community that can be focused on if sustainability is to be achieved. Fornite, GTA, Genshin Impact, FF14, or the likes' revenue can't be ignored by a successful company going forward. What do you gather is the real reason that Halo didn't focus on SP? Nor did Battlefield.

This new generation has an "always online" mentality in how they function in their day to day. FB, Snap Chat, Instagram, etc are all designed to keep them engaged online. Has it hit you yet that us "single players" "old schoolers" are the next fading idea? Which was once popular, itself. They have to adopt new functions that cater to the community of the future if they want to continue to thrive. No harm in that, and no surprise that there will be some who'll not support them. How many of our parents willingly supported the changes that they were met with as we grew up? Perhaps it too, is a memory that faded with time and distance.

MadLad778d ago (Edited 778d ago )

Has nothing to do with a singleplayer experience.
We've seen Sony trying to shutdown servers and entire storefronts.

So this game can potentially be worthless in the future, outside of people emulating it.

SurgicalMenace778d ago

Yeah, which is their right, Ted. Much like always online, if that's the way that these companies would like to do it, so be it. What's the drawback? A few crybabies lamenting over it not being the way they want it. Guess what, that's the way life is. It is beginning to sound like a lot of gamers have little to no understanding of how life works outside of games. You set the precedents or you live by them. Simple

How many of your old vehicles, clothes, games, toys, or the like have faded with time? Things grow old but often times they're replaced by new things. With your logic, even if Sony sees little support for an avenue, they should keep that channel opened even if they're losing money. Delusional. If you started a business and it wasn't successful anymore, would you keep it opened? Have any of you thought, like the internet, that these games being always online is a way to properly measure interaction with their product? Call of Duty, Halo, Forza, etc are all online but when you want to prove a point you'll state how many people are playing it. How do you suppose they gathered that data?

Our systems track what and how long we play games now. This is true for Sony, MS, Nintendo, PC, and the like. This can be used to measure. Nothing wrong with it. All because there's scheduled maintenance every once in a while, much like our internet providers, now it's a problem. Perhaps next time it's down for maintenance, read a book, watch a movie, go outside, or....play another game. Soon everyone will be crying about having to even sleep, given that's when your body shuts down for scheduled maintenance too.

Note: MT are a choice, if you don't like them, don't buy them. How weak have people become to have to cry about everything not going their way?

Magog778d ago

It's not a single player game. It's mixed online and single player. Allowing cheating in one aspect would allow cheating in the other.

Nitrowolf2778d ago (Edited 778d ago )

" Call of Duty, Halo, Forza, etc are all online"

Yes, but not always so it's proving the point that it can be done.

I can go back and play the original MW if i wanted to, campaign, local MP, and the servers there are P2P so they're still active.

Halo has a full campaign that players can dive into, and Infinite allows offline bots

Forza, really? The whole campaign is fully playable offline and Playgrounds has been open at making it playable like that.

The provided examples you gave are all online focused, yet they provide to solo play just fine, and that hasn't stopped them from collecting data from people who do play online or earn money off them.

I think everyone understands life outside a game, but ur also comparing physical to digital, you know something that gets wear and tear every time you use it, versus something that is digital that won't wear down? Sure it will age as other better visual stuff come in, but the game will be the same the day you bought it, and 20-50 years from now. Look at the original Mario from the 90's. Its the same game. Is there something better? sure, but it looks exactly the same as the day you bought and plays the same. Mario isn't suddenly going to have rust crusting over him.

MadLad778d ago (Edited 778d ago )

@surgical

This site is so hilariously hypocritical.
One moment they're anti-digital, and physical media is the way to go to preserve games.

The next they're defending companies cutting off the ability for paying customers to play the game, even just in single player, because it's "their right"; even when you own a physical disc.

Pick your battles, man.

778d ago
778d ago
SurgicalMenace778d ago

@OOMagnumGaming

That's fine coming from a child who cant handle someone's, who actually has produced and made millions in this industry, observation. If I'm a clown, then what's that make you? I am not just for Sony but I am and will always be procompany. Terms like "consumer-friendly" or anything of the like are socialistic rhetoric of which no one that's actually successful even acknowledges. These companies already provide for price drops, discounts, liquidations, etc. How much money do you expect them to lose all so you can continue doing what your anger clearly shows you can'tcontinuely support? Why else would anyone be complaining?

Lastly, I'm currently invested heavily in this market so when they win, so do I. I'd gather that you're wisdom hasn't allowed you to see passed just playing the games that they sell you, huh? Well, with a vision as shortsighted as that, I can see where your frustrations are truly coming from. Dude/Ma'am/Sir/It, just play your games as you make yourself appear as a clown telling individuals that can't be upset by anything concerning entertainment to stfu. This is a luxury not a priority unless you're making a living from it. Anger/frustration is a result of lack, take that as you will. If it remains perhaps less gaming and more working. I'm not sure, but I'm far from being as unhinged as most I've encountered. Have a better day.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 778d ago
Show all comments (49)
90°

GT7 update 1.46 features an all-electric concept racing car created exclusively for the game

Today’s 1.46 update includes ŠKODA Vision Gran Turismo, two other cars, new Café Menu, and World Circuit Events.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
240°

The best PS5 exclusives 2024

With so many PS5 exclusives to choose from, it can be a little overwhelming to pick which one to play. This is especially true for a new PlayStation gamer who has yet to experience the wonder of PlayStation-exclusive storytelling. So, here's KnowTechie's take on the best PS5 exclusives in 2024 and beyond

Read Full Story >>
knowtechie.com
Hereandthere35d ago

PlayStation is killing it with the exclusives this year. Exclusive wise, what has xbox released this year?

VersusDMC35d ago

They won't complain about Microsoft not releasing games here but put all their effort into saying that only first party counts. Games like Rebirth and Grandblue Relink don't count. Games published by Sony like Helldivers 2, Stellar Blade and Rise of the Ronin don't count because Sony don't own the studios.

It's some narrative building so for when Hellblade 2 come out they can say, seemingly without shame, that Microsoft is actually releasing first party games this year. And claim victory.🙃

Chevalier35d ago

Weird 1st party games didn't matter when Xbox had so little, but, now they're important again? Guess Ark 3, Stalker 2 don't count any more?

KyRo35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

ARK 3 doesn't exist and it's just a timed exclusive. It's also a game that a majority of the ARK player base doesn't want as it's a massive deviation from what people like about the original game

Abnor_Mal35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

Honestly to me it doesn’t matter what they say, they are just finally getting a chance to say all the things PS fan(boy)s were saying to them for the past few years. Let them get that, they deserve a “win” for a change.

The new narrative is that suddenly first party games matter again when awhile ago they didn’t, but that was because they were struggling with the same three games with the occasional fourth or fifth. That games should be everywhere on all platforms since that’s whats happening to theirs. The consoles don’t matter just the ability to play anywhere. Whatever Xbox is doing Sony will soon follow.

They’re not moving the goalpost anymore, but rather just moving the whole damn stadium.

jwillj2k435d ago

Only a incel would care about who published what and who owns who.

If it’s not on the other consoles it’s an exclusive.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 35d ago
Cacabunga35d ago

Killing what? Where are the 1st party games??
Stellar Blade and FF7 is what I’m seeing this year.. so shallow!!!!

andy8535d ago

Doesn't really matter as long as they're great games. Baffles me why people put an emphasis on 1st party. They're still games you can't play anywhere else this year

Cacabunga34d ago

Andy

PS brand is my favorite because of their stellar first party software.. currently I see absolutely nothing to go crazy for..

CS734d ago

Nonsense.

PS1 and PS2 was built on great third party exclusives like FF, MGS, GTA & Tekken.

35d ago Replies(2)
raWfodog35d ago

Of course I love the games I’ve played from PS but I don’t believe we need to limit it to ‘exclusive’ to acknowledge that Xbox will be releasing some good games this year also. In that same vein, I believe that Xbox diehards shouldn’t limit their acknowledgment of good PS games to 1st party. There are plenty of good games to go around for everybody.

Tacoboto35d ago

This is a Playstation article about Playstation games and your comment is about Xbox. Can't you just celebrate what PS has without dragging this into console war BS?

ChasterMies35d ago

I don’t think Microsoft is releasing games exclusively on Xbox anymore. They have some timed exclusives that release on Xbox first.

35d ago
34d ago
+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 34d ago
Abear2135d ago (Edited 35d ago )

Returnal, Astro Bot, and Ratchet made having it since day one worth it.

GT7 free updates and Spiderman 2 and others at 60fps have made this last year more than okay.

But yeah, it’s been dry lately. BG3 and third party have made great filler, but we ready for that SOCOM or Killzone announcement and some more 1st party goodness. Crossing fingers for Ghost of Tsushima 2 announcement this summer.

Didn’t know Helldivers was exclusive! Wtf is going on at Xbox that they can’t get these games, series s strikes again.

SonyStyled34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

Sony owns the Helldivers IP. The first was a PS3/Vita/PC game. It was never an Xbox game that they could ‘get’ a decade ago. I’m not sure what the upset is with Xbox here

CS734d ago

Lol, how do you ignore Rebirth one of the best games ever made?

anast35d ago

Looks like they are on par with the previous gens. Solid games all around. Interestingly enough, we can't say they released a bad game yet this gen. Unlike the Quiet Man dustup.

35d ago Replies(2)
34d ago
DefenderOfDoom235d ago

I actually do not mind if Marathon releases on multiple platforms . I just wish that Marathon has a dedicated single player campaign.

DaniMacYo34d ago

Helldivers 2 is exactly what gaming needed. I’m loving it.

Show all comments (35)
80°

Gran Turismo 7 Update 1.44 brings 3 new cars, an extra Café Menu, 3 World Circuit Events, and more

This month’s update includes the return of the legendary Toyota GT-One (TS020) '99.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com