Approvals 11/10 ▼
tonyjames404 (3) - 2037d ago Cancel
gangsta_red (3) - 2037d ago Cancel
hercules_ (2) - 2037d ago Cancel
Qobb98 (3) - 2037d ago Cancel
410°

Bethesda Softworks Says The Elder Scrolls VI Will Be Next Gen Console

It's news that doesn't take a lot of guesswork to uncover, but Bethesda Softworks pretty much confirmed that The Elder Scrolls VI won't be in this generation of consoles. Still it may come as a bit of a disappointment for those of us who were hoping not to have to upgrade their console to dive into the highly anticipated next installment of The Elder Scrolls.

Read Full Story >>
bleedingcool.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

Old
This was confirmed at E3 when they explicitly stated Starfield was next generation and that Elder Scrolls 6 comes after that. Plus the titles is completely butchered.
The 10th Rider2037d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2037d ago
anonymousfan2037d ago

It will probably look incredible on PS5/Xbox Two but I do feel like we have been waiting for a couple of big sequels like TES IV the entire current generation only to be told next gen is almost already here!

HaveSumNuts2037d ago

Nevermind them doing TES on a next gen, main thing that matters is if they finally use a brand new in house engine for the game. Fallout 76 is using the Skyrim engine

BrettAwesome2037d ago

No. Fallout 76 uses the Creation Engine, which was also used in every other Bethesda game since...Morrowwind? If they just release TES VI within the release window of either next gen system, we won't know how shitty it looks 😆

porkChop2037d ago

@Brett

The Creation Engine was first used for Skyrim. Previous Bethesda games used regular Gamebryo. The Creation Engine is a newer engine built from Gamebryo, much like how the COD engine is based on id Tech 3.

sinspirit2037d ago (Edited 2037d ago )

I think they said that ES6 is a ways off, and that it's not just because of the games to be released before that, but because they wanted it to have a completely new engine behind it to push what they could do with it. Pretty sure he said something like this in the conference where they showed the reveal trailer.

KryptonKronos2037d ago

I think Bethesda have tried to maintain a unique image of their games by using the same engine. Unfortunately its not exactly a good thing. They tweaked it for Fallout 4 but not by much.

UltraNova2037d ago

I just hope they take took their sweet time with the next TES because they've been hard at work developing a new brand new engine...

oasdada2037d ago (Edited 2037d ago )

.... Fallout 76 is using the Skyrim engine AND looks like shit! You forgot this part :D

darthv722036d ago

Fallout 5 will be next gen as well. This gen they did elder scrolls online in lieu of ESVI and Fallout 76 now in lieu of Fallout 5 (though Fallout 4 was close to the beginning of this gen).

It seems they wanted to embark on making an online spin off within each respected franchise and next gen will be a return to form for single player adventures for each.

himdeel2036d ago

And they will be using the same old ass glitchfest of a game engine and blame no crossplay for items falling through their world.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 2036d ago
andibandit2037d ago

"but I do feel like we have been waiting for a couple of big sequels like TES IV the entire current generation"

yeah but didn't they give us that Elder Scrolls online(which I hate) ?

anonymousfan2037d ago

Good point... And I hate it too!

Shadowsteal2037d ago

That's not made by Bethesda Game Studios, it's made by Zenimax Game Studios. Fallout 76 is being made by another studio too. Bethesda Game Studios is just working on ESVI and Starfield now.

lelo2play2037d ago

With subpar graphics why the hell does Bethesda need a next gen console to release their games?

ApocalypseShadow2037d ago (Edited 2037d ago )

Put some VR in it and you might have a future sale. After playing Skyrim in VR with motion control, anything less than that is like eating a stack of pancakes(flat screen gaming) without syrup. They're edible. But you know something is missing.

anonymousfan2037d ago

did you play the PS4 or PC version? how about motion sickness?

ApocalypseShadow2037d ago (Edited 2037d ago )

I'm currently playing it on the base PS4 and it's fine. Using magic and using the bow and arrow is amazing. I'm aware of the Pro looking a little better. But I'm not a graphics whore to worry about it not looking the best or willing to spend for a minor bump. I can wait for PS5 for that. The outside is blurry when looking in the distance. But in the caves, cairns,etc. the lighting and detail is fine.

The immersion is the best that counts for me. The only draw back is moving backwards in some situations. But the move scheme Bethesda came up with for Move should be in more PSVR games. Even if PSVR had analog sticks, it would still feel like your sliding around on a skateboard. And I love skateboards.

The PC version looks great but that's after a ton of unofficial mods stacked on top of other mods. And you needing a good PC to run it with that type of detail. It's not something I need to go out and buy a PC graphics card for either.

But once you play it in VR, after setting the game up to your body tolerance if any, you wouldn't want to go back to playing it any other way. If Bethesda updated the last Elder Scrolls(Oblivion) to VR, I'd buy it day one.

Dom_Estos2036d ago

When I started playing, I got a bit nauseous from having to move and look around. Played with blinders. Gradually reduced those down, and now I play with no blinders at all. No sickness. You can adjust and get used to it and be completely comfortable if you're smart about it.

SoulWarrior2037d ago

Honestly I found the PSVR version (assuming you are referring to that) the worst version by far. Graphics are a blurry mess, it strips out features like being able to view your character, no kill animations and other animations removed from the game too. The FOV is also really terrible but I understand it's all to maintain the locked 60fps which is nice, and aiming the bow with the headset allows unparalleled accuracy compared to a controller.

Sadly I get motion sickness easily so have to turn the FOV filters all the way up to max, turning whilst having it off makes me wanna hurl.

Dom_Estos2036d ago

Not sure why you say the FOV is terrible, as it uses the maximum FOV on the headset, which is on par with the likes of the Rift and Oculus.

Profchaos2036d ago

They released a patch that improved visuals massively recently I'd say try again to be honest

Lionsguard2037d ago

Melee in VR is pretty meh though. Without the real weight of a sword, it just feels light and not satisfying at all. Archery however is AMAZING. I felt like Legolas and even though it took a bit of getting used to the aim, I could hit things with pretty amazing accuracy once I got my eye in. Funny enough, once I obtained the skill to zoom in and pretty much see where my arrow was going to go, my aim got worse. The motion sickness did get to me at times and I'm pretty resilient to it. With that said, I do hope VR is made for TES6.

ApocalypseShadow2037d ago (Edited 2037d ago )

I feel ike Legolas in Skyrim and Green Arrow in Raw Data as Elder. Lol! He even looks the part.
https://cdnb.artstation.com...
I've hit things I shouldn't have and have had those moments where you are like "Wow."

The next Elder Scrolls and Cyberpunk 2077 should have a VR option next Gen.

VenomUK2037d ago

Over a million people will now want the next-gen to come a little bit faster.

crazyCoconuts2037d ago

I hate that i played the hell out of it the first time, because I wish I'd be experiencing it the first time in VR. I've heard that one NPC's gruff voice too many times and it now grates on me lol. I will be getting back to it in VR after I catch up with some other games though. BTW, about the syrup, after playing FWZH I played BF1 for a bit and was irritated that I couldn't turn my head quickly while running into a skirmish. battlefield in VR would be amazing

ApocalypseShadow2036d ago (Edited 2036d ago )

I know what you mean. Playing Skyrim is my very first time. I totally skipped the other versions including the one on the calculator...okay. Bethesda didn't go there. But you get what I mean.

Yeah BF1 could look amazing. But it's EA. Good luck getting anything from them. I still wish Criterion was allowed to make a full game instead of the one mission VR experience in STBF that I bought for $5 because EA doesn't deserve my money. I'ts not like Criterion are allowed to make Burnout anymore because of EA buying them. I despise them for locking down licenses or killing their competition. Come to think of it, Burnout would be insane in VR.

Dom_Estos2036d ago (Edited 2036d ago )

Ha. I love seeing comments like this, because it's absolutely true.

I'm currently playing RD2, and its great. It's an impressive game. It might possibly end up being one of the best I've ever played by the time I finish it. But you know what? I look around on the tiny screen in front of me (it's not tiny, it's 40 inch) and I feel limited. Restricted by the view. I want to get closer. Peer in. I wish it was in VR.

I'm taking the break from Skyrim VR at the moment to play RDR2, but as you say, playing that game with motion controls and physically knotting an arrow and then aiming your bow, drawing back and releasing can't be replicated with a TV and a controller. The first time I used the bow in RD2 illustrated just how archaic and redundant flat gaming can be.

ApocalypseShadow2036d ago

crazy and dom, that's my take. Now that I've played in VR, going back to flat screen now seems limited. I can still play older games and 2D games without problem. But new releases, the first thing I look at is if it has VR implementation. Because I know that I'm going to feel like the game is like peering through a window. I've done that for decades and that just doesn't do it for me any more.

I can't see myself playing in front of a television for another 40 years. I've waited for VR for over 30 years. Now that it's here, I'm going to enjoy it until I can't.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2036d ago
XxINFERNUSxX2037d ago

This better have ray racing tech as well. For PC of course.

MWH2037d ago

It will eat the framerate like wild fire in a hay field. RT is still a gen or two from being practicle.

Gridknac2037d ago

No thanks, I would rather have the 4k 60fps.

Eldyraen2036d ago (Edited 2036d ago )

People that are downvoting don’t seem to realize it’s an option you don’t have to use? Disable it and 4K/60. In a few more years enable it and get that much better lighting as ES games have super long legs that can be played for years via mods.

By time it’s even out they might have a much better ray tracing enabled card too.

Pete Hines I believe said to expect their big games to launch about as often as they used to (Oblivion->F3->Skyrim-&g t;F4->F76) which means even after Starfield we will have years to go for ES. ES6 might be late next gen in other words. Next Fallout? Even later (next, next gen?), if not their last next gen title (so about 9 years out possibly going by his quote).

New Engine might be able to speed it up though if they future proof whatever Starfield will be using. They still need a lot of time to populate their worlds though with everything they throw in them.

akurtz2037d ago

New gen calls for a new engine Beth

Good-Smurf2037d ago

The game will be next gen console?!
I think there's a typo...

SegaGamer2037d ago

The way it is written makes it seem like the next Elder Scrolls game is going to be a next gen console rather than a next gen game XD

Show all comments (61)
190°

Metal: Hellsinger dev says he is against Game Pass after seeing how it affects sales

Founder of Metal: Hellsinger studio says he wasn't against Game Pass until their game launched on Microsoft's service, which affected game sales.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community7h ago
TheProfessional6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Why did PS copy gamepass if it's so terrible and unprofitable? PS Now was before gamepass but it was streaming trash that no one had any interest in.

And honestly the way the industry releases overpriced and broken games with day one season passes and dlc who wouldn't want to just pay for a subscription instead of $70 per game?

Only biased PS fans would defend paying more to a corporation rather than an option that's cheaper for the consumer overall. If it's from an indie studio that needs the sales that's different but games published by larger companies are fine on a subscription model. Also any of these devs who complain did decide to put their games on gamepass in thr first place.

ocelot074h ago

Ahhh yes the typical but but but Sony in a Microsoft article.

When did Sony copy Microsoft? I havent seen Sony's big day one titles such as God of war Ragnarok or GT7? Do you want to know why they are not on the service? Because people are still willing to PAY for the games. Sony has already admitted they lost millions putting Horizon Forbidden West and Ratchet & Clank on PS+ Extra.

"larger companies are fine on a subscription model" Oh really? So why is all the cod games yet to be on it? Where is elden ring? Resident Evil 4 Remake? Street Fighter 6? Boulders Gate 3? Alan Wake 2? Where are they of gamepass is great and big publishers are fine putting newer games on it?

I'll tell you where they are. They are currently still selling for their respected publisher's. You know actually making them money. That money they can use to fund the next project.

who wouldn't want to just pay for a subscription instead of $70 per game?

I'm one of the millions who much rather pay $70 so fully support the publisher. Why do we do this? Well for starters I rather just pay for it rather than keep renting it each month. If we all just kept renting years ago blockbuster would still be around. Secondly, I rather we have AAA titles in 10 years time to enjoy. Rather than play mobile quality crap from a subscription.

Tell me how this is a good thing for gaming going forward. The last time I subbed to Gamepass was October 2023. During that one month subscription I played the newly released Starfield, Forza and a few other titles. All for the cost of about $7. Since then Microsoft have not released anything I want to try out or put anything on GP I want to try. So they last made $7 from me 8 months ago.

In the last 3 months. I have bought Sea of Thieves on PS5 (earning MS more money on that than my 1 month subscription to gamepass). Resident Evil 4 for £20 and Diablo 4 for £25 (again earning MS more buying this than buying a sub). Tell me how it's best for gaming I pay $7 and play the latest and greatest for a month. Rather than just buying what I want even if it means waiting a few months and getting it cheaper than full price yet earning the publisher more than renting said games of a monthly sub.

Hofstaderman4h ago

Sony has never released new titles day one. They experimented with Forbidden West which was fairly new and quickly discovered that it cannabalized sales. XBOX gamepass was always an act of desperation to remain relevant and in their desperation they effectively dug their grave where today everybody is biding their time for their formerly exclusive titles. In a nutshell GamePass made XBOX not relevant.

lellkay3h ago

Literally dev who put game on gamepass:
It's not good

TheProfessional: but but sony but sony

S2Killinit2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Sony didnt copy MS. MS copied Sony, then MS went on to make xbox a subscription device. Remember that part? Yeah.

MrNinosan2h ago

You're not too bright, right?

First of all, Sony didn't copy Microsoft regarding PS+ and GamePass, which you admit to early in your comment, but with some faults. PSNow was not only streaming.
The mentality at Xbox gamers, is to NOT buy games, because they are used to get it on GamePass, preferbly day 1 like with all Xbox Studios games.

This is not a thing at PS+ and never was.
Sure there was plenty day 1 games on PS+ like, Rocket League, Stray, Sea of Stars, Tchia, Operation Tango etc, but those didn't take away from gamers that it was more like a "bonus" than a "thing".

Playstation gamers buy games, a lot of games and PS+ has been proving to be way better for business than GamePass, both by actually having more subscribers but also no eating up sales.

dveio2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

"Only biased PS fans would defend paying more to a corporation rather than an option that's cheaper for the consumer overall.“

How can you possibly come to this conclusion?

First, you pay for a subscription.

Then download games. But games will eventually leave the service. You will again need to buy them if you want to play them ever again. Or if you cancel your subscription. Right?

Eventhough this may NOT have an effect on every subscriber, this IS in fact the economical motiviation behind the service like GP.

If you are not already paying "double" this way, you pay at a 1.2 or maybe even at a 1.5 ratio eventually than opposed to simply buying the game in the first place.

As I said, this maybe doesn't apply to every subscriber. But this doesn't erase the fact of this business model existing. And possibly keep growing.

It's driving me nuts at times that especially the die hard Xboxers seem not to understand what they are actually cheering for foolishly.

The Wood1h ago

xbots always tryna group...

..they'll never understand or refuse to acknowledge why these two console brands are miles apart. Gamespass isn't the golden egg some would have you believe. Its hit its peak and is nowhere near the demanded target of subs by the purse holders

The Wood1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

xbots always tryna group...

..they'll never understand or refuse to acknowledge why these two console brands are miles apart. Gamespass isn't the golden egg some would have you believe. Its hit its peak and is nowhere near the demanded target of subs by the purse holders. on top of that it seems more devs on top of the devs that have shunned the service are not seeing the value of subs vs actual sales. Sell first, sub later works better than sub off the bat. MSGaming has a major sea change decision to make regarding COD. Do they release it dod and lose a high portion of up front revenue or either up the price of gp on the whole or create an even higher sub tier to cushion the blow or don't release it on gp at all and potentially damage the good will gesture reiterated not too long ago. The acquisition money wasn't free money....they'll have to pick their poison

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 22m ago
Skuletor5h ago

I feel no sympathy for the guy, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that putting your game on gamepass would affect sales.

JEECE0m ago

Seriously, how is it that devs need one of their games to bomb in sales due to Gamepass for them to realize what so many people could easily predict? Like people joke about "armchair CEOs" on here, but at least with respect to the effect of Gamepass, we keep seeing that the armchair CEOs are actually smarter than the real heads of these indie studios.

dveio3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

The 'day-one' feature is the breaker or maker with GP, business-wise.

GP is no Netflix.

Because, from all the Marvel's Avengers to Sicarios, illustratively speaking, they all had their box office money. Before they had entered Netflix.

This concept shows you what Microsoft have actually put themselves into.

And what situation studios put themselves into if they go day-one into GP.

truthBombs3h ago

Why not sell your game the traditional way first? Then after about 6 months to a year put it on a sub service.

Day one on gamepass is a gamble. It works for some (Pal world) and not for others.

Show all comments (20)
210°

Istanbul based developer teases new game based on Turkish mythology

Shadowfall Studios have announced via X.com the studio is now an official PlayStation partner.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 5h ago
Changed: title
purple1012d ago
darksky1d 4h ago

https://www.shadowfallstudi...

Looks like a Skyrim clone. Very interesting if done well.

1d 3h ago Replies(3)
Terry_B1d 3h ago

Is there even one good game created in the Turkey so far?

PitbullMonster1d 3h ago

Metin 1&2 and the Mount and Blade Series are the most known ones.

Michiel19891d 3h ago

Metin ....how dare you name that in the same sentence with the word "good"

Cacabunga1d ago

Crytek says hi.. learn before posting

Zeke6822h ago

"Crytek was founded by the Turkish-German brothers Cevat, Avni and Faruk Yerli in September 1999 in Coburg, Germany."

So he's right, Crysis games are not made IN Turkey... ;)

Terry_B19h ago

Just as Zeke mentioned..Crytek is a German developer, created by a turkish guy who lives there, was probably born there.

What I meant are games completely made in the country

MrNinosan15h ago

@Terry
3 turkish guys, not 1.

ghostliving14h ago

-Mount & Blade: Warband
-Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord
-Oddmar
-Anomaly Agent
-Demonologist
-Stygian: Reign of the Old Ones
-Cardboard Town
-Conarium
-Monochroma

S2Killinit19h ago

What is turkish mythology? They don't have a mythology of their own. Unless we are going to rewrite history? Can someone fill us in on what mythology turkey has.

Eonjay17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

It could mean folklore, proverb, or even fairytale like Jack and the magic beanstalk. It could even just be lore about historical figures like you even see in American culture like Jonny Appleseed (a real person whose life story was mythologized).

S2Killinit16h ago

I see. I was thinking in terms of actual deities. But that makes sense.

purple10114h ago

You know that thing called google. (Or DuckDuckGo, depending on preference 😏)

Have a go at it sometime. It’s good

https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

TheCaptainKuchiki2h ago

Do you even know what "mythology" means?

16h agoReplies(1)
Show all comments (23)
170°

Is 2K Games actually making FIFA 25, the next “best” entry yet?

FIFA president Gianni Infantino teases the future of FIFA games in a brand-new interview, and NBA 2K24 studio 2K Games might be behind it.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2d ago
Cacabunga2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I truly hope so.. day one buy

Ninver2d ago

Time for a change. Football games haven't evolved much.

Cacabunga2d ago

It’s tough when there is no competition

Abear211d 20h ago

There’s PES and now we’ll have FC25 and FIFA so yes, but it is no longer true, shit is about to get real!

Now if we only had two viable options for Basketball and American football we’d be on to something.

MrNinosan1d 15h ago

@Abear21
PES didn't exist since 2020, and the rebranded eFootball is crap.

porkChop1d 12h ago

If what we've heard is true, the reason FIFA games don't change is literally because of FIFA itself rejecting nearly every pitch for new features and mechanics.

anast2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

The barber shop and roulette wheel are going to be awesome.

Abear211d 20h ago

Pay to win is the new free to play

CrimsonWing692d ago (Edited 2d ago )

It’ll be monetized to all hell, regardless

StormSnooper2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Hmmm, let’s see how they do. If they riddle it with microtransactions, hell no. Otherwise, I’m excited.

Show all comments (18)