850°

Sony Changed Two Major PS4 Features and Proved That Microsoft is Making Smart Moves with Xbox One

Microsoft's Xbox One has gotten much better over the past five years, and it's forcing Sony to make some major changes to the PlayStation 4.

Read Full Story >>
amp.businessinsider.com
Nyxus2053d ago

"Cross-play, the most important change to the game industry since polygonal graphics"

Really?

NecrumOddBoy2053d ago

I didn't know that it was since cross play has existed well before Microsoft's tactic of making it a relevant reason to buy the floundering Xbone over a much more successful PS4.

Eonjay2052d ago

Sony has always at every point this gen HAD more cross play titles than the other consoles combined. This just sounds like more moneyhatted brainwashing.

Aeery2052d ago (Edited 2052d ago )

"Cross-play, the most important change to the game industry since polygonal graphics"

This sentence is almost disturbing !

Obscure_Observer2052d ago

@NecrumOddBoy

Crossplay exists by some time. But Microsoft will aways be remembered as the company which pushed crossplay between CONSOLES foward!

sinspirit2052d ago

@Obscure_Observer

Yes, in retaliation to poor sales and for their desperate attempts to try and look pro-consumer while taking every chance to make Sony seem like the bad guy since all MS does is post misleading numbers whenever possible to make it look successful, and their new controller designs every month.

It will also be them remembered as hypocrites for denying cross-play between consoles on PS3 and PS4, which Sony wanted, and them only now pushing it since their sales are dwindling. If they hadn't disagreed in the past then Sony wouldn't have declined them for so long. We already know that they've been transitioning the XBox into more of a SteamOS-type environment. While they won't use SteamOS, with crossplay, XBox players will still pay for Live to play against PC gamers that play for free.

UltraNova2051d ago

Obscure, to new gamers a big fat maybe...yo gamers who have been around for decades they'll always be remembered as the company that abandons their platform 2 years before next gen, the company that tries to kill used games and the company that forced paid online on consoles.

PapaBop2051d ago

@Obscure_Observer

No Microsoft will always be remembered as the company that wanted gamers to check in every 24 hours in order to have a functioning games console.

CarlDechance2051d ago (Edited 2051d ago )

@Obscure_Observer

"But Microsoft will aways be remembered as the company which pushed crossplay between CONSOLES foward! "

Wow....such a fanboy viewpoint. But you are the last person who should be talking about what company "pushed crossplay". Just the other day you were yapping at me about how Epic had said "nothing" about cross play. I posted three quotes from Epic CEO Tim Sweeney. You are simply ill-informed and really have no idea what you are talking about. You are just a MS cheerleader.

IcedOmega132051d ago

right?... I remember playing my dreamcast copy of 4x4 evolution against people on PC...

fr0sty2051d ago (Edited 2051d ago )

Sony was the first to bring cross play to consoles back in the PS3 days with Portal... they just didn't let Xbox gamers play in their ecosystem until now. Microsoft raised a big stink, developers jumped on board, Sony relented, and now Microsoft are the innovators?

darthv722051d ago

Crossplay existed long before Sony or MS did anything related. Hell I can still play Quake 3 on my DC against a PC in my home.

As far as platform vs platform play... I have wanted that since back when there was the xband modem on the Genesis and the SNES. It may have taken a lot longer than it should but I welcome that evolutionary step in online gaming communications.

Babadook72051d ago (Edited 2051d ago )

Bitching and complaining about your competition is a smart move. Ok then.

I give Sony all the credit here. They asked for cross play first. It was they who were the bigger man and caved when it benefited their competitors. Microsoft wouldn’t do it during the 360 days.

darthv722051d ago (Edited 2051d ago )

@dook... that's not exactly true. Sony was indifferent last gen on the subject. I believe they said it was up to the individual game publishers/developers if they wanted to pursue that. Then MS said no and somehow it came back to being a Sony issue when Sony was neither onboard nor against the idea.

This gen, however, it was MS that has said they want to do it so it's the first time a platform holder has been onboard with doing such a thing. So with MS offering up their support and devs/pubs also saying they want to do it... it then became on Sony to accept the olive branch.

2051d ago
+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 2051d ago
P_Bomb2053d ago

EZ Ben. I’ve been cross platform on DCUO for years but you never noticed because.....?

I don’t get the bleeding goodwill comment. They do two things people have been asking for only to find themselves “bleeding goodwill?” Damned if you do damned if you don’t.

sampsonon2052d ago

Sony just signed the death warrant for PS.

KickSpinFilter2052d ago

Sony gonna come out with the PS5 in 2020 with good price point, TLOU2 at launch, with Backwards compatibility with PS4 games. Plus these two things. Na... more like Sony just signed the death warrant for the next XB

sampsonon2052d ago (Edited 2052d ago )

@KickSpinFilter: sorry to burst your bubble but TLoU2 is rumored to be released next year. tired of trying to explain the ramifications of this move.

you own a restaurant and you sell great burgers. You sell 500 burgers each day and the place is the most popular in town. what would happen if you allowed people to bring burgers from your competitor into your restaurant? if you don't allow them to to bring food in they will be forced to buy your burgers. but once people can buy a burger and bring it in you lose revenue, and when that happens you will either have to raise prices a bit or let go of some employees.

sony is allowing a competitor to bring their burgers into their restaurant.

how many people bought a ps4 because they wanted to play with their friends that own a ps4? 80 million sold so it would be a lot of consoles.

think this will be my last comment on this subject.
If people are so blind i give up

pyroxxx2051d ago

Xbox has no reason to exist,...

2pacalypsenow2051d ago (Edited 2051d ago )

Nah PS will be fine.

sinspirit2051d ago

So, why would it be the most popular console that would suffer the most from this?

Also, burgers aren't constant existences able to be accessed continuously. Bad metaphor.

MS is transitioning back to the PC game. It's been obvious for years now. The way they want to control updates is to create more Windows Marketplace traffic.

Crossplatform was to ensure they had relations to keep enough players online for their Live customers, aka future Windows Marketplace users. When they launched Windows Live it couldn't keep players at all even after removing the fee.

AmUnRa2051d ago

You are just delusional and have non argument that Sony signed the "dead warrant".
For PS. Please give me your argument, if you cant that will be saying enough.🙄

SarsOxley2051d ago

Haha! Sony makes rice cookers, TVs, consoles, select titles and a bunch of other stuff but, not burgers :).
If they did make burgers though, they would be exclusive burgers and I wouldn't be able to get that exact tasty burger experience from anywhere else...now a 99 cent coke that every burger joint sells and is made by someone else that they make a paltry amount for every time they sell...wouldn't hurt to let someone drink their Activision coke in the swanky Sony dining room while talking to someone on the phone in Microsofts hipster hot dog stand also drinking an Activision coke because they are there to have easy access to that one of a kind Spider Burger and that's what keeps bringing them back.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2051d ago
Nodoze2052d ago

LOL, yeah ok. Have used it a grand total of.....NEVER. Fortnite is garbage and it's time will pass soon enough (not soon enough for some). I am happy some are enjoying it, and that it is working to attract more people to gaming but that is about it.

Cross play was not something I was, or am interested in.

Zeref2051d ago

You dont have friends that own different consoles?

rainslacker2052d ago

I'd say online play is probably the most important change to the game industry. After that, the uptake of mobile and self-publishing.

Cross play has been around long enough that its not really an important change anymore. It didn't matter much when it first happened, or when it was pushed more, and it really doesn't matter that much now. It's not going to fundamentally change the industry in any way, nor will it really have much effect on the end user to a huge degree.

Obscure_Observer2052d ago

@rainslacker

"It's not going to fundamentally change the industry in any way, nor will it really have much effect on the end user to a huge degree."

Only your head, otherwise Sony would do what you were saying/expecting, which was, crossplay for next gen Playstation. The notion that you have about crossplay as not important is not what Sony thinks. Fact.

rainslacker2052d ago

You know what Sony is thinking?

And what's this new thing with everyone putting fact at the end of their comment as if that somehow solidifies their statement as some kind of fact?

I never once thought or said I expect Sony to do it next gen. I always maintained that there was something holding it up, probably on the back end, and if the powers that be could work something out, and were trying to work something out, then it would happen, if not, then it wouldn't happen.

We've certainly had the conversation enough times that you couldn't have possibly forgotten that. Or did you really not listen to anything I've said for the last two years?

Anyhow, cross play isn't really that important. The industry was fine without it. It didn't change much once we had it, and its unlikely to change much going forward. It's a good end user feature, and those devs that want to use it for the consumers benefit, or for their own, can now do so. But if they couldn't the industry would still go on. The industry is growing, and has despite the lack of cross console play.

Explain to me exactly what will change so drastically for the industry that it makes it an important change. Explain what would be hindered in the grand scheme of things if everything stayed the way it was.

neutralgamer19922052d ago

I know Xbox one isn't doing the most important thing right and that's AAA exclusives

Rest of features are just that extra features

Hardiman2052d ago

If it were me those are the articles I'd be pushing! Where are the new exciting IP's and how come some are able to pull this off yet the most powerful stumble!

JackBNimble2052d ago

I'm willing to bet that most AAA multiplat games in the future still will not use this as a feature.

KwietStorm_BLM2052d ago

I've been an advocate for the benefits of crossplay for the industry, regardless if it matters to you as an individual or not...but yea that is one silly ass statement lol

FyBy2051d ago

Agreed! I never needed crossplay while playing online. Never needed crossplay during online play in my whole life.

Raiden2051d ago

@Fyby
So you only play single narive titles and put it down, you never wanted to test your gaming skills against your competing console counterpart, who is better which system gives its gamers great evolution COD FIFA F1 These are games that pushes your skill. If not there is nothing wrong with that, but it's the closest we're going to get towards a fairly fair competition because we console owners stand no chance playing against PC gamers

RememberThe3572051d ago (Edited 2051d ago )

@Raiden
Your agrument for cross play is that with out it you can't play against other people online? Or is it that without it you can't have PS4 vs Xbone matches (which I don't think will ever be a thing even with cross play)?

We can compete amungst ourselves just fine. I'm not a pro gamer, I don't need to put my skills against the best players from other platforms to enjoy myself.

bluefox7552051d ago

Hard to take anything in this article seriously after that, I lol'd.

Zeref2051d ago

downplaying crossplay just because your favorite platform doesn't do it. Smh...you guys aren't real gamers.

Nyxus2051d ago (Edited 2051d ago )

First off, PS4 does support cross-play now. Secondly, downplaying? Just because I don't agree with that ridiculous hyperbolic statement? Can anyone seriously sit there with a straight face and tell me cross-play is the most important chance since 3D graphics?

RememberThe3572051d ago

Cross play doesn't matter and won't change anything. I play video games everyday but I guess they aren't real games and I'm just hallucinating.

trooper_2051d ago

Biggest load of crapola I've ever read.

jacksmith562051d ago

i agree with you the biggest change is going to be read dead and cybur punk

feedthereaper2051d ago

It is one of the biggest changes..... because it makes console hardware less relevant than the content now. It is like how we all use Facebook on Android but all use different phones to run that Android.
10 years from now, other hardware manufacturers will be developing much cheaper hardware, not to gain an advantage on hardware sales, but simply because they can offer the exact same games to an already large audience.

RememberThe3572051d ago

Do you think every game from now on is going to have cross play as a feature?

Also, your describing the PC market with your last point. With your Steam or Origin account you can play on whatever PC you want.

Why do consoles need to be like PCs when we already have PCs?

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 2051d ago
PhoenixUp2053d ago

“Suddenly, "Minecraft" players on Xbox One could play with iPhone and PC and even Nintendo Switch players. There was just one notable exception: Sony's PlayStation 4. It continues to be the exception, and it's not a measure of Microsoft not working with Sony - Sony apparently halted talks.”

Pretty sure Microsoft has Switch owners using Microsoft accounts in order to do cross platform play. Safe to say Sony wouldn’t want any of that.

“What Sony is missing, however, is Microsoft's bigger play with Xbox Game Pass and cross-play: An overall move away from dependence on the Xbox as a hardware platform, and a move toward Xbox as a service available on a variety of devices.”

The author says that like it’s a good thing to move away from hardware dependence.

letsa_go2052d ago

It is Business Insider. Of course they are going to write it from a perspective that is good for businesses and not consumers.

Raiden2050d ago

Sorry, but how do businesses work again, if the industry is trying to evolve and the most successful Gaming console of this generation company can't follow the market, then good luck to it future, crossplay cross progression is important and Sony must understand this, look at ps vita, it would have been the perfect play anywhere hardware for those long journey, but no short sightedness on Sony own path cause this to be no more, look at the switch, 200 games on the move, look at tablets with access to steam, my point is not what Sony wants but the options to the gaming public, some people believe this is all a money grab by MS, well i can't answer that, but i am going to point out that almost everything that MS was going to do has started to happen in the industry, DRM lol you come home from work BANG the game you're about to play has a 4gd load so you play another game while you wait which then takes longer, look at google alexa and Amazon voice command devices, these devices are only on the market now, MS see the future of technology and where it heading, if PC are to evolve then consoles must become as powerful as PC, WE ONLY KNOW OUR LIMITATIONS WHEN WE CAN NO LONGER EVOLVE.

rainslacker2052d ago (Edited 2052d ago )

Sony didn't halt talks. Sony wouldn't allow MS to provide updates through its own servers and require that an XBL account was needed to actually get an update. That is their policy for everyone. They distribute the updates, which are compliance tested, and charged for. Said update can not ever be locked behind a secondary account. MS could have removed this policy, and cross progression features could have been provided, and if MS wanted to, they could have allowed cross play with PC, and maybe at the same time started talks about allowing it with X1 for the game instead of taking the route they did.

Example. One can update FFXIV to their hearts content without every logging in with an account. You'll need an account to play, but that's about it.

MS didn't like this policy, so they took their toys and went home, thus locking out PS players from getting the updates, and the new features being rendered unavailable on PS.

This minecraft thing should not be placed on Sony, as it is entirely MS decision to restrict the content from PS players.

conanlifts2052d ago (Edited 2052d ago )

That's actually incorrect. As I stated above MS have unified purchases for Minecraft, which requires an xbox account to verify. Unified purchases are a very good thing, it means we do not have to buy things repeatedly for each platform. There is no other way to verify purchases cross platform without a unified account. Sony have blocked it as they only want people buying content from them. In addition Minecraft on PS4 still gets updates. But here is a link to what I am talking about.

"btw when I was at Sony, the stated reason internally for this was money. They didn’t like someone buying something on an Xbox and it being used on a Playstation. simple as that. dumb reason, but there it is.
— John Smedley"

Read more at http://www.playstationlifes...

rainslacker2052d ago

Except that's not what prevented Sony from approving XBL accounts on the PS4. They refused it because MS wanted to control the updates itself. There are other unified accounts on the PS platform, that require a 3rd party account to access.

They don't have any problem with doing this with FFXIV, SF5, Warframe, Mass Effect 3, or any other number of games.

Yes, Minecraft gets updates on PS4, but they don't get the new features that MS has, because MS wants to control the updates, and force a XBL account for those updates. But Sony's own policies don't disallow 3rd party accounts on the platform, and in the case of Minecraft, Sony still distributes the updates through its platform.

conanlifts2051d ago

"There are other unified accounts on the PS platform, that require a 3rd party account to access."

Pretty sure none of these allow crossplatform purchases, which is what I am specifically referencing and the reason ms need to control updates etc.
Also to my knowledge Warframe is not cross platform. Personally I game on all of the consoles and therefore crossplatform purchases are a huge must have.

kneon2052d ago

When you can't compete on hardware then you might as well move away from depending on hardware.

conanlifts2052d ago (Edited 2052d ago )

"Pretty sure Microsoft has Switch owners using Microsoft accounts in order to do cross platform play. Safe to say Sony wouldn’t want any of that. "

Yes they do, but Sony is against it for reasons that are not in the benefit of consumers. Microsoft have said that all purchases you make are linked to your online account. So if you buy mods or add ons for Minecraft they are universal and work on any system. The caveat is you need to log in to your Microsoft account to link your purchases. This is how your purchases are unified. How else can it be done. Sony on the other hand have publicly stated they do not want people buying content on other platforms and using it on theirs as they get no money from it.

"So playstation is the only platform not allowing cross purchases for Minecraft in this case.
btw when I was at Sony, the stated reason internally for this was money. They didn’t like someone buying something on an Xbox and it being used on a Playstation. simple as that. dumb reason, but there it is.
— John Smedley"

Read more at http://www.playstationlifes...

http://www.playstationlifes...

http://www.playstationlifes...

Silly gameAr2051d ago (Edited 2051d ago )

Here we go with this anti consumer trash again. If I was running a business, I wouldn't want to hand my customers over to the competition either. Why is that hard to understand?

conanlifts2051d ago

@silly gamear.
So do you think it is fine for 1 Company to refuse to let purchases for a game to carry over to other platforms. Particularly when every other platform allows it for these games?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2050d ago
jznrpg2052d ago

Xbox fans want features not games duh

NeoGamer2322052d ago (Edited 2052d ago )

No, that is not true. As a primarily xbox gamer I want GAMES and FEATURES. MS has to improve the games for sure.

And so do most gamers. Whether it be achievements/trophies, apps like Netflix, Blu-ra/DVD/CD, game streaming, profiles, EA Access/Game Pass, PSN Plus/XB LIve Gold, etc. gamers all want features as well as games. It just makes the console more valuable and useful when it can do more than games.

Soulrakk2052d ago

can we stop generalizing an entire fanbase based on childish insults?

how about appreciating what every brand brings to the table? or is a level mind too much to ask for?

it's amazing how much people really hype up and ride with these corporations. my god. both these companies feed off each other and that's a GOOD thing. both have led, stumbled and moved forward by learning from each other. if you're preference is sony, great. the need to tear down microsoft for it though, is fucking assinine.

masterfox2053d ago

hmmm I would really want know what kind of stuff is the xbox one doing better or smart moves, I'm saying this because I still don't care one bit about purchasing that thing and this is mostly because their exclusive games just sucks imo(if they have any) , multiplataform games doesn't match the high quality of the PS4 games , so what exactly are doing right? , play 360 games ?, game pass to play their "exclusives" ?, xbox one X way expensive console that doesn't prove his so called power in games ?.

When xbox start having awesome exclusives games and I mean new ones so until then we can safely say they are definitely doing the right moves or smart moves but until then currently and sorry for say this but the xbox is submerged in mediocrity right now.

DarkkMinion2051d ago

Replace the words xbox one with PS4 and PS4 with xbox and it will make more sense. For example: "When PS4 start having awesome exclusives games and I mean new ones so until then we can safely say they are definitely doing the right moves or smart moves but until then currently and sorry for say this but the PS4 is submerged in mediocrity right now."

AmUnRa2051d ago (Edited 2051d ago )

DMinion: "PS4 is submerged in mediocrity right now".

WTF?? What have i been reading right now? Please explain your self cous i can make nothing of that rediculous steatment.

Atanasrikard2051d ago

@amunra

Not to put words in his mouth but I believe darkkminion's point is that everything that guy said is completely subjective and other people can feel the opposite of someone else in a subjective statement.

Hardiman2053d ago

Cross-play is a feature, a feature but games are the main course and the reason we are here in the first place! Also I know there are games for Xbox but what Im talking about is where are the Knights of the Old Republic, Jade Emipres, Strangers Wraths, the Splinter Cells or Otogis or the Mass Effects, the Bio Shocks or the Blue Dragons that the Xbox and 360 had?!?!

Sure some would say those series went multiplat or don't exist anymore but they all started on Xbox so if it happened before why isn't it happening now Mr Phil?

Show all comments (151)
110°

How And Why Online Multiplayer Is Still A Thing For Dreamcast

A trailblazer for online gaming, some players are still holding a candle for Dreamcast.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
purple1011d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

such a shame, its my fav console by far. it was way better than ps1, problem was ps2 was due to come out, a year or so later, and many just waited for that, especially after the flop that was the Saturn,. (even though it way okay, it didn't sell well,).

ps1 did sell well, a lot of those fans waited for ps2. thus, the downfall of Dreamcast,,

Jingsing17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

Every console is responsible for its own destiny, You don't go around pointing fingers at him or her or anybody, cowards do that and that ain't you! you're better than that!

lodossrage17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

Not true,

The Dreamcast falling apart was because Sega couldn't make up the pay for the increasing debt from the Sega Master System, Game Gear, 32x, Sega CD, and Sega Saturn. The Dreamcast and Genesis were profitable. But the profits weren't outpacing the debt plus interest.

It had nothing to do with anyone waiting for the PS2

MetroidFREAK2116h ago

You're forgetting the most important part of the story. Sega was losing so much money so fast due to their past failures, they couldn't sustain the business. Even if the PS2 did help the demise of the system, the true blame is Sega themselves

lodossrage13h ago

Exactly

Even Bernie Stolar R.I.P (former Sega exect) admitted in an interview past debt was what hurt the Dreamcast.

Everyone says "Sony killed Sega" when that's not even remotely true. Not just that, but most of their debt came from fighting Nintendo, not Sony

ZeekQuattro12h ago

This. The only truly successful home platform Sega made was the Genesis. Every thing else flopped to varying degrees. The real culprits were Sega of Japan and Sega of America which went to war against each other for some odd reason.

Chocoburger21h ago

I bought a DreamPi to play both Dreamcast and Saturn online! So far I'm only played with two people online with Saturn, and I need to spend more time with the Dreamcast community in order to play with them. I miss ChuChu Rocket online, good times!

Profchaos20h ago

P2P there's even Sega genisis games that still connect online based on this.

Hosted servers wasn't really something I saw regularly on non oc platforms until the 360 era.

Ravenkiss16h ago

The Dreamcast was easily my favorite console of all time, home of many good fighting games

300°

Report: Sexual Misconduct Investigation Conducted at EA, Suspects Named and What They Did Revealed

EA senior staff has been investigated for sexual misconduct involving female coworkers, and these said people have been named publicly.

isarai1d 23h ago

Aye just call Phil, i mean he somehow made Bobby Kotick's scandal disappear and gave him a few million dollar high five on the way out.

Cacabunga1d 14h ago

I wonder if it will be censored with some in game ads.

XiNatsuDragnel1d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

EA about to go down like Activision and then Phil saves the day saying.this is good for the industry and consolidation will help create competition. /s.

ravens521d 18h ago

What's up with all these horny creeps. You gon be horny, fine. Just not at work take care of that shit before you go in. Rub one out if you have to. Don't be a creep at all. ESPECIALLY at work. But don't be one AT ALL.

Extermin8or3_1d 13h ago

I mean part of the issue is that things transpired outside of work....

KwietStorm_BLM1d 13h ago

You think deviants care where they are? Work sometimes makes it an even better situation for them because they can abuse their power.

mudakoshaka21h ago

Nerds think they are Gods when they are making video games.

NotoriousWhiz1d 18h ago (Edited 1d 18h ago )

"it seems that according to EA, given the events transpired outside of work between two adults, and the fact that once investigation has started that the alleged perpetrators didn’t do it again, the investigation is considered closed. [...] The victim still has to work with the people that harassed her."

Yep, EA is disgusting.

Extermin8or3_1d 13h ago

I mean the fact stuff happened outside of work puts EA in quite a difficult position legally. These women don't seem to have reported the matter to the police which kinda ties EA's hands on what they can do. If they don't file reports of the crimes then yeah from EA's perspective it is stuff that happened outside of work. The only exception is the guy that apparently referenced things in the slack channel for work, spending on what he said proving it may be very hard and he may well be able to get away with plausible deniability. I don't like EA and I think these people need to be dismissed but without any legal action being taken, EA can't really do much without risk of being sued themselves for unfair dismissal etc.

Show all comments (18)
180°

Xbox No Longer Has Its Head In The Game

Microsoft & Xbox have shut down Arkane Austin and Tango Gameworks to lay off more workers, insinuating that they're not in the game anymore.

XiNatsuDragnel2d ago

They're headless for a long time because closing tango isn't exactly a good move

PapaBop1d 17h ago

Ever since that cringe Kinect reveal they've never been the same. They used to make some amazing games and do great deals with third parties Early on in the 360 era they had games like Chromehounds and Shadowrun, both well ahead of their time. Now instead of nurturing their studios, they'd rather gaslight gamers and throw billions on pre existing studios. Not sure how Spencer is still in a job, I wouldn't trust him to organise a piss-up in a brewery.

Father__Merrin1d 16h ago

We've said all along Spencer needs to go. I wish xbox went back to xbox only with new gears fable forza halo releases lots of third party releases

Those early rainbow 6 Vegas days and phantasy star universe are gone forever

S2Killinit1d 13h ago

MS has its head in the game but the game they are playing is something different from what console gamers expect from a platform. MS’s end game has always been to use the xbox as a trojan horse.

XiNatsuDragnel1d 11h ago

Lol that's funny well this plan they have isn't working homie

1Victor2d ago

“Acquisitions always come with cuts”

343 trillion points shield activated
343 trillion percent damage negate activated
All damage reduced to 1 for 343 trillion turns.
MICROSOFT DEFENSE FORCE IS A GO

Tacoboto2d ago

Especially for Microsoft, when Booty pretty much said they didn't know how to handle that many studios.

Why even make the acquisition then.

-Foxtrot2d ago

Didn’t they make the swipe for Bethesda when Sony wanted like 6 months exclusiveness for Starfield

It’s like…chill, you got Rise of the Tomb Raider for a year.

romulus232d ago

Do they always come with senseless cuts becasue that's exactly what cutting Tango was, senseless.

H92d ago

Everyone's acting now that game companies care about games and Xbox is committing the Ultimate betrayal, they are all like this and you have just been quiet about it for far too long

Nuclearmoon2d ago

I wonder if Microsoft do pull out of the console market that it might open the door for valve to relaunch the Steambox. Competition is good for the industry but Microsoft don't even seem to be trying anymore.

UltimateOwnage2d ago

Steam / Valve are one of the few truly pro-consumer bright spots in gaming right now. Thankfully.

Jingsing17h ago

From all the money Valve make from Steam they reinvest almost 0 into creating new AAA titles for the PC platform, Absolutely no giving nothing back in that regard. Wake up.

jwillj2k42d ago (Edited 2d ago )

“Your game has won some pretty significant awards and is a show piece for where we want to go in the future.”

1 hour later.

“We’re gonna have to let you go. You can’t cover our 100 billion dollar acquisition. Oh and take your awards too 👍🏾”

Show all comments (30)