Approvals 11/3 ▼
JamieReleases (4) - 2340d ago Cancel
digim0 (2) - 2340d ago Cancel
Wolfyseyes (3) - 2340d ago Cancel
aarogree (2) - 2340d ago Cancel
570°

LawBreakers Publisher Blames “Blockbuster” PUBG For the Game’s Lower Than Expected Sales

The publisher of LawBreakers, Nexon, believes that the launch timing of the shooter was unfortunate with PUBG becoming available as well.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2340d ago
ninsigma2340d ago

So basically they're saying it's unfortunate a game that everyone thought was better released at the same time...

NewMonday2340d ago

lame excuse, LawBreakers had more hype than PUBG

ninsigma2340d ago

Yeah I'd never heard of PUBG until it was shown at Microsofts E3 conference. Law breakers was definitely a bigger name.

Death2340d ago

Pfft. I thought for sure they were going to take full responsibility and blame Comey. Got to love living in a world where “personal responsibility” is an oxymoron. It’s pretty clear Cliff made a game that no one wanted. It happens.

Gazondaily2340d ago

PubG isn't even out on PS4 lol.

Rude-ro2340d ago

Yet @septic.
Just timed release... but by the sound of it... ps4 is not missing anything yet.

DaMist2340d ago (Edited 2340d ago )

@Rude-ro

I think septic is referring to their weak excuse, as in, PUBG isn't out on PS4, so why wasn't Lawbreakers successful there at least.

thekhurg2340d ago

Lawbreakers killed Lawbreakers.

It's a fast paced, high action, twitch 600mph shooter, with increased Z-Axis movement built into the game. It's far too much for standard gaming audiences to handle. It's a niche experience, and since it's an online shooter, that niche experience killed the game.

Frodosmugins2340d ago

I knew there was a Cliff game out there somewhere but I never heard of lawbreakers till it died.

ravinash2338d ago (Edited 2338d ago )

Personally I think it was Overwatch which shot down Lawbreakers.
It already had the multiplayer team shooter wrapped up just before Lawbreakers came out.
It also has more character that Lawbreakers which looked more generic in comparison.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 2338d ago
aarogree2340d ago (Edited 2340d ago )

Even though the releases of the game were separated by several months. And the games had nothing in common.

Mr Pumblechook2340d ago

Don't blame market conditions, blame your game.

Michiel19892340d ago

i do think they appael to the same audience, most players who play pubg, fortnite etc also like overwatch /cs/lawbreakers. But to say that pubg ruined their release is just ignorance.

CliffyB ruined the game by sitting on his high horse. At least he finally got kicked off it and is now humble as fuck. Also there was hardly any promotion for the game.

Mr Pumblechook2340d ago (Edited 2340d ago )

@Michiel1989. I really don't think PUBG is an adequate explanation because PUBG is not available on PS4 and LawBreakers still failed to sell on that platform. I don't even think the obnoxious Cliffy B. is to blame because if the game had an attractive appeal it would have still bought the players.

Before the game was released when they were showing footage the game's biggest problem is that it just seemed GENERIC and BLAND. Like a churned out second-rate TPS from the 360 days. I can't remember a single character from the marketing. Maybe the mechanics were great but early in development the team should have taken the time to ask 'Why will gamers want to play this game above the competition?'

AngelicIceDiamond2340d ago

Getting sick of devs blaming EVERYONE but themselves for a failure of a game.

2340d ago
getbacktogaming2340d ago

I'd argue LawBreakers was a better game in the 'polished' sense yet PUBG is much more innovative and original ... and that makes it a more successful game.

SuperSonic912339d ago

LoL at Cliffy.
He predicted the doom of console gaming.
He just reaps what he sow.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2338d ago
FlyingFoxy2340d ago

PUBG had review scores in the 7.x range, and according to sheep who hang around reviewers like flies on crap, they say it's a bad score.

I don't pay attention to people who say "this sux but this is great", i have my own tastes and likes. Many people liked Dead Island, i didn't.. I enjoyed the L4D and Killing Floor series way more.

Console players didn't even know what KF or PUBG was until they came to console.

yeahokwhatever2340d ago (Edited 2340d ago )

PUBG is hella broken, but even so, its a great game. I'm glad Sony is waiting to allow the game on their platform. I have it for PC, and I've had it for a while, and its a broken game that is not what you should want representing your platform. Hopefully the additional 60 million + PS4 potential customers can make BlueHole(<-worst name ever) fix their broken mess in a timely manner. The game is rampant with cheating, exploiting, glitches, bugs, and crashes. Just walk around the maps and you can see silly things like trees floating above the terrain, items floating sort of near things, loot that is too close to doors so you cant pick it up without accessing the inventory screen, and rocks you can literally crawl into. Its a hot mess, but its fun. Give it time.

2339d ago
yumi762340d ago (Edited 2340d ago )

I blame the fact it was lead by Cliffy B. who has alienated everyone on every side of the fence.

And even if a game was to be blamed I would blame Overwatch, which was what they like Battleborn and so many other tried and failed to copy.

2340d ago
yeahokwhatever2340d ago

A ton of people thought Lawbreakers was an Overwatch clone, and Overwatch it too good of a game for anyone to want to invest in a knock-off. Lawbreakers isn't really anything like Overwatch, and so it's rather unfortunate that it was sort of perceived as such. Had they said its more of an Unreal Tournament clone more people would have been possibly interested. Possibly.

Kribwalker2340d ago

he definitely shouldn’t have shunned and talked smack to his biggest fan base (the xbox crowd). CliffyB is now nothing more then a clown to all fan bases instead of just the PC and Sony fan base

yumi762340d ago

Or ya know he should have had the foresight not to talk crap about the PS3 and PC way before anything to do with xbox. And if you think this game would have sold better if it had been on xbox your kidding yourself, this game was doomed from the start.

"Something something burning bridges something something..."

gangsta_red2340d ago

Just goes to show that even though we always hear the thumping of chests about the bigger fanbase it isn't always a garuntee that the game will do well with them.

Nexon and Cliffy could have taken their chances and released on all platforms since the architecture is basically the same and went from there.

This is why I scratch my head when I hear these excuses from developers as there has to be more behind the scenes for these reasons. (Checks being made$$)

FinalFantasyFanatic2339d ago

I have to agree wholeheartedly, I think Cliffy B. was a big factor in the game's lack of success, I remember many people here saying they wouldn't buy the game because he was at the helm. The other problem is the gameplay, from what I've see in Youtube videos, it seems to be a blander, somewhat flawed version of Overwatch.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2339d ago
-Foxtrot2340d ago

Haha.

Guys it was beaten by Overwatch first and foremost...Cliffy B and the rest of them were comparing it to OW before it even released.

So it was beaten by old games and new ones....maybe it was just a bad game.

Rude-ro2340d ago

Not a bad game, just online only fast paced twitch based shooters never really make dent in the market.
Not saying some make it through, but it very little of a chance of a game like that to dominate.
Overwatch is more casual and pubg is definitely nothing like a twitch based shooter.

yeahokwhatever2340d ago

It's actually a really solid fast-paced(WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAY faster than OW) arena shooter. Comparing it to OW was what I believe sealed its fate.

Salooh2340d ago (Edited 2340d ago )

It's simple, the game design was too shallow. It needed more unique and addcitive feeling, some games provide a story to achieve that, some provide a great background and great design to the characters, they needed something like that. Gameplay wasn't enough. Look at rainbow six siege, even if you don't play it you can admire it because what it deliever feels solid. They lacked that feeling to their game. Despite PUBG being a clone , it had that unique feeling to it. It changed enough to satisfy people.

No matter what they blame, the game needs more refining to be relavent, memories, praised. This will encourage gamers to share their experience of their game. If they can't see that than they need to put more time in looking for what will satisfy gamers before releasing a game.

FinalFantasyFanatic2339d ago

I think the game was just to bland, or simple, it needed more to standout from the crowd.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2339d ago
RAM0N 2340d ago

I was going to buy it but then I played the beta.

FinalFantasyFanatic2339d ago

Would you mind sharing your opinion on the gameplay? I get the feeling this is where the game falls down, from what I've seen on Youtube it doesn't have much depth.

Liqvid2339d ago

The combat actually has a lot of depth and is very skill-based. Traversing the map with the grappling hook and stabbing people with the Assassin was so much fun.

To me, it's unfortunate that the game failed. I loved the gameplay, but unfortunately, shortly after launch, the population became so low that I couldn't find matches.

Tbh, the only thing I didn't like about the game was the art style. Was pretty generic. Maybe if it had a more unique art direction the game could have been more popular.

Oh well, at least I had a blast during alpha/beta. I hope I can see a similar game soon.

Show all comments (96)
160°

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie. This is something of a homecoming, as Microsoft owns Activision.

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3h ago
Obscure_Observer7h ago

Very very early in development. Still, fantastic news!

Let´s GO!!!

Lightning775h ago

I guess.

How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )

At least it wouldn't be MS of all ppl destroying them.

MS really should let go Tango go like they did TFB here.

darthv725h ago(Edited 5h ago)

one was under Bethesda (Tango) the other under Activision (TFB). Clearly each one handled the separations of their subordinates differently.

Obscure_Observer4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

"How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )"

Perhaps because Zenimax and ABK handles such matters differently based on their own internal policies as "independent" publishers.

Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future. Which could also be the reason why they ensured an exclusive partnership with TFB and its new game, before anyone else.

Sad and disgusting. But it is what it is.

Lightning7754m ago(Edited 53m ago)

"Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future."

MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB.

It's inexcusable, they have options on how to handle studios they don't want anymore with killing jobs. Not just MS but the rest of the industry also.

Sad and disgusting sure how many will get shut down next year or this year even?

I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another.

-Foxtrot7h ago

Manages to buy their freedom especially after all the shit Microsoft has been doing with its studios lately

...

Goes right back to them as partners.

Okaaaaaay...

darthv725h ago

Id venture a guess that TFB working directly with MS was a better outcome than working through Activision to get to MS.

VersusDMC3h ago

From the article...

"Toys for Bob spun out as an indie back in February after Microsoft instituted sweeping layoffs that impacted 86 employees, which was more than half of the staff"

I doubt those 86 employees enjoyed the Microsoft experience over Activisions.

Inverno2h ago

MS shuts down studios because of lack of resources and then helps these guys by giving em resources. Also MS is what forced them to buy their freedom in the first place? What kind of logic 😂

Sciurus_vulgaris5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Xbox’s gaming division seems to still function as 3 semi-autonomous sub-divisions, Xbox Studios, Bethesda and ABK. The three main sub-divisions can seemingly shut down or build studios and set up partnerships independently. This would explain why Bethesda can recently shutdown studios, while ABK spins off one studio, while building a new one. Plus, Toys for Bob could be spun off by ABK, only to immediately re-partner with Microsoft.

180°

Sony shares big new PS Plus stat, but not the one we want to see

PlayStation Plus has improved the split of PS4 and PS5 players on its priciest tiers, but Sony continues to hide total subscriber numbers.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community11h ago
mandf10h ago

lol acting like it’s equivalent to ms numbers

Mr Logic10h ago

Uh...They're definitely not equivalent.

"Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass service now has 34 million subscribers."

"the total number of PS Plus subscribers across all tiers was 47.4 million"

darthv7210h ago(Edited 10h ago)

That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN.

bloop6h ago

That's not the "gotcha" you think it is Darth.

darthv725h ago

^^it's not supposed to be bloop.... it's just an interesting observation.

Einhander19724h ago

darthv72

"That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN."

Have you ever heard of a PC before? I hear they are pretty popular.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4h ago
shinoff21839h ago(Edited 9h ago)

What. Definitely more os plus subscribers but that makes sense due to actual console sales

Darth the difference between the bases are huge your right but you gotta think. Ps players buy more games, where as the Xbox base relies on gamepass for their gaming. So it makes perfect sense

darthv729h ago(Edited 8h ago)

What makes perfect sense though? You say PS players buy more games... so then logically there should be more PS+ subscribers given the increased number of online multiplayer games in the PS4 generation alone. The PS4 was the first time that + was required for online play much like Gold was for 360 users.

Keep in mind we are talking subscribers, not simply XB/PS users. I assume you meant to say offline single player games, which is most likely true as well. That gen also saw a significant increase in games with an online component comparted to the previous gen.

victorMaje8h ago

I for one will be going back to essential at the next renewal. When I feel a game is good & right up my alley, I’ll check trusted reviews & just buy it.

jznrpg7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

I have the top tier until 2028 as they gave me a massive discount for all the years I had left but I’ll most likely go to essential as well. I buy my games but my kids do use the service occasionally. They do prefer to own their games as well since any game can leave the rental service at some point and they don’t like that idea. They mostly use it to demo games then ask me to buy games if they really like it.

RedDevils2h ago

For me, I will cancel it all together but unfortunately I still have it till 2030 lol

meganick6h ago

I would like to see Sony add a fourth tier of PS Plus for people who just want to be able to play games online without any of the perks like monthly games, store discounts, or anything like that, and it should cost $20 annually, $30 maximum. There’s no way I’m paying $80 just to play games online. Even the original $60 fee was too much, and I would often wait for sales to re-up my subscription.

P_Bomb2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Essential is too expensive, I agree. We’ve got one Essential and one Premium sub. Dropping the Premium when it expires.

130°

What Happens to Your Steam Account When You Die?

The Outerhaven writes: While Steam has come out recently, stating that Steam accounts can't be transferred, we need to think about it since we all will eventually kick the bucket. But if Valve is denying transferring accounts, what can be done? Plenty, actually.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community18h ago
thorstein1d 8h ago

It goes to my kids because I gave them the passwords.

To Steam: Missio has a song that conveys my feelings about you stealing my purchase after I die. It's called "Middle Fingers"

shinoff218313h ago

Pretty much. My son knows my info.

Abear2113h ago

Yeah worrying about digital ownership when you’re on the other side of the grass seems a little strange, but also on brand for these millennial journalists to worry about.

Goodguy0117h ago

I suppose if I have kids, I'd just give em my account details by retirement age. If I die young then...idk lol.

CrimsonWing6914h ago

Yea, I mean just give someone the password to your account. Is that difficult to do or something? Like, I’m legit asking because I don’t know.

anast12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

It's not difficult but It's against the policy. If they find out, they will lock the account permanently.

CrimsonWing6911h ago

Ah ok, I had a feeling there was something like that. It seems kind of weird that you can’t just hand your account over to a family member or friend and let them take over the account.

Show all comments (13)