230°

Final Fantasy XV on PC: Has Square Enix lost its way, or do graphics really matter?

FFXV director talks Nvidia GameWorks, the death of consoles, and playing games on robots.

Read Full Story >>
arstechnica.com
Adrian_v012433d ago

The headline reads like a Final Fantasy on PC is the atrocity of all atrocities.
Furthermore the article doesn't really make any point to support the headline. It's well written but it's just a lift of facts and interviews but remains pointless in the end.

Also, why does one exclude the other. Are bad graphics needed for SE to keep it's way? Are good graphics a sign that a game will be bad? Square's problem is that the teams of the previous few games were badly put together. For XIII they had an interesting story but chose a bad type of gameplay, for XV they had good gameplay but lacked in storytelling. But looking at the past with VII, VIII on PSx then X and XII on PS2, XIII on PS3 and XV on PS4, Final Fantasy was always known for being in the front line when it comes to graphics, even "before SE lost it's way". One could even say that top notch graphics are one of the series' key parts.

xtheblackparade2433d ago (Edited 2433d ago )

I agree with the last part you said. Ever since PSX era Final Fantasy games were always the best looking games I had back then (or at least the CGI part). I think somewhere in the PS3 era other games started to look as good or better than FF games, especially MGS.
But in the end for me it's all about fun gameplay in a genre that I like, FF XV isn't in the genres I like so I can't judge it.

As for release on pc, well they've had FF releases on pc since FF7 or 8 I think so that's nothing new. Only question is how well will an action game play on pc? I think it's gonna be extremely hard to make that work on keyboard and mouse but most players will probably just buy a controller anyway.

SarcasticDuck2433d ago

completly agree. Btw, since when and why is the PS1 called PSx? I thought that was the name of the emulator.

Lon3wolf2433d ago

For a long time:

The PlayStation (officially abbreviated to PS, and commonly known as the PS1 or PSX) is a home video game console developed and marketed by Sony Computer Entertainment.The console was released on 3 December 1994 in Japan

Lon3wolf2430d ago

I forgot to add I thought the emu was called PSX-E (as in psx emulator)?

RedDevils2433d ago

Who FF15 is shit. That and 13 worst Rpg I had played in a while.

drizzom2433d ago

Nah, I cant agree that XV had good gameplay. I like action style games but the one in XV was terrible. Things like responsiveness, canceling, camera work and targeting were really poorly implemented. I didn't feel like I was in any real control over the moves I wanted to do at will with Noctis.

bmf73642432d ago

Its not just about that. Square Enix has spent years building Final Fantasy's name up on PC by slowly porting the entire library of FF games to Steam. But theyre just simple ports of the console versions with a possible graphic tweak like resolution or upped framerate cap.

Theyre advertising FFXV to be the Final Fantasy game meant for PC. Full graphics-setting customization. Nvidia Gameworks features. Support for up to 8K resolution. Mod support. This is the opposite of a nail in the coffin for Square Enix. This is showing that theyve taken interest in a demanding market and are finally able to give it what it wants. A committed PC version of a modern FF title.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2430d ago
ONESHOTV22433d ago

PC will have both the best graphics this game can offer and the frames to match

djplonker2433d ago

True but pc will also have the worst graphics and frames.

(Depending on the pc)

chris2352433d ago

graphics don't matter (ask any switch user) but square enix lost its way a looooong time ago. ff15 looked good but played way too stiff and generic.

Takwin2433d ago

It was so boring. I forced myself to finish it, but the open world was the most sterile and lifeless thing ever, and the distance between things was huge. I will never replay it.

MonChiChi2433d ago

GFX is about the only thing this game has going for it.

Show all comments (17)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic18811d ago (Edited 1d ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus2314h ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

rokos5h ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb334h ago

i think you are really missing the point

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4h ago
SonyStyled20h ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

18h agoReplies(2)
ChasterMies8h ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear212h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2h ago
jwillj2k41d ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot23h ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

Jon615863h ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

RNTody23h ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead13h ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage6h ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast22h ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn197922h ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel14h ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn19793h ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage6h ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (59)
180°

Xbox No Longer Has Its Head In The Game

Microsoft & Xbox have shut down Arkane Austin and Tango Gameworks to lay off more workers, insinuating that they're not in the game anymore.

XiNatsuDragnel1d 8h ago

They're headless for a long time because closing tango isn't exactly a good move

PapaBop10h ago

Ever since that cringe Kinect reveal they've never been the same. They used to make some amazing games and do great deals with third parties Early on in the 360 era they had games like Chromehounds and Shadowrun, both well ahead of their time. Now instead of nurturing their studios, they'd rather gaslight gamers and throw billions on pre existing studios. Not sure how Spencer is still in a job, I wouldn't trust him to organise a piss-up in a brewery.

Father__Merrin10h ago

We've said all along Spencer needs to go. I wish xbox went back to xbox only with new gears fable forza halo releases lots of third party releases

Those early rainbow 6 Vegas days and phantasy star universe are gone forever

S2Killinit7h ago

MS has its head in the game but the game they are playing is something different from what console gamers expect from a platform. MS’s end game has always been to use the xbox as a trojan horse.

XiNatsuDragnel5h ago

Lol that's funny well this plan they have isn't working homie

343_Guilty_Spark1d 4h ago

Acquisitions always come with cuts

1Victor1d 3h ago

“Acquisitions always come with cuts”

343 trillion points shield activated
343 trillion percent damage negate activated
All damage reduced to 1 for 343 trillion turns.
MICROSOFT DEFENSE FORCE IS A GO

Tacoboto1d 3h ago

Especially for Microsoft, when Booty pretty much said they didn't know how to handle that many studios.

Why even make the acquisition then.

-Foxtrot1d 2h ago

Didn’t they make the swipe for Bethesda when Sony wanted like 6 months exclusiveness for Starfield

It’s like…chill, you got Rise of the Tomb Raider for a year.

romulus231d 2h ago

Do they always come with senseless cuts becasue that's exactly what cutting Tango was, senseless.

H91d 3h ago

Everyone's acting now that game companies care about games and Xbox is committing the Ultimate betrayal, they are all like this and you have just been quiet about it for far too long

Nuclearmoon1d 2h ago

I wonder if Microsoft do pull out of the console market that it might open the door for valve to relaunch the Steambox. Competition is good for the industry but Microsoft don't even seem to be trying anymore.

UltimateOwnage23h ago

Steam / Valve are one of the few truly pro-consumer bright spots in gaming right now. Thankfully.

jwillj2k41d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

“Your game has won some pretty significant awards and is a show piece for where we want to go in the future.”

1 hour later.

“We’re gonna have to let you go. You can’t cover our 100 billion dollar acquisition. Oh and take your awards too 👍🏾”

Show all comments (28)
70°

Sega's Profits Are Up, But It's Mostly Down To Pachislots

Sega has released its financial statement for the 2023-24 fiscal year, and profits may be up, but it's mostly not down to video games.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net