In an article on IGN, the Playstation 3 and Xbox 360 versions of the upcoming MLB 2K7 are briefly compared. Somewhat surprisingly it seems that there are some significant differences between the two...
“I thoroughly enjoy retro-style games and with that, Magic Orbz modernises the classic brick breaking formula and it has held up beautifully.” - A.J. Maciejewski from Video Chums.
BLG writes, "Some of the most popular games have had a rough start, with some of them being downright unplayable.
Despite that, developers have managed to turn it around for them and make their game worth playing. Here are some games that had a rough start but were pretty great."
Sea of Thieves... I'm not disagreeing that the game has improved in terms of content. But I feel that the most significant change between now and its release is actually the public perception. Nowadays, most people are aware that the game is a multiplayer PvP-focused experience first and foremost, and not "Black Flag made by Rare". Consequently, people dismissing the whole experience because the single-player aspect is lacking or the story is plain are much less common.
Days gone! By the end of the game I couldn't drop it down! I went around so many hours killing zombies! It was addictive by the end.
Richard writes: "Now was the right time to release the Fallout 4 Xbox Series X|S update. It just could have been more."
They aren't going to give more. We are talking about a company that has rereleased an 13 year old game at least 5 times.
Looks like they built this one on xbox360 again then ported it over to PS3, that's the advantage for 360 because it's easyer to develop for good job i'm not one bit interested in this game. bring on Sony's inhouse games and i can always pick this up for my 360 if i'm really desperate...
Oh please SimmoUK
even if it is made on the 360 and ported to the PS3, start to get used to it then. Which still means multiplatform games (which are the large numbers of games over the lifecycle of the consoles) will be best on the 360.
Seen in the past (COD3, FNR3) seen in the future.
Anyone would be best of buying a 360 if one likes games. Even the exclusives are most and best on 360. SImple. If you like BluRay movies buy a PS3. Gaming is second on it.
But games nowadays are made on PC and then optimalized for PS3 or 360 or Wii. Not even ports. The PS3 just ain't a gaming machine. How many times have to be made clear to die hard Sony fanboys the PS3 just can't cope the next gen games???
What about the online part? 30 players on 360, 12 for PS3? That's not problem of a port, that's problem on a online bad service. What about missing the rumble in the game (see page one of the article!)
SimmoUK you don't own a 360.
who cares? 2k7 franchise blows worse than EA. MLB the Show will have everything I need, just like NBA '07 and NHL '07 rock the house, period. 2k7 can keep those "989" leftovers in the doghouse where they belong. =]
..... idiots, still comparing ports
news for Sony but hey, I'm NOT going to make too much of this.....yes, alot of multiplatform games look better on 360, but honestly I don't think its a "significant" difference that takes away from the fun of the game.....for example: I was watching a friend recently show off FNR 3 on his PS3, and yeah I thought it looks better on my 360, but it wasn't like "wow" mine is so much better.....he thought it was great and loves the game....still I have to admit its ironic(and funny) that ALL the Sony claims of raw power, superior graphics, the cell, 1080p, etc. that 360 games simply look better....don't worry Sonyfanboys, I know you're going to tell me yeah BUT, dev's need more time to optimize/gain experience with PS3, and yes I do agree that the games will start to look more and more impressive on the PS3, BUT that goes for both consoles....well at any rate, like I said, as long as the games are interesting and fun this isn't a "significant" problem....at least I don't think so.