Approvals 10/3 ▼
BigManFanelli (2) - 3036d ago Cancel
OriginalPSP (2) - 3036d ago Cancel
jfams (1) - 3036d ago Cancel
Sentionaut (2) - 3036d ago Cancel
GrantPatterson (1) - 3036d ago Cancel
MikeClarKent (1) - 3036d ago Cancel
Fenriff (1) - 3036d ago Cancel
220°

Do all RPGs really need to be so long?

Although everyone expects RPGs to be dozens of hours long, one gamer wants to know, after playing short titles such as Undertale and South Park: The Stick of Truth, if they can be better paced if they just trim all the fat.

Read Full Story >>
syfygames.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3036d ago
FallenAngel19843036d ago

It's very expected of the genre

syotos773036d ago

Well most rpg story games are single player. So if these companies expect me to buy their game for 60 dollars, I expect to get 60 dollars worth of entertainment. I wouldn't be happy paying 60 dollars for an rpg that only lasted 10-20 hours with little to no replay value.

aquaticDonut3036d ago

And what about when they're only $10, like the one used in the thumbnail?

syotos773036d ago

@donutboy honestly I don't really want a short experience when I play an rpg so I typically go for the larger titles, but things like bastion and Transistor weren't too long but we're definitely worth the play through, so there are exceptions, but I've heard people say there is too much to do in games like the witcher or dragon age or fallout and it just always seemed silly. The main point I was trying to make is that it's important to me to feel like I got my money's worth.

Bdub20003035d ago

I wouldn't enjoy a role playing game that wasn't very long. The whole idea is to take your time and build your character to a role you want to play, and spend hours using that character to complete missions.

CarlosX3603036d ago

Yes, and my answer to the question of this posting: Yes. The whole point of RPG's is to start from zero, and climb up to a climax of sorts. FF7 does this brilliantly by converging story and how "experienced" your player is (Cloud at Level 30-ish for example).

Sunny_D3035d ago

RPG's are literally the only game genre that makes me feel that I get my money's worth and then some when I buy them. I put hundreds of hours into them and come out satisfied even if they aren't the best in the genre.

Thefreeman0123036d ago

Well no but it needs replay value and substance story/ plot wise

GryestOfBluSkies3036d ago

the length of these games is why i now (usually) pass on them. RPG used to be my favorite genre, but i also used to have a lot more time to dedicate to playing them

xerokai3036d ago

So since you no longer have time to play full length RPGs should the remaining player base be denied a lengthy RPG experience? I'm not criticising perse. I also no longer have time to invest in a full RPG but I wouldn't expect game play to be changed to follow my availability. I just play more ARPGs or strategy titles.

Sunny_D3035d ago

This is true. I have had Witcher 3 for months now and I'm still early into the game due to my busy schedule. But, I am willing to keep playing it. I just play other games with RPG's as well.

Articuno763036d ago (Edited 3036d ago )

A lot of them have way too much fluff, both in terms of grind and meandering narrative. It's funny because older JRPGs tend to be blisteringly paced in comparison to modern ones: more happens the opening 15 hours of FFVII than the first 30 in newer games. And all of Chrono Trigger's excellently paced story is over and done with before the 30 hour mark.

It's better to tell an average story with excellent pacing than it is to tell an excellent story with average pacing.

wonderfulmonkeyman3036d ago (Edited 3036d ago )

I would argue that what goes on during the bits between the story paces is what defines whether or not an excellent story with average pacing is a better choice than an average story with excellent pacing.

To be fair, a lot of games recently haven't had that much in terms of meaningful between-story content, but there are some stand-out examples that use smaller side-story narrative to fill the gap, rather than merely meaningless fluff.

I think with games like Witcher III and Xenoblade X, we're getting closer to devs realizing what makes good content for between story missions.

Unless something goes horribly wrong in the next few years and we get a string of stupid mistakes from both old hats and new faces, I think we can at least hope that it will be a gentle up slope in quality from here on out...

Articuno763036d ago

"I would argue that what goes on during the bits between the story paces is what defines whether or not an excellent story with average pacing is a better choice than an average story with excellent pacing."

Yeah, I was making the assumption that "all other things be equal". But in reality it's rarely quite that black and white.

Khaotic3036d ago

I like long rpgs as long as they keep me engaged. Its a good value to have one i can put 100+ hours into since i dont buy alot of games.

_-EDMIX-_3036d ago

Agreed, as long as your engaged. I just don't feel value is in hours as one can play a RPG that is lots of hours that is with a lot of filler or bad or your not engaged as much etc.

Show all comments (47)
100°

I Think It's About Time We Realize Fallout 4 Wasn't That Bad

Ahmed from eXputer: "2015's Fallout 4 received harsh criticism upon launching, but I think it was unwarranted and the game deserves more praise than it got."

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3d ago
helicoptergirl3d ago

It was totally that bad. I couldn't finish the campaign it was so bland and boring as I recall. Got so sick of it. 1000 stimpaks on hard. It is very rare that I play half a game and then just quit. I usually always finish it. But i was so bored with this game I just stopped and never went back and never regretted it. Just thinking about that game makes me shudder

Furesis3d ago

That's exactly what happened to me too lmao
Fallout 4 is not a fallout game period it's a bethesda game

Vits3d ago

The comparison with Skyrim is mind-boggling. Yes, Skyrim has streamlined many of the systems that Morrowind introduced. However, it did not tamper with the core of the Elder Scrolls franchise; it did not diminish the freedom and sense of exploration that made Bethesda RPGs famous. Fallout 4, on the other hand, did exactly that to the Fallout series. It eliminated what made Fallout such a beloved series to play. There are no consequences for your choices, no reason to explore, and barely any interesting set pieces in the game.

It's not terrible, but it's a painfully mediocre game in a franchise that typically doesn't produce such mediocrity. So that is why people see it as bad, the bar is just much higher.

anast3d ago

They both feel the same because they are, it's just that one has swords and magic and the other has swords and guns.

anast3d ago

I'm replaying it now. It sucks. I'm about 30 hours in and thinking about quitting again. I am so tired of the dialogue I just spam a random button because it doesn't matter. The upgrade just feels like a graphical mod, everything else is not good.

Good-Smurf3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I couldn't play the game as-is it was insanely boring and grindy and the grind itself are not fun at all.
Mods helped me stomach the game a bit better but after a while I just stopped playing and uninstalled it because the game did nothing after the first few hours to give me any motivation to keep playing it, it just became a mindless looter shooter with obsession in settlement building and defending.
Compared to F3 and FNV, F4 was barely a mediocre game it wasn't bad but it's also very forgettable entry.

MrDead3d ago

It's not that bad after 300+ mods that fix it's issues and make the game fun... but lets not talk about mods right now as they are f****d.

Show all comments (13)
60°

Interview on Fallout 4 with the Actor for Nick Valentine, Codsworth & Mr Handy (Stephen Russell)

Interview with Stephen Russell, Actor for (Nick Valentine, Codsworth, My Handy) in Fallout 4 which is a vast open world role playing game set in the apocalyptic wastes of Boston, the Commonwealth. The career goes further with other Bethesda games from Starfield to Prey to The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim.

Read Full Story >>
gamerheadquarters.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3d ago
70°

Fallout 5 -10 Ways It Should Improve on Fallout 4

It may be years away, but whenever it arrives, Fallout 5 needs to improve on its predecessor in several areas.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community5d ago
Changed: embed code
-Foxtrot5d ago

They really need to get rid of weapon mods and bring back more unique weapons that are hard to get / find

anast5d ago

They won't improve it other than a slight graphical upgrade. They have always been better at live action than making games.

MocBistro5d ago

Only way it could improve is taking it away from Bethesda and regroup Classic Fallout (1&2) devs with decent budget and time to make it.

4d ago