390°

New Xbox One Update Removes Kinect Gesture Support for Dashboard Navigation

Gamespot:
The upcoming New Xbox One Experience update completely removes support for gesture-based dashboard navigation through Kinect. Microsoft's Mike Ybarra says in a new interview that the company decided to cut the feature because people barely used it at all.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
AizenSosuke3109d ago

Yeah Kinect was pretty much useful and useless at the same time when it came to appeal but I used my Kinect only to switch to the tv really. Admittedly.

MightyNoX3109d ago (Edited 3109d ago )

It was a dumb device meant moreso to scan your room and sell you concentrated ads. As less people have used it, note how Microsoft keeps phasing it out.

First the 30%
Then the abandonment of games for it
Now turning off gestures.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Gazondaily3109d ago

Gestures usage was low for a reason. It didn't work well.

But the voice stuff is practical and actually is very useful. I don't think it is a dumb device. Itsactually quite clever but ultimately operates as a universal remote

3109d ago
christocolus3109d ago (Edited 3109d ago )

"It was a dumb device meant moreso to scan your room and sell you concentrated ads."

Wut??? Lmao xD

Have you even used the device? ever? The voice commands work really well.skype is something my family, friends and i use a lot. If MS feels the need to remove gestures then its fine..im sure they'll put the freed up resources to better use somewhere else.

Godmars2903109d ago (Edited 3109d ago )

"Gestures usage was low for a reason. It didn't work well."

Yet Kinect's main supposed strength, the key advertised feature meant to gaming, was motion controls. If was just about voice command they could have just done it through a headset or an iOS app.

With the XO they were prepared to make it's use mandatory with many a fan more than willing to defend it. Some still defend it. Yet now its presence has been reduced.

Is it really that hard to admit that Kinect was a bad idea? Introduced too quickly with attempt to implement and develop it further just plain poor.

@christocolus:
At one point, when it was going to be mandatory, MS was talking up Kinect as a marketing research device. Something which could watch anyone in the room recording their reactions to commercials. Using it count people in order to set fees for watching special events. They were almost more about selling such to advertisers and the likes of the NFL than XO owners. But that all dried up with kinect being optional and few buying it besides.

RzaDaRazor3109d ago

You are a dumb device. If you've never used one for an extended period of time, which you obviously haven't, you can just troll articles and say it's a "dumb device". The Kinect is amazing and it helps separate the Xone from PS4. Gestures were pretty useless but the voice commands are well worth the $100 buy in cost. I will never have another entertainment center where I cannot talk to it.

3109d ago
frostypants3109d ago (Edited 3109d ago )

@RzrDaRazor "Gestures were pretty useless but the voice commands are well worth the $100 buy in cost."

So you paid $100 for voice recognition software and a mic? That a horrible deal.

bf0007779663109d ago

@RzaDaRazor it's the evident tha MS have abandoned kinect but still want to sell it

donthate3109d ago (Edited 3109d ago )

It wasn't a dumb device, but people like you kept talking smack about it and so MS has no choice but to shelve it.

If MS came out and did any support for it now, people will complain the old tired "why are MS supporting Kinect? They could use that resources for games, games, and games!".

The same mentality killed innovation on consoles, and now we have a dumb console that is used mostly to play games.

Killed all innovation!!!

I can only imagine what would happen if people screamed, I only want my phone to make phone calls when smart phones were released what we would have today.

Godmars2903109d ago

@donthate:
It never worked fully as advertised. The Star Wars Kinect title was obviously and poorly staged. Project Milo was the being of Peter Molyneux's empty promises, the man's verbal diarrhea during interviews, being shown for what they were. No Kniect title either worked properly or managed to honestly gain attention for more than a few weeks. It was a bad product with tons of advertising that tried to say differently but the obvious kept showing through.

Smartphones are thing today for the simple fact that they *WORK*. Kinect never did.

badz1493109d ago

So...it's ok to remove features now that MS is doing it, ha? Strange...

r2oB3109d ago (Edited 3109d ago )

Wow, I'm seeing people ok with Kinect being just a remote. It's ok that it's just used to skype and do voice commands. People spent the $150 mark up for Kinect, and people are ok with it. Talk about trying to justify a purchase. A less expensive camera could do skype and voice commands properly if that's all it's to be used for. No need for a $150 peripheral with advanced cameras and tech, if it's only going to be used for basic functionality.

Seems like people are reluctant to admit that they fell for the whole "Kinect is integral and that it cannot be unbundled" drivel Microsoft fed them. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice...

People saying "I love the Kinect and always use it for (insert basic function here)" is like someone saying "I'm so glad I bought that 80 inch 4K 240hz HDTV, I use it to watch all my VHS tapes on my VCR" (a touch of hyperbole, I know, but you get the point). Paying a premium price for a product that only does basic stuff, and being happy about it, is funny.

$500 well spent, lol. /s

fr0sty3109d ago (Edited 3109d ago )

@septic, a simple mic is all that is required for voice recognition, as PS4 proves. A simple webcam could do the skype stuff. The rest of it was just gimmick that nobody really wanted.

@R2, beat me to it. Very little of what Kinect was hyped to do turned out to be why people say they like it.

Irishguy953109d ago

Why was kinect bundled with Xbone originally? Because it was vital to the system. According to microsoft.

Just saying.

I just bought an xbone yesterday and im extremely happy I waited.

Meishpizza3109d ago

It's an interesting device but not practical for gaming, and the argument that it's great for voice control is lame. They can do voice control by using a microphone you don't need Kinect for that. Maybe they can use some of the tech for VR controls in the future when MS decides to come out with a new system powerful enough to handle Oculus.

nosferatuzodd3109d ago

Wow how fast people change their tune I remember ppl saying how great Kinect is and how advance it is and thTs why Xbox cost more than the ps4 and how the ps4 eye is inferior to it .. Now has soon has ms remove it it's a dumb idea boy the hypocrisy of n4g is over 90000

Major_Glitch3109d ago

Wait a minute...you mean to tell me the device that failed to make any meaningful impact last gen, failed to make any meaningful impact this gen too?! But the MS PR brigade kept saying how new, futuristic, and NECESSARY("...In fact, Microsoft said Kinect and Xbox One were one in the same...") Kinect was to the future of gaming. Odd. The MS PR brigade is usually pretty accurate about these things. I mean, they were totally right about...about...about.

donwel3109d ago

@donthate
I honestly can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.
Here's something to consider though, maybe the reason why people want "games, games, games" is because it is a GAMES console.
Just a thought.

Kribwalker3108d ago

@r20b
W
I use my Kinect daily. I use Xbox fitness in the winter time, we play dance central when we have parties, I use the voice commands to start parties, change inputs, turn everything on and off, load games (since 95% of my games are digital I don't have to switch discs or anything either which is a bonus as well) not to mention skype with family members and other uses. It was a $100 premium when I purchased the system, and I'd get it again if given the choice. For me, gesture dashboard control has been disabled from the start, so I don't have a problem with them turning it off on their own.

alabtrosMyster3108d ago

@Septic you just demonstrated why it is a useless device, they could replace it with a built in microphone and you could switch on the tv with your voice to fell like you are in the future! Amazing!

+ Show (18) more repliesLast reply 3108d ago
sensor213109d ago

Love the evolution of this system pretty cool to phase out whats not needed yet the voice gestures work stil. Use those resources elsewhere !

kneon3109d ago

So the next evolution is to remove the camera entirely and just use a microphone, as they should have from the beginning.

marioJP873109d ago

"XBOX ON" never F'ing works correctly, man. It still pisses me off.

TeaRunner3109d ago

I don't use it alot, but when playing FIFA, you can call out substitutes during the game without hitting pause.

Found that to be super useful. Really speeds up that part of the game. Other than that I don't use it.

UltraNova3109d ago

Yes but you can do that using a simple microphone not a $100 dollar dead weight as it turn out.

showtimefolks3108d ago

Ms is giving up on kinect so maybe now Xbox fanboys can also take it easy and let this whole kinect is awesome thing go

Razor

People like you are the real problem with in gaming and publishers look at people like you when they are trying to take advantage of gamers

Season passes
Launching broken games
Gimmicks
Micro transactions
A year later game of the year edition at full price

Julion07153108d ago

Or jus maybe he really like his Kinect and don't need ppl like you to tell him other wise he's happy so who are you to come in here and hate on something you dnt own jus like the rest of the fake Xbox owners anyone who really use Kinect know how great it is to have

BallsEye3108d ago

I use a lot of kinect in dashboard but only voice commands. Hand gestures are pretty useless. Love it in games tho like battlefield or Dead Rising.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3108d ago
MasterCornholio3109d ago

Thanks for answering my question.

Bubbles for helpful.

kneon3109d ago

But quite expected, people just didn't want to listen.

KiwiViper853109d ago

Going from full screen to home and vice versa worked really well, I used to just do it occasionally when people were over, made me feel like a magician.

But navigating the dashboard with gestures was abyssmal

MasterCornholio3109d ago

Understood. Thanks for answering me.

Bubbles for helpful.

joeorc3109d ago (Edited 3109d ago )

It did not have to be that way though, kinect worked, it really does. Microsoft just excluded things that needed to be there in order for the platform to work in viability past control, but cannot be effective for hardcore game User controlled interactive methods without such it would not work correctly.

The problem was not the technology, it was how the implemented kinect was missing features to offset its limited viability usage without those key functions it would not work. If you look at oculus Rift, project Morpheus's or is: playstation VR you will notice something.

In order for kinect to really have viability for hard core gaming , it needed to go Hand in Hand with a motion control method where the optical lenses of the cameras could focus and track your users movements in a game development design that allows the camera to completely focus its compute on very fine focused body locations and points of body language in action.

There is nothing wrong with kinect, its Microsoft's implementation of cutting out a control scheme to coincide with keep connected to kinect at the same time that really is exactly why its not been able to be viable for hardcore game control mechanism with out those other much needed control mechanics needed.

Good thing is with Oculus Rift Microsoft is pretty set to be able to offer such, that is if Microsoft invests into Oculus Rift though.

Salooh3109d ago

Why you give bubbles !! . It's not helpful! (/s at disagrees)

MasterCornholio3109d ago

What an incredible helpful comment.

Bubble down for not being helpful.

Just kidding have a bubble for being funny.

UltraNova3109d ago (Edited 3109d ago )

MasterCornholio,

Since you are obvisouly in bubble up spree here I thought I'd take you up for it and say Hi!

Thanks for the bubble, in advance :-)

showtimefolks3108d ago (Edited 3108d ago )

never did but if you listens to fanboys than it was the best thing since sliced bread

Major_Glitch3108d ago

Yea, the fanboys really tried their best to convince everyone else that Kinect was awesome. Too bad they failed...both times.

kenwonobi3108d ago

Yep but I think slowly killing off Kinect sends a bad signal. It wasn't completely useless with the right applications of its use. See PSVR.

BallsEye3108d ago

I had zero issues, both with voice commands and hand gestures. It was working perfectly fine. No idea how anyone can have hard time using it. Doesn't mean it had any good use in dashboard tho.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3108d ago
javauns3109d ago (Edited 3109d ago )

the gestures didn't work 100% of the time, neither does the voice but its around 85% while gestures was 55-60%. but i did like the ability to move around the interface like in sci-fi movies. hopefully now the voice becomes more responsive and intuitive. cant wait for cortana

MasterCornholio3109d ago

Ahh ok now i see why people didn't use it that much.

Jayszen3108d ago

Can I have a bubble just for saying "Hi" to you? I have been stuck on 5 for god knows how long...No? Okay sorry, just don't take a bubble away....

Sm00thNinja3109d ago

I feel like my kinect has been dumber lately too commands use to work 95% of the time now it's more like 70%

javauns3109d ago

thats so true, when i first got it i never had any problems with the voice and gesture, then as the updates rolled out it got dumber and dumber.

Concertoine3108d ago

Probably killing its brain cells with booze due to all the kinect hate.

towelie12883109d ago

xbox on and xbox turn off
are awesome voice commands but gestures

mehhhh....

Show all comments (91)
390°

Former Blizzard President Says Closures Hurt Phil Spencer 'as Much as Anyone Else'

The former president of Blizzard Mike Ybarra in a statement on Twitter says Microsoft Gaming CEO is hurting just as much as anyone else following the closure of three studios under Bethesda - Arkane Austin, Tango Gameworks, and Alpha Dog Studios. Roundhouse Games is also joining ZeniMax Online Studios.

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com
jambola8d ago

Yeahhh I doubt it's hurting a millionaire as much as it's hurting fans and people who lost their jobs

VenomUK7d ago

Mike Ybarra‘s defence of Phil Spencer is the dictionary definition of tone deaf. Even Alanah Pearce, who’s close to Aaron Greenberg and Phil called him out on it.

“Mike, I have a lot of fondness for Phil and don’t doubt he’s incredibly bummed about this, but CEOs can handle some “shots” amidst people having their lives destroyed. Your sympathetic posts should solely be directed at those who’ve lost their jobs.”

https://x.com/charalanahzar...

GamerRN7d ago

What makes you think these are Phil's decisions? This is likely coming from Microsoft, and not the Xbox division.

Name Last Name7d ago

Phil is the only guy in the industry that has plot armor.

RNTody7d ago

Hahahahahahaha! xD Legendary comment.

lelo2play7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

At this moment, even Xbox fanboys are starting to hate Microsoft. It's fu**up, after fu**up, after fu**up... that's the state of Microsoft gaming.
Purchasing developers left and right, then killing them off...

Phil was the worst thing that happend to Xbox. Might as well just shut down their gaming division and fu** off

Jingsing8d ago

I can already hear Jim Ross.. He has a family damnit!

Barlos7d ago

Poor Phil. He must be crying into his bonus cheques. Makes your heart bleed doesn't it?

MrDead7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

I'm sure he'll be upset that those cheques contain a small percentage of money MS is still making from the closed studios games too. Next time someone purchases High-fi Rush or Evil within all that money is now just Microsofts, just think the former devs at Tango who made Hi-fi Rush MS's most highly acclaimed game in years will get nothing more.

MS are buying these publishers for the big IP's like Elder Scrolls and Call of Duty they have little interest in the ones that don't make huge profits... and firing thousands and closing studios looks good on the next quarterly shareholder report. Gotta protect the share price.

Eonjay8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

This is all coming from the executive who thinks we should have the option to tip devs... apparently so publishers can pay devs minimum wage. Will someone think of the C-suite executives!!!

dumahim7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

That was from a former Blizzard exec. Did Phil make a comment on that also?

edit: Oh, it wasn't Phil who said this himself.

HyperMoused7d ago

Gott alove the tought process on that...gentlemen we need think of more ways to get money out of these..gamers...wait..what if they just gave us their money..like for free.

LucasRuinedChildhood8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Yeah, the guy making $10m a year is hurting as much as those who have lost their jobs and are worrying about their future and supporting their family. /s

It takes a real lack of shame to even try put the Good Guy Phil™ spin on this. It's not going to work this time.

Profchaos8d ago

He's sitting around feeling sorry when he should of been doing everything in his power to get people jobs in other studios you're telling me after toys for Bob split from Activision there wasn't a opening in the call of duty mines for arkane it's just woah is me.

Show all comments (65)
390°

Former Blizzard President Suggests Players Should Have Option to Tip Developers

Former Blizzard president Mike Ybarra recently suggested an interesting concept that has sparked a debate among gamers - the idea of being able to tip developers after completing a game.

LG_Fox_Brazil31d ago

If I had a 100% way to be sure that this money would go to a fund or a reserve dedicated only to the guys who develop the games, be them designers, artists, programmers and so on, I could think about it.

But we all know that this 'tip' would only end up in a publisher's CEO pocket to buy a new yacht, so, no, I ain't tipping anyone anytime soon on this industry

neutralgamer199231d ago

Exactly these companies were raising money for good causes and gamers were donation and come to find out they are keeping a good chunk of be pie

PapaBop30d ago

Yeah tip your developer, 5% proceeds go to developer, 95% to the publisher or whoever. Isn't tipping for staff not making minimum wage? How about they just pay their developers properly and like you know, give them fair bonuses? Too much to ask from Blizzard these days, Kotick saw to that and is now laughing all the way to the bank.

MrDead31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

It's the t**ts at the top looking at ways to cut devs wages and get the players to tip them like waiting staff, and I'll guarantee a percentage is skimmed and kept by Activision Blizzard. This is 100% for shareholder and CEO playouts.

Popsicle31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

I have to agree with this. On the surface tipping devs sounds like a great idea, but in the end it leads to pay cuts and subsidization of pay. Tips then become an expectation or the devs “can’t make a living.” Lastly, especially in the US, tip culture has gotten out of control, and it serves as an excuse not to properly pay employees. Sounds good but doesn’t end well.

drizzom30d ago

@ Popsicle

I think your right on the nose with how much tipping has become rampant. Instead of it being a relationship directly between the customer and the developer or employee, it now has a middle man ingrained in the system. DoorDash is one example. It ends up becoming a metric where the company can measure 'just how much more money you are willing to part with' before raising the price on the main product.

1Victor30d ago

Uh so they’re trying triple dip or more we buy the game that they’re already withholding/cutting content for dlc we was told that season pass would help the developers thrive we felt for it.
Now on top of all that plus their sales bonus they want tips enough is enough whatever happens to you create/built a good game get a bonus for sales milestones you care about your game and community we reward you with more sales not for doing 3/4 of a game then save the other 1/4 for dlc and passes after

raWfodog30d ago

The 'tip' is me buying your game in the first place.

S2Killinit30d ago

Very well said. If it was possible to send the money to either the developer or some organization for the betterment of gaming, sure. But we all know that will not be the case.

Rynxie30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

No, it would go to those on the top. They will still fire developers, have a bunch of microtransactions, raise prices of games and so on.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 30d ago
H931d ago

So they eventually don't pay their workers and depend on our tips to pay them like the case with waiters!

Deeeeznuuuts31d ago

That kind of practice is only normal in the states, as far as I know anyway, what a backwards system

H930d ago

No it's as well in a every country that wants to amercanize

bloop30d ago

Ireland is literally the first stop across the pond and we don't have a tipping culture. The only establishments here that would expect a tip are the tourist haunts that Americans visit. Other than that, you might tip in a restaurant as a sign of gratitude for great service and waiting staff would be paid a full wage anyway.

Rebel_Scum30d ago

Tipping is not customary iin most countries dude. Get a passport lol.

Jin_Sakai31d ago

Is this a joke? How about the big wigs giving up some of their pay for their hard working developers.

MrBaskerville31d ago

Maybe the CEO could earn his money based on tips.

mastershredder31d ago

good god. The devs are not baristas dude. Total 1% ideals. Fing Chadosaurus.

Show all comments (76)
380°

Former Xbox Executive Applauds PlayStation First Party Games As “Bangers”

Former Xbox executive Mike Ybarra has applauded PlayStation first party games as “bangers” that are worth celebrating.

MrDead38d ago

Must be hard if you're passion is gaming and the company you work for only wants to purchase and lock away what's already there. Seeing what Nintendo, PlayStation and independent studios can do with far less recourses just makes MS very unappealing.

z2g37d ago

I don’t think it should be hard to be objective. It’s just being honest.

MrDead37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

That's not really what my comment's about.

ApocalypseShadow37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

How objective can he be? He's right. Most of those games Microsoft's has were 3rd party creations in production that Microsoft would have gotten anyway.

You trying to hide that fact is the actual bullshit we should worry about. Just because he said something nice about PlayStation doesn't change anything about what we already knew.

StormSnooper37d ago

I don’t think you guys understood z2g.

On topic: yeah, it would have been so bland without PlayStation’s amazing hits.

Babadook737d ago (Edited 37d ago )

@StormSnooper

“ I don’t think it should be hard to be objective. ”

Was a response to.

“ Must be hard if your passion is gaming and the company you work for only wants to purchase and lock away what's already there.”

Which was a response to

“ Former Xbox Executive Applauds PlayStation First Party Games As “Bangers””

(Among many comments by Ybarra)

Is that a correct understanding?

Cacabunga37d ago

I couldn’t agree more with him, but i hope Sony reveal some games in the near future

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 37d ago
GamerRN37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Actually, they purchased studios, but promised not to lock away any existing franchises. Only future, new IP.

In case you weren't sure... This is the same thing Sony has done for years and it's what got them where they are ...

Microsoft is just catching up with big studios Sony can't afford.

MrDead37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I'll make it easy for you, show me anyone in the industry spending over $80 billion on two publishers and I'll except your point... if not then this "This is the same thing Sony has done for years and it's what got them where they are" is pure BS.

GamerRN37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Ohhhh... My bad, so what upsets you is that they paid more than Sony can afford?

You DO realize most of Sony's 1st party studios started off as 3rd party studios, right? They purchased them a long time ago, and now you seem to forget that they grew in the same way Microsoft is today, just Microsoft has a much, much larger bank account....

It's not pure BS, it's a fact.

Naughty Dog was founded in 1984, acquired in 2001 by Sony. That's probably their main one, should I go on? It doesn't take much to Google and see for yourself. I think you need to brush up on your video game history young man...

MrDead37d ago

$80 billion on two multiplatform publishers filled with studios, MS is responsible for the biggest consolidation in the history of the industry and that's all you have as a response!?!... child go home, it's past your bed time.

GamerRN37d ago

So again, what upsets you is they bought more than Sony can afford? Sony, over the years, has purchased almost all of their studios. Microsoft just did it quicker and all at once.

I guess you really don't know your video game history...

Yes, Microsoft has made the largest single purchase in video game history. And Sony immediately bought Bungie to keep up. The below might not be the same, but Sony bought studios before Microsoft even got their feet wet in the gaming industry...

Abear2137d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Difference is Sony has helped build those studios and put them all under one umbrella that gets their support.

M$ clearly does not support their acquisitions or want them to grow like Sony does with theirs. Studios have been built up under Sony’s guidance, whereas M$ bought already established third party in the industry and is leaving them hanging, blowing in the breeze, as evidenced by Redfall—that Nintendo seal of quality or Sony oversight is clearly lacking when even their biggest game, Halo, wasn’t supported the way it should have been and just pushed out the door for money.
M$ doesn’t want to sell you high quality entertainment and enjoyment, the want you to buy into their ecosystem where you rent for perpetuity.

Do you see the difference now?

GamerRN37d ago

So you think Sony doesn't want you to buy into their ecosystem? You think they bought these studios and made first party exclusives diy any reason other than to get you to buy into their ecosystem? I hate to tell you, but it's the same thing. Sony has better PR right now due to fanboy mentality.

Also, Sony didn't communicate these studios, they grew. Come back in 10 years, since it took Sony 15 years for most of the studios to develop, and let's see where Microsoft is...

Honestly, the double standard is huge with fanboys.

Chevalier36d ago

"Also, Sony didn't communicate these studios, they grew. Come back in 10 years, since it took Sony 15 years for most of the studios to develop, and let's see where Microsoft is..."

Didn't you just mention double standards?! Why does Xbox get a pass for not developing the studios they own over the last 15 years then? Playstation studios and even Nintendo studios have developed light years ahead of Xbox studios and it didn't take them making $80 Billion in purchases.

Xbox studios have overall been pretty terrible in terms of quality over the same span.

Playstation and Nintendo developed or further developed new/old IP like Uncharted, Ghost of Tsushima, Horizon Zero Dawn, TLOU, Xenoblade Chronicles, Fire Emblem, Zelda, Smash, Pokemon. Whereas Xbox in that same time has what Recore? Sea of Thieves? And AA IPs?

GamerRN36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

I'm not casting a double standard, I'm asking you to give Microsoft the same time that it took Sony to develop anything worthwhile...

Also let's not forget they've closed studios and dumped staff also...

As far as developing new IP, Guerilla Games was purchased in 2005 by Sony. Horizon Zero Dawn was release 2017.

My point? Why don't you give Microsoft 12 years with these studios before you judge them? They aren't going to just shit out banger after banger... Even Bethesda dropped a few average games, but they still produced some solid games as well with Microsoft.

You are being very one sided.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 36d ago
GamerRN37d ago

Since you don't know your video game history, here's a site that shows you all of their studios, and when they bought them. Please note the major ones, like Naughty Dog, Guerilla Games, all started off as 3rd party studios.

https://gameworldobserver.c...

Abear2136d ago (Edited 36d ago )

I get that and actually agree with you. Still, buying COD and Bethesda and Id is a little different than Guerilla or ND 15 years ago.

Plus, you are still Missing my point that Sony supports theirs while M$ does not.

Also, I lived through all of gaming history, I’m old! Bought Xbox in the past and probably will again, so yeah, that’s part of the reason I’m not supporting them now. They seem to not care about the day one product.

GamerRN36d ago

So your problem is that they bought studios that already proved their value? Well, that's why they paid so much instead of gambling like Sony did for years. Sony took a lot of chances because the competition was slim. Microsoft doesn't have the luxury of time, because fanboys are criticizing everything they do. Because of that, they have to spend larger amounts of money on studios that already have a proven value and IP because they don't have 20 years to let it grow, they have to catch up now!

MrDead36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

@ Abear21

A complete lack of understanding is used as their defence, one company grows industry while the other spends more than any other in the industry's history to consolidate a mammoth part of it.

It's like saying a brick is the same as a house.

Edit: actually just ignore him, looking down the comments it just seems like they are having one of those days.

GamerRN36d ago

So when Sony buys companies, and 15 years later they produce good games, they are growing the industry. When Microsoft buys companies, they need to produce a hit immediately, and already they are just consolidating the industry and killing gaming and locking up exclusives...

Well, that seems like the most double standard thing said on this thread...

neomahi36d ago

Naughty Dogs about to fall. Neil Druckmanns ego has gotten the better of him and it's put a choke collar on the dog. Naughty Dog, also, hasn't been able to stay out of the woke/political game going after a small audience that's stirring up the bigger audience they should have more interest in, and Druckmann knows better. His upbringing has taught him doing the right thing brings success and going against what you know is right leaves one to themself.

It's great Druckmanns had success with The Last of Us, but it's all about him at this point. Naughty Dog have had a set pattern, there's a formula as well to keep things fresh and that vision is dying, plus, Druckmann doesn't have an opposing opinion to balance him like Wells and Balestra or Gavin and Ruben had. Naughty Dog have been focusing on remakes and remasters and that's not what Naughty Dog does. They were the pride of PlayStation at one time but, Druckmann has a choke collar on his teams. Also, keep in mind TEAMS. Naughty Dog ought to have two games ready to go, one to announce and other waiting to support that one.

I don't think they're doing as well as you're giving them credit for

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 36d ago
LG_Fox_Brazil38d ago

I have yet to play Rise of the Ronin, but other that that, yeah, the PS5 is killing in this first quarter of 2024, I still can't get enough of Helldivers 2 and FFVII is probably a very strong contender to be GotY

Crows9037d ago

I've hear tremendous things regarding ff7 but yeah....helldivers 2 is keeping me really busy. Spreading democracy is hard work!

GamerRN36d ago

It is a surprisingly fun game.... I hope it holds my attention now than 6 months, I fear it might get repetitive faster than bigger games do...

Abear2136d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Oh I get it you’re a troll. Being paid by M$ or not getting laid, or both.

M$ puts their games on Gamepass day one to sway you to not buy the game but rent the service, Sony doesn’t do this. It’s safe to buy their games day one.

Microsoft’s problem isn’t the “fanboys” it’s the fact that blind loyalists such as yourself don’t realize the “fanboys” are responding to how M$ has moved.

Wake me up when they release something noteworthy from one of the giant can’t miss game companies they bought up.

Can’t wait to play another Doom or Elder Scrolls. Those will be the only games worth playing and I’m sure they won’t be as good as their past games because, as I’ve stated but you seem to ignore, they will get no support and probable be forced to release the game even if it’s not complete.

Crows9036d ago

@abear21

I assume you're talking about gamer RN

...

GamerRN36d ago

I'm a troll because I like Helldivers 2 and I'm worried if it's going to still be fun in 6 months?

Sony has multiple banger exclusives, which is why I have a PS5. God of War is still my favorite, although Uncharted is my favorite franchise. I still didn't finish TLOU or TLOU2, but I enjoyed what I played of the remake of the first one.

I still like GT over Forza, but I sometimes think it's a color palette thing. That being said, old GT is better than new GT.

This is how I know people are fanboys though... God forbid you say anything about Sony that isn't praise, and they come after you. Just buy both damn consoles and stop being such a troll yourself...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 36d ago
phoenixwing37d ago

I'm loving rise of ronin alot more than i was expecting. the reviews didn't cover half the stuff the game does well.

Elda37d ago

I played Rise Of The Ronin this entire weekend, such a good game.

phoenixwing37d ago

@elda
I just got it yesterday and played at night and morning. I have off till Wed. To play it

Demetrius37d ago

I rarely compare games, folks got on my mf nerves with comparing it to tsushima, they're not even tryna be like that game, I'm definitely gone cope rise of ronin soon it looks fun af

shinoff218337d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I'm loving rebirth even remake. I'm also one of the ones that hate modern ff games. Ff7 trilogy is actually really dope.

I've got no interest in helldivers. I just don't play online games. Sounds good for those that do.

Bathyj37d ago

Not trying to convince you at all but I never played an online game either.

180 hours later

anast37d ago

Rise of the Ronin will approach cult classic territory.

Ironmike37d ago

I agree first few hrs are bit slow but when it gets going it's brilliant

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 36d ago
XiNatsuDragnel37d ago

Even xbox exceutives former or not knew playstation kept releasing bangers.

Tacoboto37d ago

Even Phil, when he's posted about playing PS titles.

It's undeniable that PS Studios lead the industry in consistency, even with the recent GaaS blunders except Helldivers 2

thesoftware73037d ago (Edited 37d ago )

While I do agree that Sony puts out bangers, the consistency part imo goes to Nintendo, they rarely, if ever put out bad games. The only thing that may make a Nintendo game seem weak is, another Nintendo game lol. Like Galaxy being better than Sunshine, Metroid prime being better than prime 3, ect.

Even their smaller projects are tons of fun.

Tacoboto37d ago

I've gotta agree. Luigi's Mansion and Metroid Prime are some of my favorite games of that generation, but Sony takes the crown for the narrative, deeper experiences that Nintendo doesn't try to venture into

Profchaos37d ago

No one is denying it Microsoft stated for years they would internally review PlayStation exclusive games and it's been shown that they would detail how incredible games like tlou are internally along with public tweets congratulating both Sony and Nintendo on their big launches like tears of the kingdom.

Abnor_Mal37d ago

Some people are not going to like this story, while others will do their best to avoid commenting.

notachance37d ago

lol take a guess of who’s disagreeing with you

Chevalier37d ago

I'm observing this conversation to see who you might be talking about. Intently watching.

lodossrage37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Well that's true Abnor

But look at it this way, this isn't the first time we heard what a former Xbox exec really thinks of Playstation. Remember when Peter Moore spoke about how obsessed Xbox execs were with Sony? He even OPENLY admitted that his company intentionally pushed the "console war" narrative to help sales

And before someone says I'm lying about that, here is Peter Moore's interview

https://metro.co.uk/2022/07...

italiangamer37d ago

Sony lives rent free in their head since December 3rd, 1994.

S2Killinit37d ago

They really do deliver the goods and consistently. You gotta love PlayStation even of you hate PlayStation.

Show all comments (66)