230°

Ryse: Son of Rome: The Kotaku Review

Seven years in the making by a collection of studios under the Crytek umbrella, Ryse is the adventure of one Marius Titus, a Roman soldier who has both the will to defend his people and the skill to chop off his enemies' arms.

zeal0us3839d ago (Edited 3839d ago )

This wouldn't be the first Kotaku review I disagreed with.

komp3839d ago

Memory recall folks...

Kotaku said "Not yet" to buying an XBONE and then says RYSE is a buy "YES"?

So how does that work Kotaku????

FamilyGuy3839d ago (Edited 3839d ago )

Basically saying to buy Ryse once the system gets better.

Or

They secretly reeeeally liked the "superfluous boob physics" even though they mentioned it as a negative.

Ausbo3839d ago

its called different people reviewing the game/system

SniperControl3839d ago

Well ,we know where Kotaku's allegiances lie dont we?

So far i have seen a 2/5, 5.5, 6, highest so far is 7.

Disappointing to say the least.

B-radical3839d ago

Cause one reviewer kinda liked the game? Haha opinions may vary. Majority will be bad

Omran3839d ago

the average is 60 on metacritic

wheresmymonkey3839d ago

looks like this is the abox one's knack then. So basically the decision is based on how much you like racing games. the forza reviews tend to be positive.

Zack_attack3839d ago

Idk how some people say the game is short. 8 to 10 is perfectly fine for this type of game.

TIER1xWOLFPACKx3839d ago

reviewers have been saying its about 4-5 hours not 8-10 hours

SniperControl3839d ago

One of the reviews said 5 hours, cant remember which one, seems to be a flood of Ryse reviews all of a sudden.

isa_scout3839d ago

I just read IGNs review and the reviewer said something about it being close to 6 hours long, but by about hallfway through the game you'll have seen pretty much everything there is to see. It's def a Crytek game, all flash and no pinash. How Crytek is so respected is beyond me, they haven't made a good game in almost a decade.
Shouldn't be an issue though XOne users still have Forza 5 and Dead Rising 3 to look forward to, and both look like awesome games. Don't know why everyone expected these launch games to be so much better than last gens launch games though. The good games always come about 3-4 months after a system launches, it's just a matter of waiting.
I picked up my PS4 last week, and am having a blast. Hope all you XOne users have a good time tonight at your midnight release, and just be safe, and enjoy it. This kind of thing only happens about once or twice every decade so savor the moment. Oh and think of me when your playing DR3, that game is def a game I would love to get my hands on.

komp3839d ago

Embargo release I would guess.

KillrateOmega3839d ago (Edited 3839d ago )

I guess that embargo has been released. It would explain this sudden influx of Ryse reviews.

Anyways, the majority of reviewers are giving it poor scores, ranging from 3-6/10 with the best score having been a 7/10. All citing that the game is visually stunning, but the gameplay is lacking and it has a tendency to get boring early on.

Not to sound like a fanboy, but I kind of saw this coming.

Show all comments (19)
110°

15 Best Ancient Rome Games of All Time

From underrated Xbox One launch titles to absolute emperors of the strategy genre, history heads will love these games based around Ancient Rome.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Leeroyw400d ago (Edited 400d ago )

There's fifteen ancient Rome games?

LG_Fox_Brazil399d ago

Shadow of Rome was so freaking good

Sashamaz399d ago

I'm still waiting for the sequel.

HyperMoused399d ago

Ryse was awesome, i have no idea why it wasnt recieved well and why we havnt seen another, Rome conquered so much, you could take the action anywhere, and it looked great when xbox one came out, now would be even better.

200°

Ryse: Son of Rome Deserves a Second Shot

Ryse: Son of Rome was an Xbox One launch title that has been left to collect dust, but Crytek should set aside Crysis and give Ryse another shot.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
AngainorG7X654d ago

It was a great game, it had issues but it can only go up from here.

crazyCoconuts654d ago

It was just ok. Looked really good for an Xbox game though

Snookies12654d ago

"for an Xbox game"

Way to subtly throw shade there. It looked amazing compared to any game at the time it was released.

Never played it myself though, wasn't really interested in it personally. Plus it came at a time when I didn't own an Xbox console. But it was at least different than the usual copy/paste games we get. So I hope it gets another chance sometime soon.

Crows90654d ago

It was a crytek game though

1nsomniac654d ago (Edited 654d ago )

It was a stunning game on all basis. One of the standout games for Xbox as a whole. I ended up buying on pc as well… and yes nothing looked better than it in PC at the time either. Nothing just ok about it, definitely needs a sequel.

fr0sty654d ago

@snookies12, don't pretend like the Xbox One didn't struggle with being gimpled by its tiny pool of ESRAM as a frame buffer. It was significantly weaker than the PS4.

crazyCoconuts654d ago

Metacritic 60, user score 6.4. I'm not alone in putting it into the "ok" category...

VenomCarnage89653d ago

@snookies
Haven't played it but at least you know enough to defend Xbox over it. The game did look good, for an Xbox game. That's not some "subtle shade," it's full on reality.
I remember it being nearly the only graphically decent game on the Xbone for like the first two years after launch, and graphics were that games strength

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 653d ago
CrimsonWing69654d ago

I really enjoyed it. Bought it at launch even.

ManMarmalade654d ago (Edited 654d ago )

The qte's were disappointing though. God of war was doing it back in the ps2 days. As gorgeous as the game was, the gameplay needed to be updated.

annoyedgamer654d ago

I really liked the original Ryse but Crytek doesn't have the funds. The mismanaged their properties and let EA raid them with Crysis for the duration of their relationship. Right now they are working on Crysis 4, I doubt they can spare resources to work on a Ryse sequel.

gamer7804654d ago

It would have to be funded by MS, I really liked Ryse sure it got repetitive but the setting visuals and story were good

moriarty1889654d ago

MS should have funded a sequel to Ryse and Sunset OD. Two good franchises they definitely needed last gen.

annoyedgamer654d ago

MS is too busy trying to become the next EA, Ryse wont be on their list of titles to finance unless it gets a hipster makeover with lootboxes.

darthv72654d ago (Edited 654d ago )

I recently bought it for the steamdeck and have to say... 60fps is a game changer. I really wished MS had gotten a one x patch or series boost mode option but sadly, nope. Other games that definitely deserve a second chance (esp on steamdeck/pc) are quantum break and sunset overdrive. Both deserved 60fps support on one x / series but you have to go to PC for that.

Rumor has it Crytek had plans for a Ryse 2 but due to the low turnout for XB (at the time) it was shelved. They really should give this another shot. i dont care if its multiplat on PS and XB and PC and Switch... just so long as part 2 gets made.

babadivad654d ago

The game is automatically boosted on Series X

darthv72654d ago

sorry... but it's not. It still runs at the same fps the XBO did.

lelo2play654d ago

Game was good enough, not great.
Graphically it was top notch. Still holds well till this day.

Crows90654d ago

It only needed more enemy variety and few more movesets or weapons to use. That would have made the experience tons better.

MadLad654d ago

It was a good game.
Only time I saw quick time events actually make me feel engaged.

Show all comments (39)
50°

Here are the new Xbox Game Pass Quests for August 2022

Xbox Game Pass Quests recently reset for the month of August. So if you try to collect as many Microsoft Rewards points as possible, there's a new set available now.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
anast660d ago (Edited 660d ago )

This is not what I would call value for money spent. They give you quests in liveservice games to get you "re-engaged" with the monetization schemes or to get you hooked or so you at least spend some extra on skins and loot boxes. Then they dole out paltry points after you have already paid extra for whichever liveservice within a liveservice that you are already paying for. My worry is people can't actually be that stupid to fall for this, can they?

littletad660d ago

Absolutely nothing in this comment makes sense. At all.

anast659d ago (Edited 659d ago )

How does it not make sense? O thy god of reason, shine some evidence upon us. Ryse of Rome, ESO,and AC: Origins are all live service games, between them you can get 275 points. Liveservice games are made to keep people spending. Therefore, Gamepass is a live service and the points are for playing live service games.

It is not my problem that this does not make sense to you, it is absolutely your problem. I mean it is all your problem.

Julion0715659d ago (Edited 659d ago )

Hate Xbox but comments in every Xbox article 😂 without making sense smh

anast659d ago

Bring the evidence and then your emoji might make sense.