Approvals 17/3 ▼
JamieReleases (10) - 3996d ago Cancel
aceitman (1) - 3996d ago Cancel
Relientk77 (3) - 3996d ago Cancel
darklordzor (2) - 3996d ago Cancel
Hellforged_Savant (1) - 3996d ago Cancel
550°

Does Battlefield 4 Look Better Than Call of Duty: Ghosts?

GamingBolt: ''DICE revealed Battlefield 4 at GDC 2013, debuting its new Frostbite 3 engine in the process, and Infinity Ward recently showed off the fruits of their labour with a “new” engine for the upcoming Call of Duty: Ghosts. The question was bound to come up sooner or later though: Which game looks better out of the two?

A YouTube user VidxHD took it upon himself to find out, and created a side-by-side comparison video of the two games, with Battlefield 4 on the left and Call of Duty: Ghosts on the right. Specific moments have been edited in such a way to showcase aspects of both games that can be compared, such as the facial animation and destruction. Check it out below.''

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Add/remove tag
Remove Wii U
Pandamobile3996d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3996d ago
Reverent3996d ago (Edited 3996d ago )

Your disagrees are delusional. Face it people, Battlefield 4 does in fact look better than CoD: Ghosts. That is not an opinion. It is actually graphically superior. If CoD fanboys want to try to argue about which is more fun/entertaining, then by all means... But people need not fool themselves here.

Hydrolex3996d ago (Edited 3996d ago )

I'd say they both look good ! but

BF4 looks more realistic for some reason

Gaming1013996d ago

The thing is, that CoD footage is all cut scenes, there's no actual gameplay. Whether it's being done with the in game engine or not remains to be seen, but that's probably the best the game is ever going to look. In game will be smooth, but it won't be as graphics intense as Battlefield 4.

Gamers won't care either way, they'll look for what is familiar and safe as they always do, and buy the next CoD like they always do. EA is just hoping its used game online pass BS being thrown out will help sales as they're going to need it with the high costs of next gen development. Those graphics aren't going to come cheap!

Campy da Camper3996d ago

Also, the bf footage was gameplay the cod was CGI. Jesus.

MRMagoo1233996d ago

LOL anyone saying that COD looks better is just blind wow

PeaSFor3996d ago

its a no contest, even bf3 on pc look better than cod:ghost

Kevin ButIer3996d ago

You kidding? dog hd next next gen graphs and killer fish AI make BF4 look so inferior...

Peppino73996d ago

Battlefield 3 looks better than ghosts.

mmccarthy43996d ago

bf3 looks better but I never liked the way the guns looked in bf3 hopefully look better in bf4

xxLuckyStrike3996d ago

There's a whole lotta foolin goin on round here

DARK WITNESS3996d ago

Why is this even up for debate ??

SolidStoner3996d ago (Edited 3996d ago )

BF series have better physics also, big time!

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3996d ago
Blackdeath_6633996d ago (Edited 3996d ago )

regardless of which looks better this is just too funny http://computergames.ro/wp-... pause the video at 0:15 you can see the fake lighting there as well never laughed so hard before when i saw that pic.

cell9893995d ago

lazy development 101 COD style

irepbtown3995d ago

Haha, screw Logic... this is COD land.

Great find btw, never laughed to so much before.

Shaaunyb3995d ago

This has been out and about since the trailer got released, can't believe none of you saw it before.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3995d ago
GraveLord3996d ago

Graphically? Yes.

From a gameplay perspective COD will still be the #1 choice for most.

Pandamobile3996d ago (Edited 3996d ago )

Which is something I still don't understand. I played the BLOPS2 free weekend last week, and could barely manage to play for an hour. The movement is so awkward and sluggish compared to what I'm used to in Battlefield 3. BF3's gameplay at its most basic level (movement and shooting) is just so much more fluid and satisfying.

Salooh3996d ago (Edited 3996d ago )

You both confused between facts and opinion.

Battlefield have better graphics and gameplay but which one you prefer is your decision. It's a taste matter. It's like comparing GT to forza , GT win as a sim however which one i prefer is a taste matter. You can't argue with facts but you can say i like call of duty art style and gameplay more then BF which is kool because that's your taste but don't deny the quality of BF gameplay.

elhebbo163996d ago (Edited 3996d ago )

@Pandamobile yea its retard, the guy looks like hes runnin really fast since hes shaking the gun side to side, when in reallity he only walked 5 feet. the animation and gunplay in bf3 destroy all the other cods.

Themba763996d ago

well if cod version of gameplay involves calling out airstrikes i want no part of it i'm pretty damn good pilot i fly my own aircraft.

pandehz3996d ago (Edited 3996d ago )

Um lol BF3 gameplay by far is the most fluid any fps can ever get till maybe BF4 comes out?

DARK WITNESS3996d ago

@ Pandamobile

The crazy thing about that is the movement speed in blops2 is not consistent.

I have no idea how they have managed to do it, but it seems to be something related to the whole lag comp/anti-lag or whatever it is they did with the network code to mess it up so bad.

I have played games using the same class setup in every game with lithtweight etc and yet some games I move really fast while others I seem to be running in quick-sand. On the flip side I have seen opponents running so fast you can barely track them, yet when they kill you and you can see what perks they are running there is no lightweight, nothing...

Blops2 and cod in general has become one of the most inconsistent MP games I have ever played. People who don't play a lot of it would not really pick up on these issues as much. For some people they don't have any of these issues at all. It's all down to your connection (that is not to say you have a bad connection) or rather what they have done with the netcode in relation to your connection.

Anyway back on point. BF3 > ghost. BF4 no contest.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3996d ago
windblowsagain3996d ago

4 people need to goto specsavers.

merciless3996d ago

And by like a bazillion miles. It's almost as if Battlefield 4 is running on a new engine developed to harness next gen tech while cod is running on the same engine they've been using for over 10 years, merely tweaked to run on next gen tech...

Wait... a.... minute........

:(

die_fiend3996d ago

Does BF4 look better than a game using an updated engine from 1999? (Yes, really)

Dannycr3996d ago

Battlefield 4 gameplay looks way better than COD: Ghosts CGI cutscenes. That's actually really funny and pathetic at the same time. I do like COD, i have fun with it, but I've felt really cheated with this last game. Doesn't feel next gen (unlike BF4).

HammadTheBeast3996d ago

Keep in mind it is running on a high end PC, but its safe to say even BF3 on medium looks better than Ghosts.

Dannycr3996d ago (Edited 3996d ago )

Agreed. The only time when Ghost felt somewhat next-gen, was when they zoomed in on the models, but during the reveal trailer, it looked just slightly better than MW3, whilst BF4 looked gorgeous from start to finish with A TON of stuff happening. I know it was PC, but that should be the standard to be judged. I know the PS4 and Xbox One will be capable of running BF4 close to what was shown. BF3 is miles away better looking on PC, but BF3 is still gorgeous to look at in consoles.

YourSavior3996d ago

Short and sweet... I like that.

SegataSanshiro3996d ago

Are you pooping me? Why is there even an article about this? You gotta be blind not to know which one is better! Call of duty of course! (lol jk guise)

GuyThatPlaysGames3996d ago

That's like saying is a Lamborghini faster than a Honda Civic?

Legion3996d ago

No because A Honda Civic can actually beat a Lamborghini in the right kind of street race.

ExCest3996d ago

Well, the two cars would have to be stock because a modded Civic can probably beat a stock Lamborghini (probably depending on which Lamborghini).

DanyBrown3996d ago

did you know lamborghini make tractors? im sure a honda civic can beat one of those

B-radical3996d ago

Battlefield 3 looks better then ghost bit ill admit cod does look a whole lot better now

showtimefolks3996d ago

Lol is this a real question lol

BF4 eats COD for breakfast and than has tea with halo only to have dinner with KZ

Legion3996d ago

Doesn't matter if they even both look the same. Battlefield games play better then CoD games... so that is enough for me.

S2Killinit3996d ago

yeah battlefield looks better in my opinion as well. The engine of COD is just too old now.

llMurcielagoll3995d ago

I wanted to say the same exact thing but you beat me to it!

Still never gets old,

Yes.

DrJones3995d ago

@BadboyCivic

I was expecting a "yes" comment and you delivered!

PhantomT14123995d ago

Ghost looks like a current gen Call of Duty maxed out on PC, which is not ugly by any means but still is VERY underwhelming for next-gen graphics.

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 3995d ago
Irishguy953996d ago (Edited 3996d ago )

Battlefield 3 does(PC). Bad company 2 on PC does

elhebbo163996d ago

Hell even BF3 on console shits on the ghost cgi trailer.

YoungPlex3996d ago

This is all wrong! It doesn't matter if it looks better or not, the question should ALWAYS be does it play better! But hey, if all people care about is graphics then enjoy; I for one could care less about graphics so long as the gameplay is topnotch. Don't get me wrong graphics are nice but I feel that gameplay has always been the core of what makes gaming great. I would rather a developer focus on more realistic physics instead of graphics because gameplay usually benefits from realistic physics. We're at a point where graphics already look superb so why not focus more on physics and gameplay first and graphics second...?

KrystofKage3996d ago

Graphics is just one argument being made here. But if you wish to discuss what has better physics and gameplay, it's not even a competition. It's not just the destructible environment, but the little things that make BF superior(such as going into a building, and having gunshots sound hollow).

Call of Duty is just a new paint job every year, it hasn't done anything amazing in regards to gameplay since COD4.

allgamespc20123996d ago

so what you are asyaing is that you are a COD fanboy right? your opinion doesnt matter if thats the case.

YoungPlex3996d ago (Edited 3996d ago )

Please you got it all wrong! If anything I have always preferred Battlefield genius! I'm just sick of graphics being the high note when gameplay is ALWAYS better! Since you have clearly showed that your some type of fanboy your opinion becomes invalid to me!

I've always chose BF because of the realistic physics it's delivered nobody's arguing this. I think that most people that read my comment felt like I was defending COD in some way when I was just saying that, you now what? Never mind... This site has gone to Sh*t!

Blakhaze9993996d ago

Im sure people care more about the gameplay. But since none of us played either game yet it dont hurt to compare visual quality based on what we see. I always thought Bf looked better but preferred COD gameplay. 60fps and the smooth controls makes a big difference in my opinion.

cell9893995d ago

yeah but Battlefield gameplay is way better than COD, until now I cant think of one single advantage COD has over BF3 besides zombies. Ive had Bf3 since it first came out and I still play it constantly till this very day, those $60 have paid off with countless hours of awesome VARIED gameplay. So my layers of gameplay compared to the generic COD where the AI does everything for you as long as you can acquire a killstreak.....

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3995d ago
FrigidDARKNESS3996d ago

We havent seen actual in game graphics of COD Ghost.. I like the Frostbite 3 engines facial details.

Pandamobile3996d ago

"We havent seen actual in game graphics of COD Ghost"

Yes we have:

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

And it barely looks any better than previous installments.

PirateThom3996d ago

Someone pointed out a screenshot/video still earlier where it had sunlight coming from two different sources as well.

http://i41.tinypic.com/i5bs...

mmccarthy43996d ago

double sun ftw!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!

pandehz3996d ago (Edited 3996d ago )

@PirateThom

Omg hahahahahaha

DigitalRaptor3996d ago

Yep, we've seen it and it looks ridiculously current gen. Don't know why I'm expecting anything different from Activision tbh.

Jumping over cover, lean and peak and dynamic fish are all apparently next gen innovations according to these guys. It's ridiculous how stupid it all sounds.

nick3093996d ago

Ppl usually say crap about alot of games to save money. Cod has fun sp imo,i dont like mp much unless it is co op .

MajorLazer3996d ago

The singleplayer is fun. I borrowed MW2 and MW3 from a friend for the hell of it and it was quite fun.

Show all comments (126)
150°

Battlefield 1, Hardline, BF4 Servers Are Being Taken Offline by Cheaters; EA Silent on Issue

Cheaters & hackers have been causing grief on Battlefield 1, Hardline & BF4 servers, with nonstop DDoS attacks among other things. Unfortunately, EA has remained silent about it.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community774d ago
-Foxtrot775d ago

Course they are silent, they are hoping people flock to 2042

gamesftw250774d ago

Maybe it was a inside job then haha.

jeromeface774d ago

wouldnt be the first time, titanfall 1+2 anyone?

PapaBop774d ago

Not even if they paid me.. EA always do this with old games with less money potential, if this was Ultimate Team, they'd address and sort it faster than stories could spread. Why invest time in their products when they will just dump it in the following years? Then again EA never could see the forest for the trees.

Inverno774d ago

I imagine after those games were given out for free a couple months back through Amazon, anything that makes people go to 2042 is a plus for them

XiNatsuDragnel775d ago

They want people to go on 2042. My theory

excaliburps774d ago

Nah. I think they can't do anything about it or they want to sink money into fixing it.

Pudge102888774d ago (Edited 774d ago )

EA owns all BF servers so yes, they can do something about it but they refuse to because they dont want ppl playing their old games instead of the new one. Its EA we’re talking about here

pr33k33774d ago

if this happened in 2042, they'd have something to say. which is weird, considering battlefield 1 has more players on steam right now.

Pudge102888774d ago

Its so obvious that EA is doing this or hired ppl to mess up the games so that we’d be forced to have just 1 Battlefield working.

FPS_D3TH774d ago

Honestly it’s probably the devs themselves. They did an update to bf4 way back that kinda made assault rifles doo doo in hopes that people would flock to BF1 cuz BF4 was too perfect

Show all comments (15)
60°

5 Great Shooter Games on Xbox Game Pass

The shooter genre is one of the most beloved videogame genres in the gaming community, and rightfully so. From DOOM Eternal to Battlefield 4, passing through The Outer Worlds, the Xbox Game Pass has a lot to offer when it comes to amazing shooter experiences. Come check out some great shooter games available on Xbox Game Pass!

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community790d ago
MadLad789d ago

There's a bunch of great shooters on gamepass; both legacy and new.

A recommendation I have is a work in progress preview title called Anacrusis. It's a lot of fun, and has a cool aesthetic.

190°

All Call of Duty Games Ranked from Worst to Best

BLG writes: "Call of Duty has to be the most recognizable franchise on the planet. They didn’t get that way by only making a handful of games.

COD has a long and storied career. Launching as a PC WW2 first-person shooter, Call of Duty has gone through numerous makeovers and been on just about every system. The series has gone through some serious highs and tragic lows. I’ll be looking at each Call of Duty game, the good the bad, and the ugly."

Read Full Story >>
bosslevelgamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community815d ago
UnSelf815d ago

Vanguard better be at the fkn bottom. Can’t believe ppl haven’t eviscerated that game with all its lacking

Minimoth815d ago

Yeah, it's close to the bottom. There are a couple of worse ones. Infinite Warfare definitely deserves its place.

KyRo815d ago

There's a number a lot worse than Vangaurd. It's also a lot better than that car crash Treyarch released before it.

XbladeTeddy815d ago

World at War is my favourite. Didn't know the N-Gage had a Call of Duty.

MadLad815d ago

Same for me.
I was never huge into Call of Duty, but I sunk a lot of time into WaW.
Both the campaign and the multiplayer are on point. Wouldn't mind a remaster.

I quit on CoD for a long while. Though I'm the odd man out that actually really enjoyed the campaign for WWII, being I got it through Humble monthly way back when.

TheLigX815d ago

I really enjoyed the Infinite campaign. Multiplayer... not so much.

Yppupdam815d ago

I agree, The Infinite campaign feels more like it's own thing that they slapped the CoD name on. If it stood on it's own, (sans the CoD name) I think it could have been it's own scifi franchise. And a damn good looking game, to boot. I never bothered to play the multiplayer.

victorMaje815d ago

MW 2019 apart from the desastrous file sizes is way better than AW.

MadLad814d ago

That was one I grabbed for Playstation because it pretty much just came out during the Redbox purge of videogames, and I got it for dirt cheap.

It was great coming home to an update every night, and watching one game eat up almost half my console's memory.

Amplitude815d ago (Edited 815d ago )

Will get disagrees but Infinite Warfare campaign was really good. Decent story, set pieces were amazing and if it didn't have the CoD game on it I'm sure people would have been more into it. Advanced Warfare was alright too. Titanfall 2 was just 1000 times better than both but I enjoyed them for their campaigns. I literally barely gaf about the story I'm in it for the set pieces and 5 hours of being stoned watching cool nonsense happen if I'm in the mood to play a CoD campaign. If I'm looking for a deep plot I'm gonna go somewhere else.
Ghosts was the worst story-wise though lol that cliffhanger ending was so bs.

Also MW 2019 was sick and is one of the best CoD games in yeeeears not sure why it's so low on this dude's list. Campaign was great, multiplayer was great and Warzone was fun for a while. Over it now but shrugs.

Beat the Vanguard campaign too but I can't even remember a single thing about it other than that it felt like it was 45 minutes long. Might be the most forgettable thing I've ever played lol just fully erased from my brain

Show all comments (17)