Approvals 7/3 ▼
Da Ill One (1) - 4280d ago Cancel
PaPa-Slam (4) - 4279d ago Cancel
amandadyar (2) - 4279d ago Cancel
230°

Microsoft XBox Next delay rumors abound

"SemiAccurate has been hearing about problems at Microsoft with their next console part since we exclusively reported the tapeout. The short story is that officially the PoR was December 2012 for production wafers in (Note: This is a specific term with a very specific meaning, if you don’t understand what it implies, SemiAccurate does do technical consulting) has not changed. The rumors however are growing much more persistent and frequent, so we spent the last month digging in to the details." - SemiAccurate

Read Full Story >>
semiaccurate.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4279d ago
Godmars2904280d ago

If there are production issues, hopefully MS will address them before releasing their system. Though if there's another "RROD" incident they could probably damage control their way out of it.

Blankman854280d ago

By damage control you're referring to paying 1 billion dollars to extend the 360 warranty to 3 years and paying back the money of those who had already fixed theirs out of pocket?

nukeitall4279d ago

I know, unlike another company that got sued for a disc drive problem, dragged it out until the generation essentially ended then offered:

"Now a settlement has been reached which would give consumers who have recently bought, repaired or lost a PS2 with one of the specified model numbers a cheque for USD 25, a free PS2 game from a defined list, or a free or cut-price repair or replacement of their console - at SCEA's discretion."

http://www.gamesindustry.bi...

That is if you still had the receipt after all those years. The kicker is that Sony *may* only offer you a "cut-price" repair!

They didn't acknowledge the problem, didn't take care of their customers when it mattered and barely took care of them afterwards.

In comparison, MS offered 3-year warranty on all consoles, refund on all repair charges already paid and paid for return shipping and shipping materials. They also gave you a free month of XBL Gold for your troubles.

gatormatt804279d ago

Nukeitall, I had one those faulty disc drives in my PS2. I bought it in Feb. 2001 just a few months after they launched. My system quit playing the dvd games but would still play games on cd. This happened after owning the system just over a year. I emailed Sony and explained my situation. In the end they said, mail it in to us and we'll fix your PS2 at no cost to you.

I agree they may not have publicly acknowledged the issue, but as far as taking care of customers I personally cant complain.

MrBeatdown4278d ago

@nukeitall

I love how you always have that PS2 settlement article ready to go any time anyone mentions RROD. Always gotta be ready for damage control, right?

Yeah, let's all praise Microsoft for having the least terrible response to their massive hardware and PR disaster.

Bravo, Microsoft! It only took a year and a half before you decided to give people who went through the official repair route their money back. The whole thing shouldn't have happened to begin with, but let's give MS props for supposedly being the best of the absolute worst.

@gator

I had a similar experience. I got my PS2 for Christmas in 2001. It was bought before then which took some time out of the warranty. It was out of warranty by the time I had an issue a few months later, but Sony replaced it for free. The replacement had a memory card slot that wouldn't completely close, so after sending that one back, Sony then sent me a brand new console with a new controller and everything.

Ben_Grimm4278d ago (Edited 4278d ago )

@ Mr. Beatdown

"I love how you always have that PS2 settlement article ready to go any time anyone mentions RROD. Always gotta be ready for damage control, right?"

Well Beatdown its for those people who always have to bring up RROD in MS related articles. But lets ignore that and go straight after Nuke.

Oner4278d ago (Edited 4278d ago )

@ Ben_Grimm ~ This article is about hardware issues and Microsoft...so to discuss MS problems is a topical reference in this specific instance since it's not just any old "MS related article". Sorry but it's quite clear Nuke is in damage control mode.

MrBeatdown4278d ago (Edited 4278d ago )

@Ben_Grimm

Then how about he keeps the "but, but, but... SONY DID IT TOO!" to places where it's actually appropriate, and direct it at people who are using RROD to troll in those other articles instead of bringing it up, TWICE, completely unnecessarily, in an article where discussing RROD is completely appropriate?

That would probably make too much sense.

RROD is relevant here. Sony isn't. "But let's ignore that."

4278d ago
vega2754278d ago

i brought the ps2 when it first launched it broke down twice due to dre and had to come out of pocket 2 times and never received my money back or a free game from sony.

Ben_Grimm4278d ago (Edited 4278d ago )

@ Mr. Beatdown

RROD is relevant here? Why is that Beatdown, just because its an MS article? Did you even read the article? Nowhere is it stated that RROD is a rumor of the delay. Nowhere in the article does it even mention RROD or the original cause of it.

In fact RROD isn't even an issue anymore with the 360 as of late. So how is it relevant? And where is it appropriate to bring up the "BU BU BU BUT SONY DID IT TOO" if not for the poster who he's replying too and his subject matter.

But then again you did ignore him.

MrBeatdown4278d ago (Edited 4278d ago )

@DK and Ben

You guys really can't put two and two together can you?

It doesn't matter what caused the RROD issue. The problem was that it was released before MS could guarantee that it was up to generally accepted quality standards. Nobody wants that happening again.

Maybe I'm misinterpreting the article, but what I'm reading is an article about producing a component that as of right now, is giving MS trouble. Problems with components, whatever those components may be, lead to problems with the hardware if not dealt with properly.

Now, if I'm wrong on that, and Godmars is too, maybe you guys have some greater understanding of chip manufacturing than the rest of us simpletons. If that's the case, maybe you DK, maybe you Ben, and maybe nukeitall should be correcting Godmars and explaining to him why the issue described in the article has no bearing whatsoever on the quality of the final product, instead of playing cheerleader for the guy that wants to troll the one that you all claim is a troll just for mentioning RROD, which, hypocritically, drags the comments here far more off topic than Godmars' comment ever did.

But I suppose that wouldn't provide for an opportunity to drag Sony down, and prop up MS for their ever-so-wonderful response to a hardware fiasco that never should have happened in the first place. It speaks volumes that Godmars' and my comments are the only ones you two take issue with, and nukeitall's gets a complete pass. I guess it's okay to go into full-blown troll mode as long as there is a comment that might, sorta, kinda look like "borderline trolling".

4278d ago
ash_divine4278d ago (Edited 4278d ago )

@DK286K

Why are you so afraid of someone talking about RROD?

Do you think that if you don't acknowledge long enough it'll suddenly stop existing?

Besides, no has really even used RROD as an insult (or whatever) here. You're kind of over-reacting.

P.S. The article is about hardware issues at Microsoft. No matter how you spin it, RROD is completely relevant.

MrBeatdown4278d ago (Edited 4278d ago )

***"That's a pretty convenient position to take. That way, you can bring RROD into ANY MS hardware discussion, regardless of how irrelevant it is to the actual topic of discussion."***

You really will cling to just about anything won't you? I didn't bring up RROD in "ANY MS hardware discussion" but that won't stop you from spinning what I'm saying to make it sound like I'm setting the stage for some long term trolling. You just need to resort to that kind of BS because you don't have anything better to respond with. You have to imply some shady, ulterior motive that you pulled out of your ass, because you can't find any better way to spin what I'm saying.

Fact... this is an article about production issues relating to chip performance. In a broader sense, it's dealing with MS's response to quality issues. RROD specifically isn't what's relevant... it's MS's handling of quality issues that's relevant, and RROD is a prime example of that. But for some reason, you need everything spelled out for you because you can't (or refuse to) put two and two together.

***"This article deals with chip performance. RROD had nothing to do with chip performance"***

It doesn't matter if RROD isn't related to chip performance. What matters is MS's quality assurance. They shipped a product with a horrible design flaw. And it's not like the 360 was infallible in every other regard either. Chalk it up to MS knowingly doing it, or being oblivious to it. It doesn't really matter. What matters is that in the end MS failed to properly handle an issue during console development and production with their last console. It's perfectly reasonable to question it again, especially when you have an article pointing to an issue like this which suggests quality concerns in a core component of the hardware.

I guarantee you the rest of the gaming world isn't as naive as you. The rest of us aren't going to wait and see how well MS handles the chip placement in their next console. They're going to wait to see if the damn thing holds up, regardless of underlying issues.

***"you & Godmars are searching desperately for any reason to bring MS down. You have no high ground here."***

More spin. I point something out... something fairly obvious... RROD was bad, even with MS's eventual resolution for it, and you have to treat it like I'm trying to "bring MS down". God forbid someone do anything but lavish praise on Microsoft for their handling of their colossal hardware ****-up in the presence of DK, even if it is directly related to the comment being replied to.

Like I said, it speaks volumes about you that you're here, taking issue with just me and Godmars.

nukeitall mentions Sony's response to disc read error... you give it a complete pass.

Godmars mentions RROD... you call it "borderline trolling" and attack me for my relevant responses.

It's fine and dandy when nukeitall drags Sony into this purely to troll, but you make it sound like I'm the one with an agenda. We all know why.

You're a hypocrite, plain and simple. You take issue with the mere mention of RROD, but you're perfectly okay with a guy that brings up Sony's response to a hardware issue in an article that you claim has nothing to do with hardware reliability.

You can tell yourself whatever you want about how I have "no high ground", but at least I don't have to apply double standards like you are... ignoring obvious off-topic trolling, and saying others who are "borderline trolling" are "searching desperately for any reason to bring MS down."

Lvl_up_gamer4278d ago (Edited 4278d ago )

@ ash_divine

"Do you think that if you don't acknowledge long enough it'll suddenly stop existing?"

The PS1 and PS2 both had SERIOUS hardware issues where Consumers had to sue Sony http://www.consumeraffairs.... yet nobody on this site seems to remember or acknowledge them. They existed yet on this site you would think thet it never happened and Sony has never released a gaming console with a high percentage of failure rates.

I agree that RROD was an issue on the 360, but that is a pretty broad comment. What caused the RROD was just placement of the parts and not the actual parts themselves. BUT, at the end of the day when you go to turn on your 360 and it doesn't turn on....nobody is saying "golly! I can't believe the parts are put too close where they can over heat causing my 360 to RROD"....If the 360 doesn't turn on, then you say it's the 360 that is broken.

Whatever the reason is the 360 wasn't turning on, we as consumers don't care as to why it not turning on, we just know the 360 was RRODing.

All manufacturers have had their mis-steps. People still bought a PS3 after bad experiences with the PS1 and PS2. People are still going to buy an Xbox 720 even with RROD on their 360.

Gildarts4275d ago

I still have my Xbox 360 elite from launch.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 4275d ago
BDSE4279d ago

As it is I'll wait 18 months before getting the new XBOX so that any issues with hardware become apparent. I really can't be bothered to continually send back units for replacement.

nukeitall4279d ago

If there is one thing a company is really good at, it is to react to something they got hurt really badly from.

I doubt MS will ever have another RROD incident, just because it is within their control and it freaken cost them a billion dollar, a lot of bad publicity and lost many customers.

If it did happen again, I would trust MS to handle it more gracefully than other companies that dismiss it, settle the lawsuit later, doesn't acknowledges it and gives you a swift kick in the ass years later.

http://www.gamesindustry.bi...

Nintendo though has been pretty good, they had a problem with the graphics chip in the Wii and they fixed it for free. They even sent out free jackets for the Wii mote.

morkendo234279d ago (Edited 4279d ago )

oh, lawd here we go again with NEW "possible" RROD, E74,Disk tray malfuctions,I hope for MS this is ONLY a rumor.

anyone planing on buying 5-10... X720's??? @ 499.00 a pop (possible price range)...
for 6,000.00 that is a decent used car price.

we dont need that fiasco again.

DeadlyFire4278d ago

Looks like Microsoft is throwing itself at rushing its console production again. I foresee RROD 2.0! Unless well they change the color.

Gildarts4275d ago

This is a problem with the PRODUCTION of the chips not the chips themselves.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4275d ago
GribbleGrunger4280d ago (Edited 4280d ago )

If it's delayed, it won't be a production issue. Both Sony and Microsoft are waiting for the final specs of the Wiiu and the specs of their respective competition. This is just normal procedure to maximise impact on release.

andibandit4279d ago

Having worked for several companies that produce hardware/software, at no point have we ever just been waiting for what the competition releases.

what you are implying is a deadlock.

karlowma4279d ago

Wait, can you delay something that hasn't been announced?

Blankman854279d ago

Just because they have not yet announced it does not not mean they don't have a schedule they are following.
Pre-production and production all happen according to a worked out timeframe and if there are problems, delays occur.

bobshi4279d ago

I love that this comment has a high ratio of disagrees.

Bathyj4279d ago

How can it be delayed?

Has it even been officially announced yet?

Dms20124279d ago

I suppose this is here to compliment the Gamestop article about there being only one next gen console in 2013.

Show all comments (40)
430°

PS6 Graphics – Can it Approach Photorealism?

If the PS5 Pro leaks are accurate, the eventual PS6 is slated to be one powerful console. But if modern GPUs still lag behind true photorealism, can the PS6 get there?

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4d ago
Hugodastrevas4d ago

I hate to be "that guy", but we have go ask ourselves do the industry need photorealistic graphics at this point or actually good games, good content, less anti-consumer practices?
This graphical obsession has brought nothing but years upon years of waiting for a game to launch with huge detailed empty worlds, bad stories and predictable gameplay and (micro)transactions everywhere. Sorry for the rant.

MrGameAndWatch4d ago

Same. I really don't want to be in an interactive film and, to me photorealism is not needed for immersion.

RaidenBlack4d ago

Why always target photorealism?
Why not use the extra horsepower for better, complex & diverse AI?
Why not target more interactable world? Why not use the new performance headroom for more physics effects?
Player choices that drastically affect and changes the game world?

Cacabunga4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Let’s first see what PS5 graphics look like.. we’ve seen nothing yet

RaidenBlack3d ago

@Cacabunga
For that, first Naughty Dog's PS5 single-player exclusive, then Guerilla's PS5 single-player exclusive

OtterX4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

If anything, the massive layoffs in the industry right now are showing that investors are pulling out and not wanting to invest as much as they are right now into AAAs. Much less push for even higher detail, unless many parts of it are automated by AI for a cheaper price. Not saying I support people's jobs being replaced by AI, just stating a reality of what the money people want.

DarXyde4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Photorealism should be reserved for games like Gran Turismo. It costs far too much to incorporate that level of detail.

Even then, if it comes at the cost of physics calculations or frame rate given the shared resources of consoles, I'd scale it back in favor of a smoother experience.

Nintendo was quite smart to never pigeonhole themselves into that. Great foresight on their part, I'd say.

8bitAssassin4d ago

But they've gotten very lazy on their games. I still like their approach don't just make game play your biggest innovation.

DarXyde4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

8bitAssassin,

I assume you're talking about Nintendo.

I think it works for them. I'm honestly glad that it's nothing like PlayStation or Xbox. It's a great reason to own one.

8bitAssassin3d ago

Yup!! I am. Yes it works for them and I love it. I want them to have better than average old tech so the scope of some of their games can drop jaws. I'm not talking about counting pixels either.

anast4d ago

I think we need both. Why lower the standard? A photorealistic Bloodborne or Elden Ring game would be insane.

isarai4d ago

Nah im with you on that, like visually games look fine, maybe up the resolution on average but i would much rather resources be spent on things that actually make the game FEEL good to play at this point.

shinoff21834d ago

Don't forget about the budgets.

ROCKY284d ago

agreed - stop with the expensive photo realism and just create amazing games that are less expensive that are not a risk to create an original game within 2-3 years and not 7 years of development - like the OG PS2/Xbox era !

WolfSeed4d ago

There are individual goals for individual parameters. Graphics, gameplay, scale, geometry, AI Sophistication, etc.

This article touches one of them. No need to cancel the conversation because you care more about other things.

Amplitude4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Some photorealism is much cheaper to produce than what devs are currently forced to do.
If all games could have path tracing, there would be no need for developers to manually map ambient occlusion, shadowmaps, reflection probes, etc. It's a huge undertaking that's making games cost way more to produce on account of the rather pathetic-for-2024 RT and general performance of the current gen consoles.

As much as i hate to say it, we need new consoles as soon as feasibly possible. These consoles launched at the absolute worst possible time, right before RT/DLSS2.0/3.0 were able to quickly skyrocket games in quality on the PC side of things, leaving a ridiculously large gap between PC and console almost immediately after launch and preventing things like CyberPunk Pathtracing Mode in other games. They're holding everything back and making games take longer to produce.

I think Microsoft may be smart if they end up adopting a model where multiple companies (including NVidia) can release multiple spec variant "PC" boxes with the XBox OS. One console every decade doesn't cut it with how quick technology moves in this new era we're in.

smolinsk3d ago

I would love the Next step in graphic to be massive but it always turns out that it takes a long time so the ps6 graphics are gonna be like the best we have now Just with 60fps in every game. World love to se the big ass large worlds with fantastic graphics and depth. Gta 6 are gonna bring that for sure.

just_looken3d ago

@hugo

100% agree but it also made the use of upscale tech the norm which made games worse and the fact console now are just tablets we need a console with a real gpu real cpu real ram setup.

It would be so amazing to see a game like you said made like the ps2/ps3 era using today's pc parts pushing the hardware.

There are titles out there that make my pc run like its still on the desktop

Barlos3d ago

Agreed. For me at least, games are escapism. I don't want them mimicking real life. Graphics don't have to be photorealistic to be impressive. As with you, I'm more about the story, and I would prefer innovation in other ways. The PS5 did it with the DualSense. This it more important to me than just shinier graphics.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 3d ago
Zenzuu4d ago

Personally for me, graphics have already gotten to the point where I don't really feel the need to see having it to make anymore realistic or better.

At this point, I rather game developers focus on quality/engaging stories, gameplay, & contents. Also not every every single game needs to opened world just for the sake of it.

anast4d ago

I'd rather they focus on both. It's a trillion dollar industry. They should be able to do both.

neutralgamer19924d ago

Zenzuu

Believe it or not when it comes to consoles and games graphics are still the biggest factor. Why do you think we still see CHI trailers or in engine footage. The first impression is very important. Not for us core gamers but for millions of casuals who are quite easily impressed with wow factor graphics

TiredGamer4d ago

"More, more, more!!! I don't care what it takes - I deserve more! And I won't PAY a dollar more!"

That's the mindset of some people out there.

JEECE3d ago

I mean, can we still say that's the case even when casuals flock to mediocre looking battle royales? PUBG became huge among casuals, and it looks like a PS3 era shooter with textures that didn't load properly. And casuals have embraced the cartoon aesthetic (Fortnite is the easy example here, but there are others). What is the recent graphics focused game casuals have flocked to? Are you counting COD for that?

anast3d ago

@1992 Candy Crush and Monopoly Go

@Tired Like I said. It's a trillion dollar industry. They could definitely do more. Customers are paying a ton of money.

WolfSeed4d ago

There are individual goals for individual parameters. Graphics, gameplay, scale, geometry, AI Sophistication, etc. No need to cancel the conversation because you care more about other things.

smolinsk3d ago

Graphics are the biggest selling point and will always be.

neutralgamer19923d ago

Agreed especially for those who aren’t hardcore gamers. We core gamers look at everything through core gamers POV. But there is a much bigger casual market who likes looking at pretty things

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
andy854d ago

Honestly with UC4 I thought we were close but things don't really seem to have improved much in 8 years. Hellblade 2 seems to have raised the bar a bit though

MrBaskerville4d ago

I don't think publishers have the money to make that happen. They can barely sustain the current level of fidelity.

Sciurus_vulgaris4d ago

The goal post for what photorealistic graphics are has always been moving. I remember some 360/PS3 sports games being called photorealistic way back in the mid 2000s.

bRuud834d ago

Simply, no! Graphics wise there is barely any difference between the PS4 and PS5 just a little more particle effects and very minimal use of ray tracing. I expect even less diffence between PS5 and PS6. Just better implementation of Ray Tracing.

purple1014d ago

you are correct, but there ram has doubled, and now we have ssd not a spinning disk drive, I think we have not yet scratched the surface of next gen personally,

Show all comments (99)
280°

Nintendo says Switch 2 will be officially announced before the end of March 2025

This is Furukawa, President of Nintendo. We will make an announcement about the successor to Nintendo Switch within this fiscal year. It will have been over nine years since we announced the existence of Nintendo Switch back in March 2015. We will be holding a Nintendo Direct this June regarding the Nintendo Switch software lineup for the latter half of 2024, but please be aware that there will be no mention of the Nintendo Switch successor during that presentation.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed: content, url, credit url
Christopher17d ago
Changed from Pending to Approved
Community17d ago
Profchaos17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

I'm excited for a switch 2 however I don't feel it will be coming this year as per the tweet in they are commuting to a reveal in this Japanese financial year in 2025.

Realistically we will get one last holiday season to focus on the switch because it would be madness for Nintendo to go into the holidays where the switch always performs well when they have announced a switch 2.

I'm thinking we see a announcement late Jan 25 personally with a release between March and June depending on when the software is ready and how strong the holday sales were if they need to boost those figures for the next earnings call or not

gold_drake17d ago

yea agreed. they'll probably match it with the new pkmn game they announced

VenomUK17d ago

So it begins!

Where one contender pulls out of the game, another comes back bigger and stronger.

Nintendo Switch 2 - let the games begin.

Cacabunga16d ago

A new Splatoon launch title for sure.. hoping they change the recipe and make it open world.

I think it’ll come out Q1 25. Let’s wait and see

H917d ago

There's a event in June for games on the switch and they said there won't be a switch 2 announcement so no way they will announce the console after june and still release it in the same year

Eonjay17d ago

So, I think they will shoot for another FYQ4 release (like with the first Switch) but I am confused by the headline:

'[...] Switch 2 will be officially ANNOUNCED before the end of March 2025' This implies that the Switch 2 isn't coming out till maybe holiday 2025 or maybe even 2026. I think they will be better served by NOT releasing when GTA 6 launches (unless there is some shocking reveal that it will run on Switch 2). Release early 2025.

Neonridr17d ago

I'd say it'll be released before March 2025 tbh.

notachance17d ago

Holiday announcement with summer launch

thesoftware73017d ago

It should be an interesting year; Sony, Nintendo, and MS all have new Hardware to show.

Show all comments (28)
470°

PS5 Pro specs leak video taken down by Sony

Sony is taking actions as video by Moore’s Law is Dead, has been issued with a copyright claim.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community37d ago
andy8537d ago

And people say it's all fake because Sony haven't said anything 😂 conveniently forget the PS4 Pro was only announced 2 months before release.

BeHunted37d ago

It's fake. There's no factual evidence other than his own made up specs.

Hereandthere37d ago

What were the specks Sony was afraid of showing?

Shikoku37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Digital foundry put a video out saying what he leaked was exactly what they also knew about the PS5 PRO. So no it's not just stuff he made up

Babadook737d ago (Edited 37d ago )

If it’s fake what copyright does MLID infringe upon?

😂

andy8537d ago

Aye because they'd go to the effort of copyright claiming it if it didn't exist 🙃😂 you'd have to be a special kind to be thinking its not a thing by now

Cacabunga37d ago

They need to reveal it with uncharted killzone or a heavy hitter like this

Ironmike37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

U mean the specs that we'll established digital foundry which said these are the actual specs published a video on 2 weeks ago I mean they are only one of most trusted sites for tech information but they just made up a video for the sake of it

Christopher36d ago

I would love for it all to be fake, but lots of people are saying they've seen/heard the same thing. But, man, we 100% don't need mid-gen upgrades when we're failing hard to optimize current hardware.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 36d ago
Seraphim36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

if I recall Sony lowered sales expectations for PS5 earlier this year. if that is the case we won't hear anything about a Pro until next year or shortly before/when it's dropping. After all, if the Pro was dropping this year/fiscal year they wouldn't have lowered expectations.

As for squashing rumors. Yeah, shit like this prevents potential buyers from adopting now, just like slim rumors in the past. It only makes sense to keep things under wraps from a business perspective. Despite living in a technological age of unfettered access to information we don't need to know whats going on behind closed doors be that at Sony, Nintendo, MS, or amongst any development studios. When the steak is done we shall feast.

JackBNimble36d ago

By the time games are actually made to take advantage of the pro spec's the ps6 will be released or close to it.

jznrpg37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Just announce it already! I want to preorder one asap. But in reality they don’t want to lessen PS5 sales until Pro is ready to launch so I understand the business part of it. September is probably when they announce it with an early November launch like the PS4 Pro

Ironmike37d ago

Pro won't lessen sales sames ps4 pro never and the ps4 pro was more relevant at the time cos move to 4k this not needed

RaidenBlack37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Yea, my brother got his PS4 (coz of a good deal) after the PS4 Pro's release.

darthv7237d ago

^^same here. I got a base 4 for only $100 off a guy who bought the Pro. then a few months later I found a guy on craigslist selling a pro for $100 because it was left behind by his former roommate who moved out. That was the beginning of my obsession to buy up the different variants of the PS4 that were released.

As of now I am really only missing the 500m one and the gold slim but otherwise I have pretty much all the other retail ones. https://consolevariations.c...

crazyCoconuts36d ago

Anyone with 4K that appreciates 60fps is gonna disagree about it not being needed.
DLSS is a god send for Nvidia, and there's been nothing like it for AMD...yet ...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 36d ago
DeadlyFire36d ago

They will announce it around E3 timeframe about May-June whenever they do a showcase for the year.

neutralgamer199237d ago

Just announce it this thing will sell well

Ironmike37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I don't think it will pll still haven't seen the potential of ps5 yet

Cacabunga36d ago

agreed, but it might sell if they announce some 1st party games to lead the way. if people see the difference with the base version they can move on. for my sake I am still gaming mainly on PS4 (still not finished with RDR2 due to lack of gaming time). I have a huge backlog on PS5 I am hoping to get into.

mark3214uk37d ago

why? game makers havnt even come close to maxing out current spec yet, were getting al lthese new TFlops and game maker are making crappy remakes not worthy of the ps3

Minute Man 72137d ago

The guts of the 5 and X are 5 years old

fr0sty36d ago

People keep saying that, yet we still have games running at near HD resolutions, 30fps, and ray tracing features turned off.

PRIMORDUS37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I would take that video and upload a torrent of it, fuck that copyright bullshit. If your going to do something that has a chance of being taken down, make a torrent first share it. Then Sony or any other company is helpless and you can laugh in their faces, taunting them to try to take it down 🤣

LoveSpuds37d ago

With kind of analysis and advice, you could be a lawyer for Trump!🤣

tronyx1237d ago

As much as the PS4 Pro didn't represent a major % in the playerbase, announcing a 'better' model will hinder sales from the 'base' model. They are right, business-wise.

Show all comments (36)