Ubisoft's Tom Clancy games once stood at the top of the heap as a shining example of what military and tactical shooters could aspire to accomplish, but since the beginning of this generation, Ubi seems to have completely ditched the successful foundation of earlier Clancy games in favor of simplistic and dry sequels.
Ubisoft says they are focusing on two "core verticals," and that's to return as a leader in the open world genre, and live service games.
Calling Ubisoft a leader in open world gaming at any point in time would be like calling Dollar General a leader in retail.
I don't think they were ever the leader tbh. I've never really cared for any of their open world games. I do wanna try watch dogs 2 because it looks like it's set in San Fran. Looked interesting
Hanzala from eXputer: "With Ubisoft's practices becoming increasingly anti-consumer lately, the destruction of The Sands of Time Remake looks almost inevitable."
Hey Ubi, here's a gun, don't shoot yourself in the foot.
*Ubi takes gun, aims at foot, empties clip*
Top executives including games boss Sean Shoptaw have also been promoted…
yes they have the new one is utter rubbishn and runs piss poor on the ps3, F..K UBISOFT
Rainbow Six Vegas 2 was the last great Tom Clancy game.
It's not Recon of old but all games evolve over time to suit a new demographic. However if they fix the lag and server crashes I will keep playing, loving it so far.
GRFS is definitely not a bad game. I've enjoyed most of what it has to offer since I started playing on release day.
However, it DOES need a number of issues patched. Without some quick and heavy support from Ubisoft, I fear GRFS might suffer a pretty short lifespan...
It's a LOT better than the GRAW games. Tom Clancy brand was destroyed though a long time ago. Long gone are the real tactical days of games like the original ghost recon and raven shield.