300°

MS Earnings Shows Xbox Div Profit

Microsoft has posted its earning for it's fiscal fourth quarter of 2008, posting the full fiscal year results alongside it. The company on a whole posted a $60.42 billion revenue for the year, up 18% over 2007.

Read Full Story >>
edge-online.com
GiantEnemyCrab5780d ago (Edited 5780d ago )

Monie, monie, monie.

Come on MS now drop the prices of your HDD's!!

"According to the report, Microsoft shipped 1.3 million Xbox 360s in the three months ending June 30th; this compares to about 700,000 shipped in the same period last year. For all of fiscal 2008 the company shipped 8.7 million consoles, compared to 6.6 million the year before."

Since prices generally haven't increased I would say the 360 has been seeing an upswing not a downswing like many people claim. No wonder MS has been bullish with its console pricing.

NO_PUDding5780d ago

And yet.... PS3 is still beating it.

Fact... Please don't hate.

PimpDaddy5780d ago

Your right the PS3 is outselling the 360. It's also costing Sony more money than Microsoft. See unlike Sony, Microsoft is making money in it's gaming division. Thats even with the Zune hurting it's overall numbers.

On the other hand the PS3 is bleeding Sony Computer Entertainment so badly it wipes out any positive numbers from the PSP and PS2.

Fact... Please don't hate.

NO_PUDding5779d ago

No hatred at all... but you'll notice that the PS3 costs more, and has been out less tiem than the 360.

That affects this directly, and that's a fact too.

Eitehr way you look at it, Sony is doign pretty good, atleast better than 360 was doign respectively... and the PS3 is dealign with a saturated market. Shocking really.

karlostomy5779d ago (Edited 5779d ago )

Lol dude.

Given the precedent of the outlandish success of its predecessor (ps2), the PS3 sales are woeful. (FACT)

SONY are still in third place (FACT) and will most likely remain there throughout 2009 and 2010 and 2011 as they have no way of matching the dropping 360 pricepoint! (FACT)

Sony knows this and has been forced to sell their hardware at below cost, to even remain in the game. (FACT)
http://www.ps3fanboy.com/20...
I would not brag to anyone about the PS3 sales while they are making horrendous losses on each and every PS3 sold!

Make no mistake, PS3 is Leaking money like there's no tomorrow (FACT) and with each desperate attempt to claw back market share, the situation is getting worse. (FACT)
http://www.n4g.com/industry...

Not even the games that Sony has on their console can match the 360's superior effort, both multiplat and exclusive (FACT)
http://theexplodingbarrel.c...

Exclusives that once were the selling point of the ps2 are coming to the 360 one by one (FACT)
http://www.n4g.com/events_e...
http://au.gamespot.com/news...
http://www.joystiq.com/2006...

In point of fact, Sony and SDF alike should not be bragging about *anything* while this woeful situation continues...

Until the day that the PS3 turns a profit and outsells the 360 worldwide, they should all eat humble pie and STFU!

(FACT)

Obama5779d ago

Hitler, ps3 will outsell the 360 in 2009. FACT.

1 year lead the 360 first got outsold by the wii, then is catching up by the ps3. Pitful. A 10 million lead became a 4 million lead. haha.

karlostomy5779d ago (Edited 5779d ago )

I looooove it when you call me Hitler!
It just proves that you have no intelligent counter to my argument.
Lol what?... no RROD comment?
You are slipping obama....

By the way, I will expect a congratulatory PM from you by the end of 2009 when you are (once again) proven wrong.

NO_PUDding5779d ago

To be fair, half the things you said weren't facts are were predictions.

And predictions can't be facts.

So even if he said Hitler, you have just totally embarassed yourself.

And if the PS3 is doign badly in comaprison to the PS2, then imagine how badly the 360 is doing in comparison to the PS2? Woeful you say? There isn't even a word for the 360's performance.

karlostomy5779d ago

All my assertions were backed by industry links and are facts.

Here's the list again
1. PS3 Sales should be much better (ok. my opinion)
2. PS3 is in third place (fact, with link)
3. PS3 can't match pricedrops (fact, with link)
4. PS3 is still sold at a loss (fact, with link)
5. PS3 has accumulated tremendous losses (fact, with link)
6. PS3 multi/exclusives inferior (fact, with link)
7. PS3 exclusives are coming to 360 (fact, with link)

All of the above, bar one, are facts with links.

Don't hate, no_pudd....!

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5779d ago
Angelitos5780d ago (Edited 5780d ago )

HaHa, GiantEnemyCrabs sticking with M$ that bribes game, and has overpriced hdds.

Montrealien5780d ago

so many comments, so many agrees and disagrees for so little approvals and report, odd no?

thekingofMA5780d ago

just be thankful that he's down to one bubble and you have to click 'view' to see his comment-

also be happy he dropped the "poor xbots," thing-

maybe it's a sign of maturity for that pathetic bastard?

Montrealien5779d ago (Edited 5779d ago )

I could swear he had two bubbles when I said that though. And at the time there where about 5 comments in both the gamer zone and open zone with a bunch of agree and disagrees across all comments with no reports or approvals. That is what I was commenting really.

Montrealien5779d ago

wow, that comment alone got me 6 dissagrees and 10 tracked users, hmmmm

Xi5780d ago (Edited 5780d ago )

It means that MS is going to try to remain a dominant factor in gaming, and competition is always good.

mcgrawgamer5780d ago

but it pretty much stabilizes their shareholders and investors concerns that they can actually make a profit the gaming space. At this point whether they "win" these so called console wars or not they are making a profit and that alone will keep them relevant in the industry.

morganfell5780d ago

It is not a good sign, it is a deceptive sign and the writers of that article are too financially ignorant to understand it. People like Giant Enemy Crab are easily deceived as well.

Revenue does not equal net profit income. You have to take revenue and then remove all the operating costs. This includes over a billion dollars to cover RROD.

At least we can see the article doesn't say the revenue = profit AFTER subtracting the RROD loss. They simply say it was charged back. It was charged back along with all of the costs. That has to be subtracted from the 1.575 billion. By the time you factor in all MS costs for the Xbox/Zune division I would guess they will be in the red....a loss.

nordberg5780d ago (Edited 5780d ago )

But still have a profit of 426 million for the year (thanks to software (PC and Xbox360)). Impressive after a loss 1969 million in 2007 fiscal year.

kewlkat0075780d ago (Edited 5780d ago )

MS, year to year gains?

If they did better than last year then it's still a positive and a step in the right direction.

Right here it says profit $426 million PROFIT..

http://www.gamesindustry.bi...

I think that's after you minus expenses..
You FAIL.

PimpDaddy5780d ago (Edited 5780d ago )

Maybe the financially ignorant person is you. The article is correct. I have broke down the article just for you so you don't sound so ignorant in the future.

That 1 Billion RROD charge was for the end of Fiscal Year 2007. So Fiscal Year 2008 which just ended does not include that.

"compared to a loss of $1.223 billion for the fourth quarter in 2007—during that quarter, Xbox 360 warrantee expansion charged $1.1 billion back to the division"

Microsoft lost money this past quarter that just ended thier fiscal year.

"The Entertainment Devices division, which containts the Xbox 360 and PC gaming business as well as the business for Zune, Microsoft Service and other devices and platforms posted $1.575 billion in revenue for the quarter, compared to $1.153 billion for the same period last year. This came out to a quarterly operating loss of $188 million"

But as we can see for the whole fiscal year 2008 they did make a profit. Also remember that the Entertainment division isn't just the 360, but PC, Zune, etc...

"Revenues for the division for the year came in $8.140 billion, compared to $6.069 billion for fiscal 2007. The division also posted a $426 million operating profit for the year, compared to the previous year’s loss of $1.969 billion. According to the report, Xbox 360 and PC gaming revenue for the year was up $1.7 billion, or 41%."

morganfell5779d ago (Edited 5779d ago )

No because I understand two very basic terms - revenue and profit. And I understand the difference between them. The writer of that article is a daft idiot for either A - not knowing the difference or B - knowing the difference and intentionally misleading people. Either way the article isn't worth the paper it would take with which to wipe my rear...and I don't use much. And the writer of the article, this clown Joe Keiser needs to buy himself a dictionary. First he had better make sure the money for the dictionary is from a net profit and not revenue.

OOG5779d ago

Net profit is a very important thing....but dont downplay revenue...of course once you consider every cost and expense you will get to your net profits and then you have to go figure out the shareholders take etc....

The only way you can really make a comment and judge the revenue is by seeing units sold of each product etc and compare to year b4 and compare the expenses etc etc etc.....

you trying to act like you smart by saying NET PROFIT but anyone who opens up a business book knows what net profit is...not like its a bright secret

uxo225779d ago (Edited 5779d ago )

Here are three words you need to learn.

TROLL!
GO AWAY!

Zeevious5779d ago (Edited 5779d ago )

with some significant additional details including an excerpt from Microsoft's COO.

37% year-over year increase & 34% increase in sales to 8.1 billion in total revenue.

The 427 million is up from the 2 billion loss the previous year, and it is being reported as a first-ever profit.

That statement cannot be made legally to shareholders if it does not comply with SEC requirements for publicly traded companies.
On that basis I would have to disagree with Morganfell.

If you do have information to the contrary you should let the SEC know of this discrepancy.

Although I may be accessing my system remotely at the moment, the numbers still add up in both Excel and Open Office. (and my phone too)

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5779d ago
kewlkat0075780d ago

MS is now considered a threat.

Show all comments (39)
290°

Why Xbox believes it must cut costs and close studios

Companies, particularly public companies like Microsoft, need to grow.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
gold_drake1d 10h ago

i mean its pretty simple, they spent close to 30 billion in acquiring activision, they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen.

its just shit that because of MS's miscalculation alot of people lost their jobs.

Jingsing1d 6h ago

This is exactly what many people said would happen including the CMA and FTC. Lies lies and more lies and they allowed a $69 billion buy out to happen.

gold_drake1d 6h ago

oh yeh it was 70 billion. that was my bad haha even worse.

JackBNimble9h ago

MS has educated financial advisers, they knew there was little chance to recoup the 70billion just to break even on the Activision deal let alone whatever other nonsense is going on in MS.
This whole thing was to corner the market for leverage.

thesoftware7301d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

gold,

You can't be serious, right?

Do you think that MS thought they would make 80bill in a year & Half? They haven't even released titles under MS yet, lol.

But in fact, that A/B revenue is already paying off, look at the last earnings call. That $80 billion is long-term money, my guy, no sane person/company would think they would make that back in any short-term situation, it's a long-term investment.

Let's play silly then. If MS's reason for laying off staff and closing studios was due(which it really was not) to the A/B deal, tell me what Sony's reason was for past studio closures, the recent 900-person layoffs, closing Sony London, shutting down Dreams, and closing Japan Studio? Zipper? Psygnosis? cuts at all their internal studios.

Keep in mind, you are claiming MS's reason is because of the A/B deal; please explain Sony's reason.

Hofstaderman1d 6h ago

You actually still defending them? Sheesh.....

gold_drake1d 6h ago

this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt.

and of course not, but im pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. they didnt, and closed off some studios.

its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case.

romulus231d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

(It really was) due to the Activision Blizzard deal and the loss of physical sales due to gamepass. You keep bringing up Sony in all your posts about this, stop deflecting and trying to change the topic, this is about MS and what they are doing.

BehindTheRows1d 5h ago

Has nothing to do with Sony. Stay on topic.

notachance1d 5h ago

once in a while you see someone too invested in their make-believe console war that everything happened has to be connected to said war…

a bit of banter between fans is normal, this crusade you’re doing now isn’t.

Chevalier1d 5h ago

Wow idiotic. You bring up very old closures not that there haven't been recent ones from Playstations, but, seriously stop deflecting. This has NOTHING to do with Playstation.

Does Playstation got $3 trillion behind them and daddies wallet? No they don't so stop making a fool of yourself.

Xbox has never been profitable really and they just keep losing money so between their worst hardware sales, terrible 3rd party sales and now terrible 1st party sales.

Gamepass numbers that are no longer being announced shows their numbers after 3 years of missed targets has flatlined. Plus their recent gains up to 34 million were ONLY because they folded Gold members in too. Absolutely take your idiotic rhetoric out of here. Keep on topic without deflecting.

S2Killinit1d 5h ago

Ayayayay with these xbox/MS excuses.

Reaper22_1d ago

How dare you mention Sony! Everyone here knows when Sony closes a studio and lay off workers it was the right thing to do. Even when they bought Gaikai and fired almost everyone it was the right thing to do.

Gamers can be such hypocrites sometimes.

andy8523h ago

Is it? That's revenue not profit. Completely different.

fr0sty13h ago

The earnings call only showcased how dire the situation is... Even with ABK and Bethesda, they still couldn't make enough to keep investors happy, gamepass subs are stagnant, and hardware sales are tanking.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 13h ago
thesoftware7301d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

Drake,

"this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt."

You are correct that it's not an MS Vs Sony Topic, but when exaggeration and imagination mix from a one-sided social group, similar examples are needed to ground radical thoughts; in this instance, the example was that shutting down 3,4,5, even 6 studios during a restructure/ buyout/acquisition is not some anomaly(it can suck) that has to be dissected or spell doom and gloom.

"But I'm pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. They didn't, and they closed off some studios."

But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue.

"its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case."

The fact that they did make money, kinda throws this out the window, and besides, you don't wake up and say, hey let's close a studio, you look at the output, you look at the dev as a whole, the long term and short term, you weigh it against all other studios and goals, you keep key members, ect..then you close if they are the weakest links...which by MS analysis they were.

Again, I will make a small Sony comparison, just so some of you can understand and see past the bias; Insomniac, ND, and Bungie have made some of the best games ever created, yet Sony saw fit to cut jobs in every of these studios, even tho Insomniac & ND are the biggest producers of PS games, leagues ahead better than Tango and Arkane, yet, they saw cuts, mind you, while being the TOP produces of PS first party. They were told to cut costs, and more jobs may be on the line, and Bungie is being threatened by a hostile Sony takeover. Put that in perspective, as I know that layoffs and dev closures are different, but if the best of the best is getting cut off, it is less than surprising, that lesser studios are closing.

@Cheva,
My response fits well with your comments as well. You even went on to prove that the dev closures are not just due to A/B acquisition. Then you point out Sony has less money than MS, inferring that MS should keep devs open that they see as lesser earners, while Sony having less money makes it okay to close them. lol...it doesn't work that way.

gold_drake1d 3h ago

im not reading all of that. u have ur opinion, i have mine.

thats rly it.

but this aint sony vs ms.

ApocalypseShadow1d 3h ago

You're trying to compare a 100 billion company to a company that has 3 TRILLION worth. SIE has to live or die on their own. And in turn, PlayStation has helped the main company again and again. Sony has to balance out what is working and not working in the company.

While Xbox has Daddy Warbucks footing the bill to keep the platform afloat. They have been bleeding money from Nvidia hardware in the OG Xbox, the RROD fiasco, the attempted 2013 DRM nonsense and the lies about being the most powerful console in the world and the losses of paying out millions to prop up a service hoping it catches on with enough subscribers to justify its existence.

They're not comparable if Xbox isn't allowed to live or die by its actions. It's subsidized. Revenue isn't profit. And if they were profiting on their own, they wouldn't be closing developers. If they were profiting, they wouldn't need Daddy Warbucks spending 80 to 100 billion buying up 3rd party publishers to sustain a loss leading platform.

They stopped announcing game sales, stopped announcing hardware sales, stopped announcing game pass subscribers, they are putting games on their competitors platforms but you're telling us that they are doing great even after killing jobs and closing developers at Xbox.

Stop drinking the Kool aid. You're drunk.

Chevalier17h ago

Again at which point did Playstation have a $3 trillion company shift the market with a giant purchase?

"But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue."

Lol. No they didn't. Increased revenue was ONLY due to adding Activision Blizzard revenue in. Growth was only 1 percent. It's idiots like you that have no idea what they're talking about is why Xbox isn't better than it is. You guys just make excuses continually.

If Xbox got so much profit then why did they stop announcing hardware numbers? Why did they stop announcing Gamepass numbers? Oh right because they're NOT profitable. Their sales in every category has dropped off the face of the planet. It's why Spencer will be closing more studios and canceling upcoming projects too.

The Wood10h ago

How can they be profitable when they're not selling enough hardware, software or subs. You need take a seat on this one my friend unless you can prove you angles

jwillj2k49h ago

Sony didnt shut down the studios you mentioned after they made last of us or ratchet and clank or destiny. Cutting jobs is not equal to closing studios. Sony cuts are a candle in the sun of Microsoft’s closures.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 9h ago
WelkinCole22h ago

I am pretty sure MS knew this would happen and this was part of their plan. I mean if anyone with half a brain can see this happening I am pretty sure a multi billion company like MS knew this would happen

The whole strategy in buying Beth and Acti/Blizzard is for

1. Buy established games they can have under xbox because they have done a horrible job in building their portfolio internally for the past 15 years

2. Following from 1, try and boost xbox competitivenss against a dominat PS which MS after 3 tries still can't crack

3. Follolwing from 2, try and weaken Playstation dominance by taking out these massive multiplats from the PS

4. Following from 3, try and profit off from the PS domiance with selected games they will still have on the PS to make money like COD

5. Obviously get the IP's by buying them instead of creating them which again as I mentioned in number 1 they have been woeful in doing

None of these had anyting to do with keeping all the devs they accuried. MS has always been very shitty to Devs under them. Look at what happned to Bungie for example.

I believe MS in court truely mean it when they said they had to do something because PS was just too dominant. This was their last roll of the dice.

And from the looks of things. It has not panned out as MS had hoped. PS5 is still as dominant as ever and xbox is still behind. Worse still their MP's they got is not irreplaceable as they thought. Starfield? lol!. There have not been any major shift in momentum in this console war in their favor so now its time to start cutting their loses and it starts with the most expensive cost for any company. People.

Michiel198920h ago

for a comparison, sony laid of a bigger % of it's staff this year than ms, it's what companies sadly do nowadays. If you think with GP and Bethesda + acti aquisition they were looking for quick cash, you couldn't be more wrong. It hasn't even been a year, "they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen." shows you have 0 understanding of how a business operates.

thesoftware7307h ago

@ Michiel1989

Exactly this!

I'm reading these comments, and it's mesmerizing how off-base most of them are.

I posted a few comments above, and their rebuttals have nothing to do with the points that I presented; when they start doing that, I just ignore them because, at that point, they're debating all over the place.

Profchaos13h ago

30 more like 70 to 80 plus 7 for Bethesda

Tzuno8h ago

meanwhile everything turned woke an inevitably went downward, i'd say it serves them well if they promote such kind of approach, mwuahahahahahhh!

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 7h ago
anast1d 6h ago

They are going to use AI for a large portion of the game development process. Upper management need bonuses and the shareholders need more money. So, people will lose their jobs.

Skuletor1d 6h ago

Maybe they were already using AI to make business decisions, which would explain why they closed Hi-Fi Rush's studio, then said they need more games like Hi-Fi Rush not long after that announcement.

Crows901d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

They shouldn't have bought any studios. Some is okay...but they went on a shopping spree...stupid

Einhander19721d 5h ago

The better question is why did Microsoft buy publishers for a service they were subsidizing they knew couldn't support.

And why are so many websites trying to make people feel sorry for Microsoft instead of truly criticizing the fact they are closing studios and killing jobs that would have been fine if Microsoft themselves hadn't gotten involved.

Quit feeling sorry for Microsoft and start feeling sorry for the industry and the all the gamers who are actually losing out.

THIS IS MICROSOFTS FAULT.

RNTody1d 5h ago

The first thing that happens after any major acquisition or merger is a consolidation of the whole new portfolio, which includes cutting any excess, bloat or portfolios that don't fit the larger MO of the big boy. So far, it's been par for the course with Microsoft and that's why gamers have been so against this acquisition. Tango Gameworks is the beginning. You think Microsoft wants to pay to keep small timers like Ninja Theory in business?

There is absolutely zero evidence to suggest that Microsoft will improve any of these studios, but plenty to suggest that they will get rid of what they don't need and hold onto the IP. The real agenda of the acquisition was always to acquire The Elder Scrolls, Diablo, Fallout, Call of Duty, Candy Crush etc. that will create millions in passive revenue stream for Microsoft regardless of where the games release. Microsoft simply wants their cut.

Because of Games Pass Microsoft has no interest in investing in new IP which is risky and requires creative talent they can neither nurture nor manage. Game Pass has also not grown in the way Microsoft expected it to, even post acquisitions. Therefore the logical thing to do, without serious money makers to release, is to cut as much cost as possible.

Show all comments (46)
110°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

90°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Vader822d ago

No 7 days to die is criminal