850°

GT5 and Forza 3 comparison video

A brilliant comparison video between GT5 and Forza Motorsport 3.

Read Full Story >>
gametrailers.com
shocky165419d ago

Definitely buying both though, they look Fantastic!

locos855419d ago

The graphics look great for both games. But we all know that when it comes to racing sim the most important aspect of the game is gameplay. Until we actually play them I can't tell which one will is better.

shocky165419d ago

I knew I should of said inb4 100 disagrees. :)

JOLLY15419d ago

Forza just looks move vibrant. The colors aren't muted, the road actually have texture to it, not just a flat gray and the sounds are just so much more robust.

Party Boy5419d ago (Edited 5419d ago )

"Forza just looks move vibrant. The colors aren't muted, the road actually have texture to it, not just a flat gray and the sounds are just so much more robust."

Forza looks more vibrant? Have you ever owned or seen a car? They sure don't look like Forza cars. Forza cars look so glossy. It's like they're trying to fake lighting like in Gears. It looks unrealistic. And those grass textures were so flat.

Surprising. Seeing as there's only ever 8 cars on a track at any given time, compared to GT's 16 on a track at any given time. Forza also runs at lower resolution than GT.

really duh5419d ago

Arcade racers don't require the background processing real Sims need. I wonder if GT5 will really have *cosmetic damage* since they showed CGI damage footage. I wonder how this cosmetic damage in GT5 will effect how the game *really looks* once they *really show* GT5. I wonder why they didn't show *gameplay* or provide *hands-on* with media or *playable SKU's* set up. LMAO

gaffyh5419d ago (Edited 5419d ago )

As expected, Forza 3 looks good, but then you see GT5 and you're gobsmacked at how good it looks. Forza 3 is directly competing with GT, the devs have said so themselves, and it doesn't look as good.

But again as expected, all the xbox fanboys are now making excuses for the games "vibrant" colours. If you want "vibrant" colours go play Gripshift, I said it before and I'll say it again Forza 3 had no chance of standing up to GT, ESPECIALLY in terms of graphics.

GT, the real driving simulator, everything else is just not as good.

Edit: Also this isn't a brilliant comparison, it's just the two trailer of the games.

sniper-squeak5419d ago

...F3 and GT5 are in direct competition, and F3 has a release date of October 2009, then that means GT5 will also have to be released around this time...

I think Sony are planning a surprise release with a Bundle/PS3 price drop/Slim PS3 around october to count for all the times they delayed other promised PS3 games.

jcgamer5419d ago

or Xbox 360 in general...I'm changing my ways...gamers UNITE :)

"I'm gonna make a change
It's gonna feel real good...Shamoan!" - Man In The Mirror

MJ Forever :)

nycredude5419d ago

They both look really good!. However I think the oversaturated colors in Forza makes i look less realistic. GT5 looks more real.

Also if you look closely at all the Forza vids you will notice that none of the cars exhibit body roll when turning and landing after being airborne.

Look at The GT5 videos for the same thing and you will notice the opposite. I think it is fair to say that, judging by this video, GT5 has always, and will always have the physics lock down.

JOLLY15419d ago

silly boy, my daily driver is more than ample to show that I have in fact owned a car.

JOLLY15418d ago

Ahhhh glossy-vibrant-REAL goodness.

5418d ago
El Botto5418d ago

- the amount of cars
No contest here: GT5 wins as it has 3-4 times as many cars then Forza

- Amount of tracks
With Nascar, World rally and Formula 1, GT5 wins hands down again by having two to three times more tracks than Forza 3.

- The gameplay
GT5 wins hands down as it is the only and most realistic racer ever created. Forza 3 gameplay resembles nothing like real cars. It plays like an arcade racer. Calling it a racing sim is a disgrace.

So there you have it. GT5 is leaps and miles ahead of Forza 3. The undeniable truth.

Defectiv3_Detectiv35418d ago

Honestly, I think the fact that the colors are too vibrant makes Forza look a little too flashy and less realistic. And that environment they are driving in looks like they got the animators from shrek working on it.

Don't get me wrong, I still consider myself a fan of Forza, I'm just a little disappointed that their biggest new feature is a movie editor. I was hoping they were going to do more to progress the series.

Why dis5418d ago (Edited 5418d ago )

Yes Forza 3 is more dynamic with environmental lighting conditions and the way it effects the level of reflection and color palette on cars.

Jaces5418d ago

And once again you have nothing to say but your garbled trash talk.

When they decide to show GT5 footage they'll show it.
Still though I think they both look great, not buying either mainly due to the fact that I'm not that in to racing sims.

I mainly stick to Burnout. :D

Why dis5418d ago (Edited 5418d ago )

Why do you always attack people? Thats all you do is bash people for having a opinion. Is it that hard for you to leave the attack part out?

El Botto5418d ago

Denial.

GT5 cars has twice the amount of poly's. What you just stated, is therefore impossible.

Furthermore, everyone who watches that vid can tell that Forza 3 cars look like PLASTIC.

Everyone...except the fanboyos like you.

5418d ago
Jaces5418d ago

"I wonder if GT5 will really have *cosmetic damage* since they showed CGI damage footage. I wonder how this cosmetic damage in GT5 will effect how the game *really looks* once they *really show* GT5. I wonder why they didn't show *gameplay* or provide *hands-on* with media or *playable SKU's* set up. LMAO"

Now you read that carefully and tell me if that's an opinion or fanboy trash.

Not that I expect you to tell the difference since your no better than him.

marinelife95418d ago

It's funny how the Forza fans are saying they both look good. GT fans are saying only one looks good. The movie doesn't lie. One gets called vibrant and colorful. The other gets accused of being CGI because it looks close to real life.

If there was no such thing as GT I would say Forza looks incredible. But instead we have another Killzone vs Gears battle and we all know how that one turned out.

Monkey D Luffy5418d ago

For the cars - possibly. But for the game (i.e. environment etc.) vibrant kind of seems off. Everything apart from the cars... look pretty bleak.

I did not murder him5418d ago (Edited 5418d ago )

A lot of the GT5 trailer was CGI dude. No one said they think it was CGI because it looks real they said it because its CGI lol.

Forz3 just looks better compared to anything claiming to be gameplay in GT5 http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Shadow Flare5418d ago

GT5 simply looks better. That's all there is to it. The part in the video which shows the GT5 rally car damaged just ends this debate straight away

El Botto5418d ago

To claim GT5 is CGI is an attempt to say that GT5 cant look that good.

Pure denial when GT5 prologue already looked that good.
When Killzone 2 already looked that good.
When Uncharted 1 and 2 already looked CGI good.

Haha its hard for 360 fans to swallow these facts. But these are facts. Haha

Shadow Flare5418d ago

LOL says the expert you i bet anything hasn't played GT5 Prologue. Because if you have, then you'd know those graphics are already that good in prologue. Interestingly enough, alot of that forza footage was cgi, as was confirmed by turn 10 themselves. And it STILL doesn't look better then GT5

I did not murder him5418d ago

GT5 video had a lot of CGI in it. Why won't the devs show GT5?

SaberEdge5418d ago

They both look good and about the same. Anybody that says otherwise is a fanboy. I think these games will distinguish themselves in other areas apart from graphics.

gaffyh5418d ago

@1.28 - Actually most of it's in-engine, and if you don't believe me look at GT5 Prologue in-engine/in game footage.

Jaces5418d ago

The funny thing is this kind of reminds me when KZ2 was shown in CGI then went above and beyond the capacity of what the CGI trailer was.

You guys are making yourselves look like morons when you say Forza looks better than GT5 when nothing from GT5 has been truly shown.

DragonWarrior465345418d ago (Edited 5418d ago )

Nice 4 banger Jolly. LOL!

Anyways, Im gonna be completely honest. Forza looks phenomenal. Ive played every racer bad and good, and I gotta say even after all of these years, GT had the physics down since GT3. GT5P feels just as good. Now to me, Forza never really did it for me man. The physics just have never felt right. I hope that Forza 3 ends up being more sim and less floaty. If so then I will have to say that Forza is right up there with GT5P.

Also, I just wanna comment on everyone saying that Forza looks better. Yes it really does look more vibrant. But you cant deny that GT5 looks realistic. The cool thing about all of this is that you can buy both and not worry about not being able to distinguish one from another. Its a win win situation.

BTW, one last thing guys. GT5 has yet to prove itself with its online as Forza has owned that domain since it released. Not having voice chat in GT5P has left a sour taste in my mouth, and I know its gonna have damage, but from what I seen Forza devs took notes and the crashes have the burnout kinda style. That is freaking awesome. But one thing for sure is if feels anything like Forza 2 in physics then I wont even buy it. Ive been playing alot of GT3 lately and I have to say that the GT devs have the physics down perfectly. Im crossing my fingers and hoping that Forza gets better with the gameplay.

Edit: Actually I take all that back. I finished watching the rest of this video and GT5 clearly wins in the graphical dept. The rally is my favorite part in GT and it looks second to none. Not even Dirt 2 looks to have anything on it. Also, if you guys look closely the GT devs have obviously worked on car damage cause it shows the Rally car having front side damage, so now its official. GT5 is the definitive racer this Gen. I dont care what anyone has to say. I hope that Forza has a demo at least so I can see for myself if its worth me getting day one or not.

@Jolly Do you want me to take pictures or video of me driving my 2004 Vette?

chidori6665418d ago

lol ... just a tip .. never make useless comments like this in the first post or else you will lose Buble ;) ;)

GarandShooter5418d ago

@ Jolly

Nice STi dude. Factory or modded?

JOLLY15418d ago (Edited 5418d ago )

I traded my '05 in for it. I am now waitiing on SPT to make more stuff for the '08 so I can mod this one up. I love it.

One a side note....I would love to see what dragons car looks like and I would love to see his >4 banger go 0-60 in 4.7 seconds or handle .95g's

SuperM5418d ago

First half of the trailer they showed GT5:Prolouge footage. Second half they showed the real GT5, and i must say it looks almost real life. Forza looks good but it looks fake. And by fake, i dont mean "not realtime" i mean it doesnt look real.

Also as been said earlier, GT5 have 16 cars at once vs 8 in Forza, and GT5 runs at 1280x1080 vs 1280x720 on Forza. Pretty much beaten in every single area.

D4RkNIKON5418d ago

I really think both games look amazing! That being said, GT not only has way more cars and tracks but did you see the environments in the GT trailers? The environments blow Forza away, Forza had flat grass textures.

The Xbox Empire5418d ago

haha Some of these comments are classic, this video says it all, loud and clear....Forza 3 stepped up its game from Forza 2, to compete with GT5. Whats funny is they used GT5 CGI footage from the rally/Nascar trailer....thats kind of odd.

pain777pas5418d ago

GT looks photo realistic. Forza looks good but fake.

JOLLY15418d ago

yes I do. I would love to see your 04 vette skidpad at .90 g's. That'd be a huge feat for that car.

patterson5418d ago (Edited 5418d ago )

So in this case YES, Forza 3 is vibrant.

As for which of the two looks photorealistic, that's obvious.

TheBand1t5418d ago

Both suck. ModNation Racers FTW!

marinelife95418d ago (Edited 5418d ago )

By continuing to insist that its CGI you are proving my point.

I don't know if it's CGI but neither do you because neither of us has actually seen in game footage.

However, the reason you believe it is CGI is because it looks so incredible in the first place.

If Forza looked better you wouldn't care or even bother to accuse GT of using CGI. Case in point GT fans don't care that some of the Forza footage is CGI even though Turn 10 admitted as much.

MNicholas5418d ago

GT5 is virtually photorealistic while Forza 3 does a great job within the limitations of the hardware. In the end, it's simply not even close.

Shadow Flare5418d ago

I love it when people say the GT5 video was cgi, because it just shows how stupid they are. Simply, play GT5 Prologue and you will know those graphics are real

randomwiz5418d ago (Edited 5418d ago )

in terms of graphics, they both look stunning, but does anyone disagree the GT5 has more realism in the cars.

But graphics won't really matter when it comes to gameplay. They won't matter because they both look amazing, only after we play both will we know which is better.

you can't tell which game is better by looking at the previous games in the series

stevenhiggster5418d ago

I honestly don't know how any sane person could possibly honestly say that Forza 3 looks better than GT5, it's just not true. Take off the fanboy goggles for a second and be completely honest with yourself!
There is absolutely no question over which game looks better.

Tarasque5418d ago

Wow just shows how much more detail is in Forza3 than Gt5. For people claiming that Gt5 is a sim, i never been in a car that slows down as much as a car in Gt5 pro in taking a turn. Seriously though the lack of detail in Gt5 is just......well.... i am not going to say it. I mean at this point if you have pop ups in your racing game you need to go back to the drawing board *cough* Gt5 pro* cough*, i could care less if it runs at 1080p or not the lack of detail is kinda sad.

Boody-Bandit5418d ago (Edited 5418d ago )

I played GT5P and I agree with those that say it looks photo realistic and some of this footage shown here is from GT5P and not GT5. Polyphony Digital has gone on record time and time again saying GT5P is not GT5. GT5 will have increased resolution, better textures and a rock solid frame rate.

With that said Forza 3 is a leaps and bounds upgrade over Forza 2 and I look forward to seeing it in motion on my display. I am a big fan of both and will pick up each launch day.

This will be my first time using a wheel for Forza 3. I pre ordered the Fanatec Porsche 911 and a new c0ckpit just for Forza 3. I have a G25 and playseat evolution that I used for GT5P. Having the best of both worlds is where it's at! When it comes down to it I know both games are going to be awesome fun for me and that's all I care about as a gamer.

MNicholas5418d ago

that forza 2 looked better than GT5 Prologue. It's simply inevitable that the die hard fanboys of any consumer product will be blind to it's failings and that's true for all consoles.

Here however the visual difference is quite obvious. Just the Audi R8 shot alone should put to rest any notion of visual parity. The lighting and reflections on the GT5 Prologue Audi are simply in another class. Even the insides of the car are rendered to a much higher level. Then engine cover on the 360 Audi looks like cheap plastic due to the inferior shaders while the GT5 Audi's engine cover looks brilliant and glistens beautifully in the sunlight.

Forza 3 doesn't even look like it has proper HDR.

randomwiz5418d ago

The only part that was cgi was half of the nascar part. The other half of the nascar part was real.

Look at this video
http://www.gametrailers.com...

you can clearly see the change from cgi to gameplay @ 1:23

Traveler5418d ago

You can't tell much from this low quality video and I would say they both look good here, but I have a feeling that GT5 will be the better looking sim when it comes out. No worries though. I am sure both games will be really fun to play.

eelnats20005418d ago

but i think, and thats just my opinion, GT's cars look more realistic.
Theyre both great, but Forza kindof A LITTLE looks more cartoonish

cmrbe5418d ago

Yes. And that is the porblem. It still looks cartoony like it's from the Ps2 era with the unrealistic glossy plastic graphics. GT5 on the other hand has moved on and now it's lighting is borderline real. You can easily see the difference in that GT5 looks real but F3 still looks like a video game.

djevolve4205418d ago

FORZA 3 is the clear winner here..

ThanatosDMC5418d ago

Lame. These arent even their own vids. They just pulled the trailers they downloaded and put them together.

JL5418d ago

I for one think they both look good. I have to give the edge to GT5 though as it looks more realistic. So I think GT5 wins that. That being said, that doesn't mean Turn10 has to be ashamed or anything. They've made a huge jump since Forza 2 and their game looks very good. GT has always been amazing, it's not bad if you don't top them. The real test though is gameplay, and nobody here has played either so nobody here can really say anything. Though if past experience shows (and gt5p displays) I think Gt will have the edge in the sim department as far as physics go. And for me, personally, there probably won't be anything to top GT franchise in a while (especially since Forza don't effect me).

All that being said, like I said, gameplay is what matters most here. And in that regard I kinda agree with Bandit way up there. Oh, I'm going to love GT5 and going to be putting in LOTS and LOTS of time into it. But as far as enjoyment and fun factor, I'm really excited for ModNation as well and can almost see that as being just as fun (though those are two different creatures and can't be compared: sim racer-vs-arcady/battle racer). Just wanted to mention that since Bandit brought the game up and I'm REALLY excited for ModNation. And don't think it's getting as much attention as I think it should (or would like it to).

na2ru15418d ago

Forza3 = 400 cars (2 discs. not sure how many times you gonna flip discs each time to change car on another disc)

GT5 = 800 cars + nascar & WRC......packed in ONE disc.

The first half of the video seemed fair since it was GT5P(2007-08) vs Forza 3(2009)

+ Show (55) more repliesLast reply 5418d ago
Nelson M5419d ago

Because it's Engine Blew up
And there aint a Junk Yard in the World that would take that Wreck in

360isthebestps3sucks5419d ago

no, forza is much better than this crap game.

lociefer5418d ago

why they even comparin forza to gt , they should be comparin forza to nfs and gt to real life

Narutone665418d ago

F3 should be compared to NFS or GT for PSP.

user39158005418d ago

In another 10 GT5 will be ready. another simulator thats not worth a crap coming to a flopstation near you. Ridiculous, and to think that they stole the forza game engine and all elements such as designing, lining, wreck damage, online and tracks to name a few. Oh well, what else is the sony b!tches good for anyways all they do is copy everyone else and steal ideas, but thats how they roll. Poor droids, go suck on a white lemon that spits brilliant seeds of life.

El Botto5418d ago

That GT5 is the superior game in every aspect, is an undeniable fact now.

But look at all these xbot kiddies. xbot kiddies, xbot kiddies, hahaha KIDDIES, xbot kiddies in denial. Look at all the xbot kiddies in denial hahaha.

xbot, xbots, you all just little kiddies hahaha.

na2ru15418d ago

Because it was being compared to GT5P lol.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5418d ago
Ninjamonkey5419d ago

Graphically that video for me shows that GT5 is the more realistic looking game.

Gameplay wise though its still up in the air...

PixlSheX5419d ago (Edited 5419d ago )

Also, the first part of GT5 is from the GT5:Prologue trailer.

Critical_Hit5418d ago (Edited 5418d ago )

Yeah, you can definitely see the graphics jump between GT5: Prologue and GT5. GT5 just looks more realistic hands down. The Forza cars look like they're plastic toy car models and the reflection/lighting makes the cars look too shiny and unrealistic.

pushergreen5418d ago

Rollover is HUGE for FM3, completely changes the dynamics of what a true racing sim should be, not some fake damage from the "arcadey" driving game of past(all GT games). GT5 certainly looks good but gameplay and imersion are crucial, without any real damage or top notch physics calculations there is know way PD can compete with Turn10 in that regards. FM3 has rollover nuff said. How about the promises PD made, where is the dynamic weather, real damage(rollover),imersive enviroments. Seriosly waiting and waiting and wait...........
FM3pwnsGTwaitforit5 in every single way.

Snake Raiser5418d ago

Graphically I give the edge to GT5. Gameplay wise we don't know, but I expect that to be close...maybe photo finish? ;) But I've got to say that the edge goes to GT5 just because of the amazing amount of content that it will have.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5418d ago
Sony Rep5419d ago (Edited 5419d ago )

Forza Got owned!!

No more touched up photos to hide behind now! Forza look like Mario Kart!!

Only on teh CELL, b1tches!

GayASSAdmins5419d ago

its ridiculous to say that Forza looks like MarioKart

Elven65419d ago

Good thing you're posting in the right zone though, I'm surprised your trolling was allowed to go on for as long as it did in the Gamer Zone.

cryymoar5419d ago

cant even compare the two!
Forza looks like a NFS game.
GT looks miles ahead of Forza.

http://i42.tinypic.com/11w5...

All Time Greatness5418d ago

Apena, thats from the CGI GT5 trailer, its not real gameplay footage...you wished it looked that good. lmao

da720izcumin5418d ago

have you no shame, mentioning the cell???
the cell has been the most overhyped and overestimated piece of trash since the last i went to the bathroom.....
if you wanna talk about games then ok, but please don't mention the cell to me anymore...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5418d ago
GayASSAdmins5419d ago

Can't Front , they both look good.

Why did Shocky in the 1st comment get 4disagrees?

care to answer?

Lord_Ranos5419d ago

actually 6 disagree and counting.

shocky165419d ago

You make that sound like some sort of achievment..

gamesR4fun5419d ago (Edited 5419d ago )

by the time this reaches 400 degrees

personal preferences bring a lot of disagrees if their not 4 the viewers console of choice it seems...

funny tho when i started here it was the 360 fans that ruled the bubble mill...

Show all comments (295)
480°

Forza Motorsport players slam devs for using 14 year old car model

Throughout its marketing campaign Forza Motorsport has been described as being “built from the ground up,” but some players are skeptical after discovering a reused car model that first appeared in Forza Motorsport 3.

Flawlessmic207d ago (Edited 207d ago )

yep been playing it all day and the newer car models look ok at best and the older models looks downright ugly and out place. im playing on pc at 4k with everything on ultra with dlls performance mode and the cars just look completey off, even the paints looks off, gt7 on ps5 shits on the car models here and its not even close, espcially paint and materials wise!!

its by no means a bad game but it is again another hype job from MS doesnt get close to living up to what it should be.

i genuinly thought this was gonna improve on GT7 in every way, when in fact at this in point after 10 hours the only thing i think is better is the standing start races as opposed to gt7s god awful chase the rabbit races starting 25 seconds behind.

the fuel and pit stop additions to forza are just surface level additions so they could say hey we did it, i am yet to see a meaningful incorporation of either one and the systems that would facilitate it being genuine are not there.

I cant control my power to fuel ratio during the race like i can in gt7, there is no timing hud for the whole grid, so i dont know how far ahead or behind i am or when drivers are pitting so i could plan my strategy, not that pitting is necesarry at all.

rain doesnt cause a slippery surface or aqua plaining nor does it tell you just how wet the track is like gt7 which informs you if inters or full wets are needed, no weather map, nothing.

its really just shinear version of previous forza, if you want proper sim racing where actual strategy comes in to play with longer races, with real pitt stops and having to manage your actual fuel effectively during the race then this game isnt it, go get gt7.

if you want a really simple and basic sim racer then this is for you.

majorly dissapointed, i thought this was the one game from MS that would hit all the right notes, in reality built from the ground up for next gen was a bullshit line and and its not even better than a cross gen game released a year and half ago.

MTRNYC207d ago

One big thing I feel makes GT7 so much better is that they surface mapped all the tracks so they have actual imperfections which means that sometimes the fastest path is slightly off the expected path because you have to avoid the imperfections to maintain traction.

GT7 is by far the more realistic racing game. It's kind of funny because they claim they reworked the whole driving and physics system to compete with GT Sport and Forza's not even close to as realistic as even GT Sport was and GT7 is way better than GT Sport.

Stanjara207d ago

Excellent write up.
I follow SuperGT and in the preview of the game he was not impressed with improvements.
Said it felt the same as FM7.

The whole time I was searching for ray tracing in race and it was not present.

Built from ground up my ass.

(Yes yes I know there is a performance mode and a visual mode I know)

P.s. You can choose your starting grid position. WTF is that in a sim race?

Flawlessmic207d ago (Edited 207d ago )

@mtrnyc

its all the little details, you see the track evolve in gt7 with the rubbers marks, and the marbles from the tyres start building up off the racing line on the side, you can actually see the tyre deformation when racing an f1 car for instance.

honestly, im actually shocked at how much better and more advanced gt7 is than this game, this is literally just a surface level sim racer, it would make a fantastic entry point for someone new to sim racers but my lord does it pale in comparison to gt7 where it counts

@stanjara

yep picking your starting spot is dumb AF for this type of game

dumahim207d ago

"there is no timing hud for the whole grid, so i dont know how far ahead or behind i am or when drivers are pitting so i could plan my strategy"

Wait, really? They don't have the distance or timing splits options for the HUD anymore that's been there from the start, after they add pit stops, when you'd really need something like that?

Flawlessmic207d ago

@dumahin

i will correct myself slightly just opened the game to see if it was option and you can turn it on for single player races, it was set to multiplayer only but again if the races were really gonna need it they wouldve had it set as on but no the races are like i said simple surface level sim racing.

but to answer the question correctly yes it actually does have the option, you just need to turn it on

Mr Logic207d ago

So...you're rendering at 1080p. Much wow

eagle21206d ago (Edited 206d ago )

And what about the loading times in Forza? They sure are super fast in Gran Turismo 7 (PS5). :)

outsider1624206d ago

"i genuinly thought this was gonna improve on GT7 in every way, when in fact at this in point after 10 hours the only thing i think is better is the standing start races as opposed to gt7s god awful chase the rabbit races starting 25 seconds behind."

This! I really hated this for every race it's always a running start and always last. And we all know the reason for that which is the bad ai.

206d ago
yeahokwhatever206d ago

"its by no means a bad game but it is again another hype job from MS doesn't get close to living up to what it should be" <-- Spot on. I've been playing since the second it launched and I'm a little disappointed too. You're totally right about the paint..its whacky how bad it is visually. I have pretty damn good hardware and the frame pacing is totally jacked up. I wanted a close-to-GT7 game on my PC, unfortunately Forza is the furthest from GT that its been. :-(

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 206d ago
isarai207d ago

Reusing assets is ok, but 14yr old model, when it's a hero model? That's just lame.

MTRNYC207d ago

“built from the ground up,”

This isn't even the oldest models, they are recycling, there is stuff dating back to the 360 in the game.

Everything is all lies with these guys.

Enjoy the battle pass and the DLC to get cars and tracks in your live service b.s. game, meanwhile we'll be getting them for free in GT7.

outsider1624206d ago

Built from ground up for the Series S most probably. I mean that's 75% of the audience right there.

Father__Merrin207d ago (Edited 207d ago )

Forza motorsport doesn't have that traditional campaign but rather just tick box races. Most reviewers are omitting this

Flawlessmic207d ago (Edited 207d ago )

i dont mind how they have done it but, theres not a whole lot of content race wise which is a let down, and the car RPG thing sucks balls.

i unlock the same things in the same order everytime and make the same upgrades in the same order everytime.

rather than being able to look at the strengths and weakness of the car im using and put my credits into upgrading the weakess im stuck upgrading parts i dont really need cause thats all i can do and by the time i do unlock what i really wanted, lo and behold the 5 race series is over and its on to a new car to rinse and repeat my unlocking and applying my upgrades

IRetrouk207d ago

I remember this being a massive negative for another game a couple gens ago👀

dumahim207d ago

On one hand, that was kind of a bigger deal since the old models didn't have an interior so it was all just a black silhouette inside. But on the other hand, they made no claims that it was built from the ground up and were clear there were premium models that did have the full interior and some without.

IRetrouk207d ago

I agree, it was jarring and not needed in my opinion, but it didn't make the game bad or worse, yet that was the impression around here at the time if you remember.

yeahokwhatever206d ago

i uh....liked the black interiors. I got the perspective without the distraction. I wish it was an option.

Show all comments (51)
90°

PlayStation 3: chasing the 1080p dream, part three - Gran Turismo 5 and the indie explosion

From Digital Foundry: "Welcome to the third part in the biggest DF Retro episode we've ever produced - a year-by-year look at how 1080p gaming fared on the PlayStation 3. Launched in 2007 touting its then-exclusive HDMI digital interface, Sony layered full HD gaming on top of its Cell processor and RSX 'Reality Synthesizer' as key selling points for its third generation console. Of course, we all know how that turned out - both Sony and Microsoft machines routinely ran the most advanced titles at sub-720p resolutions, often with questionable performance, so what happened to the 1080p dream?

In the first two parts of John Linneman's investigation, we've covered off the first four years of the Triple's lifecycle and moving into 2010, the overall fortunes of the PlayStation 3 continued to improve. The platform holder released - what was then - the most advanced motion controller in the console space, backed up by experiments with stereoscopic 3D, which turned out to be a short-lived but still formidable pairing. Combined with a strong E3 showing, PS3 was looking good.

However, it's fair to say that it was a fallow year for 1080p gaming on the system, with only Scott Pilgrim Saves The World's razor-sharp pixel art upscaling, Castle Crashers and Soldner X2's 3D/FMV stylings accommodating full HD output - alongside a wonderful Monkey Island remaster."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
ApocalypseShadow644d ago (Edited 644d ago )

Just remember ladies and gentlemen, Sony never said all games would be 1080p. Only that the system would support games up to 1080p in a survey before the system was released.
https://spong.com/article/9...
And as we saw, some games did support it, some games tried their best to support it and some games didn't or never reached it.

Is a higher resolution great to have if you can do it? Sure. Is it necessary for a fun game? No

But what I find interesting is Eurogamer. Are they really talking about HD and PS3 in their article or are they really pushing their 4.50 Euros 4K video download subscription? Seems one is being used to sell the other. Just look at the bottom of the article.

Michiel1989644d ago

thats what every company tries to do, push for people to buy their products. Are you really gonna blame them for that?

ApocalypseShadow644d ago

Not all articles are about selling. They're about informing or entertaining.

Maybe I'm supposed to watch the video instead of reading. But I shouldn't have to click. But the article lazily tells us some games did hit 1080p and some didn't. I didn't learn anything new as I own the console. Then, they push a Patreon subscription.

Are you saying every opinion, preview, review and rant article requires a push to buy something now? Tell me which sites are prone to do so so that I can avoid them in the future.

Michiel1989644d ago

not everyone played during the ps3 era. I started during snes era but loved seeing articles/videos about how gaming evolved before that.

i dont think this article is trying to push you to get that patreon sub, it doesnt for me at least. I dont think theres anything wrong putting an ad at the bottom of the article. all the regular DF videos are free already.

SonyStyled644d ago

Wipeout HD on PS3, a remake of the PS1 game was 1080p 60fps. And that released in 2007-08

Christopher644d ago

This really feels like a filler article. I don't feel like I learned anything notable or substantial from this. I feel they could have reduced the unnecessary intro and over-explanation of things and put the whole series in one article for a more substantial and possibly informative piece rather than piece-mealing it out as they have.

dumahim644d ago

It's more about the video. DF Retro videos are for Patreon members first, and I think the whole thing was one big video. For the youtube channel, it gets chopped up and released weekly.

ApocalypseShadow644d ago

Chris is actually right on this one. Something known already was just kind of washed over in the article. Unless you're supposed to get more in the video. If more is in the video, then more could have been said in the article.

Only thing I learned new was that they are selling a subscription. My point though is that you gain more viewers by having better articles and content.

642d ago
280°

What Happened To Gran Turismo?

When thinking about simulation racing games in this console generation, it’s not unreasonable for your first thought to be “Forza”. Microsoft’s first-party sim-racer series has been wildly successful, and for many of us, it’s been the go-to franchise for quite some time. But simulation racing games weren’t always synonymous with Forza; there was a time when Polyphony Digital’s hardcore series, Gran Turismo, reigned supreme. While the long-time franchise continues to sell exceptionally well, there’s no doubt that it isn’t the young, spry series it used to be.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
darthv721711d ago

It doesnt suck but I would love to see a return to form with GT7. Sport is such a departure that it can turn some people off. It has gotten better over time but it's still no match for a proper GT7.

Rude-ro1711d ago

Sport is awesome for what it is...
However, polygon built a whole new engine and the tech is still being worked on...
I understand it is easy to praise a cookie cutter because it release the same game over and over with rotations of maps and cars...
But this engine polygon has designed does more for things other than gaming.

Repetitive old engines with new makeup does not make anyone king.

Gt7 will be most likely in two years with 120fps and ray tracing because their new engines are ready now.

LordStig1711d ago

It decided to focus on racing rather than cars and in the gaming world, racing = gameplay.

Imalwaysright1711d ago

What complete and utter BS. GT has always focused on racing and gameplay.

1711d ago
neutralgamer19921711d ago

Good I guess selling millions of copies and have OFFICIAL FIA license races and Esports means it sucks

We just don't get it every year which is why ms also delayed next forza. You can't keep making yearly sequels. Quality and innovation takes time

GT sports at launch to now it's a different game and support has been free

Imalwaysright1711d ago

GT games have always sold millions of copies and what's so innovative about GT sport? It's a racing game FFS.

IRetrouk1710d ago

The online championships and tournaments alone offer more innovation than any racer this gen🤷‍♂️ then you also get the live ones in New York etc with proper race like commentary, something else no other sim has done before. It sells millions because it's the best, simple really.

Imalwaysright1710d ago (Edited 1710d ago )

IRetrouk

I'm not even sure why think that having proper like race commentary or championships and tournements is innovative but I'll play along... GT Sport was released in 2017 so how do explain that this video https://www.youtube.com/wat... from 2016 exists?

Dark_Knightmare21711d ago

Spoken like someone who hasn’t played sport

Imortus_san1710d ago

And those Paid demos, that fans try to hide and not talk about it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1710d ago
SCW19821711d ago

It became the best online racing community for console players and its an amazing achievment.

Keltech1711d ago

"Forza?" HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!! good joke!

kayoss1711d ago

Too early for an Aprils fool joke.

1711d ago
ElementX1711d ago

@solidgamerX That's really not very impressive. Somebody with an interest in cars plays racing games and becomes a race car driver. That's like saying "look at this guy, he played COD and now he's in the military"

Imalwaysright1711d ago

SolidGamerX

You must think that we're all stupid enough to believe that a game will turn anyone into a professional racing driver.

Prince-Ali1711d ago

FORZA!!! AAHAHHAHA !! Haven't i schooled you on this already before! You're still spewing nonsense on this threaddd looool

mcstorm1711d ago

Forza has always been better online than. GT and still is. Great to see PD try something different with GTS but let's face it this gen sonys racing games have been poor this then compaired to what Microsoft has had to offer. Forza 7 is one of the best racing games on xbox and pc but for me Horizon 3 and 4 have set the bar this gen. Of all the things microsoft got wrong this gen 2 of its racing games got a lot right and others are now playing catchup.

DarXyde1711d ago

It's debatable which is the better game. To me, Forza has the upper hand.

But in terms of online community and events? Ha. Don't lie to yourself just because you don't like Playstation.

1711d ago
1711d ago
Dark_Knightmare21711d ago

Lol not even close have you even played gt sport online?

Imalwaysright1711d ago (Edited 1711d ago )

SolidGamerX

You didn't need to confirm what I already knew: if you didn't think that we're all stupid you wouldn't make such stupid comments that only those that are dead from the neck up will agree with.

IRetrouk1710d ago (Edited 1710d ago )

Did he say gt could turn anyone into a racer? No he didnt, he asked what game has done it like gt has, which is true, gt academy done it throughout gt5 for a start. You need to do some research fella, cause your wrong.. again.

And lmao at element and the downplay, not even similar you crazy man, not even similar🤣 you realise gt has turned gamers into drivers from gt5? Go look at gt academy and tell me how that would be anything like someone playing cod and then joining the army, the downplay in gt articles is funny.

ElementX1710d ago

So you think he learned the required skills playing video games? I remember when people claimed children were learning how to operate guns because of video games, do you think that's also true?

IRetrouk1710d ago (Edited 1710d ago )

Two completely different things and you know it, it is a fact that gt has helped real gamers become real race drivers, the proof is easily available online and I'm not going round searching for links that has been posted many, many times before on this subject, Go and look at gt academy like I mentioned and you can see for yourself, they start out on gt and go from there, so yes the game gran turismo teaches you some driving techniques, now if you can find me a link where someone has been playing cod and went on to become a war hero, please let me know because I couldnt find anything, also do you have a link to where cod has a program to train soldiers? Like cod academy or something?, I couldnt find one of those either, maybe when you do then your comparison will actually make sense.

Imalwaysright1710d ago

IRetrouk

You mean the GT academy that provides training and licenses for a person to become a professional racing driver? The GT academy is how you go from being an average driving joe to become a professional racing driver not GT the game.

1710d ago
+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 1710d ago
1710d ago
xRacer74x1711d ago

Forza owns the racing game scene in my area as far as video games go.

dekke1711d ago

Forza = Arcade
GT= Sim

why u ppl keep comparing those 2 games every time..

Keltech1711d ago (Edited 1711d ago )

GT owns the console sim racing scene in my area and around the world. Just ask a real race car drivers

https://youtu.be/2pC3-eCAdv...

LordStig1711d ago

Forza isn't a racing game. It's a car game.

1711d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1711d ago
Hungryalpaca1711d ago

I’ll stick to sims. You keep playing with your hot wheels.

King_Noctis1711d ago

You forget that there are two Forzas, Forza Motorsport and Forza Horizon, which aims at different audiences.

King Nezz1711d ago

The usual response from someone insecure that feels their favorite racing game is nowhere near as good as it once was. I really liked Gran and played them all. Loved the Vector from part 2. But the franchise is not the same.

Gaming4Life19811711d ago

Yea Forza took over and is now the best sim racer with motorsport and the best arcade racer with horizon. GT was the best but it has been falling short for a long time and I'm not saying gt games are bad but no where near king like it used to be. I'd say forza motorsport 3 was the forza that really upped the franchise and forza 4 was when forza became #1.

I remember the glory days of gt but those days are long gone but it's still a good game just not the best. Of course ps fans will never admit it because they will die before giving MS credit.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1711d ago
Nacho_Z1711d ago

I do think they need some new creative heads in to give them some new perspectives, they seem stuck in a rut. It's a very high quality rut but they're still stuck in it.

LordStig1711d ago

The USA leg of the Gran Turismo World Tour is going on in New York right now. Go watch it guys, there's some damn good racing and crazy updates to come.

Nacho_Z1711d ago

I've seen some of it before and to be fair it's not much different to watching real motorsport so credit to them for that.

Heavenly King1711d ago

the MACH 5 :) GO SPEED rACEr!!

Show all comments (108)