Whether you trust GamingBolt is not the point here. The point is that this is coming directly from Remedy. There is no patch incoming that will update the visuals.
Yes.
@Eonjay This is a statement directly from MS and Remedy. So, no way this is fake.
If pre-release footage is anything to go by, it still looks pretty damn amazing
Well, there may be a PSVR version. I believe Sean even hinted at it in a recent Gamespot interview.
That is not the case always. Some games are in development for several years. This does not mean that performance will be better automatically.
No Man's Sky being such a big open world game needs to hit 30 anyhow.
@Abriael I respect your opinion but I dont agree with it. It makes zero sense to me, as a consumer, that something that is compulsory to the experience is being left out. You need to understand (which I am sure you wont either ways) is that Sony is pitching the PS VR as a platform and not as a peripheral.
You can twist the wordings and do whatever you want, but the fact remains. PS VR is not $399 for the majority of the fan base.
@MetalProxy
You fall under a small portion of the PS4 install base that has the camera. The point of the article is that Sony's price point for VR is not $399 for "majority" of the install base.
Not sure what you mean but we both know why people defend such moves as well.
At the end of the day, the point remains. The PS VR is not $399 as Sony has advertised for more than half of their install base. Even if 20% of the install base has a camera, you are forcing the other 80%, the majority, into buying one.
It's like saying, that a company is launching a console for $399. But they don't bundle it with a controller. You need to pay more for a controller.
There is no way this can be defended. A compulsory part is being left...
Did you actually read the article? The article points out that the price of $399 is only valid for a few million.
Your definition of "many" is wrong, Abriael. For the majority of PS4 install base, the price is not $399.
@sdcard4gb
Pretty sure that the next "main" Metal Gear game won't be a pachinko machine.
I know I will be in the minority about this but "another" way to look at MGS5 is the culmination of frustration of Kojima. He was tired and honestly, bored of working on the same franchise for almost three decades. Although MGS5 is an amazing game, Kojima's stress and frustration can be thematically seen in the game (like Huey's exile when he sits in the boat, the words he say while wearing the same glasses as Kojima are an indication towards that frustration)
As much as you want that to happen, Pachter is very important to many investors and game companies out there. There is a reason why he is called an analyst,
This is true I think. One of our writers got hands on the PC build and he says its running at 30fps.
http://n4g.com/news/1875067...
I hope that is not what the next game is.
You are missing the point of the story. It's what is behind the script.
Not really. The game is still a year away. Remember, the game is now delayed to Q1 2017.
The article is mostly focused on 3rd party, high budget AAA exclusives :) They are quite less these days compared to the good old days.
Let's just hope that this delivers. We don't want a a Kinect/Move like hype that only happens at launch only to loose steam a year later.