280°

Gamersheep: "The Future Revealed" Microsoft Press Conference Preview

Microsoft are having their press conference on Monday, June 6, at 9:30 AM PDT (GMT -7) and apparently the "future will be revealed"

Read Full Story >>
gamersheep.com
ThichQuangDuck4740d ago

It simply is not going to happen this early. They cannot announce another console because it would overshadow what they have left for 360. Just because Nintendo is announcing a new console since the Wii was barely supported does not mean Sony and Microsoft have to announce new consoles.

eldeladi4740d ago

If Microsoft feels like beating the competition to market has helped with the 360, then they would work hard to match Nintendo to market.
I have a strange feeling that The next Xbox will be virtually a PC that runs Windows 8 and plays games and that is also upgradable in terms of Ram and HDD.

fr0sty4740d ago (Edited 4740d ago )

An upgradeable console would be stupid. It's the fact that people don't have to bother with upgrades and such that give consoles their mass appeal. If they want an upgradeable console, they can buy any PC.

Also, Wii isn't exactly barely supported (80 million people disagree with that comment), even if it's third party core game support is weak. It has still made plenty of third party devs plenty of money, and nintendo even more. it's sales are just slowing. Kinect hasn't had much of an effect on 360's sales (PS3 still selling on top worldwide), so I wouldn't put it beyond MS to at least reveal their next console. Remember, we heard about PS3 first in 2005, and it was 1.5 years later that it finally launched. Cafe is still a year out. MS could easily reveal their nextbox and target christmas of next year to try to steal some of nintendo's thunder.

It would explain MS' shift to casual with Kinect, and their lack of AAA core exclusives this year. They're prepping for next gen. Could be wrong, but it's not too far fetched.

kevnb4740d ago

pay attention, microsoft has gears of war 3 this year and a few otherminor releases. This is their strategy, one big release and let third party do the rest. Its working for them, and third party devs are mostly focused on xbox 360 first.

DeadlyFire4740d ago (Edited 4740d ago )

Microsoft has only a few options they could annouce.

One being AMD/OTOY's projected game service. OTOY. Basically OnLive just with X360 controller support and Keyboard+Mouse.

Another being Xbox 3. While possible. Not something that is expected from most. If they do speak on a new Xbox its very likely that there will not be any solid games for it just yet to show off and likely to launch in 2012/2013.

3rd option. Is Xbox + Windows possibility. I believe it might be an option for them to try and accomplish. If they can make Xbox Live inescapable they will try it I bet.

Other option is just the IPTV option they are tagging onto a new pricing tier of Xbox Live.

Either way it involves the future.

jneul4740d ago

lol someone is apparantly behind, sony already declared ps4 is in development you dont think m$ is going to sit there and watch do you seriously??

theonlylolking4740d ago (Edited 4740d ago )

"They cannot announce another console because it would overshadow what they have left for 360."

First of all the new xbox wont come out this year so that is one reason why it would not overshadow the 360.

Second reason why it will not is because if hot games(like gears 3) are coming out on the current console people are still going to buy it just like god of war 2 on the PS2.

"Just because Nintendo is announcing a new console since the Wii was barely supported does not mean Sony and Microsoft have to announce new consoles."

Sony easily will not announce something but M$ will most likely announce a new console. M$ sees $$$ being potentially lost if they do not show something or release something around the same time.

@frosty
A upgradeable console will not be like a PC. All games must be required to run on the retail version of the console and it is optional to use the upgrades for better performance.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4740d ago
eldeladi4740d ago

720 is too far ahead; it's not the 7th generation consoles.
My guess would be on something catchy, How about
KinectBox.

itani4740d ago

If that's the new Xbox, it looks like a toilet seat.

Bolts4740d ago

Everyone is anticipating the next Xbox, anything less, nobody cares.

Redgehammer4740d ago

I am not anticipating the nextbox.

RevXM4740d ago

Yeah its too early for the next xbox, they have soooo many games coming for 360 ATM that its impossible that they will announce their 8th gen console and Nintendo can take over the world./S

Why would the next xbox be too far ahead?
360 has become a casual device. Ms need something to sell to Core gamers right?

Would they let Nintendo just have a massive head start and steal their customers?

What have microsoft been doing, been so careful about if it is not their next system?

Yeah totally Lionhead and all MS studios have been working on Kinect tittles all along.
They needed to make a new ultra advanced engine that harldy even runs on a 360 to appeal to casuals!/s

caliman874740d ago

they would consider doing a new console and being backwards compatible...taking care of gears 3

mcstorm4740d ago

I can't see there being a new console being shown at e3 as the 360 is doing fine in terms of sales as well as kinect still selling very well. The ps3 maybe selling better in terms of total number but the two markets MS have USA and UK the ps3 is still lagging behind there. This e3 will be all about core kinect games and gears 3 as well as a dash update and kinect update as we are only seeing alittle bit of what kinect can do at the mo. Plus I would expect MS to give us a game or app we did not expect from them. One thing MS are better at doing than Sony n Nintendo is keeping everything in house until they want to talk about it.

Show all comments (19)
150°

10 Biggest Xbox Mistakes of All Time (So Far)

The Xbox brand has done a lot of good over the years, but their various blunders are pretty wild to look back on in their magnitude.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
piroh4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Ironically number 9 can save them at this point (releasing games on multiple platforms)

ChasterMies2d ago

By “save them” you mean make more profit for Microsoft. Xbox will still be a dying hardware platform.

OtterX3d ago

You could add the naming scheme for the consoles, it just confuses customers. I know they wanted to avoid traditional numbering bc it would always be lower than their competitor, but this whole 360 then One then Series thing is confusing af. Imagine a Soccer Mom trying to figure this stuff out. I still mistakenly call the Series X the One from time to time on accident.

RNTody3d ago

Don't forget about the Xbox One, Xbox One X and Xbox Series X! Good luck to Soccer moms around the world.

S2Killinit2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

They did that on purpose to confuse and direct attention away from the generational numbering.

MS doesn’t like reminding people that they joined the industry after others had already been involved in gaming.

For instance, they called the xbox “360” to combat PlayStation “3” because they wanted to seem like “more” than “3”, so instead of xbox 2, they opted for xbox 360. Also this had the additional benefit of selling consoles to uninformed parents who might purchase a “360” instead of a “3” by mistake, or because they thought 360 was more than 3. Kind of a disingenuous move.

They have been continuing with their confusing naming patterns for pretty much the same reasons. Frankly, it fits with who and what they are as a brand.

FinalFantasyFanatic2d ago

I can understand their reasoning, but whoever came up with that naming scheme should be fired, bad naming schemes have killed consoles (I'm pretty sure it was the major reason for the downfall of the WiiU). They should have had unqiue names like Nintendo and Sega have had for their consoles, far less confusing for the consumer.

Cacabunga3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Phil Spencer is the worst that has happened to Xbox.
They built a respectable brand up to Xbox one. Then this guy took over and things became a joke

Reaper22_3d ago

He still has his job. Something you can't say about Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga3d ago

Both bad execs. One is on job and one thankfully retired.

FinalFantasyFanatic2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I didn't like either person, both people damaged their respective brands and produced worse outcomes, but Phil did save the Xbox brand from being retired by Microsoft. Although in hindsight, he should have just let it die, rather than languish in limbo like it is now.

Rainbowcookie1d 16h ago

Yeah but the one that was "bad" didn't even affect sales.

bunt-custardly3d ago

Phil Spencer was also on the team back when 360 was around, alongside Shane Kim, Peter Moore etc. I think the damage that did the most harm was the Don Mattrick "Always Online" console (ahead of its time basically). They handed Sony and Nintendo a free-pass when that was revealed. It went downhill from there. Then the corporate machine went into full swing to try and recover. They have to a degree as a games company for the masses, and less so for the core gamer. Outside USA, the Xbox brand does not sell as well as Japanese based consoles (citation needed).

Cacabunga3d ago

Want a decision maker. The always online and TV plans was a disaster yes, but they caught up by announcing 1st party games that gamers actually kept the hype going.. until this moron took over and introduced the PC day one release.. e all know where that ended..

S2Killinit2d ago

I dont think they were ever a respectable brand, not since the beginning, when their goal was never to be involved and share in the gaming space. I think the OG xbox was an exception because MS as a brand was still getting its foot in and so the people behind that were people of the gaming industry.

FinalFantasyFanatic2d ago

The 360 was the brand in its prime though, everything went downhill towards the end of that generation. Its staple games like Halo, Forza and Gears are what kept the console relevant and afloat for so long.

MaximusPrime_3d ago

Really good video.

I remember the days with RRoD was big news on here, N4G.

Microsoft had it turbulence number of years.

Looking at the success of Sea of Thieves despite being 6 years old, time to release Halo, Forza horizon 4 & 5 on PS5. It'll help their revenue

shinoff21833d ago (Edited 3d ago )

2 of the 4 games they did already sold really well. So it's definitely going down. Idk about halo or forza but I feel those studios they've bought in the last 5 years, their coming

ChasterMies3d ago

I found this video painful to watch. Can someone list them out?

Top 10 for me from are:
1. 2013 reveal presentation
2. Bundling Kinect 2 with Xbox One
3. RRoD or why rushing to market with hardware is always a bad idea.
4. Buying studios only to close them.
5. Ads on the Home Screen
6. Letting Halo die.
7. Letting Geard of War die.
8. Every console name
9. Charging for Xbox Live on Xbox 360 when Sony let PS3 players play online for free.
10. Cancelling release of OG Xbox games after the Xbox 360 launched.

Show all comments (30)
150°

Microsoft to Add Copilot AI to Video Games

Microsoft recently revealed its plans to incorporate Copilot directly into video games, with Minecraft being the first showcased example.

Read Full Story >>
xpgained.co.uk
Fishy Fingers7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

F*** AI

"Hey Copilot, what's a good meme to prove I dislike AI".... https://giphy.com/clips/sou...

Einhander19727d ago

Two trillion dollar company that just can't wait to put as many people possible out of work as fast as possible.

It feels like every single thing they do is making gaming worse and destroying the industry.

7d ago
7d ago
7d ago
darthv727d ago

....you know it takes people to program the AI.... right? It isnt like it is sentient. We haven't reach skynet level of situation or anywhere close to the matrix just yet.

That's next Thursday.

Einhander19726d ago (Edited 6d ago )

It takes a people to program the AI then that AI is used for who knows how many games eliminating countless jobs which only grows as AI is used for more and more game creation functions.

What you're saying is so ridiculously short sighted and truly larking any kind of understanding and foresight.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6d ago
CaptainFaisal7d ago

Why all the hate? Im actually excited about this! Always wanted this kind of immersion, and an AI companion with me all the time helping me out knowing the status of my skills/inventory/progress and giving me tips on the best approach or how to craft something specific is game changing for the industry.

Hate all you want about AI, but this is just the start and I can see the potential already. You wont be complaining in the next 5-10 years about this, but rather complain if a game hasn’t implemented it.

MrDead7d ago

Yes we can't wait for the work of others to be used without the need to pay them so that MS can profit even more from the people they fire.

I_am_Batman7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

There is no chance I'd ever use something like this, especially if it's not part of the core game design, but a layer on top of it. It's way too much handholding. Many games already feel like busy work, because they don't let the player figure things out on their own. Having a real-time interactive guide defeats the purpose of playing the game in the first place in my opinion.

If this were to become the standard like you predict, we'll see more and more video games get away with bad design, because people will just be used to ask for help from the AI companion anyway.

Number1TailzFan7d ago

Well Nintendo don't need this with some of their games these days, with invincible characters, items, easy bosses etc.. they do the hand holding built in

helicoptergirl7d ago

Takes "hand holding" in games to a whole new level.

BlackDoomAx6d ago

Because human nature xD Almost every new technology had these kind of comments.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6d ago
Show all comments (19)
70°

Activision team is opening a new game studio in Poland 'Elsewhere Entertainment' to build new AAA IP

Microsoft's Activision subsidiary announced today that it is opening a new game development studio to take advantage of the huge talent pool growing in Poland. It'll be the second Activision studio based in the region, joining Infinity Ward Krakow, although this studio is, in fact, not working on Call of Duty.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Psychonaut8511d ago

They’re not working on Call of Duty? Give it time.