570°

Killzone 3 vs Crysis 2 vs Crysis 1: Water Effects And Character Comparison

We have got some screenshots which shows some amazing differences between three great first person shooters. Check them out below.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
gameseveryday4805d ago

Water effects=Killzone 3

Close combat=Crysis 2

Character Model=Crysis 2

Crysis 2>Killzone 3>Crysis

Thats my opinion by the way.

halocursed4805d ago

Killzone 3 all the way for me in terms of character model and close combat!

Army_of_Darkness4805d ago

I must honestly say that its the best looking FPS on consoles hands down!!

PLASTICA-MAN4805d ago (Edited 4805d ago )

WTF? Comparing water effects in... screenshots???
Did you know that Guerilla Games team dedicated 2 senior engineers working for more than 6 months just to develop these heavy waters effects and physics making them look accurate with all the floating pieces of ice and the heavy icy waves etc... Let alone the snow effects on the ground and how bodies and feet interacts with them and that aren't only static,lifeless cheaply and lazily 2D rendered photo-textures bumped with with a bugsfiest parralax illusionist tricks.

You try to educate those illeterates, try it on yourself first. Lamingbot.com

NewZealander4805d ago

i thought the killzone 3 characters looked better, but actually playing the game there was some things i didn't like about them, like the way eyelashes look horrible, so does that guys beard that you meet later in the game, when he talks his chin kinda pops through the hair, also the helgast fur collars kinda look fake, but overall they still look cooler then the crysis characters.

DualConsoleOwner4805d ago

not even a competition...

water is just a texture in Crysis 2 while KZ3 water actually has physics effect and what not.

PS360PCROCKS4805d ago

I play crysis 2 with "mods" on PC and kz3 looks better

Dee_914805d ago

screen does none of these games justice
you have to play in person
.. its like that with every game

crxss4805d ago

Sorry but the KZ3 WATER in those pictures just looks terrible compared to the rest. The character models for C2 and KZ3 both look great.

ABizzel14805d ago

As I've been saying, both games look amazing. It's all about preference. In my eyes they share the graphics crown on consoles.

yianni4805d ago

@PLASTICA-MAN
Should probably learn how to spell illiterate before calling others illeterate. Irony.

Dee_914805d ago

@crXss
have you ever seen the ocean in sub zero areas ?
http://www.abc.net.au/storm...

Spydiggity4805d ago (Edited 4805d ago )

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

it's all scripted that's why you die the MOMENT you hit the water...cuz it's not really there...crysis 1 has amazing water...best in any game ever (til from dust comes out that is)

MaxXAttaxX4805d ago

You're only showing the environmental/background water on that level.

hesido4805d ago

@Spydiggity

LOL, "it's not really there"

How on earth can you say it's not really there? It's being rendered in realtime, the waves can have a pattern indeed, but it's there.

"it's all scripted that's why you die the MOMENT you hit the water"
I really wonder the twisted logic behind this statement. It's just that, you don't swim in KZ3. No reason in preparing an underwater shader.

evrfighter4805d ago (Edited 4805d ago )

looks like a 9 second loop to me >.>

thanks spy for exposing this obvious lol moment bubs dude. I would have found it myself had I played it but after buying that travesty that is kz2. No way I'm being suckered again.

awesomeperson4805d ago

@Spy

1. Nice way to draw views.

2. What the hell? Do I care, I never even noticed before I've seen that. When I played I thought it looked aweosme, I still do. Do I give one sh** about how its rendered? No. All I care is it looks good and plays on my screen, not trying to degrade a game.

Epicor4805d ago

@crxxs

I think that both crysis games have better water textures than KZ3 but I do think that KZ3 has better water physics (scripted or not). You can really feel the weight and the massiveness of the waves - the ocean feels alive and threatening.

Spydiggity4805d ago (Edited 4805d ago )

i wasn't trying to "draw views." i made this video for you people in response to these ridiculous crysis comparisons. i don't see how a person could possibly play the first crysis, see the water in that game, and think this is even close. there's an entire generation in between the two visually. i guess i'll be making a crysis vid next.

seriously though, you really think i care about views on a youtube profile i've used 3 times? come on now...that's such an immature way of dealing with this. if you really think i'm wrong, lets see some evidence... where's the counter proof? so far i only see one video... fanboys always love to say 2 things when you disagree with their biased opinion. 1) "you just want hits"; 2) "you didn't even play it."
well, i believe this video proves 2 wrong, and i think number 1 can be easily dismissed considering i don't get any money for my 10 minutes of total videos. especially not on a video that took me about 20 minutes to throw together.

Kleptic4805d ago

This seems like a pretty weird comparison...and imo uncharted 2 has better water than any of them...not just the way the water looks in a screen shot...but the way it looks in motion, and the way it 'wets' drake's/npc's clothes when they get in and out of it...

its the only engine I know of so far that has realistic currents...like rivers and things that still have dynamic reflections and still has layer manipulation...

that is where Killzone 3 (weirdly even more so than 2) falls pretty short water wise...shoot that gorgeous ocean...and nothing happens...your bullets just disappear into it...i've hated that since developers first started trying to make realistic water effects...

Killzone 2 at least had a realistic looking animation that would shoot a spike of water up from a bullet hitting it, even though it didn't have layer manipulation...and i'm not sure yet if there are other water effects in other parts of killzone 3...but that ocean level does not have any of these effects...its cool to look at for a few minutes, but it definitely seems a little shortcut'd...

in fact a lot of killzone 3's visuals feel that way to me...I spent the last weekend going through and playing more killzone 2...to finally platinum it before buying killzone 3 this month...and compared to the demo, I think killzone 2 actually looks better...the lighting in killzone 2 still seems unmatched...killzone 3 did away with muzzle flare lighting for assault rifles, but has it more than killzone 2 for heavy weapons (the jet pack MG will blow shadows all over everything, but the regular guns no longer do...)

I like killzone 3...but I don't like that it may try too much at one time...the 3D, the move support, appealing to people that couldn't handle killzone 2, etc...somewhere in there visually things got changed for some reason and I don't really understand why...its definitely not always better looking than killzone 2...

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 4805d ago
theonlylolking4805d ago

killzone 2 has better water than KZ3. Crysis 1(with mods) has the best water, close combat KZ3 is the best, character model crysis 2(PC)

Kahvipannu4805d ago (Edited 4805d ago )

Agreed on the water part.
This is Crysis 1 with mods, only 720p, and DX10, would love to see what DX11 could do.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

I don't still get it why some people think KZ3 has better graphics technically. It looks amazing, but is still "just" pipelined scripted shooter, with low interactivity with environment, as tecnical point of view. Artisticstyle is other thing. It's beautiful game indeed, but not inpar with Crysis1 or 2 technically.

MaxXAttaxX4805d ago

I think I might just agree with what you said.
Although I think KZ3 did a better job with the dynamic water(the interactive parts) you can walk though.

That pic they showed was more of an environmental/background water.

4805d ago
Epicor4805d ago

kahvipannulle

Holy crap! That youtube video looked yummy. I wanna go back travelling after watching that - dunno why ;).

Kiitos.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4805d ago
Oxymoron0284805d ago

Nah I'd say Character models goes to Killzone 3 tbh

downwardspiral4805d ago

These are in game comparison of the character models. I think the killzone model look more realistic.

meetajhu4805d ago

Crysis 1 will demolish every game till todays date. Only game which will dethrone Crysis is Rage

ThanatosDMC4805d ago

Exactly. Crysis 2 is a step down Crysis 1. People forget how insanely good looking Crysis 1 is. Check out the youtube hd videos.

BK-2014805d ago

Crysis 1 looks better then both because its a PC game but KZ3 looks and preforms much better than C2 on consoles.

zootang4805d ago

KZ3 Mawlr is the most intense gaming experience I have ever had. The game surpassed my expectations and they were set high.

DoomeDx4805d ago

My expectations were quite low. But after playing it i changed my mind. It is indeed one of the best games ever

(Playing games since Wolfenstein 3D!)

NewZealander4805d ago

yeah my expectations for KZ3 were low too, i wasn't a fan of KZ2 but decided to give the third a go, graphics for the most part were pretty good, but some areas did look pretty rough, it was also far too short and the story was weak, unless you like multiplayer i would suggest renting it, those who like online will probably get more out of it.

Fat Bastard4805d ago

Crysis 2 was very disappointing for me. I played it on PS3 and 360, and both versions didn't perform as well as I had hoped. Months of Crysis 2 gameplay videos got me very excited but the title underperformed for me. The graphics are definitely spectacular, but the characters don't control as well as I would like, and it isn't as smooth and enjoyable to shoot/play (shooting enemies isn't as satisfying for some reason). I am much happier with Killzone 3 as far as gameplay and multiplayer. As far as visuals, I would give KZ3 the slight edge but both look great visually. I will say KZ3's story had lots of corny and stupid parts, so I'd give the SP to Crysis 2 even though I didn't enjoy it that much.

fooltheman4805d ago

I actually like the story though...
In essence there is't much room for making it into a deep story...it's war...
I really like the background story about those two helghan 'warlords'.

Whoever expected a high standard roman ...

STONEY44805d ago

That's a terrible picture being used for Crysis 1. THIS is what it looks like.

http://www.pcgames.de/scree...

NanoSoldier4805d ago

Honestly, anyone who thinks that Killzone 3 is technically ahead of Crysis 2 needs to get his eyes checked.

Last night I was watching the rain falling down in Crysis 2 for minutes, it's a incredible step from Crytek that they achieved something like that on consoles.

cooperdnizzle4805d ago

You are a fan boy, Have you even played Killzone 3, i have crysis for the ps3 and pc. It looks pretty bad on consoles, but on the pc it looks really good!

talltony4805d ago

Nano soldier
Give me your psn id and prove me that you have played both games because alot of people like to throw out crap like you just said all the time.

Oh BTW the environments and textures are nowhere near as detailed as killzone 3's so I think you need to get your eyes checked.

lee_ten4805d ago

...and your name is nanosoldier. okay, sure.

RememberThe3574805d ago

Um do you know that "realtime" means? I think you mean "dynamically". And no the water isn't rendered dynamically. But that water is doing a lot more than just sitting there and shimmering. With all that KZ3 has going on there is no way they'd have the resources to run that water dynamically. But show me an other game that has waves that look that good.

DrHouse4805d ago

Most of Killzone is pre-rendered, only on N4G will you see ppl say its realtime, Even the snow in Killzone is only in the camera, its not all over the area as it would seem.

Darkfocus4805d ago

that's still realtime as it's being rendered in 3D by the hardware itself it's just not dynamic and its scripted...also I really don't see why some people in this thread are saying it looks better than crysis though...clearly they've not seen crysis in motion.

awesomeperson4805d ago

...

As I said before. Do I care if how the hell the game delivers it to me? Does it hurt me knowing a game isn't rendered a particular way?

No.

When I play the level it looks awesome, it still looks awesome. End. Of. Story.

Jazz41084804d ago

Kz2 I enjoyed somewhat so I picked up kz3. My psn and live acounts are both jazz4108. Kz3 imo has to be the most overated and most boring corridor shooter I played in a long time. I don't play online so I play the sp campaigns but kz3 tooke me sinch launch to finally finish it as I could not play it for long as it was so underwhelming. Crysis2 I started it and could not put it down and the large levels and the fact the gameworld is open to explore and packed full of destructable enviroments make the cryengine 3 unmatched on consoles imo and the story in crysis 2 was much better written by a famous author and the campaign gave me around 11 hours of play where kz3 was half that and to think crysis did this on the 360 with a dvd9 is just incredible. Give props where there due and crysis2 for the win imo.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4804d ago
aceitman4805d ago

how can u compare still water with wavy water. characters look better on killzone 3 .

Jazz41084805d ago

I play the sp campaigns and don't count pixels but had way more fun with crysis.

Roozium4805d ago

Lol. Crysis has the best watereffects in anygame ever. Proof: http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Kahvipannu4805d ago

The game is still jawdropping visually. It's just insane.

WetN00dle694805d ago

PLASTICA-MAN

WOW 6 months......and still it pales in comparison to Bioshocks water effects.

FACTUAL evidence4805d ago

Wooooooow! No freakin BIAS here! I asked my granma which one she thinks looks better and she pointed to killzone 3 I shit u not!

Jezuz4805d ago

Don't you know everything must cater to KZ3 or else the fanboys will disagree with you?

TVippy4805d ago

Very ignorant opinion, man.

starchild4805d ago

Some people are really blind it seems. The water in Crysis 2 looks far better than the water in Killzone 3.

The movement of the waves looks kind of cool in that scene in Killzone 3, but when I shoot the water there isn't any kind of splash or ripples left by the bullet impacts. In Crysis 2 the water ripples and splashes in a realistic way when you shoot it.

On top of that the actual way the water looks is better in Crysis 2 as well. It has the right amount of reflectivity and specular highlights, whereas the water looks very flat in Killzone 3.

The movement of the waves isn't all that impressive either. I mean it looks pretty cool overall, but it's not bar-raising in any way. Very nice looking waves have been done in other games before. Check out the waves in this old Xbox 360 game, Far Cry Instincts, at around 0:29 in the following video http://www.youtube.com/watc... The movement and graphical quality of those waves looks better than that which is found in Killzone 3.

Crysis 2 on PC looks far better than Killzone 3 and anybody that says otherwise needs to go in for an eye exam. Even on consoles I think Crysis 2 looks better.

+ Show (17) more repliesLast reply 4804d ago
cyborg4805d ago

KZ 3's water effects in motion, I couldn't help but jump into the ocean, a couple of times, it was so so amazing. Overall, aswell, Killzone 3 looks far better in motion than consolified Crysis 2

Grenadan4805d ago

crysis dynamic vs killzone scripted

fooltheman4805d ago

... You do know that seas have some sort of rythm...
Scripted isn't bad by any way...

RememberThe3574805d ago

Crysis has dynamic waves? Please show me that video!

AngryHippo4805d ago

Lol I jumped in the water too.

RememberThe3574805d ago

I did too but it wasn't on purpose :(

awesomeperson4805d ago

Stupid Akmir Snowdrift when I first started playing *runs out to protect battery* *fallen_dawn has commited suicide*

ksoto4805d ago

Seriously i jumped in the water a few times too lol and the snow effects are awesome too kz3 has so many things going on and beautiful graphics u really cant compare Crysis 2 to it i dnt understand how ppl even take that comparison seriously. Dont get me wrong i own crysis 2 and play the mp alot bcus it is fun but in my opinion it doesnt compare graphically to Crysis 2.

BlackKnight4805d ago (Edited 4805d ago )

Actually KZ3 water in motion looks pretty lame at certain times. The tip of waves are incredibly low poly count and look like triangles poking out. It's actually just an animation, or "script" as Grenadan said but scripting is actually more complex that a looping animation.

The low poly count is pretty noticeable. And the fact that people talk about the "physics" like how the icebergs are floating around is just sad. It is just an animation, no physics, the icebergs are just an animation, nothing else.

I wouldn't say the water is HORRIBLE as this video says, but it is one of the few RETAIL, not beta, videos of the water waves in KZ3 that shows this loop (and pokey waves, watch in HD):

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

BK-2014805d ago (Edited 4805d ago )

Check out the pools in Kaznan jungle, there are dynamic water effects. Its just hard to find but I'm guessing it was a design choice not to include too much water in the game.

Edit: the guy who posted this video is an idiotic fanboy.

BlackKnight4805d ago (Edited 4805d ago )

@BK-201

I know what you are talking about. It's pretty similar to Crysis 2 water interaction.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

He may be an idiotic fanboy (which I warned by saying I didn't agree with his comments) but it DOES loop and is just an animation and not physics at all. I just used the video because it is the best quality video of the retail copy of KZ3 showing the water waves.

DrHouse4805d ago

When did you jump in what did you see? DiD YOU SWIM AROUND? no? why not? maybe cause its pre-rendered visual trickery?

BrianG4805d ago (Edited 4805d ago )

If it looks better, but is pre-rendered, then whats the point in not pre-rendering it?

Not everything has to be all real time all the time, like the Cryengine 3 does. That my friend leads to inconsistent results (objects morphing in screen (trees for ex) and pop in) and variable framerates. Unless that was the developers issue and not the engines. And lets not blame hardware either because other developers are doing great things.

Are we going to start rendering clouds in real time for our FPS games? Or maybe the stars behind the clouds that we can't see or interact with but exist anyways.

hesido4805d ago

The water is not pre-rendered. The *pattern of the waves* can be pre-prendered. But the water surface is an actual 3d object. You can look at it from every angle. You cannot pre-render that.

awesomeperson4805d ago

Ah K, because I'm sure even if it did let you swim around you would really want to swim in ice cold weather, been gunned down on an alien planet with heavy equipment. Right?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4804d ago
DelbertGrady4805d ago (Edited 4805d ago )

The Killzone 3 character model screenshot is taken from a cutscene.

one2thr4805d ago (Edited 4805d ago )

nope,the cutscenes in killzone are actually, simple recorded videos of the games REAL TIME engine, that gives the game time to load without leaving gamers, having to watch a "pre-rendered cutscene AND then have to wait for the actual game to load..... And so far all the games that does this are great games, such as: God of War 3, Killzone 3, and Uncharted 2.....
So yeah, that pre-rendered statement about Killzone screen shots are irrelevent sir, good day

BlackKnight4805d ago

@one2thr

The pre-rendered cutscenes do use the KZ3 engine. However, they bump up the character models and texture resolution alot higher since it is....PRE-RENDERED. Meaning they don't have to worry if it's 30FPS in real-time because when you pre-render, you always get your target framerate, it just takes time to spit out the video.

So it does not represent real time since if the PS3 actually had to render it in real-time, it would have framerate way below 30 FPS.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

bluwulf4805d ago (Edited 4805d ago )

BlackKnight,

The models are the same, as are the textures. They up the levels of Anti-Aliasing. Its the same across the board from Uncharted/MGS4/Killzone etc.. The Intro videos are what you're thinking about.

Those have increased model polycount.

Unlike Gears/Halo/Alan Wake etc. The PS3 actually has the ability to use its game models in the cut scenes, because the engines are able to run the high polygon characters.

Its not a significant jump in polygonal count of the characters, pre-rendering is taxing on Anti-Aliasin/Motion Blur etc.

There may be a slight increase in quality, but its not as night and day as other titles.

BlackKnight4805d ago (Edited 4805d ago )

@bluwulf

I will gladly show you comparisons straight from my PS3. Just ordered component cables yesterday so I can record in HD once I get those suckers. Sony/PS3 blocks you from recording on HDMI no matter what is being shown while MS/Xbox only blocks when watching netflix or a DVD or anything like that, games can still be recorded from HDMI in clean digital HD. Super annoying. And I am not about to go buying blackmarket HDMI-HDCP recording hardware or expensive workarounds( http://jarkhd.blogspot.com/...

Anyhow, in-game character models are noticeably lower quality in gameplay than in cutscenes and Uncharted 2 is a great example. I didn't even bring up xbox in my previous post and you are acting like I did. Psst, your fanboyism is showing. Try not down talking platforms you don't own (or hate due to "loyalty") and just speak the facts. Devs do it on ALL platforms.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4805d ago
AngryHippo4805d ago

Killzone 3 and crysis 2 both look amazing. Let's move on people.

news4geeks4805d ago

I'm liking Crysis2 from these screens but I'm sure if you pick and choose you could make any of them look the best and the rough waters of Killzone will look much better in motion. I have only played Crysis1, but I think I'll end up buying Crysis2 and Killzone3.

Show all comments (158)
230°

20 Years of Guerrilla: The Story of a PlayStation Studio

The Amsterdam-based studio reflects on its humble beginnings, beloved franchises, and growth through the years.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
SullysCigar384d ago

Up there with the top tier in the industry. Love Guerrilla Games - Horizon Burning Shores is simply STUNNING.

1Victor384d ago

Can’t wait for their next franchise

SullysCigar384d ago

Same. They nailed it with Horizon. The trouble is I also want a new Killzone! Can't I just have it all?!

jznrpg384d ago

I’m with you I want Horizon 3 , Killzone and new IPs

badz149384d ago

I have yet to play Burning Shores as I just started Forbidden West (bought at launch, just unwrapped last weekend LOL) and playing on PS5.

man...I still can't believe the graphics especially now I'm playing it on my LG OLED. that graphics and with stable performance backing it up, GG really is the master of their craft!

Vengeance1138384d ago

32.7M sales in the Horizon franchise! With 8.4M coming from Forbidden West alone! Truly a hugely successful game and franchise as a whole. Looking forward to Horizon III

Shane Kim384d ago

That's kind of a huge drop though. It's only been two games.

VersusDMC384d ago

One year after realease HZD sold 7.6 million.

https://www.noobfeed.com/ne...

So not a drop off.

Unless you're saying a HFW should have sold as much now as HZD sold in 5 years?

Vengeance1138384d ago

It's been 3 games, this includes Call of the Mountain. Also no, its a great improvement over HZD.

solideagle384d ago

lol you are comparing:

HZD: 28 February 2017 - May 2023 (6 years+)

HFW: 18 February 2022 - May 2023 (1 year+)

We will see if it surpass original number.

Phoenix76384d ago

@shane, 2 full main games, 2 DLC add ons, 1 VR spin off game, oh and a an official LEGO set.
Not too bad for an ip that's only been on market for 6 years

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 384d ago
REDGUM384d ago

Wow, very impressive. I didn't know the numbers were so high for Forbidden West. Still playing through it myself

thesoftware730384d ago (Edited 384d ago )

Yooo, when I first saw that Killzone 1 footage at E3, my friends my brothers and I were like, Holy shit! When it came out, it didn't look exactly like it, but we sunk so many hours into 1 & 2.

I even liked Killzone: SF, it was a spectacle to look at, and even today it looks good. I hope they make a new one. Can you imagine how that will look, and they can get some modern FPS pointers from Bungie.

blacktiger384d ago

thank you fps lover, I'm with you

talocaca384d ago

Such a wonderful studio. They deserve all their success.

The Decima Engine is absolute 🔥 I'm just mad they have abandoned Killzone.

OzzY-waZZy384d ago (Edited 384d ago )

Kinda wish they move on from Horizon tbh.

potatoseal384d ago

They are probably working on mutiple projects. One of them is Horizon 3, but another is a multiplaer game and probably somehting else.

Imalwaysright384d ago

There were rumours that they were working on a Socom reboot.

Show all comments (47)
80°

Can You Run Crysis In VR? You Can, Thanks To A New Mod

A Crysis VR mod is now available for download, allowing users to experience the first entry in the series in VR

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Rynxie415d ago (Edited 415d ago )

No one cares. The whole can it run Crysis is old, dead and stupid. It's also irrelevant, considering only less than one percent of pc owners, own a high-end PC. Second, I believe Crysis wasn't even optimized properly.

TheColbertinator415d ago

Crysis blew my mind back then and still kinda does.

bunt-custardly415d ago

Let's hope the modders can get the other Crysis games working in VR as they use the same Cryengine.

220°

10 Old Games With Outstanding Graphics

GF365: "There are some games with extraordinary visuals that impress us to this day. Here are old games with outstanding graphics."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
ShwaaMan486d ago

Bioshock still looks fantastic, one of my all time favorites.

Yui_Suzumiya486d ago

Beyond: Two Souls on PS3 can compete with modern day graphics.

SonyStyled486d ago (Edited 486d ago )

Same as Killzone 2 and 3, uncharted 2 and 3, Infamous 2, Heavy Rain, Resistance 3

jasonismoney486d ago

I wish this was entirely true, but you might want to load up Killzone 2 and Resistance 3 again.

SonyStyled486d ago

@jason I watched some gameplay videos of KZ2 and R3 on my full screen. They are on par or succeed graphically to the first person shooters mentioned in the article that also launched on the seventh generation of consoles. Try the same and see what you think

cthulhucultist486d ago

Killzone 3 was super impressive! I could not believe the graphics back then as I was regularly pausing the game to stand in awe looking at the surroundings! Resistance however did not impress me that much. Heavy rain is also another amazing graphically speaking game. It almost felt next gen

Fist4achin486d ago

I always thought the first 3 Gears of War games looked great and still hold up for today.

SonyStyled486d ago

They did for their day. I recently played gears judgement with on the 360 and the draw distance was so blurry. The characters up close look great though

JEECE486d ago

Far Cry 2 was awesome. In addition to having demonstrably better physics and AI than later games in the series, it had a lot of design decisions that, criticized at the time, have since been praised in games like BOTW and Dark Souls.

iNcRiMiNaTi486d ago

It might not be super amazing by today's standard but I thought Mgs3 looked really good

JEECE486d ago

In terms of art style it still holds up.

Show all comments (13)