Ars: "While writing our Fallout: New Vegas review, Andrew Webster contacted me to ask for guidance on how to give a verdict to a very enjoyable game that was filled with bugs. I told him to go with his gut, and he gave it a "Buy" rating. We weren't alone in our verdict, as the game scored between 82 and 87 on Metacritic. Based on my Steam and Xbox Live friends list, the chatter on the forums, and posts on Twitter, it's selling very well."
BLG writes, "Some of the most popular games have had a rough start, with some of them being downright unplayable.
Despite that, developers have managed to turn it around for them and make their game worth playing. Here are some games that had a rough start but were pretty great."
Sea of Thieves... I'm not disagreeing that the game has improved in terms of content. But I feel that the most significant change between now and its release is actually the public perception. Nowadays, most people are aware that the game is a multiplayer PvP-focused experience first and foremost, and not "Black Flag made by Rare". Consequently, people dismissing the whole experience because the single-player aspect is lacking or the story is plain are much less common.
Days gone! By the end of the game I couldn't drop it down! I went around so many hours killing zombies! It was addictive by the end.
The Fallout Anthology Edition is coming to PC very soon, and is packaged with some very S.P.E.C.I.A.L. bonuses.
It’s an awful downgrade to the last one they did
They included physical disc back then
I would love the classic fallout games on console. Closest I could find was atom rpg, I liked that one a lot
Getting free games is never a bad thing and Amazon Luna has new offerings for Fallout fans looking for free adventures in the Wasteland.
Guess people are starting to look past bugs in a otherwise solid game. Glad media are stepping up from being whiners and looking past silly things.
All too many times ive seen games slammed for minor bugs, then someone like Bethesda releases a game riddled with them and gets a free pass?
It shouldn't be one rule for one, then one for another. If a game is buggy as hell and they effect the experience, I don't give a damn which developer it is, the game rating should reflect this. Another reason why reviews hold no weight to them.
I honestly haven't seen that many bugs yet
The only time i care about bugs is if it ruins online or if people are using to for an advantage over the other team.
Bethesda Softworks has been making buggy games for as long as I can remember. Especially on PS3.