550°

PS3 vs PS3: God Of War III vs Uncharted 2 Hi-Def Screenshot Comparison

But like in everything else there's good, better and best. God of War III and Uncharted 2 are the best looking games on PS3. Still the question exists, which one's the most visually impressive?

Read Full Story >>
gamesthirst.com
unrealgamer585164d ago

I'll give it to uncharted, But you have to admit gow 3 has alot more going on Ingame.

Darkstorn5164d ago

I still think Killzone 2 had the MOST stuff happening onscreen at a given time. The sparks flying everywhere, the smog, the explosions and all that made it almost hypnotizing.

And I think we need to distinguish between technical graphics and art style. Personally, I think Jet Set Radio has some of the awesomest graphics around to this day, but they may not be as realistic as say, Uncharted 2.

SnuggleBandit5164d ago

Just speaking from playing the actual games, not these screenshots, I think GOW looks better. The scale is FAR bigger and also, just some spots in the game look UNREAL. Like when you are ripping hades' pec off, that part right there looked absolutely crazy!!

The textures in GOW were amazing, and even though uncharted's lighting was a little more realistic, i would give it to GOW overall.

ABizzel15164d ago

This is a tough one. Overall Uncharted 2 wins in my book, because the graphics in God of War 3 are inconsistent. If the entire game of GOW 3 was as brethtaking as the Poseidon or Chronos battles then it would easily win any graphics comparison battle.

But it's not. When you're in a moment of downtime or fighting a couple of skeletons the game still looks good, but not as mind blowing as the previous scenes I listed, and at similar points in Uncharted 2 the game is still as impressive as if you were right in the action.

God of War 3 demonstrated the best use of graphical detail in the Poseidon and Chronos battle that I've seen so far in gaming, but overall best graphics still goes to Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, and Crysis (God of War 3 just misses the mark by an eyelash).

But we still have Gran Turismo 5, The Last Guardian, Crysis 2, and other games to try and dethrone the current winners.

Megaton5163d ago

Anyone else getting a Trojan alert when visiting the page? Avast blocks something every time.

randomwiz5163d ago (Edited 5163d ago )

in my opinion, the camera angles in God of War 3 don't do the game justice. There were moments I just wanted to stop and and admire the scenery, but I couldn't.

I think graphically, they were similar, but I liked the environments in Uncharted 2 better, but the Chronos battle in God of War 3 was really awesome.

Tachyon_Nova5163d ago

I think GOWIII looks better, as in I prefer looking at it than UC2, but UC2 does have better texture resolution etc etc. Lighting in GOWIII is pretty impressive though, you have to admit.

raztad5163d ago (Edited 5163d ago )

@above

I do agree camera position is definitely against GoW3. Still it never ceases to amazes me. Game is smooth as butter (>30fps), EPIC beyond belief while manage to have such sharp textures and gorgeous environments. I cant believe how smooth is the transition from the Grand scale to up close w/o a single framedrop. Oh, and dont forget MLAA.

With all due respect for UC2, there is not competition GoW3 is king.

sikbeta5163d ago

PS3 vs PS3: God Of War III vs Uncharted 2 Hi-Def Screenshot Comparison.... and The Winner is:

PS3 COMMUNITY

presto7175163d ago

Only room for one on top I guess. We will be seeing more and more of these as ps3 continues to pull ahead.

mikeslemonade5163d ago

Uncharted 2 looks better than God of War 3, but God of War 3 has more things going on screen.

bnaked5163d ago

Imo, Uncharted 2 is still the grafics king.. I think it's because of the art design. I mean, it's so damn impressive on the roof top in Nepal. Or the village, it's just beautyful.. yes, beautyful.

bpac1234567895163d ago (Edited 5163d ago )

GOW 3 looks amazing but it suffers from a fixed camera. The camera is noramlly so far away that you can't really see how amazing every texture really is. When it finally does zoom in you get a rare treat and it looks like one of the best games ever. But Uncharted 2 had consistency and a lot more detail packed into each environment. But GOW 3 was every bit as epic and two scenes in particular outdid anything in uncharted 2.

Edit: and GOW 3 has the best lighting ever! EVER! It's only possible competition is Gran turismo 5. For example, The light is so realistic that it sends beams of light through each individual feather on krato's Icurus wings. There where so many spots where the lighting blew me away.

sid4gamerfreak5163d ago

lol look at the number of off topics reported in this article...

Both are really awesome games and to me they seem equal, both catering to different environments in a highly detailed manner.

ChineseDemocracy5163d ago

To be quite honest, i can't really decide. Both games are outstanding in their own right, i'm not sure if it's entirely fair to compare the two. Third person shooter vs. Action/Hack'n'Slash they both require different kinds of gameplay elements.

That being said, I'd call it a tie. Uncharted is possibly the most graphically consistent game I've ever seen, the whole thing looks CGI. However, the sheer scale and amount of action going on in GOWIII is equally impressive. I remember right after the Hades fight, i was just so impressed i kind of just sat there.

Commander TK5163d ago

Crysis beats both. Yes, I know it is unfair to compare PC games to consoles games, but Crysis has no competition now

HDgamer5163d ago

It's come to a time where ps3 gamers have to compare two beastly AAA games against each other not only for graphics but gameplay. It's just too bad that both games crush a lot of 360 fanboys dreams and lies.

Rageanitus5163d ago

graphics are washed out and the textures are low res with the low resultion on top of that

gow3 and uc2 easily trump kz2... why the textures are better the resolution is higher and the facial animation is also better.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 5163d ago
kaveti66165164d ago

Uncharted was an amazing looking game in most of the areas. My only gripe with Uncharted 2 was that even though the developers had a lot of disc space to worth with, some of the scenery was repeating way too often. For example, in the Nepal level where Drake and Chloe are searching for the right temple, Drake does a lot of climbing on telephone poles and/or advertisement poles to get to places, and I noticed that the advertisements were the same from pole to pole. I don't know if it's a disc space issue or a RAM issue, but I figured with more disc space to work with, Naughty Dog would add in more varied environments. Other than that, the game looks astounding, but it's the Crysis palm tree effect if you know what I mean.

I am going to play God of War III like tomorrow or next week. I think I will be blown away.

bpac1234567895163d ago

Wow I've played the game Four times and I never noticed that. That's gonna hurt the immersion for me a little if I play again.

shadow27975163d ago

Yeah, I've never seen more than one advertisement from the same company in real life before. That would be crazy.

SpartanZero5164d ago ShowReplies(11)
Silly gameAr5164d ago

Man, I'm sorry, but why do the Uncharted 2 screenshots always look so washed out?

Uncharted 2 is a vibrant, detailed game, and these screens always look so washed out.

Brklynty15163d ago

Those same washed out screenshots are still better than most of the comparisons it gets, like 98% of the time. In this case its matter of opinion, they both look very good.

Show all comments (115)
70°

The Best Video Game Opening Levels In Gaming History

The Opening Levels that hooked gamers from the outset.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
240°

Ranking Every God of War Game From Worst to Best

Cultured Vultures: Let’s delve into Kratos’ long and rampageous history and find out which games are worth the hype and which are better left buried under the weight of Kratos’s might.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
JL2930196d ago

Both requels over 2 and 3? Clowns. Those are two of the most boring games I've ever played.

Snookies12196d ago

GoW 3 was amazing, but I personally hated just one thing. (This is on me alone, because I was dumb, lol.) I hated that you couldn't skip cutscenes on repeat playthroughs. I had to go back through the game a third time because I missed one trophy accidentally on my way to the platinum... The cutscenes were great the first go round, even the second... But the third was pretty agonizing.

Haven't played Ragnarok, but I still think GoW 4 is a wonderful game in its own right. Not sure how I would stack them up against each other honestly.

Monstieur196d ago (Edited 196d ago )

I don't consider the reboot part of the original series. The original series were high-skill games with combos and rewards for mixing things up.

solideagle196d ago

lol square, square and triangle is the only combo you needed. I have played all of them on the hardest difficulties...

Golfcoachh196d ago

Maybe I’m just old school but I just couldn’t get into the last two. Maybe it’s the slower action and more story telling but the original trilogy was by far my favorite.

Crows90196d ago

It's not that youre old school. They're different genres

JL2930195d ago (Edited 195d ago )

Me either, at all. It's just yap yap yap. They try to be a RPG's instead of being action games like they used to be.

Fluke_Skywalker196d ago

I'd put the two psp games over 3 in terms of story any day. But not over 2.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 195d ago
TheEnigma313196d ago (Edited 196d ago )

My favorite was part 2 and I think Ragnarok is better that 2018.

Shane Kim196d ago

The newer games are better imo.

ravens52196d ago

There is no worst. Except for Ascension, only cause I didn't play it lol. They are all masterpieces. 1,2,3, 2018 and Ragnarok. 1 of, if not the greatest video game franchise...besides MetalGear.

Snookies12196d ago

Oh wow, I actually forgot that Ascension even existed... I never played it either.

Crows90196d ago

I like ascension. It was different and some interesting combat additions.

darthv72196d ago

If you didnt play it, how could you call it the worst? Its not as bad as the media portrayed it. Honestly the worst are those flash games. they arent even considered true GoW games but in name only. At least Ascension is a real GoW game.

ravens52196d ago

Not saying it's a terrible game. Just mean it's at the bottom of my list. I played a little bit of it. Jus to me, compared to the other main games, it's last.

Fluke_Skywalker196d ago

Ascension is the only GOW game I never finished. Hated it.

Inverno196d ago

Can't agree, older games do so much more than the last two. More weapons, magic abilities, enemies are more varied, level design is also more aesthetically pleasing, and agree with those who say that they shouldn't have removed jumping. Was a time I'd agree, but those old games are so so much better, that they really should've looked into bringing into the reboot/sequels.

Crows90196d ago (Edited 196d ago )

If a game is good then a game is good. Doesn't matter what came before or what comes after.

Inverno196d ago

Of course it matters. If not for what what came before there wouldn't be an after. And if something is great before then you strive to make it just as good if not better, after. I personally don't think there's a fair way to judge the new with the old because the newer games are still essentially a reboot, and went a way different direction. But I still believe the old games did it better. I'm probably bias though since I've been going back to old games and have been finding that they lack all the annoying aspects that devs have shoehorned into new games to fluff out game time.

Crows90195d ago

@Inverno

Im not talking about the passage of time here. Im talking about individual pieces of software. If a game is good then it is good. Thats not a controversial statement. You can compare good with good...sure. But you still end up with good. Now if there is a bad game in the mix and you compare you do end up with some differentials between them...makes sense to compare and see where it went wrong.

But theyre different genres and styles which were individually executed very well.

And no. The new games are not a reboot. Theyre a new direction but simply a continuation.
Tomb raider was a reboot.

Inverno195d ago

The new games are definitely a reboot, and a continuation, it can be both which it is. And a good game might be good, but my point is that if there are things done better before it then there's plenty of room for critiquing and trying to make whatever comes after better rather than just good.

Show all comments (31)
170°

God of War 3 Remastered Has Sold 4 Million Copies To Date

God of War 3 Remaster has sold 4 million copies since its inception, making the franchise PlayStation's most profitable gamer merch brand.

purple101358d ago

Haha I still remember my brother playing the opening scene on ps3!!!

Yeh he had to put the controller down his heart was beating too fast trying to get past first 10 minutes. He said "it's too much". Best thing I've ever seen in gaming. Haha

robtion357d ago

A great game from an era before things went politically correct and gaming turned serious/'mature'.

It certainly wasn't concerned about upsetting or offending anyone and was more fun because of it.

The boss battles and set pieces still top most games released today.

SullysCigar358d ago

This game was absurdly good for it's time. The very definition of 'epic'.

robtion357d ago

Yes. The graphics were just ridiculous compared to most other games on the market at the time.

masterfox357d ago

I wished Ascension had the same treatment.

Heavenly King357d ago

Ascension SP had some things better than GOW3, and also some things worst than GOW3. But in general it was a really good game, for me it also deserves a REMASTER. The problem per se with the game is that most people were satisfied on how GOWIII ended, so Kratos got his revenge, so in order to rise the interest in the game how have to make it MORE EPIC is that the game did not had the epicness of fighting huge bosses (I guess due to technical difficulties,the game had actually a lot more colors (because the world is not dying like in GOWIII) so it is graphically more demanding that is my guess), but it compensated with having in general a more complex combat system, and an amazing soundtrack. but in general the game needed to be more epic than GOWIII somehow, and that did not happened, after GOWIII people had expectations through the roof. They should have waited and release it for PS4 so the vision of the game is not compromised.

My list of good and bad compared to GOWIII

GOOD: THE COMBAT
The combat was more elaborated, which allows you to be more immersed in the fights. Also every enemy was more resistant, even those that you could usually kill in 2-3 attacks in previous games. THE LAST BOSS is so damn epic!!!, but there is only one moment like this in the whole game.

GOOD: LESS QTEs
I love the fact that "cicle" in the new enemies (killing animations) are not QTEs, in Ascension they are mini-games on their own, depending on the enemy, making it more engaging. You had to dodge and hit when the window was open in order to eventually do the killing blow.

GOOD: The Soundtrack
it has the orginal trilogy musics, but with a new perspective since the game had a new composer. The ST was amazing also the new music written specifically for this game were badass

GOOD: The puzzles actually require you to think.

BAD: There are bad camera angles during the game, like zooming way too out of vista, and then swarming you with "light units" that like I said before had better AI and did not die of 2 attacks. those parts a few, but are a mess.

BAD: EMPTY ARENAS
Other thing that really annoyed me is that when you fight a sub-boss/heavy unit in a big arena; that ARENA WAS EMPTY, it was just you and against the medusa, or against the manticore. They should have zoom in into the action to avoid noticing the void scenario. I guess emptiness was because of the game having a lot more colors (because the world is not dying like in GOWIII) so it is graphically more demanding. My guess is that it was not possible technically, since in most of those cases you had huge vistas or intricate scenarios that needed to be rendered. The fact that the cerberus is smaller in this game disappointed me.

BAD: Only one BADASS EPIC moment, the others moments of the game were great but, they needed to set the bar even higher than GOWIII and they failed miserably.

BAD: The graphics did not improved much. I was GOWIII with more colors, and that's it.

So 4 good things against 4 bad ones. The problem is those 2 last BAD aspects are actually why the game was received so poorly. Everyone expects the next game to have a really BIG improvement in all aspects in contrast to the previous one, and that was not the case in ascension. And also GOW is the definition of EPIC, and that was not there neither. The jump on every aspect from GOWI to GOWII was huge being on the same console, and the jump from GOWII to GOWIII was humongous (obviously because a more powerful console). While the jump from GOWIII to Ascension is too little, and people expected more.

On it's own is a good game; but is not sufficient when GOWIII was released before it.

CrimsonWing69357d ago

I know this is unpopular opinion, but I prefer these over the new ones. I’m not saying the new ones are bad or anything, but they sort of get boring to me, whereas the older games were like non-stop roller coaster rides.

ChiefofLoliPolice357d ago

I love the new ones but I understand what you mean. The older ones had more action and was more arcady like.

MIDGETonSTILTS17357d ago

Ragnarok was not BIG at all… GoW1 had larger set pieces, and it was on ps2.

GoW 2018 had big moments in its own way…. Ragnarok abandoned these aspects though

robtion357d ago

I agree. It was just less serious and more fun.

victorMaje357d ago

One of my all time favourites.

Show all comments (16)