What do you believe, which of the two heroes would win the fight? Vote inside!
How do composers make the iconic music tracks from games that we love? And just what makes them so memorable?
Twitter is blowing up right now
All games coming to PlayStation
Next Xbox will have steam
Next Xbox niche and only for “gamers who want it” (it’s a really powerful pc or a steam deck type portable, or both)
A former 343 developer has revealed that mountains of Halo pitches failed to be approved, including a return to ODSTs and a push for more intimate, dark themes.
Not really. 4, 5, MCC, and Infinite are only remembered for their shortcomings and failures when the franchise was purely known for being a system seller and an all-time great. There's a reason 1, 2, 3, and Reach are looked back on fondly, and it's not because of nostalgia.
I don't know of anyone that speaks fondly of the later Halo games, I would like to play 5, but I know it's not good, and I'm just waiting on Infinite to hit my strike price. I played MCC a lot later after it came out, so must of those bugs/issues were gone by the time I played it.
To say it dropped the massively is just not true. Many in the community hold H5 as the best mp mechanics in the entire series and say its what 4 should've been. Its campaign was trash but the MP is Fantastic and many faces of the community still play today and it only made 500mill in the matter of months but sure it dropped the ball massively. 4 was hated due to all the changes at once. And CoD like feature and rightful get hate but it's campaign story was liked by a majority of ppl. 343 hasn't nailed ot 100% but they get 1 thing perfect but F up in other places. Infinite had a good campaign and design but the story was a mess. The MP improves upon what Halo 3 was and is what many ppl wanted to go back to but it lacked content severely. So massively aint the word. Dropping the ball massively is when it's pure trash and unplay/unenjoyable. Most ppl blind by nostalgia so soon as 1 thing aint the same its hated cause Halo set the bar so high
FYI reach was not that good.
Halo-Pop like Gears Pop. Halo bowling. Halo Cooking Mama. There’s a reason why you won’t hear about them
With its smooth jazz and iconic New Mombasa streets, we need Xbox's next Halo game to return to the remarkable world of Halo 3: ODST.
they both evenly match but MC got the weapons advantage .
Judging by the image attached it looks like they are battling to see who has the most jaggies. But we all know who wins in that department.
Master Chief is a character from the year 2550 or somewhere around there.
Nomad is a character from what appears to be the 21st century.
So, even though they aren't in the same universe, I would say that if you through them together, Master Chief logically has much more advanced technology in his suit of armor, although I like the way Nomads nanosuit looks and operates. I give this to the Chief for only the time reason.
Talking about a hypothetical fight between 2 completely fictional characters is the most pathetic thing humanly possible.
As far as I know, Master Chief weighs almost or more than a 1000lbs and can run 25 mph and jump 25ft into the air. His suit is naturally giving him strength and his armor has a shield and under that is probably metal alloy that probably can stop bullets.
Being almost or more than a ton while running 25mph and jumping 25ft into the air is something that makes alot of sense if its that far into the future.
Even though they may both be in a whole different universe it's still partaking in a human universe so naturally both pieces of technology will show up in due time. You can't compare them both because, Master Chief is genetically enhanced and the technology he carries is far beyond Nomads nanosuit since its from the 21st century.