420°

‘Cyberpunk 2077,’ Delayed Another Year, Could Have Changed The Industry

Forbes : More than a year and a half after launch now, Cyberpunk 2077 continues to stick with me. Not just in terms of the game itself, which I played through in the early, hyper-buggy days, but in terms of what could have been had CDPR execs not kicked it out the door well before it was ready.

Elda671d ago

I really enjoyed the game.

Fishy Fingers671d ago (Edited 671d ago )

I bought it late and probably went in with lowered expectations (rightly so), I mostly wanted something to push my new GPU and yeah, loved it.

Dunno if it would have changed anything, but would of done the game justice.

--Onilink--670d ago (Edited 670d ago )

I recently started playing it and its been mostly fine. Nothing mindblowing but not bad either. I doubt 1 more year of delays would have made it any better than what it currently is.

For me, they got too ambitious. Almost every single thing they were doing was something new for them, setting, shooter, loot, diverse branching paths, city simulation, driving, etc (plus whole redesign of their engine). It was crazy of them to try to approach so many new things in such a large scale, they could have started with a smaller game and reduced scope and then gradually increase things in sequels, just like they did for Witcher 3

AuraAbjure670d ago

Too ambitious? During a global pandemic? Ya think?

--Onilink--670d ago

@AuraAbjure

Mmmm… what??? The game came out on Dec 2020.. do you think it was developed in just 10 months?

What does the pandemic have to do on a game for which development started between 2015 and 2016?

AuraAbjure664d ago

@ Onilink What does it have to do with it? Probably the difference between Sony pulling it from their digital store or leaving it be.

Kyizen670d ago

Beat after the next gen update on PS5 a 5/10 for me. Only the last mission brought consequences and choices. Side missions were forgettable

bunt-custardly670d ago

"side missions were forgettable".

Really? How many did you do, because the side missions are highly regarded by many as some of the best in the game. Better than the main story even.

anast670d ago

For you, yes. But, in reality, they were well written and well crafted.

pietro1212670d ago

Side missions were the best part of the game. The main story kind of sucked ass, but there were good character moments.

PapaBop670d ago (Edited 670d ago )

Same granted I only started a few months back, you just don't get that sort of quality or ambition in Sci Fi games. Probably somewhat biased as I'm a huge Ghost in the Shell fan but I loved Cyberpunk.

neutralgamer1992670d ago

What would have helped us cancelling the last generation versions, releasing the game on PC and current generation holiday 2022. What's really sad is time was on their side, they were not struggling for money or resources. They gave into their inner greed and now they have a tainted reputation along with their company valuable being cut in half

That engine can't handle what cyberpunk is trying to do. Some have used UR5 to make smaller tech demos and it looks great

So much of what's missing in cyberpunk is that feel of the world being lived in. I still remember that E3 trailer and how stunning the world was and the product we got wasn't even close

CDPR can't get a break because they knew the game was broken yet they released it anyway

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 664d ago
-Foxtrot671d ago

A year wouldn’t have fixed the other issues

People are so taken back by the bugs and the like that they forget the game just feels lifeless and not what was promised, hyped up or in some places shown off at pats game shows

mkis007670d ago

The world simulation wasnt even ps3 game level...Oblivion had better simulation. They completely oversold night city.

-Foxtrot670d ago

Oh totally

They bigged Night City up as a massive, breathing city which would be heavily detailed and immersive

Yet, it really wasn't, I mean they don't even allow you to get into the Metro/Trains going round, they scrapped that feature. There's games out there which have been doing that for years.

Ashunderfire86670d ago

Hell even worse GTA 3 simulation with the police 👮‍♂️ star system and other NPC ai was way better than Cyberpunk 2077!

Red Dead Redemption 2 is the best open world simulation ever made to this day! By Rockstar Games.

MIDGETonSTILTS17670d ago

They had to launch it last-gen, no other option….

JEECE670d ago

Lol, just like Bethesda had to launch Oblivion on PS2 because of that install base, right?

Crows90670d ago

For the most part bethesda was still a pc developer. Launching it on consoles was extra. At that time they had no other option since they were developing for PC's and PC's were far more capable.

JEECE670d ago

@Crows90

"they were developing for PC's and PC's were far more capable."

This describes what was happening with Cyberpunk almost exactly. They were focusing on PC, and most critically they were focusing development on specs far in excess of the capabilities of base PS4/Xbox One. But instead of doing the smart Dying Light 1 move and canning the garbage last-gen versions, they just launched them anyway in a broken state and lost a huge chunk of their stock value, despite good sales numbers.

Michiel1989670d ago

@Jeece 2 out of 3 witcher games have released on console. How is that pc focussed?

Ashunderfire86670d ago

Wait a minute Oblivion was on PS2??? Where did you hear 👂 about that one? I thought it was a PC, 360, and PS3 exclusive?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 670d ago
AuraAbjure664d ago

Their stock is now 25% of what is was before they announced the 2077 delays. I hope they're happy with their choice.

CrimsonWing69670d ago (Edited 670d ago )

No, it wouldn’t have… unless the game was exactly what they were pitching to us, which it wouldn’t have been.

I played the game on Current-Gen (Xbox Series X) and aside from the typical bugs you find in a Bethesda-like game, the game was fine as a game.

A year wouldn’t have magically changed how amazing the game would have been. What they needed to do was make the game a full-on “next-gen” game and deliver on the immersion and visuals they kept feeding us from fake gameplay trailers.

I really hope the industry learned a lesson from this. Stop Watch Dogging us and Cyberpunking us with fake gameplay trailers. Yea, you may sucker people into giving you sales initially, but in the long-run it’ll come back to bite you on the ass.

--Onilink--670d ago

Honestly, even if they targeted next gen only they still wouldnt have done that. Their PC version is pretty uncompromising in terms of using the full specs possible.

Their issues were more in terms of design, trying to tackle waaaay too many things they had never done before in such a large scale game. They needed to go smaller and more focused and then go all out later in a sequel once they had a working baseline

CrimsonWing69670d ago

Yea I can see that.

I think had they been waaaaay more transparent from the beginning and cut the last-gen versions this wouldn't have been received nearly as bad, but they essentially catfished everyone.

Objectively, I thought the game was entertaining enough to finish it. It wasn't groundbreaking like they were building it up to be, but I just feel that because they pretty much lied to consumers and tried to hide it with reviews that it really pissed people off.

CorndogBurglar670d ago (Edited 670d ago )

Lol, the game still isn't what it promised even today, over a year later. After being being pressured to fix it asap.

I don't know how releasing it in November, 2021 would have changed that. This article is seriously missing the point that it's been 22 months since it launched and we STILL don't have the game we were promised.

sourOG670d ago

Doubtful. I’d guess another year delay and they wouldn’t have sold as much as they did. Hype dies quickly.

I still haven’t played it and I bought it at launch. I was waiting for the ps5 version and now my interest can’t be bothered. I have too many games to play and that’s on the bottom of the list.

Show all comments (59)
90°

Cyberpunk 2077 Support Concludes As CDPR Turns Focus Towards Next Witcher Title & Other Projects

CD Projekt has concluded support work on Cyberpunk 2077, as the studio has turned focus towards the next Witcher and several other projects.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
DustMan4d ago

Such a great game. Recently started another playthrough.

Aussiesummer4d ago

I really have to get back into it, didn’t even get half way through, have the dlc and everything too.

110°

Cyberpunk 2077 Director On 95% Positive Steam Rating: "Never Thought I'd See It"

Cyberpunk 2077 has come a long way from being one of the worst games on the planet to being one of the best ones.

DustMan18d ago

I shelved it after a few hours in game at launch, glad I didn't refund it. One of the few games I've actually completed in the last year, and after finishing the campaigns I wanted to just jump back in from the start. They pulled a No Mans Sky and finished one of the best FPS in the last few years.

330°

Games That Were Bad on Release, But Are Now Great

BLG writes, "Some of the most popular games have had a rough start, with some of them being downright unplayable.

Despite that, developers have managed to turn it around for them and make their game worth playing. Here are some games that had a rough start but were pretty great."

Read Full Story >>
bosslevelgamer.com
Terry_B29d ago

Good list..hoped to see Street Fighter 5 there..and it is.

Vits29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Sea of Thieves... I'm not disagreeing that the game has improved in terms of content. But I feel that the most significant change between now and its release is actually the public perception. Nowadays, most people are aware that the game is a multiplayer PvP-focused experience first and foremost, and not "Black Flag made by Rare". Consequently, people dismissing the whole experience because the single-player aspect is lacking or the story is plain are much less common.

darthv7229d ago

Several years ago, i submitted an idea to Rare that would change up the mechanics of battling opponents in the game. whereby if you died in battle, you turned into a skeleton warrior and had to fight your way back to the land of the living. It was an interesting twist on respawning and would allow the player to experience both sides of a battle.

I keep hoping to see something like that get added to the game.

Kaii29d ago

They consider FO 76 & ME Andromeda to be great now 🤭

anast29d ago

Every game in the last 2 decades...

INMATEofARKHAM29d ago

It's sad that this quick retort is more often than not true... The industry's acceptance of release and patch has gone too far.

gunnerforlife29d ago

Days gone! By the end of the game I couldn't drop it down! I went around so many hours killing zombies! It was addictive by the end.

S2Killinit29d ago

That game was just plain good game. It didnt improve, it was just good.

gunnerforlife28d ago

I don't know, I got it abit late, and struggled for a few days, and then all of a sudden it just got good!!

Show all comments (16)