280°

Most Disappointing PC Games Releases Of 2021

DSOGaming : 2021 was a really weird year for PC gaming. Although we didn’t see a lot of games that had performance/tech issues, we did witness some questionably PC releases. From minimal PC graphics settings to really awful stuttering issues, these are the most disappointing PC game releases of 2021.

For this list, we’ve decided to only include triple-A games. The reason we are only including these high-profile games is simple. These games come from some of the biggest companies, so you’d expect their PC versions to be more polished than some PC indie games (or even double-A games). Also note that the following games are listed in no particular order.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
RaiderNation866d ago (Edited 866d ago )

For me it was Destruction All-Stars. I really liked the graphical presentation and the gameplay mechanics. However it just lacked content. It was released as a completely hollow, bare bones experience that was really never built/improved on. The game had "Rocket League" potential but post-launch support has been non existent.

ocelot07866d ago

Didn't realise that was a PC game?

RaiderNation866d ago

Shit! I missed the "PC" part of the title LOL!

RedDevils865d ago

Don't worry it will end up a PC game in couple of months.

ocelot07865d ago

@RedDevils

Yup for £70 and exclusive to the Epic Game Store no doubt 😂

Atticus_finch866d ago

Same at least we didn't have to pay for it.

866d ago Replies(2)
Limitedtimestruggle866d ago

Battlefield 2042 for me...that game took a steep nosedive down the ugly tree, and hit every damn branch on it's way down. What a complete disaster launch and a huge letdown.

CaptainHenry916866d ago

Battlefield 2042 and Halo Infinite for me

QSPR866d ago

For me Battlefield 2042 is the disappointing PC game of all times!

Putnum865d ago

Promise me you'll lower your expectations for the next one.

Viljong866d ago

Pc guys are so sour for far cry 6 hd texture pack requiring atleast 12gb vram from gpu. Meanwhile consoles run it high/ultra settings and the hd texture pack and smooth 60fps no issues. Pc also stutters. Not to mention limited RT require 3080 for 30fps. Them you cam forget ultra settings and texture packs. And the gpu alone cost like 1500e

XbladeTeddy866d ago

They had to limit RT as its an AMD sponsored title so had to conform to what AMD cards can realistically achieve with ray tracing, which is not great compared to Nvidia GPUs. Also the 12GB texture requirement was more a marketing thing for AMD cards. 8GB cards could run the textures.

SPAM-FRITTER-123866d ago

You seem to be saying lots of words that match that of developer problems. So my PC can run ARMA 3 in 4k on ultra but FC6 wont? I mean we dont really care for FC6 because its a garbage game. Also your console is running it on ultra at 60fps?

ProjectVulcan866d ago (Edited 866d ago )

The game was full of minor technical issues on consoles as well as PC. Plenty of stutter and frame drops on PS5 and Series X, the worst issue of any version is on the console versions. This is the camera stutter that can hit any time you pan and get weird frame pacing. This is not present on PC, although all versions have traversal stutter.

The PC version on AMD cards ran the HD texture pack even if you only had 8GB of VRAM at lower resolutions since it allocated a lot more video memory but never actually used it. You did need at least 12GB for the full native 4K resolution with ray tracing enabled- neither of which the consoles actually do anyway. PS5 for example averages about 1800p, or only about 65 percent of native 4K.

In short the game wasn't remotely perfect no matter what platform you chose. In fact it was a mediocre title overall, one of the worst Far Cry games made thus far as the reviews also bear out. Nobody is that bothered about it.

If you troll do better next time.

ChubbyBlade866d ago

You mean people are mad the product they bought isn’t optimized properly and they need a GPU you can’t get to run it properly due to that poor optimization? What a shocker

Limitedtimestruggle865d ago

Lol I'm not touching Ubisoft stuff. They are so…Ubisoft.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 865d ago
XbladeTeddy866d ago

Glad he mentioned Halo Infinite, the reviews seemed to completely miss the awful performance on PC.

Si-Fly866d ago

Playing on a 9600k with a 3070 at 1440p and performance is decent for me.

XbladeTeddy866d ago

Yeah, the frame rates are fine it's the stuttering and out of sync animations causing problems. Digital Foundry covered it in detail.

Elit3Nick866d ago

Stuttering can be (at least partially) rectified by uninstalling the Campaign HD textures pack.

camel_toad866d ago (Edited 866d ago )

@Elit3Nick

I had the stuttering with an rtx 3080 but the one thing that finally fixed it for me was just disabling gamebar's recording feature. Works fine if I'm using shadowplay's recording features so it's strange that MS's own app was the culprit.

It's run perfectly ever since I disabled it. And it's some good fun too. Graphically it actually looks a lot better than I expected but I did have mediocre expectations.

CaptainHenry916866d ago

I'm playing on a 3080 and I still think the performance is mediocre. I started to play Guardians of the Galaxy and never look back. Better story and better performance. I probably won't even go back to Halo Infinite

ChubbyBlade866d ago

That’s because it’s a 3070. My 1080ti struggles at 1080p in the open world during large battles.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 866d ago
Si-Fly866d ago (Edited 866d ago )

For the stuttering I made min and max frames the same, running at 120fps. I’m also using a Gsync ultimate monitor, not sure whether that is helping but it’s smooth as butter. If I don’t match min and max the game is stuttery.

pietro1212866d ago

It doesn't play well on PC? I was planning on building a PC within the next two years and I also wanted to download it on the steam deck I don't a lot about PC gaming besides some RPG stuff. My brother in law is helping me with the gaming rig.

ChubbyBlade866d ago

It plays fine, it’s just not optimized well at the moment.

Show all comments (37)
80°

Final Fantasy VII Remake Trilogy vs Final Fantasy VII Original Story Comparison: Which Is Better?

Twisted Voxel: "We compare the story in the original Final Fantasy VII and the new Final Fantasy VII Remake trilogy."

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
180°

Far Cry 20th Anniversary Celebration

Far Cry debuted on March 23, 2004, meaning that next week, it will have been 20 years since Jack Carver first washed up on the shore of a tropical paradise teeming with hostile mercenaries.

Read Full Story >>
terminalgamer.com
DefenderOfDoom258d ago

Played and enjoyed Far Cry, Far Cry 3 and 4 campaigns .

-Foxtrot58d ago

4 wasn’t so bad

Pagan Min was pretty entertaining

Skuletor57d ago

Yeah, 4 was good, was hard choosing which Golden Dawn member to side with, when they were both pieces of sh!t.
I've beaten all the main entries except 2 and 6, ended up uninstalling 6 to download something else instead.

Profchaos58d ago

I'd love a far cry pack with the original PC game (not the half assed port on ps360) instincts, predator even a port of far cry 2 to modern consoles back when these games had their own identity and weren't far cry 3 cut and pastel

Demetrius58d ago

Still one of my most favorite franchises along with assassins creed

banger8857d ago (Edited 57d ago )

Same here, I don't know why these games get so much hate. I've thoroughly enjoyed every single one of them, with only a couple of exceptions. I wish they'd hurry up and announce Far Cry 7. The only thing I'm concerned about is the rumoured time limit.

Show all comments (14)
80°

The creation of a real-life Final Fantasy VII Buster Sword

PlayStation Japan: “A great sword that has been passed down from generation to generation and carries the thoughts of those who fight.”