270°

Saints Row 5 and Dead Island 2 may be exclusive to Epic Games Store

According to a leaked court document, Dead Island 2 and Saints Row 5 will be exclusive to Epic Games Store.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
Orchard1110d ago

This court case is proving to be the biggest info dump/leak we've ever had, and the most reliable source lol.

Paleblood1110d ago

Exactly. No one would though how Microsoft praised so much The Last of Us 2 as to say that there is nothing like it in any console or on PC.

gamer78041110d ago

Doesn’t change that it’s story and writing is atrocious...

Orchard1110d ago (Edited 1110d ago )

The irony is they are looking the 'nicest' so far based on their 'review' of TLOU2... despite looking super awkward.

Apple are looking bad for saying things like 'we run the store, we collect the revenue" & the whole case itself
Sony are looking bad for being anti-crossplay & creating fees for devs wanting to cross-play
Epic are looking bad for saying things like "I cant think of a scenario where Epic doesn't get what we want" and basically trying to bribe Sony with 'making them look like heroes'

It's a good reminder that these companies ARE big corporations, not our friends, no matter how hard they pretend otherwise.

But hey, it's early days. Very likely a lot more info is going to come out as the case continues, relating to every company. It should be an interesting few days ahead.

Paleblood1109d ago

@gamer7804

The same way that doesn't change the fact that the game has received over 200 GOTY awards and is the only game on video game in history so far to receive the most awards.

MadLad1110d ago

Getting tired of EPIC simply buying exclusivity. If they outright bought these companies, and acted as publisher, it would be one thing.

Can't produce a solid storefront, but can throw boat loads of cash at developers to make sure you have to use it ...

GottaBjimmyb1110d ago

Complaining about free games and devs making their money back? Odd.

MadLad1110d ago

And yet they've been in the red since the store's inception, and for the foreseeable future.
Looks like my mentality is shared by many. GoG reworks old titles for new OS and hardware. Steam hosts an amazing network for players to interact. Greenman actually gives you the chance to return titles for store credit. Gamersgate hosts many abandonware titles you couldn't find elsewhere.

It's cool that Epic offers free titles to people, but it's not like other sites haven't also, and it's legitimately the only thing they have to offer, outside of trying to gate off access to games on other platforms via Tencent/Fortnite money.
Everything they do anymore, as a company, is shady business practice.

smashman981110d ago

What does it matter if we're the ones benefiting?

Profchaos1110d ago

If you dont like it don't use it. It's not like this is new they have been getting exclusive titles since they launched but they offer devs a better profit margin over steam just taking 30% and long term that percentage will matter some Devs may look at less profitable games as more profitable overall leading to sequels.that wouldn't have happened if it made 15% less.

I mean steam used to be the best place for sales and overall the cheapest place to play that hasn't been the case for a number of years so I have to ask what makes steam special now IMO nothing really elevates it above epic other than it's nice to have all my games in one place but I have gog for that now

MadLad1109d ago

"Dont like it don't use it" isn't a solid response to my disagreeing to calling out the only PC storefront who is trying to wall off titles to their store.

Paleblood1110d ago

That's what Xbox is doing too.

Petebloodyonion1110d ago

Well, I agree with a lot with your claims about Epic not really improving the store but they are also making things different.

1) They are the 1st to actually cut their profit margin to give back to devs and publishers.
2) they are actually giving good quality games putting pressure on PS+/Humble bundle into offering better titles too. And let's not forget that they are giving the games not renting the game.
3) They are actually trying to push the current monopoly structure of Steam and the fact that they are fighting back shows that they are starting to be a thorn in their side.

TheColbertinator1110d ago

I don't know, Ted. They haven't committed any crimes and have been aggressive just like the other major players in the industry but that is the only way to survive.

MadLad1109d ago (Edited 1109d ago )

I don't like their business practice. Look even at the lawsuits they are in; they're playing power grabs in every market, and trying to circumvent the rules had on other storefronts for maximum profit.
It's their right as a business, but that doesn't mean I endorse it.
I like PC being an open market though, and they're the only ones trying to change that. Steam has a majority on the PC, but they never stopped me from buying games through other stores.
They're doing everything they can to get that majority market, and I'm positive, if and when they get it, even that bigger cut in sales for devs will go out the window.

TheColbertinator1109d ago

I see your point. Don't endorse their tactics myself just because I am aware of their usage.

We'll have to see in the future if their customer friendly pitches are here to stay regardless of their profits to come.

MadLad1109d ago

Don't get me wrong; the day they start taking that money and bankrolling interesting new "Epic Exclusive" projects, they'll have my money.
But as long as they're throwing around money just to limit where I can buy games, I'll simply wait until it's available elsewhere. I just choose to not support what I find bad business practice.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1109d ago
Razmiran1110d ago

If dead island 2 ever releases im fine with it even if its a stadia exclusive in the end
Im just curious if it will ever make it out

Father__Merrin1110d ago

Saints 5 better return to what saints 2 was

chicken_in_the_corn1110d ago

I'd rather see a new style altogether

Germaximus1110d ago

Agents of Mayhem is awesome

isarai1110d ago

@Germaximus

Seriously! I bought that game on sale, and honest i felt critics were too harsh on it. It's super satisfying to play and the city is beautiful. Really made me excited to see what they do for Saints Row 5.

robtion1109d ago

No thanks.

I think saints 3 and 4 are much better. Hopefully they keep going with the over the top shenanigans.

XxINFERNUSxX1110d ago

That's nice, if I was interested in these games, torrent FTW, fuck you Epic haha. While everyone complains, moans and groans I just torrent with a smile 😊

Skuletor1110d ago

I'm still waiting for Tony Hawk's Pro Skater to come to Steam and there's no torrent for that yet

XxINFERNUSxX1110d ago

I know, it's been out since Aug. 2020 I think. No torrent because it requires a internet connection at every launch of the game. They need more time. Come on CODEX you can do it 😀

Show all comments (27)
80°

The Epic Games Store has a GOTY Edition Freebie Waiting for You

The Epic Games Store has a GOTY Edition, AAA title they want you to add to your library.

Read Full Story >>
terminalgamer.com
70°

Summer Game Fest Reveals First Wave Of Partners

This is a great looking list.
Summer Game Fest is happy to reveal the first 55 partners set to participate in SGF activities this June.

140°

Square Enix Is Going Multiplatform; The Layoffs & Its Past Don't Inspire Confidence

After its latest games didn't meet sales targets, Square Enix is going multiplatform but the company's track record isn't convincing.

Scissorman1d 4h ago

Square Enix been multiplatform for decades, a few exclusively-deals doesn't make them any less multiplatform.

fr0sty1d 4h ago

Nor is selling their games on a console with only 25 million install base going to bring their sales to where they hope they will be... Unless they somehow manage to dumb down FF7 trilogy to work on switch, they aren't going to have much luck. They already released it on PC, after all.

anast17h ago

Where are you getting that number?

SegaSaturn6691d 4h ago

It kind of does, giving preference to a certain platform by timed exclusivity. Console ports generally feel superior. Legend of mana PC port extremely broken

neutralgamer19921d 3h ago

Sega

It doesn’t when square themselves didn’t want to fund the development of remake. It’s only after the success of the 1st they realized their mistake but now contract is signed. If it wasn’t for Sony there would be no FF7 remakes. Same goes for silent hill 2 with Konami. They don’t want to fund AAA budget. Companies like PlayStation and Nintendo get blamed when in reality they are saving some of these franchises

Remember sega didn’t want to fund bayonetta and epic games didn’t want to fund another gears of war. It’s easy to blame console makers but they are the ones taking the risk and paying huge upfront costs without seeing the final product. FF7 remake trilogy won’t be coming to Xbox now or in the future. PlayStation and PC is what square signed up for. Sony paid them more than they would make from Xbox sales.

ravens521d 4h ago

I just wonder when everyone is going to demand that the Square Enix exclusives with Nintendo come to PS and Xbox. Or it's just the PS exclusives that matter lol

phoenixwing1d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

I'd love for the nintendo exclusives to come to pc or ps5. They'd actually be playable then.

neutralgamer19921d 3h ago

Raven

Exactly and that’s where square enix does more exclusive than any other platform. Gaming is square has always been very unrealistic with their sales expectations. Remember when tomb raider reboot sold 7.5 million and square said it wasn’t enough. They need to spend less on development and have more realistic expectations from sales.

And those thinking games being not on Xbox makes a difference don’t understand we have a decade plus of data showing square enix games having less than 20% of their multiplatform sales on Xbox (final fantasy series) and Nintendo consoles aren’t strong enough to run any current games. Nintendo switch should be as strong as Xbox one x atleast but we all know that’s most likely won’t happen

RoadRacer1d 2h ago

@raven

thing is, as neutral said in their comm, the switch isn't strong enough to run flagship SE games
i think what SE does is, it makes unique games for switch only so that it has something for that console too. Thats where all the "underlined sans" rpgs go to mostly

maybe things will change when Swtich 2 drops cuz that's gonna be as strong as ps4 afaik from the rumors flying around

TheGamingHounds1d 3h ago

@Scissorman

Your point is valid enough but when the icon of this company is limited to one console in timed-exclusivity, it means the company has crossed the line. By some degree at least

All things aside, Square itself stated "aggressive multiplatform strategies" so we all know what it's talking about

Scissorman1d 1h ago (Edited 1d 1h ago )

Then the headline should read "Square To Drop Exclusively Deals in Pursuit of A Sweeping Multiplatform Strategy". I don't recall this argument when Square Enix released Bravely Default, Octopath Traveler, and Triangle Strategy on one platform. And even if FF is the icon, not all of its titles have gone to one platform. We're talking about three games, one of which is already on PC. Did Square suddenly go 'multiplatform' after it released subsequent Tomb Raider sequels on more than just the Xbox? It's just a silly way of putting it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 17h ago
TheGamingHounds1d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

SE needs to go all in optimization. Broken PC ports won't help its case, especially with big releases like mainline Final Fantasy

Asterphoenix1d 3h ago

It's actually simple. What doesn't inspire confidence is Square allocating their budgets on the wrong projects such as Forspoken, Avengers, Babylons Fall and Foamstars.

Square has always been multiplatform since PS3/360 days which 80 % of their games are. People kick up a fuss over PS exclusivity but not Nintendo which has more exclusive projects console exclusive from Square.

FF16 has done ok but not enough to fix the blunders that the past mistakes Square has made with some of their projects. FF7 Rebirth is unclear we'll see a PC release for sure so it's hard to say so far not as good as they would of liked.

Then again unrealistic expectations. If it weren't for Sony these games would at least had another 2 years development time. So some people need to be realistic in that regard.

Scissorman1d 1h ago (Edited 1d 1h ago )

It's the blunders that set those expectations so high. If you remove those from the equation, I bet the sales numbers would be more than stellar. Square believes it's okay to release a pile of risky, middling, garbage because the big boys will ultimately subsidize the cost. Don't worry if Forspoken sells poorly, FF16 will surely sell 10 million copies to balance that right out. Oh wait, it only sold like 4 million. Well that's a disaster. Meanwhile games that sell 2 million units with comparable budgets are deemed successful.

thorstein19h ago

I would also add that FFXVI, which I loved has a hint to one of their biggest problems: the number 16.

It's a great franchise, but that's all they've become known for. Dragon Quest is my favorite all time series but it's like they don't know what to do outside of those two IPs.

Valve never makes trilogies. The idea is that they don't want to become stagnant. Gabe Newell hates the number 3.

I can't imagine their talent wouldn't want to try a new RPG.

RoadRacer1d 2h ago

Square Enix just really need to revise its expectations. Maybe consider a change in strategy on dev end as well. Multiplat will help for sure but only good games that are marketed well will sell

Show all comments (18)