780°

Ghost of Tsushima review: You’ve played this before - Polygon

A great setting let down by rote design

mrsolidsteel201403d ago

Interesting, so it might be safe to say that Polygon will say the same thing about Cyberpunk when that game is release.

jukins1403d ago

Because it's a fps where do things that you've done in other games. Nothing in cyberpunk is new or innovative but the complete package seems to be well done. Seems they're nitpicking here.

Think the op is just saying if they do t say rhe same thing then theres obvious bias or clickbaiting

GaboonViper1403d ago Show
Kribwalker1402d ago Show
DarXyde1402d ago

This review was bound to be posted regardless, but I'm very unsuprised to see it was shared by you.
Never stop being your predictable self, Kribwalker.

To mrsolidsteel20's point, I would guess they mean that Cyberpunk 2077 isn't doing anything remarkably new. I don't agree or disagree (haven't play it obviously, and don't know much about it because I'm doing a media blackout).

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1402d ago
-Foxtrot1403d ago (Edited 1403d ago )

These kind of reviews should be tread on carefully by the reviewer or site because it marks them both by gamers towards any future reviews they'll do if they end up giving new IPs or even sequels praise despite the fact they also end up doing roughly the same thing. If they don't complain about those games and hold it up to the same standard they called out games like Ghost of Tsushima then it's going to be "why rules for one and not the other?"

I mean don't see them complaining this much with Call of Duty, Assassins Creed, Sims, Animal Crossing, Zelda etc even with some instalments of these games removing features found in past games. I could go on.

This review is an opinion and we should let them have it but like I said they need to watch what they say by making those statements if they end up reviewing another game but give it a free pass despite doing the same things. It's just going to make them look like hypocrites at the end of the day.

People did the same thing for Days Gone despite the fact other games similar got a free pass

mrsolidsteel201403d ago

@Foxtrot

Couldn't agree more Fox.

throne1403d ago

I feel days gone got crapped on coz most reviewers didn't go to far or finish it and assumed the story was just a cliche

solideagle1403d ago

Add pokemon and smash bros on the list as well...

-Foxtrot1403d ago

@solideagle

Oh Pokemon is a good one

Especially after shitty Sword and Steel, people ignoring the flaws when it came to reviews.

ShadowWolf7121403d ago

@throne

Oh, that's already been proven. One review rather specifically hinted they thought Jessie was the game's final boss. lol

TheKingKratos1403d ago

hehe, finally i agree with you on something

Zodiac1403d ago (Edited 1403d ago )

You’re listing series, though. You expect them them to be similar. This is different - completely different IP that feels like you’re in playing another IP. I haven’t played it, so I can’t say, but I see people saying “what about______” and they are all series over a decade old and It’s not a good comparison.

This review is exactly that joke about PS exclusives - what is it? 3rd person, over the shoulder camera and dark, low lighting? It’s not COMPLETELY off the mark and a few reviews have noted this. The game still has a great average score, so it’s not too damaging.

Also the average score for games like COD and Pokemon has dropped, notably, over the last few installments, so people aren’t ignoring it.

-Foxtrot1403d ago

@Zodiac

That's completely backward

Sequels should EXPAND on what came before with gameplay features that are relevant to the series and respects the franchise enough to make it feel like a natural progression that belongs in whatever franchise it is.

New IPs should get the benefit of the doubt, you can't expect every new franchise to reinvent the wheel, it would be totally different if that new IP had a sequel and it was almost EXACTLY the same without hardly any improvement.

RgR1403d ago

I don't recall playing a samurai open world before either so it's quite honestly a lie to say we've played this before. Unless I'm mistaken.

rainslacker1403d ago (Edited 1403d ago )

This review is a click bait, just like all of other Polygon's reviews.

Reviewers shouldn't worry about what the community says about them. If they are, they're playing politics, and have already given up their credibility to save face.

Review the game the way you see fit, and people will agree or disagree either way. Doesn't matter if the community lashes out, or if I, or you, feel they're wrong.

Trying to remain consistent isn't the same as being unbiased, because while many games have similar traits, it doesn't mean they all share the same experience.

Chard1402d ago

All reviews are opinions. You're supposed to read/watch then make a judgement about whether it's for you. There's no need to treat them as anything more than that.

WelkinCole1402d ago

Not just Days Gone. HZD as well.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 1402d ago
chiefJohn1171403d ago

Cyberpunk is definitely doing something unique.

franwex1403d ago Show
starchild1402d ago

Yes, it is. So is Ghost of Tsushima. It's such a generic complaint to say "this game is derivative", because it's a complaint that is used so selectively and disingenuously.

All games are built on the backs of games that came before it. Every new game is partially derivative and partially a new fresh synthesis. But when you want to hate on something you can always fall back on the ol' "it's derivative" talking point.

Zhipp1403d ago

What other games are there like cyberpunk? I'm genuinely curious as I've been hyped for that game for ages. If I could've been playing the same thing all these years then I've been missing out.

P_Bomb1403d ago

From the demo I watched you just drive around a basic city doing basic missions for underworld types that swear a lot. The car chase shootout looked like it could be on-rails. Dunno.

UltraNova1403d ago (Edited 1403d ago )

Try GTA in a futuristic - cyberpunk setting with Deus Ex-esq augmentations.

Zhipp1403d ago

@P_Bomb
There have been many demos and previews over the past two years. The biggest appeal to this game is the idea of a
branching narrative driven by the players choices. That's why a lot of the customizations (your backstory, etc) are not necessarily primarily for "gameplay" perks, but more like the charisma stat in Fallout. They change the way your character fits in the world, which is a big deal for a Western RPG.

On top of that, there are tons of different playstyles afforded by the plethora of augmentations you can get. I highly suggest you look at some of the other demos. There are hours of gameplay, but if you don't have time there are some nice breakdowns by a few fan channels. We still haven't seen all there is to see it the game either, as these demos are only from early on in a 100hr+ rpg.

@Ultranova
This game is not gta. Gta is an action adventuee sandbox. Cyberpunk is more along the lines of The Witcher 3, but with fps mechanics, a car instead of a horse, and (hopefully) even more freedom of choice due to not being constricted to a predefined character. It's a WRPG, through and through.

I haven't gotten around to playing Deus ex yet, but as far as I can tell, it's not to the scale of what they're promising in Cyberpunk. Though I'm still looking forward to playing through the series.

savedsynner1402d ago

Polygon's credibility is in the toilet. They have an overarching social justice agenda and their reviews are a joke.

starchild1402d ago

Agreed. They're a joke.

WelkinCole1402d ago (Edited 1402d ago )

Its the same shit that happened with Days Gone and HZD. PS exclusives really are held to higher reviewing standards

SyntheticForm1402d ago

As long as it's a fun game overall, I don't mind. It absolutely looks like a good time to me.

To be honest, I expected a lot of people to talk about repetition and the game loop after seeing the narrated video with Nate Fox. I liked what I was seeing, but I knew it wasn't terribly fresh either, and I knew it definitely wasn't breaking new ground in anything. I thought that Nate Fox was trying to make things sound more impressive than they are, like Jin's armor customization. When he told us something to the effect of 'We can go in loud or quiet' I thought to myself "Big deal, you have this option in every game. This isn't special."

That being said, I also know that I very much enjoy games like this. I enjoy open worlds and map clearing as long as most of it's quality; if the combat and traversal are fun, and there's enough variation in activity, and the environments are nice, and the characters are cool, I'll totally get into it.

Game's don't have to be groundbreaking and amazing. By the looks of it, this game is neither, but it does look like some good ol' escapism and fun, which is what I expect out of a video game. It also looks visually impressive. So, overall, I think I'm looking at a great game here and I'm looking forward to the 17th.

dumahim1402d ago

Polygon really seems to be the kings of bad takes, aren't they?

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1402d ago
solideagle1403d ago

It does seem like a joke. I wonder Polygon writes this about COD, Assasins creed, smash bros and Pokemon. It is ok to differ but you have to be neutral and do it with all other games as well.

FinalSpero1403d ago

That's idealistic though. For several reasons.

1. More than one person handles reviews. Multiple reviewers have different experiences, personalities, and biases. And despite the fight to stay objective those things will still come through because we're only human.

2. Game preferences. If Reviewer A hates RPG's, and knows little about them. Chances are they would give a lower score to something like The Witcher 3 as opposed to Reviewer B who is a lifelong RPG fan and understands advanced RPG systems and mechanics.

UltraNova1403d ago

Final,

And every single one of them will "adapt" their reviews based on Management's "guidelines".

starchild1402d ago

If reviews are purely subjective why should we care about them? We're all different, right? If people can't begin to put their own particular biases aside and be as objective and fair as possible in their analysis in order to help a broad range of gamers make a more informed decision then what's their purpose?

BISHOP-BRASIL1402d ago (Edited 1402d ago )

@starchild

Originally the purpose was to sell you magazines, right now is to keep you clicking and generating that sweet ad money...

Look, we all want to know whether or not a game is good before we go investing time and money in it (and if we are willing to spend time finding out, someone some where will be willing to make money out of our interest), but reality is the very nature of games being interactive media make them even more subjective in value than other media.

A review is second hand opinion, someone else's description of how they felt while interacting with this program. It's not how the interaction itself went. It's not even necessarily how they actually felt while playing. It's their description of it. That can be colored by anything, from pre-existing bias to buyer's remorse, all the way down to sneaky advertisement purposes and even bad memory retention. There really isn't much to do about it which could make reviews fair and objective because the nature of reviewing itself is not so much about the product, it's about the writer and how they view the product (true of critics in any industry).

At best you can find those reviewers you usually agree with and those you don't, doesn't mean you'll agree on future exchanges, but at least you have a track record... Also having a single standard that we could all attain to and actually help everyone making informed decisions kind of ruins the whole marketing appeal of this thing as well as the idea of keeping you clicking around, so that's a no no for the gaming "journalism" biz.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1402d ago
FinalSpero1403d ago

Polygon has never been a joke? One review you don't agree with for a game you've yet to play and all of a sudden one of the better large media websites has "always been a joke"?

Reviews are opinions. You're welcome to disagree with them. Don't take them to heart. They aren't facts. 👍

RememberThe3571403d ago

This opinion of Polygon is far from sudden. Their reviews have always been pretty trash and their articles are almost always defined by some sort of whining. I agree with a lot of their perspectives but their writers tones are just condescending, annoying, and often narrowly framed. Polygon being trash is not a new sentiment and they've done their best to cultivate this perception.

King_Noctis1402d ago

"One review you don't agree with for a game you've yet to play and all of a sudden one of the better large media websites has "always been a joke"

If only people think the same way toward reviewers/publications that give this game lower score.

rainslacker1403d ago

Polygon review. You've read this drivel before - Me.

1403d ago Replies(2)
RazzerRedux1403d ago (Edited 1403d ago )

A game doesn't have to be entirely original as long as it executes the game play and story effectively. HZD is a good example.

"With its quasi-historical setting and its open world filled with activities and upgrades, comparisons to the Assassin’s Creed games are inevitable, so let’s not beat around the bush: Ghost of Tsushima is extremely reminiscent of many entries in the Ubisoft action franchise and other, similar open-world games, both in terms of its combat and its structure. If you like maps with a lot of icons on them offering up things to do, you’re going to be very happy with this game."

Yes! Music to my ears. I was hoping AC would head out east and give us Assassin's like this. Seems Sucker Punch beat them to it. Love games like this where I can get lost for 80 hours or more.

throne1403d ago

comparing it with assassins creed considering it does a whole lot of things better especially in the stealth department

LucasRuinedChildhood1403d ago

Easy Allies said that the stealth in GOS is very basic compared to the rest of the gameplay.

MetalGearsofWar1403d ago

A game doesn't have to be entirely original as long as it executes sales.

aconnellan1402d ago

Completely agreed - one review I read was saying that Ubisoft could learn a lot from GoT. There’s nothing wrong with doing things that have already been done, it’s all in the execution, and it seems like Sucker Punch took a tested formula and improved on it

Petebloodyonion1403d ago (Edited 1403d ago )

And this is why how we review games needs to change.
because the media seem to forget that the basic goal of a review is to guide the consumer in the purchase of a product.
Not about a game should evolve or what the reviewer would want to see in a game.

Per example bring back Gamepro, style of review (score for graphics, sound, gameplay, fun, replay and reviewer tilt)
This way reviews get normalize and we don't get things like Gears 5 score 7 just because the story is predictable and Zelda 10 because who care about a story in a Zelda game.

And somehow I feel that a lot of negative reviews for this game are more like answers from the media regarding the perfect 10 they all gave to Tlou2 and how ppl react to it.

LucasRuinedChildhood1403d ago

What are you talking about? It has an average of 84 on Metacritic so most of the media that you're trying to vilify really liked the game. Why are you even complaining?

As a consumer, I'm personally really tired of open world games where you complete repetitive tasks to turn a map from red to green. It's not as engaging to me as the high quality side-content in open world games like The Witcher 3, God Of War and RDR2. I'm not saying that that is what GOS is (I've heard that the "Tales of Tsushima" side missions are great), but this is a very common sentiment so there would naturally be many critics who express the same opinion. Are you saying that critics should only address consumers like yourself and no one else?

Your examples are also just silly. Gears 5 put a lot of focus on the story so if you didn't enjoy the story, that should be part of your review. Context is important. You don't need to robotically score a video-game like an algorithm.

"And somehow I feel that a lot of negative reviews for this game are more like answers from the media regarding the perfect 10 they all gave to Tlou2 and how ppl react to it." I've heard this narrative before but it obviously didn't pan out. The game has an average of 84 on Metacritic. Even though it didn't happen you guys are still pushing that story anyway. Sigh.

Petebloodyonion1403d ago

1) I'm talking about written reviews like this one so why are you bringing Metacritic score?

2) I failed to understand your personal opinion when related to my post or the article but here: I prefer arcade racer to simulation racer: Should it be ok if I score all game like Wipeout a 9 and all game like Dirt rally a 6?

3) Sure I agree that if the guy don't like the story he should point it out, but the guy actually enjoyed the story he only felt it was predictable and gave it a 7/10 because of that single thing. Does this mean that for this reviewer story count for 60% of his score (he still liked it so I guess it must get some points yes?)
https://www.gamespot.com/ga...
And yet the same media gave Zelda a 10 despite numerous flaws.

rainslacker1403d ago

The main point of a review title when used more than just the title of the game with review as the next word, is framed in such a way to give the reviewers overall impression of the game.

To me, saying we've done this all before, is not a review of a game, but a observation that this game is not unlike some other games out there.

I don't really care so much about if the game is like some other games out there. What I would care about is how that all comes together to forum the experience. Polygon rarely ever makes that kind of title.

starchild1402d ago

How does the fact it received an overall 84 metacritic score somehow prove the mainstream journos didn't have the kind of bias he pointed out?

It seems like some sites gave TLOU2 an extra half or full point for being stunning and brave, while subtracting the same amount from Ghost of Tsushima for lacking that ignoble trait.

Show all comments (102)
60°

Ghost Of Tsushima Director's Cut Best Settings Guide For PC

Ghost of Tsushima Director's Cut, is now available on PC, and here are the best PC settings for optimized performance on mid-end systems.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
370°

Ghost of Tsushima becomes Steam's top selling paid game, soars past Hades 2 and Helldivers 2

The PC release of Ghost of Tsushima is off to a very strong start on Steam.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
PrinceOfAnger23h ago

Released on Pc after 4 years and at 60$ price currently have 57k players, now imagine if it was released day one like Helldivers 2 almost 460k players! on steam alone sony need to think again.

Lightning7720h ago

Very high demand for Sony games on PC. This is a good thing.

ZeroX98768h ago

Most ports on PC looks absolutely fantastic, so even if there's a timing difference in releases, as long as they take full advantage of what our current PCs can do, I think PC gamers won't mind as much as long as the end products plays great.

Online multiplayer games and franchises that has or will have a Tv show/movie coming out should be prioritized in the future PC ports list of games in my opinion, to ride the hype/marketing waves on all platforms while the interests of gamers for them is at it's peak to maximize sales and market exposure.

Glad it's doing well on PC, more funds for the studio for their next project(s)!

--Onilink--4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

To be honest, a strong start is always expected, but the games tend to fall off quickly (aside from HD2 of course). The SP games havent sold that amazingly on PC recently (with Zero Dawn still being the highest seller). We already saw the numbers with the leaks

While I dont really expect Sony to ever (or at least any time in the short or mid future) release the SP games day one on PC, waiting 1+ years might be affecting their sales potential.

I honestly also think people probably overestimate how many PS5 gamers wouldnt have bought the console if the games are on PC (just as people underestimate just how console sales are to a more mainstream market that probably would never consider gaming on PC anyway)

Storm2319h ago

Would you go same day release for PC with the PS5? Or do you think 6 months would be ok? We can all agree, I would think, that 4 years is way too long.

anast10h ago

Why change it? PC gamers will treat it like a day 1 release 4 years later. When the game sales completely flat lines on console is when they should bring it to PC for a second release.

DustMan7h ago

I can see maybe 2 years being fair. I'm not sure how long it takes to port over, but if it takes that long to release a relatively bug free and smooth game at launch then I'm not going to complain. I played the (new) original God of War just a year ago, and can't wait for Ragnarock. The only dumpster fire I recall so far has been The Last of Us, but they patched that up and it's great now.

shaenoide18h ago

Releasing day one means no need to buy a Playstation and Sony losing 30% of each games sold.

Chevalier18h ago(Edited 18h ago)

Its a Sony game publisher by them so it's 100% on console not 30%. If they release on Steam they Steam takes 30%

DaMist18h ago

@chevalier that's what shaenoide meant, releasing they one, they would lose 30% of each game sold on steam on top of some people not needing to get a console

hiroyukisanada11h ago

Just like @shaenoide said. If you go Day and date launch on PC, no need to buy a PlayStation. Exactly why Xbox sales have plummeted.
In order to sell consoles, you need exclusives.
Keep the Single player games exclusive for a few years but make the multiplayer games day and date.
I'd argue that's their best strat in order to sell consoles. If not, they're done for. Just like Xbox consoles.
But MS has Windows. Sony doesn't.

DustMan7h ago

Well. Lets just say that 70% is a lot better than 0% from the PC community.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 7h ago
outsider162418h ago

Releasing day 1 on pc. Why would you need a ps5 then. This strategy is doing Sony's business better.

wesnytsfs8h ago

Most console gamers will never go to PC. They either do not want to put up the money for a good gaming pc or they simply do not want to deal with PC issues. AAA games are expensive and its obvious one platform is unable to recoup that cost anymore.

jznrpg7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Nm read it wrong. I won’t go back to PC. I want physical games, I don’t want to keep upgrading my PC. I like to collect consoles. I did the Pc thing for almost 20 years and I’m done with it.

shinoff21837h ago

@wes

Your absolutely right. Mods and shit would be cool on some games but most the time I don't wanna deal with pc stuff. I want to hit my button and get rolling

derek6h ago

@wesnytsfs, there is zero reason to do day and date. Day and date is an instant drag on revenue, increased cost of development plus you open the game to piracy immediately. Nobody knows if console players would build a pc, but it certainly becomes an option so why would Sony risk it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6h ago
notachance17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

Why? Delayed release means there’s bound to be people who double dipped and buy both version, especially single player games which is often one and done. Simultaneous release works for multiplayer game riding the hype train, that’s why helldivers 2 is successfull as it is now.

Why do you think Rockstar always released a game for console first and then PC way later? Double dip is the key. Although that can only work if the game itself is amazing: GTA V, RDR2, Horizon, GoW, now GoT. I reckon if forspoken did that it won’t turn out the same..

blackblades15h ago

The whole point of PC releases is to gain more players that would never get a PlayStation to begin with. Some can wait for years apparently for it to release on pc then get a PlayStation as seen. Still day one is a no go, have them sign for psn account because they are PlayStation good strategy business wise. End of the day it has nothing to do with me except for the obvious

wesnytsfs8h ago

I traded in my series X since I never played it and Im getting close to doing the same with the ps5. The PC is usually the best version of a game and the only console I really play anymore which is still rare is the switch. Its become worth waiting to play a game to experience on the most powerful platform.

Jingsing14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

If we go by your number $60 x 57,000 then take away Valve's 30% = $1,026,000 you get = $2,394,000.

That is not including all the other associated deployment costs, so in terms of clear profit it probably doesn't end up being much. Maybe in the region of just over a million in profit. That is small fries for a company like Sony.

I'm calling that not really worth it. Also there are more than 57k people downloading it from another location that isn't Steam if you know were to look. So Sony will be considering that too. If the profits are too low and more people are grabbing it for free so to speak then why would they continue?

Michiel19898h ago

that is just the currently playing ones, not including people who stopped playing a minute ago, not including the people who play in offline mode

Jingsing7h ago

@Michiel1989 Likewise you aren't including refunds either, so it cuts both ways.

Michiel19897h ago

pretty sure that % isn't high, the game has also not even been released for that long even if it was only 57k, that would be pretty solid for a pretty old game at this point

shinoff21837h ago

Sony was the first one to let small publishers have print runs as low as 1,000 copies. How much money you think they make off that?

It adds up, money is money. Profit is profit. So when you say not much to be worth it I disagree

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 7h ago
Markdn10h ago

Only works well if you care about pc players, I sure don't, I always. Kill crossplay when on my console games. I'm not slating pc gamers. Just saying I don't care what comes out on your hardware or when, just as long as I'm supported first on Console, you can see how well that's worked out for M$ and gamepass. Killed their console division. Sony need to. Maintain a healthy gap between console and then PC release to avoid this. The trouble with the PC boys is they always want every thing first because they imagine there special or deserve preferential treatment. Thankfully Sony know this is not the case and it's the Console players who keep the company in profit not the pc players

Michiel19898h ago

why are you comparing a closed platform that actually has an owner to an open platform that doesn't?

"he trouble with the PC boys is they always want every thing first because they imagine there special or deserve preferential treatment" you literally just said that you don't care about pc as long as you get it first on your console. The hypocrisy -.-

I'm not sure what pc gamers you know, but the ones I know just want their games to be customizable to their hardware and have the game run good. I'm pretty sure that you don't talk to any pc players actually, looking at the way you talk about them.

Cacabunga10h ago

How about the console sales you excluded from your ridiculous analyse?? GoT was a big system seller that moved many PS4. Sony needs games like this one to keep their loyal fanbase. It’s in their benefit to keep the exclusives and not end couples like another company starting with x

shinoff21837h ago

And the ones who bought the ps5 version

DarXyde9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

That doesn't make sense.

Why wouldn't they continue staggered release dates if it means they can sell it years later at a premium and still have sales like it's day one?

They literally gave Ghost of Tsushima its THIRD wind.

Terry_B4h ago

Lol no. Sony does not need to be as stupid as Microsoft.

Einhander19722h ago

This did release day one on PlayStation and it sold as I recall 3 million in it's first week, so I am sure that at some point it had 460k+ concurrent players.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 2h ago
neutralgamer199219h ago

I have it on PS5 (never played it it’s in my collection) but I want to play it on PC. But I will wait for it to get below $30.

Storm2319h ago

I played it on PS5 and it was fantastic. I'm sure the experience on PC will be incredible. I hope there are some significant upgrades (if possible) to an already beautiful game.

neutralgamer199217h ago

I love sucker punch they are very underrated. I hope the rumor about a smaller team at SP working on a new SLY is also true

jznrpg7h ago

A new Sly Cooper would be so great. Definitely a game I can play on the portal

Storm236h ago

A new Sly game would be amazing, but unfortunately those rumors were debunked.

Goodguy0119h ago

Very good pc port. Some things here and there but very excellent. I stopped playing the game back on ps4 as I got burnt out but now I'm very ready to play through the whole game this time and in glorious 1440p and unlocked framerate. I suggest turning off AA and any upscaling, game looks beautiful.

Magatsuhi18h ago

Thought Sony ruined the game? That's what many youtubers said.

EternalTitan9h ago

Some stuff arent very historically accurate but this game is basically the Assasins Creed set in Japan we all have been asking for.

Huey_My_D_Long7h ago

AC games have never been historically accurate. Yet Yosuke was an historical figure, unlike any protagonist before him. Not sure why all of sudden people realize AC takes liberties but some of yall rhetoric is silly. Being mad because the Japanese leader made him a retainer is like telling National Gaurd they aren't real soldiers.

buffig1h ago

Yet the Japanese loved it and were frustrated by the fact that it took a western studio to make such an authentically Japanese historical game

UltimateOwnage17h ago

Sony has been doing fantastic PC ports that leverage the benefits of the platform, but also allow them to scale to even handheld PC’s like the Deck. It’s awesome to see them do PC ports right.

Show all comments (60)
220°

Ghost of Tsushima on PC Won't Be Released in Specific Countries Due to PSN, and Here's the List

It seems Ghost of Tsushima on PC will have the same PSN purchasing restrictions that caused massive backlash to Helldivers 2.

H96d ago

People on N4G: just fly to another country, what's the big deal

JL29306d ago

No one cares about 3rd world problems.

INMATEofARKHAM5d ago

There's actually at least one 1st world country on that list and a number of 2nd world countries too. It's almost as if you don't know what defines 1st, 2nd or 3rd world countries... 🤔

JL29305d ago

Ever hear of turn of phrase? English must not be your first language.

H95d ago

If only it was a gender problem

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH5d ago

If I had to guess your age based on your comment I’d say middle schooler.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5d ago
purple1016d ago

not available in JAPAN., wtf sony need to sort their sh** out. this is beyond a joke when a samurai game cannot be sold in Japan, something is wrong.

Hugodastrevas6d ago

Yeah, it's all wrong since they may bed to California

StoneTitan5d ago

Because for Japan you have to create a different version. You should look it up. The game is sold in Japan but its not the same storefront. Same with helldivers.
Has something to do with microtransaczion laws.
Look it up.

Hugodastrevas6d ago

Bunch of geniuses running Sony these days... Smh

ocelot076d ago

Got the feeling Sony are half arsing the PC thing. It's that or the whole PC thing is completely lost on them.

wesnytsfs5d ago

Its lost to sony, They have been quite poor at pc releases going all the way back to the OG planetside.

TheColbertinator16h ago

Sony Online had so much potential and Sony squandered it.

wesnytsfs8h ago

@TheColbertinator, I think they still can be successful on PC. But treating the platform like they do with such delays before releasing on PC will never endear them to PC gamers.

Inverno6d ago

Why tho? The SP works without the need to log into PSN, this was literally announce. So why is it an issue? Simply A. removing the login restriction fixes this, or B. People simply won't play the MP which I don't think people will care much. A better option is A, or even better just lower the game price in those countries to compensate for the lack of MP access.

Show all comments (26)