Is the sequel to New Colossus as bad as everyone says? Yes! Delrith endures and suffers through fully to give you all the info you need on Wolfenstein: Youngblood!
BLG writes, "There can be only one best Wolfenstein game. Since the franchise’s debut in 1981, the Wolfenstein series has graced our gaming platforms for over forty years. It’s hard to believe, but it’s true! In honor of that legacy, we’re going to list some of the best Wolfenstein games and the worst. That’s right: it’s the Wolfenstein games ranked."
Scheiße! Nein.
Return to Castle Wolfenstein is the best in the series. After that:
New Order
New Colossus
Old Blood
I really wish they'd remake Return to Castle Wolfenstein from the ground up. Easily the best of them all.
There have been plenty of Wolfenstein games released over the years, but which Nazi shooting epic is the best one?
Wolfenstein 2009 doesn't get enough credit. It was genuinely good, I really enjoyed it. I think the reboot series from MachineGames is certainly better, but the 2009 game is still worth playing.
I still favor Return to Castle Wolfenstein. I like the Indiana Jones and the Nazis messing with the supernatural vibe.
Wolfenstein 2009 is still my favorite by a mile. The variety of locations like the farm level and others were so colorful and fun to explore. The story as well with the Dark Sun and the enemies. Just very well thought out and BJ was perfect in it with his look and demeanor.
2009 game way too low on this list. Original Wolfenstein is not better than any of the modern games.
Jason says, "The devs of the future Indiana Jones game made this game. So duh, I decided I’d review their last work to get a feel for the potential quality of their future work!
In case you don’t know, Wolfenstein: Youngblood continues the Wolfenstein storyline of the modern games but as a spinoff centered around BJ’s daughters. It also continues along with the fast-paced, smooth-as-butter FPS action its modern revival and counterpart Doom have so competently brought back."
This game was one of the worse in the franchise
https://www.metacritic.com/...
This like a "Pet Sematary" article. It's probably not a good idea to go about bringin' up things that should be dead.
it is not a sequel. sequel is in development and it is called Wolfenstein 3. this is a side story.
"Zero innovation."
People are stupid as hell what they expect from sequels or continuations.
Also, I thought it was against the rules to only share a link to youtube? People have repeatedly cussed me out in the past when I tried doing it and reported and shut it down so wtf
Putting a game ending in your review is about the worse thing you can do. Thanks.
Now that everyone is reviewing it bad, I believe that sites like this will just follow the crowd and try to rate it as low as possible to get clicks.
I am confused as to why AngryJoeShow always gets approved with a YouTube link when smaller YouTubers get their YouTube links denied on N4G? Can somebody explain this to me?