400°
3.0

Wolfenstein: Youngblood Sucks! [RF Review] - AngryJoeShow

Is the sequel to New Colossus as bad as everyone says? Yes! Delrith endures and suffers through fully to give you all the info you need on Wolfenstein: Youngblood!

CP_Company1758d ago

it is not a sequel. sequel is in development and it is called Wolfenstein 3. this is a side story.

criticalkare1758d ago

I am worrying for sequel now... after playing this they gonna fill this with MT tacked on rpg mechanics and horrible semi small open world elements....

1757d ago
-Foxtrot1758d ago

Yeah a shitty side story they need to just pretend never happened

I mean BJ really liberated America then took 20 years to bother liberating Europe...urm...no

lptmg1758d ago

like a real american hero

NecrumOddBoy1758d ago

It just sucks. Some games are just duds. The Old Blood is a side-story game and one of the best Wolfenstein titles ever made

carcarias1757d ago

Yeah, I loved Old Blood and really enjoyed the Raven Software 2009 game too. In fact, I prefer Wolfenstein with more enemy variety and technological/supernatural elements so I was hoping Old Blood was a taste of what New Colossus would be.

neutralgamer19921758d ago

CP

Doesn't matter it's a average game at best so why does it matter. Most if the reviews have been average so everyone is wrong

Should reviewers review a game differently because it's a dlc expansion instead of a new game?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1757d ago
Germaximus1758d ago (Edited 1758d ago )

"Zero innovation."

People are stupid as hell what they expect from sequels or continuations.

Also, I thought it was against the rules to only share a link to youtube? People have repeatedly cussed me out in the past when I tried doing it and reported and shut it down so wtf

jeromeface1758d ago

If they'd changed it and he didn't think it was improved he'd been complaining about that. I honestly hate delrith reviews.

Concertoine1758d ago

I have to wonder if people are factoring in the fact that this game is $29.99. If you do the buddy pass and split it with a friend its 20 apiece.

Maybe the game is that bad - but it certainly doesnt look that bad to me.

-Foxtrot1758d ago (Edited 1758d ago )

It's bad. It's basically everything Wolfenstein isn't and the trailers are not a representation of the game

MT's

Bullet sponge enemies

Health bars above enemies

AI is bad

Forced co-op

You can't even pause offline

It's a looter shooter but not a looter shooter

Main characters are shallow and annoying while having no development

You use things like doing the robot and thumbs up to heal and other shit

Forced in RPG system

NPC's back in the base have no personality.

The issue is after Fallout 76 what does this mean for the next Wolfenstein, Doom, Starfield or Elder Scrolls VI

Yui_Suzumiya1758d ago

I got it day 1 and I'm enjoying it. It's no New Order but it's still fun for what it is.

quent1757d ago

Coop isn't guaranteed to work, there's been alot of issues for many people trying to play it online, wish they'd stop treating couch co-op modes like hep c or something and bring the feature back into gaming

Sgt_Slaughter1758d ago

"You should only post videos if the content of the video is professionally made and of interest to the community."

Since this is a long running YouTube channel with professional editing, it falls under that category.

Having said that, I have that exact same style of video removed before so I have no idea what does and does not count at this point. I just submit and hope it goes through.

Godmars2901758d ago

"People are stupid as hell what they expect from sequels or continuations."
Decent AI? AI that's not worse than the prior title?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1757d ago
jeromeface1758d ago

Putting a game ending in your review is about the worse thing you can do. Thanks.

Sgt_Slaughter1758d ago

To be fair, it's a game review. The chance that the ending is in the review are pretty good if they've played through the whole thing.

Sgt_Slaughter1758d ago (Edited 1758d ago )

Yes there should have been a spoiler warning in his video BUT he describes his disappointment with the ending which is a lead into the segment where he shows it. That's a warning in of itself, not to mention you can pause the video instead of watching the ending scenes then complaining you got spoiled. No one forced you to keep going.

porkChop1758d ago

Generally you would show gameplay from the first half of the game, or small non-spoiler clips from later levels. You would never show the literal ending. That's unprofessional and bad practice.

Dark_Knightmare21758d ago

Lol no I mean have you ever read or watched review videos smh

rob-GP1757d ago

Whereas I agree that the reviewer should have completed the game before even starting their review (which I won't get into as I've had this discussion many times before), you shouldn't include any spoilers or major plot points within the actual review.

I've not watched this review, nor do I intend to, but if they've included hints or detailed info about the ending then they shouldn't be reviewing 'new' games. Old games, like what AVGN does, sure. Those are old games and are treated differently, but a new game is a big no-no. Would you enjoy reading a review about a film a few days after release where the reviewer has told you about all the twists and the ending? Didn't think so.

All he had to say was that he's played the game through to its final conclusion, that's all. In my review, I stated I'd played it for around 23 hours and finished the story and 60% of the side missions. I didn't have to talk about the ending to validate my statement.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1757d ago
Gwiz1758d ago

*Drinks a sip from his beer, Buuurrrrpppppp*

In this case they actually showed it because they were very confident it was THAT bad.

Yui_Suzumiya1758d ago

Joe is a douche.. What you expect?

NarooN1757d ago

Joe's not the one who did this review lol

One-Shot1757d ago

Well you obviously didn't watch lol. Would've saved you looking like a fool.

lakeunn1757d ago

embarrassing comment made by a toddler.

NarooN1757d ago

@jermome

I agree. I already had no interest in the game but decided to watch this review yesterday on a lunch break and was utterly baffled that Del decided to casually show the ending in the review. Like what the the actual **** lol.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1757d ago
DEEHULK881758d ago

Now that everyone is reviewing it bad, I believe that sites like this will just follow the crowd and try to rate it as low as possible to get clicks.

-Foxtrot1758d ago

Maybe it's just bad

Have you seen the user Metacritic? That's when the reviews were being pretty decent so no one was influenced.

Vegamyster1758d ago

Metacritic user reviews are the last place I'd go for an opinion lol.

Yui_Suzumiya1758d ago

A majority of those users are idiots. Just as bad as people giving it 10/10.

1757d ago
rob-GP1757d ago

I don't trust the user count on Meta anymore as literally anyone can rate a game without owning it.

Judging by the number of people on Twitter and in the Steam forums who are giving opinions on the game, even though they don't own it and are posting these YT videos as their evidence on how they feel, the majority of Meta user reviews are basically viewers of these people posting their 'opinion' based on other peoples opinions, not their own.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1757d ago
Chexs19901756d ago

It's a YouTube channel bruh

LemyAtom1758d ago

I am confused as to why AngryJoeShow always gets approved with a YouTube link when smaller YouTubers get their YouTube links denied on N4G? Can somebody explain this to me?

Omac_brother1758d ago

Even if the youtube link was valid, the "!" in the title would get it reported on normal posts.

Show all comments (68)
90°

Best Wolfenstein Games - All the Wolfenstein Games Ranked

BLG writes, "There can be only one best Wolfenstein game. Since the franchise’s debut in 1981, the Wolfenstein series has graced our gaming platforms for over forty years. It’s hard to believe, but it’s true! In honor of that legacy, we’re going to list some of the best Wolfenstein games and the worst. That’s right: it’s the Wolfenstein games ranked."

Read Full Story >>
bosslevelgamer.com
RaidenBlack653d ago

Scheiße! Nein.
Return to Castle Wolfenstein is the best in the series. After that:
New Order
New Colossus
Old Blood

Harryvok653d ago

I really wish they'd remake Return to Castle Wolfenstein from the ground up. Easily the best of them all.

647d ago
160°

Ranking the Wolfenstein Games From Worst To Best

There have been plenty of Wolfenstein games released over the years, but which Nazi shooting epic is the best one?

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
RaidenBlack723d ago

RTCW is wayy better than New Colossus.
RTCW should get the 1st spot but I'll settle for a 2nd spot for RTCW in order avoid unneeded quarrel with late 2000s new gamers - and this is coming from an late 90s, early 2000s FPS lover. (RTCW is one of the best single player FPS eve made and one of my fav game)

porkChop724d ago

Wolfenstein 2009 doesn't get enough credit. It was genuinely good, I really enjoyed it. I think the reboot series from MachineGames is certainly better, but the 2009 game is still worth playing.

RaidenBlack723d ago

I had high hopes for Wolf 2009 especially after RTCW and Enemy Territory. And also because none other than Raven was developing it.
But they couldn't quite hit the mark. It turned out okayish. But after RTCW, it seemed pretty underwhelming as a sequel.

porkChop723d ago

Agreed that RTCW is clearly better. Though I don't think I had played that yet when I played the 2009 game.

Gridknac724d ago

I still favor Return to Castle Wolfenstein. I like the Indiana Jones and the Nazis messing with the supernatural vibe.

Sciurus_vulgaris724d ago

I remember buying Return to Castle Wolfenstein for Xbox when I was a teen. It was my first Wolfenstein title. I found the game challenging yet enjoyable.

Number1TailzFan724d ago

RTCW was one of my first online MP experiences with broadband, both online and single player campaign was very fun.

RaidenBlack723d ago

I consider RTCW as one of the best FPS campaigns made. The mood, the pacing was just really good, especially for an early 2000s PC game. And it was pretty difficult too.

moriarty1889723d ago

Wolfenstein 2009 is still my favorite by a mile. The variety of locations like the farm level and others were so colorful and fun to explore. The story as well with the Dark Sun and the enemies. Just very well thought out and BJ was perfect in it with his look and demeanor.

JL2930723d ago

2009 game way too low on this list. Original Wolfenstein is not better than any of the modern games.

Show all comments (12)
140°

Wolfenstein: Youngblood Review - Judging the Indiana Jones Devs' Future Quality From Their Last Work

Jason says, "The devs of the future Indiana Jones game made this game. So duh, I decided I’d review their last work to get a feel for the potential quality of their future work!

In case you don’t know, Wolfenstein: Youngblood continues the Wolfenstein storyline of the modern games but as a spinoff centered around BJ’s daughters. It also continues along with the fast-paced, smooth-as-butter FPS action its modern revival and counterpart Doom have so competently brought back."

1166d ago
Zeref1166d ago

Here come the Bethesda fud 😂😂😂

Tedakin1166d ago

Article on N4G tomorrow... "Doom was never very good or revolutionary..."

Battlestar231166d ago (Edited 1166d ago )

The spider-man games when multi-platorm were great now that it's exclusive to PS they are crap with SJW writing.

NeoGamer2321166d ago

I disagree. The Spider-man exclusives on PS are the only Spider-man games worth playing. They are very good.

anast1166d ago

This like a "Pet Sematary" article. It's probably not a good idea to go about bringin' up things that should be dead.

1166d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (11)