430°

Xbox Boss On Microsoft’s Struggles With Game Quality And Efforts To Improve It

Whatever the strengths of the Xbox platform, it’s long lagged behind Nintendo and Sony in terms of homegrown, exclusive video games. There have been highlights in its history and even some stellar games of late, such as last year’s Forza Horizon 4, but the Xbox One era has been rough. There have been prominent cancellations, disappointing sequels and games that under-delivered given how long fans were waiting for them.

In recent years there have been hints of a coming turnaround.

lxeasy1794d ago

There were few titles that were exceptional this gen for Xbox. Which is a shame. With new talented developers like Ninja Theory, Playground Games, Double Fine and Obsidian lets hope that changes next gen for them. It's be nice to see Xbox join Nintendo and Ps in releasing GOTY quality games.

yarbie10001794d ago

Microsoft's studios that they owned were unable to produce many exceptional games this gen, so maybe if they buy more studios then they'll be able to....

hmmmmmmm

1794d ago
1794d ago
RememberThe3571794d ago

MS closed Ensemble and I'm pretty sure they never made a bad game. I have very little hope.

mikeslemonade1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

MS is the only one of the console holders to have lots of pc games and so they are graded on the highest standard.

Nintendo is graded on the lowest standard that’s why it’s easy for them to score high meta.

Potnoodle9991793d ago

No. Sorry. They should’ve produced SOMETHING by now. It’s already gone way past embarrassing. Then the first game one of their new studios announced is a crappy looking mplayer game.
It’s taken FAR too long!

1793d ago
Dragonscale1793d ago (Edited 1793d ago )

@mikeslemonade, thats a completely dumb strawman argument that you've made up there. Lmfao.

@kingnoctis, they need more than just forza horizon fgs.

Muzikguy1793d ago

@mikes

What are you smoking?

r2oB1793d ago

@hank

More studios for Microsoft means more quantity, not quality. Especially considering they already stated they are aiming for a release every three months or so. Most of their studios will be churning out mediocre quality games for Gamepass.

And Crackdown 3 did not have troubled development. They had one team working on the game and another working on the cloud, some people working on the cloud left after the Epic acquisition. But the team working on the gameplay stayed the same. Even Microsoft stated the departures had little effect on the outcome of the game. The game was bad because Microsoft overhyped the cloud and the game was of poor quality.

Quality games require time, talent, and good management (for budgeting and time management, etc.), not just a bunch of studios.

mikeslemonade1793d ago

^
You don’t compare PC AAA games to low budget IOS games. A 95 PC AAA game to a IOS 95 meta game ain’t the same.

One is graded to a higher standard.

That is why MS has lower meta.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 1793d ago
Larrysweet1794d ago

There were zero exceptional xbox exclusives zero

gam3r_4_lif31794d ago

Only a totally indoctrinated fanbaby would actually believe that. Halo 5"s mp was amazing. Both FH3 and 4 were exceptional and ORI was just pure joy

343_Guilty_Spark1794d ago

Watch he say they were on PC so not exclusive.

Phil: That's kinda the point

King_Noctis1794d ago

But the Forza Horizon series are exceptional.

RememberThe3571794d ago

There were zero Xbox exclusives

Godmars2901793d ago

@King_Noctis:
Its a racing game.

Potnoodle9991793d ago

Exactly, zero, there were a couple of average. Forza is not exceptional. It’s a racing game for godsake, how much can you really innovate or be groundbreaking with a bloody racing game. Zip round a track in better graphics with differently modeled cars..yay big whoop. Racing games are for car enthusiasts. For anyone else they are just average games.

wiz71911793d ago

But there was , do you own a xbox ??

1793d ago
+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1793d ago
The Wood1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

Their management has been their Achilles heel. Outside of the teams that develop the forza franchise, how many studios have actually improved yoy? You can't keep blaming the studios. Adding numbers solves a part of the problems not all of them. How many game of the year contenders? How many new ip's? How many genre's are covered?

robleroy1793d ago (Edited 1793d ago )

You are close to the truth.

Obscure_Observer1794d ago

@lxeasy

"With new talented developers like Ninja Theory, Playground Games, Double Fine and Obsidian lets hope that changes next gen for them."

Don´t forget the all new The Initiative. ;)

robleroy1793d ago

They already instructed some of the new studios (ninja theory) to make their games multiplayer.
You saw what happened with tombraider??..
Managing gamestudios is sadly not a MS thing.
They are still on the old bandwagon: paywall milking.
Yet no sign they will change their tactics: sell xboxlive subscribtions.
An xbox cost 400 for 7 years ownership
Xboxlive costs the same for 7 years
Xboxlive has a larger profit margin.

In MS defense: they have tried with success in the original xbox and xbox360 era to make competing exclusive games.
But the failed financialy managing those studios.
So they stopped competing with SONY.
This would save MS money for not having to invest much in excl games.
Concerning owning and managing gamestudios :SONY is lightyears away.

The best MS could do is lie/hype about the excl games they will create ( the excl games for the XBox one were given by EA. I think EA got MS to promise they will include DRM..because of the deal)
There is no reason why MS would comeup with DRM by
Bad deal.

Grown Folks Talk1793d ago

At least have Obsidian holler at Sega & work it out so I can get an Alpha Protocol sequel done properly.

Potnoodle9991793d ago

Disagree, their were no exceptional titles for Xbox or I would’ve bought one. However I agreed with your comment as I do hope that changes next gen. With so many studios I hope we will be back to the 360 days where there was some competition and a reason to own both consoles. IMO PS3 still killed it even back then though in terms of exclusives (especially after 2009).

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1793d ago
PhoenixUp1794d ago

Microsoft has been in the console space for 18 years and only now have they discovered that they’re first party output has been weak?

porkChop1794d ago

To be fair their first party were pretty great during the 360 days, minus the last couple years. It wasn't at PS's level, but still great.

Godmars2901794d ago

Actually, honestly, always thought Xbox was a bit - more than a bit - tone def when it came to game making. Bought an OG Xbox for Panzer Dragoon Orta, and while it was fantastic looking, it played more like a mix of first and second game rather than a third arcade level entry much less Saga.

Aside from a few they heavily favored PC type games over console, then with the 360, after an initial effort to be about "all games", gabbing RPGs from Sony and even producing a couple of animes in JP for promotion there, they pretty much dropped everything because of FPS.

Rude-ro1794d ago

Actually, most were third party deals made to be exclusive to the 360.

You had halo, fabled, and a racing game.
The rest were indie style smaller games or third party.

RangerWalk2671793d ago

I prefer the MS approach to the games they make vs PS. They have replayability. Sony gives me a great story and done. Back to Redbox

1794d ago Replies(2)
PhoenixUp1794d ago

@ NoHo

Yet Microsoft has more money than Sega ever did and their first party games pale in comparison to even to what Sega used to have when they were in the console space. Even Saturn & Dreamcast’s first party outputs were far better than Xbox One’s.

No excuses. If you’re going to be in this industry you need your own lineup of strong games consistently to set yourself apart from the competition

1793d ago
wiz71911793d ago

@NoHo your right bro and people need to realize that. The Xbox division wasn't being support like it should of until recently. I remember reading the money was being split between surface , xbox , and something else. Just because Microsoft as a company has a lot of money that doesn't mean the xbox division has money. They can only work with what the higher ups dedicate to xbox. Prime example Bill Gates has billions of dollars but i bet his kids doesnt have access to his money , they get what he gives.

The-Matrix-has-you1794d ago

My thoughts exactly man. Microsoft has the resources and money to make great games, but will they? Will they take risks creating new IP’s? Will they let their development studios make games that they are passionate about?

Microsoft just doesn’t get it. They don’t understand what gamers really want. We want new, fresh and polished experiences. We want them to succeed. I want to be able to say yes to every question I asked but I fear they will never learn that lesson.

Potnoodle9991793d ago

We want a company like Sony. We have them. We also want and need Nintendo. Are we being greedy asking for a third company to bring something great to the table? I don’t think so, I hope they do it, but personally they have let me down and massively failed on delivering on every occasion over the last decade...

AuraAbjure1793d ago

smokin' up sum of that stuff I see Pheonix. Blinx, Voodoo Vince and Halo for the OG, Fable 2, Gears of War, Alan Wake, Ninja Gaiden 2, and Condemned for the 360, Dead Rising 3, and Titanfall for the Xbox One.

343_Guilty_Spark1793d ago

The Xbox and Xbox 360 had great 1st party support

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1793d ago
Automatic791794d ago

Xbox has over 1900 games in development. I have no doubt that they will produce a beautiful variety of games. Gears 5, Ori, BattleToads, OuterWorlds, Blair Witch, 12 Minutes, Bleeding Edge, Halo Infinite stood out to me at E3. Love how GamePass is a Plus towards unlimited games. I still buy my games but GamePass has really helped Xbox go all in on games.

Relientk771794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

Microsoft need a lot more than that next-gen to sell Project Scarlett, in my opinion.

-Foxtrot1794d ago

1900?

Drop the 1

Then the 0

And now the other 0

Totals to 9

That's more believable

Brave_Losers_Unite1794d ago

Playstation has over 1,000,000 games in development. Switch has 2,000,000 games releasing tomorrow

thexmanone1793d ago

Don`t know what PS has, they we not at E3

Brave_Losers_Unite1793d ago

@thexmanone

Yet they still have more games coming out than Xbox. Go figure

Chevalier1793d ago

@xboxmanone

" Don`t know what PS has, they we not at E3"

Its okay gaming on Xbox has made it hard to see that Playstation has these games that are 'exclusives'. Taking off those rose tinted glasses might help too.

xX-oldboy-Xx1794d ago

Has ms even had that many games release on all their console combined? You need some vitamins mate, it'll help you think clearly.

1793d ago
Potnoodle9991793d ago (Edited 1793d ago )

This has never helped them over the last decade. Why will it change now? Why in gods name would you have no doubt? You do have doubt. Because they haven’t produced a beautiful variety of QUALITY games in over 10 years. All I have seen gamepass do is turn Xbox into a really cheap bargain bin for very low quality sup-par gaming experiences. Great for your money, bad for your imagination. I’m glad I pay more to Sony to give me games like God of war, The last of us, last guardian, bloodborne and horizon. Same with Nintendo and Zelda, xenoblade, Mario.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1793d ago
AK911794d ago

https://twitter.com/Fobwash...

Anyone remember this? This was in E3 2015 it's gotten WORSE since then.

william_cade1794d ago

They are pretty good at making cell phone and mmo style games.

Show all comments (80)
70°

Nintendo’s new job opening hints at innovative packaging for future products

Nintendo of America has posted a fascinating new job opening that could signal significant changes for the company’s future products.

Read Full Story >>
mynintendonews.com
80°

Take-Two Head Denies Closing OlliOlli World, Kerbal 2 Devs

Take-Two head Strauss Zelnick has denied closing Rollerdrome developer Roll7 or Kerbal Space Program 2 studio Intercept Games.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
-Foxtrot2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

That's hilarious because he did and said the same thing with 2K Marin who developed Bioshock 2

They've been closed since 2013 but not officially acknowledged

He just doesn't want the backlash so pretends there's no issue.

440°

New PlayStation Handheld Reported Again, Supposedly Runs PS4 Games

Another leaker has claimed that a PSP/PS Vita style PlayStation handheld is in the works, and it'll supposedly support PS4 games.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
anast2d ago

If this is true, it will crush everything for the price.

VenomUK1d 16h ago (Edited 1d 16h ago )

Needs to be a PS5 portable.

Cacabunga1d 15h ago

PS4 native with PS5 remote play capabilities. Would be sweet.

And let PS Portal support cloud streaming for all PS+ games.

anast1d 15h ago

Going off all the pricing behavior of Sony to this point. I'm willing to bet it will be cheaper than the Steam Deck. And when the price is revealed and I am right, send me a message.

Cacabunga1d 14h ago

Could be an attempt to counter switch 2 which will have PS4 power.
Imagine all the PS4 third party re releases switch 2 is going to get.. “PS4 portable” could get the exact same games once again and publishers can resell software ..

If this portable has provides PS5 remote play on top then it will have a nice argument and exclusive feature.

DarXyde20h ago(Edited 20h ago)

Cacabunga,

Possibly, though I think any attempt to win against Nintendo in the handheld space is hopeless.

I loved the PSP and I still enjoy my Vita, but there's something about a full scale Mario and Zelda in your hands that makes it clear Sony should share the space, but never dream of taking it.

It's a very safe bet from Sony to have it run PS4 games too because then neither you nor developers are on the hook to make dedicated games for it.

Time will tell. I hope it's real. I'm willing to bet that it is—this is an inevitable strategy for Nintendo and the Surface team is allegedly handling Microsoft's next hardware stint. Sony wouldn't be the only one without portable hardware.

JL29309h ago

$199 for a dedicated handheld when they are trying to sell that piece of shit streaming screen for the same price. Hilarious.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 9h ago
crazyCoconuts1d 16h ago

It would be a niche product like Portal. Not bad, but not mainstream. It's legacy PS4 right?

Kneetos1d 15h ago

The switch 2 and next steam deck will be out by then and will likely be way more popular

anast1d 15h ago

The switch 2 will be a handheld Series S for kids and the next steam deck will be ridiculously over priced for a bunch of aging CRPGS and F2P mobile style games.

Kneetos1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

@Anast the switch 2 will Fortnite dance on the new Sony handhelds grave
Playstation can't compete with Nintendo there

With playstation porting all it's games to pc and by extension steam deck it pretty much makes the new pshandheld system irrelevant

Especially since all I ever hear from the Sony crowd is "I NEED graphics or I can't enjoy the game" a handheld PS4 is going the same way as Sony's handheld ps3

Hypertension1401d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

If the switch 2 isn't backwards compatible, it will fail.

If this is true, then it will already have a large of games to play from the start, add ps1,ps2,psp,vita games to the mix, and it can be massively popular.

anast18h ago(Edited 18h ago)

The switch is a Mario machine and for kids, they have their own space. Tell me where I am wrong here.

The problem is that Sony isn't porting all of the games to the Steam Deck specifically. The Steam Deck can't play every game. It even has a verified category with games that run the best and a "playable" category that can barely run games. So, the best option to play would obviously be a Sony product.

The last point is inane. I can't respond to comments that use caps. the point should be able to stand on it's own

NotoriousWhiz18h ago

It doesn't matter hiw popular the Playstation handheld is if it shares the same library as the PS5. It just brings more people into the ecosystem and provides them with more ways to play their games.

Kneetos17h ago

@anast Nintendo is competing with Sony and no amount of backpedaling will change that
They were competing during the GameCube era and the Wii u era, coincidentally the 2 gens they lost to Sony, but we're suddenly not competing during the ds, Wii and 3ds era because they beat playstation, but of course we can't have that can we so "Nintendo isn't competition Sony auto wins"

The switch is more then a mario and even a first party machine these days as there are plenty of games, specifically Japanese and indi games that are doing better on switch then their ps counterpart
It's irrelevant that Sony isn't specifically porting to steam deck, the games will end up on there and people will wait for a pc port just like how playstation fans wait for a playstation port of games, you aren't unique

Playstation fans constantly brag on graphics, so a handheld that only plays PS4 games isn't going to entice a lot of them, like the vita before it, and Sony has a history of just dropping unsuccessful projects, the vita psvr and it looks like the portal isn't doing too hot either

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 17h ago
Vits1d 14h ago

They literally charged people $199 for a bottom-of-the-barrel tablet with a DualSense controller bolted on. So I really can't see them releasing a powerful yet affordable native handheld.

Ps5conehead1d 10h ago

I love my portal I’m handicapped and the portal lets me play on days I’m not at my best. It’s great .and the screen is admazing even though it’s not oled

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 9h ago
-Foxtrot2d ago

If you had every PS1, PS2, PS3, PSP and PSV game then sure but I mean if it's just the PS4 why not just get a Steam Deck?

anast1d 17h ago

You might be correct, but it depends on the price point. Also, most PC gamers wait years for Sony releases, so it might be better just to get the PS4 handheld.

crazyCoconuts1d 16h ago

I'd be surprised if Sony reversed course and continued to put new releases on PS4. It would cannibalize their PS5 sales

MrBaskerville1d 16h ago (Edited 1d 16h ago )

If it supports your library, some people own more ps4 games than steam games. I know I do.

crazyCoconuts1d 16h ago

I might buy something like this to play my old library but man those old games are cheap on steam. This console would have to be cheap to make sense. I don't see it happening

MrBaskerville1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

@CrazyCoconuts
I also think it sounds a little off. I would probably buy if it could run Ps5 games, but that sounds expensive. Being ps4 only is a little limiting I think.

But if it ran all ps4 titles and new stuff created for the handheld. then it could be interesting. Basically a Vita that just happened to come with a huge ass backlog of existing games.

FinalFantasyFanatic18h ago(Edited 18h ago)

My libraries are roughly equal in size for both, maybe if I could play more classics games on the Playstation one I could consider it. But it's a tough selling point for people who aren't already heavily invested in the Playstation ecosystem.

SegaSaturn6691d 15h ago

Deck is very viable option given how good PS3 and switch emulation have become. Even new releases are chugging along at 30fps.

Lexreborn21d 15h ago

To be fair, I have a lot of ps4 games I don’t have on steam that is can play on my ps5 but I choose to play ps5 games on my ps5.

I also haven’t rebought any of my PlayStation exclusives on PC because I own them on my ps4/5 and even the upgraded ways that rival the pc version. So, if I wanted to play them on my steam deck I would still have to buy them again which if I bought the 6 top games Spider-Man 1,2, mm, horizon, fw , GoW and ragnarok and GoT with LoU1,2. It would more then. Likely be the cost of this device.

So, instead of double dipping I would buy the handheld and if it has a playable sf6 that actually works online (steam deck is not functional) I think I would want it for myself

Vits1d 14h ago

If you have them in digital form, for sure. Because I don't see Sony giving you a digital copy of your old physical PS4 games. That doesn't sound like them at all.

And also, Steam doesn't depend on PS4 games. PC got more games that generation than all the consoles combined. The ports of PlayStation games are just one of the cherries on top of the cake.

Lexreborn21d 9h ago

@vits I do have them in digital form which is why I said from my perspective. I also have a steam deck but that doesn’t mean everything runs on it which not everything is playable. And as I am also stating the perks of why people WOULD want them even while having a steam deck it’s weird to see people disagreeing purely because I wouldn’t want to double dip financially.

But even in the event you have physical copies of games, if you have ps plus most if not all of the ps4 games are there. So, it’s not like the options are non existent and people can’t find VIABLE reasons to purchase the device.

If people are justifying the portal, they can justify a dedicated portable. The desire to make it seem like people can only own one thing these days is an odd occurrence.

Vits1d 8h ago

@Lexreborn2
Then for sure, if you already have your library in digital form, something that can tap into it is definitely a good deal. That's basically the same reason why the Steam Deck is popular with PC and Steam users in general, because their library is available on it.

PS Plus is an extra cost though, and those games aren't yours. So I get where you are coming from, but that is a different discussion. As for the Portal, I don't get how people justify that piece of crap either, but they sure did so I can see a PS Vita 2 being sucessful. I don't see it being cheap or better value than the Steam Deck or any Windows Handheld, unless Sony really makes some radical changes.

As for why people want one device to rule them all instead of a bunch of them, it's likely because most people here are adults. If I recall correctly, the N4G user base is around their mid-30s. At this point in life, the issue is not usually owning things but actually having time to use them.

FinalFantasyFanatic17h ago

@Vits,
I don't think a new PS handheld would be worth it for me after owning the Steamdeck, assuming there will probably be a lot of overlap of both libraries in my case, so just having the one device is fine for me (I don't need the clutter or devices with too much overlap). I'll probably just stream the PS4 games I don't have on Steam to the Steam Deck via Chiaki, I would probably need the PS handheld to have its own exclusives to entice me.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 17h ago
Profchaos1d 9h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

Because if you already have a large digital library of PS4 titles and this plays PS4 games you don't need much more than the system. It's also rumoured to play some ps5 games.

If you buy a steam deck you have to re buy your library.

Eonjay1d 2h ago

If you are already in he PS ecosystem you probably have hundreds of digital PS4 games. Especially if you are on PSPlus Extra. These folks, of which there are millions upon millions would probably rater have access to the games they already own vs buying them all again on Steam.

FinalFantasyFanatic18h ago

This is the question, might be nice for the Playstation exclusive games from previous generations, but Sony's Playstation Classics lineup is seriously lacking, especially from their PS1 catalogue, I don't think the PS2/PS3 catalogue are that huge either.

A Steam Deck is already somewhere between a PS4 and a PS4 Pro in terms of power. Without those exclusive games from Sony's previous consoles, I don't see how you could convince anyone a new Playstation handheld to be better value than a Steam Deck. I can also literally put previous Playstation's libraries onto it without too much trouble.

-Foxtrot17h ago

“ Without those exclusive games from Sony's previous consoles, I don't see how you could convince anyone a new Playstation handheld to be better value than a Steam Deck.”

Exactly and this is a prime example of why exclusives matter

Without them Steamdeck just looks like the better choice overall

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 17h ago
XiNatsuDragnel1d 19h ago

I am hoping for amazing games

MeteorPanda1d 17h ago

I still play my vita. The oled screen was too good for it's time. I obviously had to home brew it but playing my old snes/ps1 games on it is so good.

Barlos23h ago

So many times I've been tempted to hack my Vita but I just can't bring myself to do it. I kind of want it to be as originalas possible. Also, for emulation I have my steam deck.

FinalFantasyFanatic17h ago

I was tempted to hack my Vita, but I couldn't bear to risk it, something about having the original software/experience on the handheld.

I'll happily emulate on the Steam Deck, especially the games that weren't available on the Aussie store or ones I just missed out on.

Skuletor1d 17h ago

How many people will buy this at launch? As a Vita owner, I'd definitely hold back after how Sony's support for that turned out.
Also, PSP played near PS2 quality games, PS Vita played near PS3 quality games, shouldn't the next Playstation handheld be aiming for near PS5 quality?

MeteorPanda1d 16h ago

the sadest thing on vita support for me was the removal of Close? The app that let you see local players and what they were playing. i made friends back in the day for co op that way lol.

I think it was privacy breaching? such a shame.

Skuletor1d 16h ago

Vita had so much promise, I wonder what it would have taken for Sony to have been more supportive. GTA: San Andreas Stories would have probably brought more sales alone, if they could have gotten that. I was disappointed we never really got anything on the same level as Killzone: Mercenary after that game, which looked amazing running on the Killzone 3 engine. Would have loved to see new entries of PS IP like Infamous, God of War etc, Sony really dropped the ball and using proprietary memory cards that were ridiculously priced didn't help, if they were smart, they'd have sold them cheaper since they were mainly being used to store stuff people were paying for in their store anyway, lol.

anast1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

The people that remember the vita are in the minority.

Skuletor1d 10h ago

So are the amount of people that bought it

Einhander19721d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

The point would be that it plays PS4 games, PS4 is still getting games constantly.

Everyone here including yourself presumably already has a library of games to play on this.

The success of the Portal shows the value of not needing to have a separate game library.

Skuletor1d 10h ago

I don't think it will have native PS4 support

FinalFantasyFanatic17h ago

@Skuletor,
Why not? The PS5 plays PS4 games fine (because the tech is similar), one could assume that if Sony is using AMD hardware, then they will probably have native PS4 support.

MeteorPanda1d 2h ago

Honestly the amount of games you could get on these cards was better value than what the switch was offering per cartidge. Cartridges got no slack from these same people.

The games for vita were very cheap, 30 dollars on average in store.

FinalFantasyFanatic17h ago

I'm still salty about the proprietary memory card prices, I don't remember those ever getting cheap.

Eonjay1d 2h ago

I mean how mich more support does the PS4 really need. It's not a new system... just a portable PS4. There are over 10 000 PS4 games available. Sony doesn't need to support it.

There are some crazy rumors out there but we don't have the technology to run a Series S in Portal mode let alone a PS5.

Skuletor1d 1h ago (Edited 1d 1h ago )

How many people that have a physical PS4 library will be willing to buy their games again to download these rumoured PS4 games to this rumoured portable? Until it gets officially revealed, none of us really know how this thing will operate but I will point out, Sony usually sell their consoles at low profit with the intention of making more money later in software sales. People that will be mostly playing games they already own, won't be their largest target market, most likely.

Also, hopefully it would have it's own exclusives to highlight the portables strengths too and not just games from a last gen system

FinalFantasyFanatic17h ago

Even if we did have the technology, imagine how terrible the battery life would be! You'd have to be more tethered to a power outlet than any of the other PC handhelds.

Barlos23h ago

Yeah same here. The way they handled the Vita has left me burned. I don't trust them to give a handheld the support it needs and so I'll not buy it at launch. I need to see their commitment first.

FinalFantasyFanatic17h ago

No, I don't think the technology would be near enough to give us PS5 quality, not unless you're okay with 20 mins battery life (then there's heat dissipation and weight to think of too). I feel like that's the mistakes PC handhelds like Rog Ally, MSI Claw and Lenovo Legion Go make, they over power the Steam Deck, but you pay for it in battery life, I'd rather have more battery life when I'm using a handheld.

To be fair though, with the race to beat climate change/reach net-zero, they're developing new battery tech all the time, maybe in a few years we could have a battery that adds a stupid amount of playtime to a powerful handheld.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 17h ago
Show all comments (96)