1030°

Rumor: Next-Generation Consoles To Launch In 2020, Aiming Higher Than 10.7 Teraflops

Recently, an alleged picture of the next-generation PS5 controller was shared online, however, it has turned out to be a well-made fake.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Jin_Sakai1881d ago (Edited 1881d ago )

I heard that Sony is aiming for 11.6TF for PS5 which is fine by me.

I can only imagine what Naught Dog, Guerrilla Games, Sucker Punch, and Sony Santa Monica will pull off with such powerful hardware.

anonymousfan1881d ago

Aren't Stadia servers built with 11-12 tflops? I can't imagine google doing that well in the short-medium term if your living room console is just as powerful and can stream on your local network around the house without the need for a crazy internet...

Neonridr1881d ago

depends on the price of the console I guess.. no real hardware needed for google which is a huge plus to the casual market.

Christopher1880d ago

Google specified they were 10.7 TFlop macheens. Furthermore, what that server is able to process is not necessarily what you will see when streamed. Furthermore, we don't know the level of optimization that will go into those servers as game hosting macheens compared to what we have experienced with current console manufacturers who have maximized power pretty well over time and know what to do with them.

AnthonyDavis1880d ago

My gpu is 14 Teraflops. It’s gotta be atleast 14.

AnthonyDavis1880d ago (Edited 1880d ago )

Google is targetting 60-70ms latencey for Doom on top of your local input lag. So stop talking like that’s not an issue.

nucky641880d ago (Edited 1880d ago )

i'm with you, anonymousfan; but, i don't care how many flops there is as far as stadia is concerned - the way it was described at GDC, i don't see how games on that service will work without lag/latency.

darthv721880d ago

teraflops shmaraflops... when are we going to hear how many triangles and polygons per second these next gen beasts do?

Profchaos1880d ago

Stadia servers may be built with that but the point of the cloud it's that is infinitely expandable meaning that Google can use the money from subscribers to upgrade and cluster their kit resulting in an infinite generation.

Personally I feel more comfortable using hardware I can control but that's the future I guess

DeadlyFire1880d ago

Google is doing the bare minimum for next-generation so they can easily get developers to port games over without trouble. They didn't even want to tell you what kinda cpu they are using. Which is not AMD. So... usually that is a sign. Google is also using Vega. Multiple times sources have pointed at Navi for Sony and likely Microsoft as well. Navi is a newer model so expect better performance. Yes Sony and Microsoft are going big for next-generation. They will aim for a big gpu.

bouzebbal1880d ago

I don't care about the teraflop I'm no slave of numbers. All I want is great games.

Gaming1011880d ago

Also, Sony would do well to wait and see what Microsoft unveils and then try to exceed it. Don't throw in silly bells and whistles that just increase the price when most people don't want it.

Gaming1011880d ago

Plus that controller looks like a poor design from a high school student. It's ugly, and the handles have sharp angles which will irritate your hands.

indysurfn1880d ago

@Neonridr. The casual market does NOT WANT to have 2TB web service! It is expensive enough to get 10gb a month.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 1880d ago
King61880d ago

Jin-Sakai@ Don’t forget about Sony bend and new unannounced studio in San Diego.

airshiraz1880d ago

teraflops is important but handling ray tracing is so important too and next gen consoles must handle raytracing .even 12 teraflops 1080ti cant handle ray tracing

MrSec841880d ago

TFlops are about as irrelevant as GHz or MHz in hardware comparisons.
The architecture will be far more important than those things.
You could have a 2TFlop GPU with faster core architecture that will destroy a 12TFlop Card if the tech in each Stream Processor or Cuda Core is enough of an improvement in throughput.

Crytek already disproved the notion that RTX Tech is needed for Ray Tracing, with their Ray Tracing demo that was running on a Vega 56 card.
If a Vega 56 can run visuals with Ray Tracing, then a 1080ti can too.

1880d ago
DeadlyFire1880d ago

DXR is available for any game engine supporting Direct X12.......

Also there are Linux options for Ray tracing as well.

They can't handle full scale ray tracing like a whole world on it, but they can easily drop in subtle elements and build new tricks to make things look amazing along the way to full scale ray tracing

cd11879d ago

@Mac42o_0

What does "selling 20 million copies" have to do with other people wanting to stick with PS because they simply enjoy Sony games? Some people just prefer console gaming over PC, their not wrong - they just like different things.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1879d ago
Orionsangel1880d ago

That's ridiculous. That'll never happen. I mean I hope it does but seriously doubt it.

NarutoFox1880d ago (Edited 1880d ago )

Can't wait. 5 downvotes from that certain group

rainslacker1880d ago

12tf for a 2020 release is kind of low end for a console meant to last at least 5 years. Itd get by, but wouldn't leave much room with the way GPU's are advancing at the moment. Itd be equivalent to this gen GPU's being about the bare minimum to make the gen work. I think I'd prefer they try making it faster, or delaying it another year to maximize the power that can be used.

ABizzel11880d ago

Well they’re rumored to be going with AMD ehich stays on a GPU architecture for at least 3 years, so that’s more than enough time for a Pro console to be produced.

Also 12TF of performance (Vega 64) is still costly at around $300 for a new GPU, so that level of performance is expected.

And it also depends on the benefits from Navi’s architecture changes, where that 12TF could offer a solid 20% - 30% performance boost over a current Vega 12TF GPU.

rainslacker1880d ago

I'm personally not that keen on relying on the mid gens to get through the gen. It's an interesting experiment, and good enough for those who want a better experience, but generally speaking, the base console is going to be what games are made for.

You are right about costs, but we're talking about sourcing that will start in 2020, and by then, 14TF will be more manageable.

Some of it will depend on what custom work they do on the GPU's, as some things can be worked in which can achieve better results than the base TF rating may immediately suggest. Simple processes can do a lot, but may not be a focus in a more general purpose GPU that you see on PC card.

UltraNova1880d ago

Rain,

Like I've been saying way back when the Ps4 Pro was announced, next gen specs will suffer because of these mid-cycle upgrades. Why go all in for next gen when you can cut costs, release a bare minimum spec wise for the time console that makes them money or breaks even from day one. 3 years later release the Pro version and so on....this way they transfer the cost of power to the user not them at the start of each gen. From now on every console release will be a slight refresh from the last, forget about huge generational leaps.

This is why I've made the decision to only go for the Pro versions going forward. From the looks of it, ps4/ps5 games will be forward/backwards compatible so in that end I'm covered.

froy4021880d ago (Edited 1880d ago )

This gen started with under 2TF and look at what amazing games they were able to pull off, over 10TF will be fine.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1880d ago
pcz1880d ago (Edited 1880d ago )

who's going to spend 300+ on hardware that quickly becomes obsolete with endless SKUs/revisions when Stadia will always be cutting edge?

lets face it, hardware is going to be retro real soon

Ceaser98573611880d ago

Sony and MS should aim for a better CPU aslo.. Current Gen for for both console CPU are weak.

Andrei_Sparrow1880d ago

I can only imagine how fast PS5 will become extremely loud, if it will turn up beign as powerful as rumoured. I would love to hear news how sony will deal with cooling system for PS5.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 1879d ago
fragock1881d ago ShowReplies(1)
Neonridr1881d ago

we have for several years already.. it's called a 1080ti GPU :P

ApocalypseShadow1881d ago (Edited 1881d ago )

Not exactly. You may see better detail, frame rates and resolution over a console. But the games play identical to consoles.

All that physics destruction that Stadia showed and would be possible on next Gen consoles at 11.6TF is woefully absent on PC currently. There isn't any noteworthy game that utilizes that power fully.

It's always been: Buy powerful card. Proud of the theoretical numbers. No game that fully utilizes it. Upgrade to the next card and repeat the cycle hoping to hit that theoretical limit.

Neonridr1880d ago

@Apocalypse - their comment literally said imagine 11.6TF. I simply said we have had GPUs with that sort of horsepower for years now.

A GPU can easily be maxed out if you continually adjust the in game settings. Wanna max out a 1080ti? Set the game to 4K resolution and it will max out somewhere around 30fps. I mean have you ever gamed on a PC before? There is nothing theoretical when you can change settings to literally max something out.

Srhalo1880d ago

The 1080ti was the best card on the market until 6 months ago, they still cost $1,200+.

That's easily enough for 4k/60 especially on a dedicated device, as well as 4k VR.

I can't wait to see Navi, if they can build a 1080ti into a console for $400-$500 Navi is going to be huge.

Eonjay1880d ago

Horizon Zero Dawn won best graphics in 2017 on a 1.8/4.2 TF PS4/Pro
Best graphics. So again imagine what WWS can do with 2-3 times the power of the Pro

JaXion51880d ago

It's been out for only 2 years not several and they still retail for $1000+.

Neonridr1880d ago

@Eonjay - and imagine how good the game would have looked on PC that could have gone even better resolution wise.

ApocalypseShadow1880d ago

Neon, you just proved my point. I can max my computer out with multiple web browser tabs. That doesn't mean it's displaying Avatar graphics. That doesn't mean it's powerful with 50 tabs or more open before it starts locking up.

Does Red Dead Redemption 2 on Xbox One X play any different than on the base PS4 or Xbox one? Nope. On Xbox One X, can I set the whole valley on fire or burn down whole towns or blow them up with dynamite? Nope. Looks better. Runs better. Plays the same.

Star Citizen looks great on PC and is the most expensive PC game. But it's doing nothing special. The FPS gameplay looks no different than other shooters. You won't be setting off the core in one of those pretty ships and blow up half the planet. Or smash it into a city and watch the debris fly and buildings burn. No physics whatsoever. Just looks pretty. Tera flops are nice on paper. But what's going on onscreen?

Crisis did more in its game with foliage, water and explosions than Star Citizen is currently. How is that possible when they have a grander scale? SC should be doing things that aren't possible on anything else besides overall looks. But if you down scale it, it could play identical on a console.

Neonridr1880d ago

@Apocalypse - we aren't talking about web browsers, we are talking about a game. You said that no PC GPU can be maxed out. I called BS on that. If you set a game to render at the highest resolution possible you will hit a bottleneck, either due to the memory throughput limitations or due to the raw numbers the GPU is crunching.

Nobody said the game doesn't play identical to console versions, where did I ever say that. The original comment to this thread was 11.6TF, imagine that. Why do we have to imagine that when 1080ti's can pump out those numbers and 2080ti's can do even better.

This wasn't hating on console GPU's, look at what the One X can achieve with only 6TF.

I don't know why the conversation turned away from that, it was the only point I was trying to make.

ProjectVulcan1880d ago (Edited 1880d ago )

More like Vega 56 performance, much slower than 1080Ti which is ok but by the time these machines launch in 2020 Vega 56 level will be a lower mid range GPU.

Also Apocalypse nice appeal to console gamers telling themselves that.

But truth is we all know Metro Exodus for example with all the features turned out VASTLY outstrips what any console can do, and looks WAY better than the Xbox One X version which isn't even native 4K.

Let alone how massively better it is than the other consoles you can buy, the 70 percent of the market playing on base PS4. It's off the charts superior to those versions.

In short PC games take advantage of better GPU technology on PC, don't deny that.

Flewid6381880d ago (Edited 1880d ago )

Been console gaming for 30 years, and decided to randomly get an eGPU to play Steam games in the living room.

Glad I made the right decision. lol.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 1880d ago
airshiraz1880d ago

teraflops only doesnt matter anymore and ps5 gpu must handle ray tracing too

thexmanone1880d ago

That's nothing too brag about, My pc has been getting over that for years.

Jide1881d ago

Teraflops. The new frontier. Lol

SkatterBrain1880d ago

what comes after Teraflops on the PS 32 in 2050?

Cyb3r1881d ago

I dont know whether that controller is fake or not but it does look uncomfortable to hold, I hope that they keep the PS4 controller design IMO it really doesn't need changing

Jin_Sakai1880d ago

The controller is fake. Says it right there in the description.

KillZallthebeast1880d ago

Pretty sure it's just some abomination you get when merging xbox and playstation controllers

Show all comments (134)
430°

PS6 Graphics – Can it Approach Photorealism?

If the PS5 Pro leaks are accurate, the eventual PS6 is slated to be one powerful console. But if modern GPUs still lag behind true photorealism, can the PS6 get there?

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Hugodastrevas1d 10h ago

I hate to be "that guy", but we have go ask ourselves do the industry need photorealistic graphics at this point or actually good games, good content, less anti-consumer practices?
This graphical obsession has brought nothing but years upon years of waiting for a game to launch with huge detailed empty worlds, bad stories and predictable gameplay and (micro)transactions everywhere. Sorry for the rant.

MrGameAndWatch1d 8h ago

Same. I really don't want to be in an interactive film and, to me photorealism is not needed for immersion.

RaidenBlack1d 2h ago

Why always target photorealism?
Why not use the extra horsepower for better, complex & diverse AI?
Why not target more interactable world? Why not use the new performance headroom for more physics effects?
Player choices that drastically affect and changes the game world?

Cacabunga1d ago (Edited 1d ago )

Let’s first see what PS5 graphics look like.. we’ve seen nothing yet

RaidenBlack21h ago

@Cacabunga
For that, first Naughty Dog's PS5 single-player exclusive, then Guerilla's PS5 single-player exclusive

OtterX1d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

If anything, the massive layoffs in the industry right now are showing that investors are pulling out and not wanting to invest as much as they are right now into AAAs. Much less push for even higher detail, unless many parts of it are automated by AI for a cheaper price. Not saying I support people's jobs being replaced by AI, just stating a reality of what the money people want.

DarXyde1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

Photorealism should be reserved for games like Gran Turismo. It costs far too much to incorporate that level of detail.

Even then, if it comes at the cost of physics calculations or frame rate given the shared resources of consoles, I'd scale it back in favor of a smoother experience.

Nintendo was quite smart to never pigeonhole themselves into that. Great foresight on their part, I'd say.

8bitAssassin1d 5h ago

But they've gotten very lazy on their games. I still like their approach don't just make game play your biggest innovation.

DarXyde1d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

8bitAssassin,

I assume you're talking about Nintendo.

I think it works for them. I'm honestly glad that it's nothing like PlayStation or Xbox. It's a great reason to own one.

8bitAssassin8h ago

Yup!! I am. Yes it works for them and I love it. I want them to have better than average old tech so the scope of some of their games can drop jaws. I'm not talking about counting pixels either.

anast1d 5h ago

I think we need both. Why lower the standard? A photorealistic Bloodborne or Elden Ring game would be insane.

isarai1d 3h ago

Nah im with you on that, like visually games look fine, maybe up the resolution on average but i would much rather resources be spent on things that actually make the game FEEL good to play at this point.

shinoff21831d 3h ago

Don't forget about the budgets.

ROCKY281d 2h ago

agreed - stop with the expensive photo realism and just create amazing games that are less expensive that are not a risk to create an original game within 2-3 years and not 7 years of development - like the OG PS2/Xbox era !

WolfSeed1d 2h ago

There are individual goals for individual parameters. Graphics, gameplay, scale, geometry, AI Sophistication, etc.

This article touches one of them. No need to cancel the conversation because you care more about other things.

Amplitude1d ago (Edited 1d ago )

Some photorealism is much cheaper to produce than what devs are currently forced to do.
If all games could have path tracing, there would be no need for developers to manually map ambient occlusion, shadowmaps, reflection probes, etc. It's a huge undertaking that's making games cost way more to produce on account of the rather pathetic-for-2024 RT and general performance of the current gen consoles.

As much as i hate to say it, we need new consoles as soon as feasibly possible. These consoles launched at the absolute worst possible time, right before RT/DLSS2.0/3.0 were able to quickly skyrocket games in quality on the PC side of things, leaving a ridiculously large gap between PC and console almost immediately after launch and preventing things like CyberPunk Pathtracing Mode in other games. They're holding everything back and making games take longer to produce.

I think Microsoft may be smart if they end up adopting a model where multiple companies (including NVidia) can release multiple spec variant "PC" boxes with the XBox OS. One console every decade doesn't cut it with how quick technology moves in this new era we're in.

smolinsk23h ago

I would love the Next step in graphic to be massive but it always turns out that it takes a long time so the ps6 graphics are gonna be like the best we have now Just with 60fps in every game. World love to se the big ass large worlds with fantastic graphics and depth. Gta 6 are gonna bring that for sure.

just_looken16h ago

@hugo

100% agree but it also made the use of upscale tech the norm which made games worse and the fact console now are just tablets we need a console with a real gpu real cpu real ram setup.

It would be so amazing to see a game like you said made like the ps2/ps3 era using today's pc parts pushing the hardware.

There are titles out there that make my pc run like its still on the desktop

Barlos11h ago

Agreed. For me at least, games are escapism. I don't want them mimicking real life. Graphics don't have to be photorealistic to be impressive. As with you, I'm more about the story, and I would prefer innovation in other ways. The PS5 did it with the DualSense. This it more important to me than just shinier graphics.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 8h ago
Zenzuu1d 8h ago

Personally for me, graphics have already gotten to the point where I don't really feel the need to see having it to make anymore realistic or better.

At this point, I rather game developers focus on quality/engaging stories, gameplay, & contents. Also not every every single game needs to opened world just for the sake of it.

anast1d 5h ago

I'd rather they focus on both. It's a trillion dollar industry. They should be able to do both.

neutralgamer19921d 5h ago

Zenzuu

Believe it or not when it comes to consoles and games graphics are still the biggest factor. Why do you think we still see CHI trailers or in engine footage. The first impression is very important. Not for us core gamers but for millions of casuals who are quite easily impressed with wow factor graphics

TiredGamer1d 2h ago

"More, more, more!!! I don't care what it takes - I deserve more! And I won't PAY a dollar more!"

That's the mindset of some people out there.

JEECE19h ago

I mean, can we still say that's the case even when casuals flock to mediocre looking battle royales? PUBG became huge among casuals, and it looks like a PS3 era shooter with textures that didn't load properly. And casuals have embraced the cartoon aesthetic (Fortnite is the easy example here, but there are others). What is the recent graphics focused game casuals have flocked to? Are you counting COD for that?

anast14h ago

@1992 Candy Crush and Monopoly Go

@Tired Like I said. It's a trillion dollar industry. They could definitely do more. Customers are paying a ton of money.

WolfSeed1d 2h ago

There are individual goals for individual parameters. Graphics, gameplay, scale, geometry, AI Sophistication, etc. No need to cancel the conversation because you care more about other things.

smolinsk22h ago

Graphics are the biggest selling point and will always be.

neutralgamer199220h ago

Agreed especially for those who aren’t hardcore gamers. We core gamers look at everything through core gamers POV. But there is a much bigger casual market who likes looking at pretty things

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 14h ago
andy851d 8h ago

Honestly with UC4 I thought we were close but things don't really seem to have improved much in 8 years. Hellblade 2 seems to have raised the bar a bit though

MrBaskerville1d 8h ago

I don't think publishers have the money to make that happen. They can barely sustain the current level of fidelity.

Sciurus_vulgaris1d ago

The goal post for what photorealistic graphics are has always been moving. I remember some 360/PS3 sports games being called photorealistic way back in the mid 2000s.

bRuud831d 8h ago

Simply, no! Graphics wise there is barely any difference between the PS4 and PS5 just a little more particle effects and very minimal use of ray tracing. I expect even less diffence between PS5 and PS6. Just better implementation of Ray Tracing.

purple1011d 3h ago

you are correct, but there ram has doubled, and now we have ssd not a spinning disk drive, I think we have not yet scratched the surface of next gen personally,

Show all comments (99)
280°

Nintendo says Switch 2 will be officially announced before the end of March 2025

This is Furukawa, President of Nintendo. We will make an announcement about the successor to Nintendo Switch within this fiscal year. It will have been over nine years since we announced the existence of Nintendo Switch back in March 2015. We will be holding a Nintendo Direct this June regarding the Nintendo Switch software lineup for the latter half of 2024, but please be aware that there will be no mention of the Nintendo Switch successor during that presentation.

Profchaos14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

I'm excited for a switch 2 however I don't feel it will be coming this year as per the tweet in they are commuting to a reveal in this Japanese financial year in 2025.

Realistically we will get one last holiday season to focus on the switch because it would be madness for Nintendo to go into the holidays where the switch always performs well when they have announced a switch 2.

I'm thinking we see a announcement late Jan 25 personally with a release between March and June depending on when the software is ready and how strong the holday sales were if they need to boost those figures for the next earnings call or not

gold_drake14d ago

yea agreed. they'll probably match it with the new pkmn game they announced

VenomUK14d ago

So it begins!

Where one contender pulls out of the game, another comes back bigger and stronger.

Nintendo Switch 2 - let the games begin.

Cacabunga13d ago

A new Splatoon launch title for sure.. hoping they change the recipe and make it open world.

I think it’ll come out Q1 25. Let’s wait and see

H914d ago

There's a event in June for games on the switch and they said there won't be a switch 2 announcement so no way they will announce the console after june and still release it in the same year

Eonjay14d ago

So, I think they will shoot for another FYQ4 release (like with the first Switch) but I am confused by the headline:

'[...] Switch 2 will be officially ANNOUNCED before the end of March 2025' This implies that the Switch 2 isn't coming out till maybe holiday 2025 or maybe even 2026. I think they will be better served by NOT releasing when GTA 6 launches (unless there is some shocking reveal that it will run on Switch 2). Release early 2025.

Neonridr14d ago

I'd say it'll be released before March 2025 tbh.

notachance14d ago

Holiday announcement with summer launch

thesoftware73014d ago

It should be an interesting year; Sony, Nintendo, and MS all have new Hardware to show.

Show all comments (28)
470°

PS5 Pro specs leak video taken down by Sony

Sony is taking actions as video by Moore’s Law is Dead, has been issued with a copyright claim.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
andy8534d ago

And people say it's all fake because Sony haven't said anything 😂 conveniently forget the PS4 Pro was only announced 2 months before release.

BeHunted34d ago

It's fake. There's no factual evidence other than his own made up specs.

Hereandthere34d ago

What were the specks Sony was afraid of showing?

Shikoku34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

Digital foundry put a video out saying what he leaked was exactly what they also knew about the PS5 PRO. So no it's not just stuff he made up

Babadook734d ago (Edited 34d ago )

If it’s fake what copyright does MLID infringe upon?

😂

andy8534d ago

Aye because they'd go to the effort of copyright claiming it if it didn't exist 🙃😂 you'd have to be a special kind to be thinking its not a thing by now

Cacabunga34d ago

They need to reveal it with uncharted killzone or a heavy hitter like this

Ironmike34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

U mean the specs that we'll established digital foundry which said these are the actual specs published a video on 2 weeks ago I mean they are only one of most trusted sites for tech information but they just made up a video for the sake of it

Christopher33d ago

I would love for it all to be fake, but lots of people are saying they've seen/heard the same thing. But, man, we 100% don't need mid-gen upgrades when we're failing hard to optimize current hardware.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 33d ago
Seraphim33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

if I recall Sony lowered sales expectations for PS5 earlier this year. if that is the case we won't hear anything about a Pro until next year or shortly before/when it's dropping. After all, if the Pro was dropping this year/fiscal year they wouldn't have lowered expectations.

As for squashing rumors. Yeah, shit like this prevents potential buyers from adopting now, just like slim rumors in the past. It only makes sense to keep things under wraps from a business perspective. Despite living in a technological age of unfettered access to information we don't need to know whats going on behind closed doors be that at Sony, Nintendo, MS, or amongst any development studios. When the steak is done we shall feast.

JackBNimble33d ago

By the time games are actually made to take advantage of the pro spec's the ps6 will be released or close to it.

jznrpg34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

Just announce it already! I want to preorder one asap. But in reality they don’t want to lessen PS5 sales until Pro is ready to launch so I understand the business part of it. September is probably when they announce it with an early November launch like the PS4 Pro

Ironmike34d ago

Pro won't lessen sales sames ps4 pro never and the ps4 pro was more relevant at the time cos move to 4k this not needed

RaidenBlack34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

Yea, my brother got his PS4 (coz of a good deal) after the PS4 Pro's release.

darthv7234d ago

^^same here. I got a base 4 for only $100 off a guy who bought the Pro. then a few months later I found a guy on craigslist selling a pro for $100 because it was left behind by his former roommate who moved out. That was the beginning of my obsession to buy up the different variants of the PS4 that were released.

As of now I am really only missing the 500m one and the gold slim but otherwise I have pretty much all the other retail ones. https://consolevariations.c...

crazyCoconuts33d ago

Anyone with 4K that appreciates 60fps is gonna disagree about it not being needed.
DLSS is a god send for Nvidia, and there's been nothing like it for AMD...yet ...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 33d ago
DeadlyFire33d ago

They will announce it around E3 timeframe about May-June whenever they do a showcase for the year.

neutralgamer199234d ago

Just announce it this thing will sell well

Ironmike34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

I don't think it will pll still haven't seen the potential of ps5 yet

Cacabunga33d ago

agreed, but it might sell if they announce some 1st party games to lead the way. if people see the difference with the base version they can move on. for my sake I am still gaming mainly on PS4 (still not finished with RDR2 due to lack of gaming time). I have a huge backlog on PS5 I am hoping to get into.

mark3214uk34d ago

why? game makers havnt even come close to maxing out current spec yet, were getting al lthese new TFlops and game maker are making crappy remakes not worthy of the ps3

Minute Man 72134d ago

The guts of the 5 and X are 5 years old

fr0sty33d ago

People keep saying that, yet we still have games running at near HD resolutions, 30fps, and ray tracing features turned off.

PRIMORDUS34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

I would take that video and upload a torrent of it, fuck that copyright bullshit. If your going to do something that has a chance of being taken down, make a torrent first share it. Then Sony or any other company is helpless and you can laugh in their faces, taunting them to try to take it down 🤣

LoveSpuds34d ago

With kind of analysis and advice, you could be a lawyer for Trump!🤣

tronyx1234d ago

As much as the PS4 Pro didn't represent a major % in the playerbase, announcing a 'better' model will hinder sales from the 'base' model. They are right, business-wise.

Show all comments (36)