Red Dead Redemption II is an upcoming game from legendary game studio Rockstar who produced classics such as Grand Theft Auto, Red Dead Redemption and Bully. Millions of fans anticipate this game excitedly but I personally can’t help but feel uninterested.
Love survival horror? Love physical editions of games? Limited Run Games have got your back as they reveal a physical collection for Clock Tower: Rewind on Xbox, Switch, PlayStation and PC.
The Outerhaven interviews Francisco González of Grundislav Games about his passion for Point and Click games.
The Xbox brand has done a lot of good over the years, but their various blunders are pretty wild to look back on in their magnitude.
Ironically number 9 can save them at this point (releasing games on multiple platforms)
Phil Spencer is the worst that has happened to Xbox.
They built a respectable brand up to Xbox one. Then this guy took over and things became a joke
Really good video.
I remember the days with RRoD was big news on here, N4G.
Microsoft had it turbulence number of years.
Looking at the success of Sea of Thieves despite being 6 years old, time to release Halo, Forza horizon 4 & 5 on PS5. It'll help their revenue
I found this video painful to watch. Can someone list them out?
Top 10 for me from are:
1. 2013 reveal presentation
2. Bundling Kinect 2 with Xbox One
3. RRoD or why rushing to market with hardware is always a bad idea.
4. Buying studios only to close them.
5. Ads on the Home Screen
6. Letting Halo die.
7. Letting Geard of War die.
8. Every console name
9. Charging for Xbox Live on Xbox 360 when Sony let PS3 players play online for free.
10. Cancelling release of OG Xbox games after the Xbox 360 launched.
No doubt RDR2 will have an online mode, but I think R* and specifically Take Two, know that it can't compete with GTA Online.
It's clear that R* have crafted a solid single player experience, and I don't think they've crimped it for the sake of multiplayer. Admittedly, any single player expansion packs (Undead Nightmare 2?) might instead be online multiplayer content, but as long as the RDR2 single player experience is robust and offers multiple play-through options (which they usually do) then I don't really see the problem.
GTA V is a stellar game that can be fully enjoyed without playing the multiplayer at all, I think RDR2 will offer so much gameplay options that you don't have to worry about multiplayer if you don't want to.
So the main points here is that we still know next to nothing (features, etc), but typical online game stuff (special items, cash bonuses), and you aren't sure if it is a single player game, because it can't be confirmed or denied at this point, and you think Take-Two will focus on the online portion instead of the single-player experience because no single player expansions hit Grand Theft Auto 5?
I'm not sure how you qualify a legitimate worry, but I think you're doing it wrong. Gameplay was shown recently with all kinds of details, and considering this is a video game sequel, I expect refined features from the last and an expanded world, which we got from the video. I know the social gaming world can be amazing because of the slew of info, but quite frankly in my opinion, we don't need to know absolutely everything about a video game. Surprises should be welcomed, not looked down on.
Considering how Red Dead Redemption is a celebration of the western mythos, whereas Grand Theft Auto is a parody of American culture, I would argue that there will be expansions to this game because of the amount of content one could create. Grand Theft Auto just happens to lend itself to online more, because, again, it's a parody in a modern world.
Now as for the single player confirmed or denied bit.. dude.
I'm not excited for RDR2 but that's because I didn't like the first game. *Shrugs* Just not my cup of tea I'm afraid.
Im tired of these titles on articles. They are always so contrarian for clicks.