DSOGaming writes: "As we’ve already reported, CD Projekt RED showcased Cyberpunk 2077 behind closed doors. And today, the first gameplay footage from that demonstration has surfaced. However, do note that a) this is a small glimpse/tease and b) this is off-screen footage."
BLG writes, "Some of the most popular games have had a rough start, with some of them being downright unplayable.
Despite that, developers have managed to turn it around for them and make their game worth playing. Here are some games that had a rough start but were pretty great."
Sea of Thieves... I'm not disagreeing that the game has improved in terms of content. But I feel that the most significant change between now and its release is actually the public perception. Nowadays, most people are aware that the game is a multiplayer PvP-focused experience first and foremost, and not "Black Flag made by Rare". Consequently, people dismissing the whole experience because the single-player aspect is lacking or the story is plain are much less common.
Several years ago, i submitted an idea to Rare that would change up the mechanics of battling opponents in the game. whereby if you died in battle, you turned into a skeleton warrior and had to fight your way back to the land of the living. It was an interesting twist on respawning and would allow the player to experience both sides of a battle.
I keep hoping to see something like that get added to the game.
It's sad that this quick retort is more often than not true... The industry's acceptance of release and patch has gone too far.
Days gone! By the end of the game I couldn't drop it down! I went around so many hours killing zombies! It was addictive by the end.
I don't know, I got it abit late, and struggled for a few days, and then all of a sudden it just got good!!
Source code for CD Projekt's action role-playing games The Witcher 3 and Cyberpunk 2077 have allegedly been compromised.
Well they are using unreal engine now thanks to there work culture and horrific job on making cyberpunk so for the future no impact.
But it will be interesting to see what mods will be made
https://rebel-wolves.com/
7 disagrees shows how many look at one dlc that had a rip off fight from ghost in the shell and goes wow what a goat team i love cdpr while ignoring that they only made 2 games that were good witcher 2/3 in 20yrs.
But its a new world we want a criminal that support's legal murder as president/support shoplifting love toxic work environments and have a mass casualty event every other day.
I’ll admit I didn’t play it at launch, but Cyberpunk 2077 is a really good game now.
And who the hell knows what you’re even going on about in your second paragraph here.
Wait a min...I swear to god CP2077's source code got leaked before. CDPR needs to stop using "password123" for all their accounts 😅
This is the same leak the threat actors have been trying to sell the source code after cd project didn't pay the ransom.
They didn't manage to sell the source code to any company largely because it would be unethical for say EA to buy it so the threat actors failed to find a buyer.
After they failed to make any money they went through with their threat of simply giving it away.
Cyberpunk 2077's launch resulted in a loss of goodwill with gamers, but there is a way to earn it back with the upcoming sequel.
They will need to add everything they promised in the first one and not over promise on the second one.
They also need to drop esg then hire employees that have knowledge not hire them because they have a set of tits.
Official video they hired people to fill the esg clipboard
As somebody who has been playing the tabletop games since the 90s and was let down on launch by my PS4 version, you can bet I'm not going the preorder any sequel.
3rd person option, and everything else that was originally promised. Next don't force agenda driven naratives. Finally, release a finished product without need for day one patches.
That was basically nothing. The city looked beautiful, but c'mon.
Cyberpunk was one of the most disappointing things at E3 imo. We expected gameplay after 6 years, but instead got a cinematic trailer. I honestly wasn't impressed with tone either. There were cool elements like the robot mercenaries in the cab and perhaps even the protagonist and the car at the end, but overall, i wasn't blown away. Especially considering it was Microsoft's show closer.
Even that tease looks epic.
Cyberpunk man; how will current gen vanilla consoles handle this?
You saw more in the trailer than in that video :(
I mean it looks pretty but we pretty much guessed that. Gonna remain skeptic until we see actual gameplay to decide if the first person view is right or not.
It's not that I don't have faith in CPR, but here's my issue with the first person view. They said it is an RPG first, shooter second. My problem with that is I find first person RPGs very slow and boring. A few examples of an RPG first with shooting elements are games like Prey(reboot), Dues Ex, Half-Life, Elderscrolls(when in first person view) & in some cases Dishonored. I found those games pretty boring and too slow paced for my liking (Dishonored was enjoyable but I'm done with that series now).
I also don't feel as immersed in the world when it's first person in an RPG as well. I prefer seeing my character and all the surroundings to feel like I am alive and in this world.
Now, if it was an Action-Shooter with some RPG elements similar to games like Bioshock, Borderlands, Dead Space, Dying Light, and Far Cry (the latter two aren't really RPGs but whatever) then I would be completely cool with that.
That is my main problem with Cyberpunk being First Person. I generally don't enjoy RPGs in first person unless it is an action shooter with RPG elements. I find it rather slow paced and repetitive.
I don't doubt that these guys can make a great game. It's just I do not like RPG games being in first person unless it is on the action side. That's my opinion at least.
Does look pretty epic. Imagine a world that densely populated, full of quests and interactions like the Bloody Baron in Witcher 3.