We Need to Support Ubisoft and Get Behind Them

Patrick at twobeardgaming knows this opinion has the potential to be a little divisive, but please hear him out. I know that Far Cry 5 has been getting some mixed reviews but we should all try to support Ubisoft

[porkChop]

I don't think people should buy games they don't want. However, out of all the big western 3rd party pubs Ubisoft is the only one consistently pushing new IP and new ideas.

[DaDrunkenJester]

Unfortunately they don't always deliver on the hype, but I agree. They actually push new ideas and IP's and I can respect that for sure.

[indysurfn]

I'm not supporting a micro-transactions leader. https://gamerant.com/ubisof...

[PoSTedUP]

they work hard and they give us great games. a lot of the time we are to blame for over hyping them. not every game is going to be better than the last.

[DaDrunkenJester]

@Indy

Don't buy MT's then...

[_-EDMIX-_]

100% agree with this comment

I of course cannot condone anyone trying to force anyone to purchase a Publishers games simply over personal emotion or bias but I also believe that people should at least cut Ubisoft some slack and recognize that they're trying new things more than the other Publishers even if I personally don't buy their games often. I think I only own 3 Ubisoft games this generation but I appreciate them trying new things

[Godmars290]

What would you do otherwise? Ask people on the street if they're gamers pulling a gun on them taking them to Gamestop making them buy Ubisoft games for saying "yes"?

[_-EDMIX-_]

@godmars- "cannot condone anyone trying to force anyone to purchase a Publishers games simply over personal emotion or bias"

I mean buddy it's literally right there in the post Are you seriously telling me you don't understand that means I don't support the concept of someone doing that?

So the question you're asking in your post....no ,I wouldn't do that at all as Illustrated in my actual point of saying I would never condone something like that. I mean I don't mean to be rude but are you really telling me you're unable to read and understand what that actual post means? lol

oh boy

So basically you're debating something that is pretty clear in regards to the answer that's being provided?

[Godmars290]

No debate. Rather pointing out the pointlessness of making the statement. This article.

If Ubisoft makes a game worthy of welling well, then that's that.

If someone fells the need to go on social networks to beg others to buy a poorly selling game for fear of "their" favorite studio being closed, pitching a fit when someone else tells the game is crap, then the first person never should have bothered posting in the first place.

The issue being that in the second case - that happens all the damn time!

[_-EDMIX-_]

@godmars agreed

[thorstein]

That's hilarious, I said the same thing a year ago and got a ton of downvotes. At that time it was hip to hate Ubi.

Hear hear for new IPs. Can't wait to see what else they are going to do. I already fully support them.

[Princess_Pilfer]

Not really. New IPs maybe, but they are *almost* always layered over the same generic ubisoft open world game design, and even when they do have a "new" Idea like for honor, they kill it with Pay to win nonsense and poor balance.

Also they're still putting micro transactions in single player games, for which there is no excuse, so it's basically automatically not worth supporting them.

[princejb134]

Yup but 90% of the time. Their open world games are very repetitive. Same missions over and over with lots of bugs

[BigTrain]

That's exactly how I feel about their games. Not horrible but really repetitive content wise. Another reason why I quickly fell off the Assasins Creed hay-filled wagon.

[Lennoxb63]

Gaming as a whole is repetitive. People really abuse this word when talking about games.

[UnholyLight]

I've always liked Ubisoft as a puublisher, at least they are consistently trying new ideas or IP's. I agree completely. They're solid, maybe the games aren't always perfect but I love the variety.

[Count_Bakula]

New ideas, maybe, but not quite sure how much I respect a developer that hasn't changed their running animations for 4+ years. They love recycling assets.

[DigitalRaptor]

Ubisoft is one of the more respectable AAA publishers.

They support a lot more new ideas and I can certainly get behind their products if they're good.

[AspiringProGenji]

Ubisoft has a great output of new ips and they are very versatile, but many of their new ips just fall flat in the end. Look at Watchdogs, new idea and much potential, and it ended being a GtA clone. For Honor looked cool but it has been forgotten. The division was dissapointing, and after Siege they seem to be going the Gass route. You Be Soft didn’t see a cent from me until AC Origins because after the mess that was Unity (day one buyer), I couldn’t stand them anymore

[Dlaw76]

Don't think you meant The Division

[CorndogBurglar]

@ Dlaw76

I'm pretty sure he did mean The Division because it was disappointing for quite a lot of people.

[killswitch80]

The Division is amazing now and a lot of people actually love that game. This may be news to you but people like different things. Is your mind blown now?

[frostypants]

@killswitch80, it's an objective fact that The Division was a let down upon release. It was expected to be a 90+ type game and ended up barely hitting an 80 on MC. Let's not revise history here. It may be better now, just as many mediocre games improve over time, but it had serious issues. A lot of people may like the Division, but a lot do not...is @AspiringProGenji not entitled to his opinion? This started when @Dlaw76 insisted he didn't mean that.

[narsaku]

"We need to support crowdfunding and get behind this platform."

Fixed the title for you. Or are downgrades and disappointments and modern shitty trend games that don't have lasting appeal like Watch Dogs a good thing?

For every good game they make, they make 5 lies/disappointments.

[AspiringProGenji]

Harsh but I agree.

[thorstein]

Oh really? How's Star Citizen?

[Princess_Pilfer]

Yes. Because Star Citizen, all by itself, totally negates Shantae and Pillars of Eternity and Divinity OS/OS2 and Shadowrun Returns/DragonFall/Hong Kong and Elite Dangerouse and Wasteland 2 and Torment Tides of Numinera and Undertale.

Totally. All those success stories? They mean nothing because 1 crowdfunded game hasn't come out. Never mind the independant projects having more creative freedom to make the kinds of games they want without publisher interfearance, never mind them generally not engaging in predatory monitization schemes, never mind the revival of previously near-dead genres. No, star citizen is vaporware, so all the actual benefits of crowdfunding independant titles don't exist.

[porkChop]

We started supporting crowdfunding because publishers were apparently the problem. So we tried that, and circumvented publishers. What happened?

Most higher-profile crowdfunded games have ended up being garbage or at least very disappointing. Crowdfunding isn't working, and is clearly not the solution.

[bluefox755]

Just because devs don't have a publisher screwing things up doesn't mean they're immune to failure. It doesn't guarantee success, but it does guarantee more creative freedom. What they do with that freedom is what matters.

[stanr]

I do admire Ubisoft for their commitment to longevity in their games.

[Jakens]

I agree. The great support. I'm pleased with Ubi.

[-Foxtrot]

They are all about online focused games these days especially in new IPs

The Crew
For Honour
The Division
Steep
Skull and Bones

Same rinse and repeat gameplay where they make limited content and expect the play with his friends to make their own replay value because apparently playing with friends and having fun doing the same limited things with them evens everything out...holds them over until the expansion pack hits.

[Razzer]

AC: Origins
Far Cry 5
South Park: TFBW
Watch Dogs 2
Ghost Recon Wildlands

Those games have some damn single player content. So no....not "all about online focused games". Ubisoft puts out a good mix and really good quality, imo.

[MWH]

Add greats like Child of Light and Rayman and you have one of the most versitale devs in the industry and that's always a good thing for gamers.

[-Foxtrot]

I said new IPs

Brand new original games...

AC isn't new
Far Cry isn't
South Park isn't
Watch Dogs isn't
Ghost Recon...nope

[The 10th Rider]

@MWH,

IMO those games don't help Ubisoft's current reputation. Rayman last came out 5 years ago now, Child of Light was 4 years. There was Valiant Hearts 4 years ago as well. They dabbled in those types of games for a year or two but they haven't put out anything similar in 4 years now. They don't seem to care about those smaller titles so much anymore.

[Razzer]

"I said new IPs"

Nope, you said "especially in new IPs".

[JackBNimble]

Don't forget rocksmith which is an offline single / 2 player game.
Also my single most favorite piece of music teaching software ever created.

This game is by far the most innovative game ever.

[killswitch80]

Watch Dogs is a pretty new IP

[Lockdown555]

Everyone seems to also be forgetting Mario and Rabids which was an outstanding new IP although only on a Nintendo platform.

[MWH]

@The 10th Rider

Unfortunately i think you are right. Nonetheless, potentials and talents are there so there's hope one day we will see more of these gems.

[yellowgerbil]

Mario + rabbids was an amazing new IP.

[_-EDMIX-_]

Slow down you're not allowed to mention that because it breaks Fox's bias narrative

[_-EDMIX-_]

So razzer is very much putting you in your place regarding this I'm sorry but you can't keep trying to cherry-pick this type of stuff to force a specific narrative because Ubisoft has actually been doing both Concepts unless you're going to tell me that South Park is an MMO or Assassin's Creed is an online-only game.

Spire me with trying to spin it because Watch Dogs is a new intellectual property....

[Princess_Pilfer]

Watchdogs is a generic ubisoft open world game. Just like farcry, and assassins creed, and ghost recon, ect. The split between single player focused and multiplayer focused is mostly irrelivant because they're mostly the same formula. An enormous open world, filled with a metric crapton of repetitive stuff to do (usually subdivided into like 4 to 6 types of objectives.)

There is every reason to have an anti-ubisoft bias. Even when they are actually improving their games or doing something new, they insist on ruining it somehow. (See: the pay to win crap in For Honor, the microtransactions not only being in a single player game, but bogging down the experience by increasing load times for the store)

[Petebloodyonion]

@Princess
"Watchdogs is a generic ubisoft open world game. Just like farcry, and assassins creed, and ghost recon, ect. The split between single player focused and multiplayer focused is mostly irrelivant because they're mostly the same formula. An enormous open world, filled with a metric crapton of repetitive stuff to do (usually subdivided into like 4 to 6 types of objectives."

And yet Zelda and MGS5 are given 10 for copy pasting this formula while giving less...

[Princess_Pilfer]

1: Neither Nintendo nor Konami have like 7 ongoing franchises that use that exact same formula.

2: I didn't review those games, and if I did I woulnd't give either of them a 10 so I don't know what point you think you're making?

3 BotW uses a different formula. Similar, yes, but BotW doesn't fill every square centimeter of the game world with random crap and icons indicating some form of activity. Also the shrines are mostly meanigfully different puzzles, and not repetitive beyond the broadest possible meaning of the term. Though several of the criticisms of generic ubisoft open world games do still apply, it's not actually the same formula.

[bluefox755]

@princess pretty much how I feel. They put out pretty and polished open worlds, but everything from the stories to the game play seems to mostly follow the same generic formulas. I'm not saying the games are bad, it's just we've seen it all before, over and over again.

[killswitch80]

I wish I could like Petebloodyonions comment a thousand more times. Exactly bro, Other open world games have the same types of quest over and over but Ubisoft is the only one to get sh*t on. Plus I can share most of these experiences with friends.

[Princess_Pilfer]

No, no they don't. Go play Morrowind. Or Fallout NV. Or Stalker. Or Deus Ex.

Like, the difference betwen "an open world game" and "generic ubisoft open world game" tends to be in structure. In AC and Farcry and the division and ghost recon (and definitely more that don't jump to mind) the "kill everyone in this camp" objective (in a map with 3000 of the damn things) just stops being interesting. Few of those encounters are meaningfully different, often even between games. They *could* make them meaningfully different in a number of ways. (say, a large variety in enemy types so you can't use more or less the same strategy for every single one, or mandatory stealth ones, or ones you have to take down indirectly because it has to look like someone else did it.) Ubisoft games do almost none of this, ever. The *entire game* ls like those radiant quests in F04 and Skyrim that people hate.

[Uglyday]

Sorry, with their crappy history on PC and ubiservice thingimagarbage I only buy their games used or at a deep deep discount.

[stokedAF]

Why would this be divisive? AC: Origins and Far Cry 5 are great games and should be bought if you are into those kinds of games, on a sale if need be like you say. I am in no shortage of complaints for past games either.

[PurplePeopleEaters]

The recent Ubisoft's games i've played are Farcry 3/4/5 and Child of Light.

[Gardenia]

You don't buy bad games just to support a developer, that way they will never learn from their mistakes. And don't fall for over hyped games, high review scores, but go for your own opinion.

For example I like Assassin's Creed Origins but do not like Far Cry 5. Because with AC they did a lot of work on history and details and improving the game, and it shows, while Far Cry 5 is more of a copy paste game

[Derceto]

Ubisoft can get bent and go bankrupt like the rest of the "AAA" cancer crew. One of the dumbest titles I've read in the history of gaming.

[DafunkyRebel]

have you been living under a rock?

[Kane22]

my problem with ubisoft is you can tell they are trying little by little to bring in more micro-transactions into all their games..

[Dark_Knightmare2]

They aren’t obtrusive though and you can still earn everything in game by just playing so I don’t really have a problem with them.

[Kane22]

the thing is. their going to start off little and see what they can get away with...plus the purposely make grinding in their games longer in hopes we do spend money..

[Yohshida]

yep lets support buggy ai

[porkChop]

To be fair, AI hasn't really made a meaningful progression during the last couple generations. Most of the power has been focused on graphics and larger levels, and not much CPU power is left over for AI.

As far as "buggy" AI goes, that's fair. But Ubi are far from the only ones releasing games with buggy AI. I'd argue most games have that issue at release until they get some patches in.

[Yohshida]

just look at this sht https://www.youtube.com/wat...

[AuraAbjure]

I love Ubisoft's games! They're awesome. I hope they make other games using their snowdrop engine 'sides the division. And they let other companies use that engine too since they said its easy for developers to work with.

[porkChop]

They've used Snowdrop for South Park and Mario + Rabbids. It's a really versatile and powerful engine, so I hope they push it with more games.

[hiawa23]

I too love all their games. My gaming is simple, as I buy what I like and move past the games I don't but I don't hold grudges like some gamers do. At the end of the day just games, and I think you have to keep them in their place. I actually love The Division, The Crew, and others mentioned, so I am fine with Ubi. I am fine with microtransactions. If you are not don't buy, but they are in business to make money.

[Lord_Sloth]

Until I buy a game from them that I don't have fun with I shall continue to support them.

[Profchaos]

They have had a few winners in recent years already the South park titles, far cry 3 and 5.

But they get incredibly lazy that's when you see rinse and repeat gameplay from them spreading across every title. Watch dogs 1 would have been great if it had its own ideas instead we got towers in another form and every other gameplay mechanic ubi uses at that time just in another form

[Dark_Knightmare2]

Ok they dropped the ball on watchdogs but who cares since they made watchdogs 2 which was great

[NotanotherReboot]

need to support Rayman and Beyond Good and Evil

[Big_Game_Hunters]

Support Instead. Thats where all the new ideas are. Imagine some indie studios with even 1/3rd of the budget of a usual Ubisoft game.

[InTheZoneAC]

I buy Ubisoft games because they make games I like. One of the few I haven't bought is For Honor because it has no appeal to me. So if a game doesn't appeal that doesn't mean blindly support them.

[OffRoadKing]

I buy games based on interest and research, if a game looks like something I'd enjoy I'll pick it up regardless of the developer, sure there are some companies out there that are a given like Rockstar, Naughty Dog, Guerilla, Sucker Punch, etc. but overall Ubi's games are good and I've had a lot of fun with them, so I bought FC5 and so far I quite like it.

[DafunkyRebel]

Ubisoft went from one of the best to one of the worst, annnnd then went right back to being one of the best. They need to decide what they want to be

[Platformgamer]

yes, if they release a new 2.5D rayman game.

[Slappy McGee]

Let's not forget that all these great games were a result of then fighting to hold off Vivendi taking them over. Let's see how they do the next few years now that they have a Chinese smartphone game maker backing them up and don't have to try as hard.

[Kitt92]

Let’s not forget Ubisoft consistently downgrade their games after showing it looking much better in trailers realease sometimes broken and unfinished games and think it’s okay to just patch it later and the division being a example whilst it’s fine now it was pretty buggy at launch

[showtimefolks]

We need to support good games that launch fully finished and add more via expansions

We shouldn't launch games built upon MT/LBW, games which have cut content only to be later sold as dlc

We should support those consistent developers and publishers who at the very least try to put their potential consumers into that thinking

We shouldn't support publishers who are only worried about money even if it comes at the expense of consumer experience

[PUBG]

I have love many of Ubisoft's games over the years, but they're gone hog world on open world games, and I'm personally getting tired of it. I have loved the Ghost Recon series since the PS2, the Rainbow Six series, Far Cry & Splinter Cell series since the PS3/Xbox 360, but the latest Ghost Recon game was alright I guess, and Rainbow Six Siege had no single player campaign and got boring after the first 3 months. Lets hope that Splinter Cell doesn't go open world...

[CorndogBurglar]

I would really like a new Ghost Recon game. Not Wildlands style, but a new, linear Ghost Recon. I miss those games.

[zaherdab]

far cry 5 getting mixed reviews ? it's at 84 on metacritic ... that guy is mixed up

[Tross]

I like Ubisoft. They're arguably a more reputable company than the likes of EA and Activision. However, I feel no obligation to do anything just because some journalist says so, and neither should anyone else. If Ubisoft wants support from gamers, they can get it through the normal means: by making games everyone wants to play. If their IPs are ever criticized, it's not because the company is disliked, but because they could improve in some areas. Also, I just have a hard time feeling bad for a large corporation who brings in millions more than I will ever make annually.

[getbacktogaming]

I would love a new 3D rayman with local coop in Mario 3D Land style :D!

[bigmalky]

Ubisoft has been improving over the past year. I'm willing to support them, but still wary of the future.

AC: Origins was great, FC5 looks to be an improvement over 4 and Primal, The Division still being updated and supported... But there are still problems. Wildlands was a little too rough, no Splinter Cell since last generation.

We'll see, but I'm quietly hopeful.

[StrawberryDiesel420]

Agree that Wildlands was a bit rough...but it was a nice size open world game with a Socom vibe. Plus the story is cool and action was fun.

Far Cry 5 for me is addictively fun. The world feels very organic and the gameplay is fantastic. The amount of attention to detail is astounding.

For example, I was under a very high wooden bridge when I noticed an icon above indicating an enemy vehicle was approaching. I looked up to shoot and as the vehicle went over the bridge, the sound of that vehicle going over that wood bridge was so on point and distinct I was blown away. The distance from where I stood to the bridge above in real life would have been around 100 feet. It was scary...it sounded as if I was there.

And that was after I had a massive pit bull swimming after me a la No Country for Old Men and could hear the dog's master shouting commands to the dog from underwater and was blown away by the perfectly muffled sound of the voice. It was freakin scary how real it felt. I actually felt like I was there. The attention to detail can't be understated. Far Cry 5 is damn good.

[dragonrage00]

We need to support good games. That's it

[StrawberryDiesel420]

Agree. Wanna support em? Buy game full price at launch if it is good.

[StrawberryDiesel420]

Had no plans on buying Far Cry 5. After watching reviews decided to jump in. Game is well made....and for me personally....very fun. I love the enviroments, it really looks amazing on my Pro super sampled down to 1080p. I can't even begin to imagine what it looks like on the X in native 4K at a stable 30fps...very impressive indeed.

Assasin's Creed Origins and Ghost Recon Wildlands are other examples of well made absolutely gorgeous games. Also very fun in my opinion. Three good games to keep me busy til God of War 4. Ubisoft devs have obviously been given freedom, time and resources to make these the better entries to their respective franchises. Roll on 4/20!

[lociefer]

I don't like some of their practises BUT they made sme cool and diverse ips like rocksmith, and rayman. And for that i respect them

[cj1pate101]

yeah considering how much care ubisoft puts into there games after launch. Splintercell black list is garbage and was never even updated. Thanks ubisoft for being a horrible company

[DivineAssault]

Far cry is really good but other than that and rayman type platformers, theres nothing ubisoft offers im into.

[_FantasmA_]

Let's not get on our knees for them just yet. Yes they certainly are better than Evil Arts and Craptivision, but they are still bad. You can tell Siege had a short development cycle because it shipped without a single player campaign, very little game modes, and it was a buggy mess at launch. The content they have is way overpriced in an attempt to make you say f*** it, and hopefully you'll hand over your cash for a useless cosmetic alpha pack.

Ghost Recon Wildlands is Ghost Recon only in name. Never cared for Watch Dogs as sandbox type of games get repetitive and boring very quickly. I skipped The Division and will likely skip #2. Their games are decent, but their practices suck. They also need to give AssCreed a rest and come back in few years with something that will wow us like the first two games (I actually like AssCreed 1 better than 2 even though I beat ,2 first then 1).

[sreevenkat]

Ubisoft has to think about new Prince of Persia at least this time.

[lazyboyblue]

I like Ubisoft. Do they mess up regularly? Hell yes. Do most companies. Yes again. But Ubisoft keep making games I want to play. End of.

[ClanPsi1]

No. I'll never buy a Ubisoft product for as long as UPlay exists.

[CrimsonWing69]

April Fool’s!!! Oh wait...

[LoveSpuds]

I think many Ubisoft games share the same DNA a lot of the time, I feel like I could pick out a Ubisoft game in some kind of 'Pepsi challenge' if you know what I mean.

Having said that, I think the formula works most of the time. I got the Platinum trophy in Watchdogs 2, FarCry Primal, Assassins Creed Origins and the Assassins Creed 2 remaster, I am only missing a few MP trophies on the other FarCry games and I also played a lot of The Division. I had immense fun with all these games but I think it's fair to suggest there are similar mechanics and game design across all of these titles.

They do mix things up too with the utterly incredible Rayman and fab titles like Southpark, Child of Light and Valiant Hearts so I personally have a lot of respect for Ubi, I think they make great games and do care about the industry.

[DarkKaine]

Why? Since Prince of Persia has been abandoned I couldn't give less shits.

[HeisenbergX]

They are a garbage company and i hate them .. my honest opinion here. Everything they put out no matter if it’s a ”new IP” is always overhyped downgraded mediocre been there done that crap. There are exceptions of course like Rayman, original Prince of Persia trilogy and Beyond good and evil but it’s been a long time since those games and Ubi didn’t impress me since 2007, and then they started milking AC which shows what kind of company they are. And Far Cry ... dear good is it borring and same as ever.

[Psychotica]

I almost always buy their games. I loved AC:Origins and was my game of the year. I loved Far Cry 3, Far Cry 4 was boring and I never even got half way with it. Far Cry 5 is a little disappointing and could have used some more development time. In my opinion the combat and enemy AI of GR:Wildlands is more polished.

[Artemidorus]

Sounds like he's been paid to say this, Ubisoft needs to go with EA, both far too greedy

[OpenGL]

We don't need to do anything, Ubisoft has already outlined their plans to turn games into live services.

[majedx9]

i did support them and got the Far cry 5 Gold and look how they repay me 😡😡😡 i have to wait 10 days even in japan thay cannot play yet😡😡😡 😡😡😡 8545;😡😡😡 ;

-Far Cry 5 will now officially release on all platforms in the Middle East and North Africa on April 10, 2018 / Rajab 23, 1439.

We took this decision to ensure an ideal gaming experience for our players. We can assure that the delay has nothing to do with the Arabic localisation or the game content.

We apologize for the inconvenience and thank you for your continued support of Far Cry 5.
We would like to add an update to this: Currently Far Cry 5, with Arabic subtitles and menus, is now officially available on Uplay for PC. It will launch on April 10 / Rajab 23 on PS4, Xbox One, and Steam.

Thank you,
The Far Cry Community Team

[hiawa23]

Gamer's should buy the games that appeal to them, and not buy cause someone said they should. Some of my alltime favorite games, ever, are Ubi Soft games, I.E. Splinter Cell, Ghost Recon, Rainbow 6, to name a few, so I fully support them and they are my favorite dev outside of Rockstar. I love all the Far Cry games and loving FC5 at the moment.

[Markusb33]

I don't think you support any dev just because.
Quality products get supported

[Jon_Targaryen]

About 30% of my library games is Ubisoft... So I guess I'm doing my part.

[iplay1up2]

I bought Assassins Creed Origins, and Far Cry 5, both the premium versions. Totally worth it. The games look and play fantastic on my Xbox One X.

[ziggurcat]

ehhh... not if they keep doing what they did in Origins, and designed the game in such a way that tried to steer people into buying into their MTs in a completely SP game.

[BenRC01]

Wht does everyone act like a 2yr old everytime loot boxes are mentioned? Waaaa loot box waaaa.
Ffs... buy enjoy, don't buy enjoy. Who cares? Never played a game (even BF2) where I felt they ruined it. Bought some in destiny, ignored others. Grow up ffs.

[zodiac909]

LOL did a Ubisoft employee write this article??

[xer0]

Ever since they screwed me over with Watchdogs... I lost all trust in them.

[Crueltylizer]

I just wish the rumors with Disney going to Ubisoft with their Star Wars license was true. They could only do a better job than EA is doing atm.

[BlaqMagiq1]

They have made some dumb decisions over the years but they are not as bad as EA or Activision. At least they try to push out better ideas than those 2 companies. Despite my past grudges with them they usually see my money anyway because they still make good games whether people believe it or not.

[Zjet]

People these days expect too much.

I hate when people say this or that is a bad game and they are talking about a high quality AAA title.

The game isn't bad. You are just a stupid hipster fuck who is picky down to the last detail.

Far Cry 5 is such a damn good game.

[spambot0815]

not interested in any of their current active ips so no support from my side. call me when child of light 2 is out...

[kratos2011]

totally agree , been playing for honor over 200 hr ,not to mention farcry and AC series. masterpiece work

[TRwinfrozor]

Love Ubisoft, love there games got my support.