260°

Nintendo Switch Version Of FIFA 18 Suffering From Horrifying Face Glitch; Here’s A Look At Images

ThisGenGaming says "FIFA 18 on the Switch is currently suffering from a face glitch which loads a default character model face. Here's a look at images we have captured."

Read Full Story >>
thisgengaming.com
Prince_TFK2447d ago

Oh EA, you publish shitty and half assed game on the Switch then proceed to call it "must have" like Zelda and Mario Kart 8D and then expect it to sell.

Learn from Ubisoft and Bethesda next time. And if this your last and only game on the Switch I say good riddance.

Araragifeels 2447d ago

Learn from Ubisoft and Bethesda, hahahaha. Bethesda are profession delivery broken game with no fixed while Ubisoft delivered broken game, Server all together.

Prince_TFK2447d ago

You are right, but I was talking about great support for the Switch, and EA is just half assed their support.

wonderfulmonkeyman2446d ago (Edited 2446d ago )

So maybe learn from the MISTAKES of Ubi and Bethesda's pasts, then?

That seems to fit, if we're going by your statement.

Either way we spin it here, DOOM, Skyrim, and the new Wolfenstein II on Switch look like they'll be much better experiences than FIFA 18, far as polish goes at least.
And despite initial fears, Ubisoft knocked it out of the park with Mario+Rabbids Kingdom Battle, despite doing so poorly with other titles outside of Rayman, like Watch Dogs. [Which, by the way, I own and have completed several times on Wii U]

EA hasn't had a very good track record on Nintendo's consoles, and this is just another feather in the ugly cap for them as far as Nintendo efforts go. Even when comparing to Beth and Ubi who have both had barrel-bottom-scraping moments, FIFA 18 is kinda bad.

What's worse is that the head honcho tried to claim that this would be as much of a system seller as Zelda or Mario.
Who wouldn't laugh at that kind of narcissism?XD

_-EDMIX-_2446d ago

@Kun-no you're actually only talking about the perceived support by Bethesda for the switch you actually have no clue how the outcome of those games are going to be.

So the only thing you could do which I believe is fair is give them the benefit of the doubt but I think it's way way too too soon and unrealistic to already start believing that they're offering better support when you never even played their games on the platform yet

As much as I love Skyrim we all know that game is going to come loaded with bugs on the switch.

Nothing's wrong with the hardware but you can't fix lazy development don't get me wrong bethesda's one of my favorite Publishers in Skyrim is one of my all-time favorite games but I'm not going to sit here and pretend as if it doesn't have a monster list of bugs and glitches that have yet to be addressed.

I would wait for all of those games to release before casting judgement.

RommyReigns2446d ago

Ubisoft? Bethesda?

Bethesda can't make a flawless game on PlayStation consoles even if they were held at gunpoint, and Ubisoft lmfao did you forget about the Watchdogs and Asscreed Unity debacles?

giovonni2447d ago (Edited 2447d ago )

“You know what, that’s not that bad. It kind of gives the game character...” - EA Board of directors roundtable meeting

foster4262447d ago

At least it isn't as bad as the MLB 17 The Show face glitches. Those made me itch.

Segata2447d ago

eh, not as horrible as the MLB the Show 17 glitch. That was truly horrifying.

iDadio2447d ago

Rather look at this glitch than Rooneys actual face

bloop2447d ago

Anything would look better than that.

TheColbertinator2447d ago

That tosser is more ugly than the back end of a used jam rag

wonderfulmonkeyman2446d ago

I don't know what the back end of a used jam rag looks like, but I'm assuming it's pretty bad.XD

Foraoise2446d ago

I literally laughed out loud at this haha! Upvoted.

Show all comments (30)
90°

Who Wore It Better: FIFA vs Pro Evo Covers, 2001 to 2020

Like all great photographs, the covers of the FIFA and Pro Evolution Soccer video games capture a moment in time. But which ones have been best?

Read Full Story >>
gamespew.com
120°

Why I Have a Problem with Microtransactions and You Should Too

BY PHANTOM: Why should someone who has worked hard and grinded day in, day out to build up enough resources to gain quick repairs, be in the same game world as people who have purchased the kits with real-world money instantaneously?

Read Full Story >>
growngaming.com
Hardiman1883d ago

One of the most well thought out and factual article I've read on micro transactions. I've hated the practice because to me it's just wrong unless it's a F2P title.

What gets me is the ones who say "if you don't like it don't buy it" well I don't but enough do, more than enough and it's really conditioning a generation to just accept it as "this is normal."

That's why I rally to those companies that still deliver solid FULL games. Games that are not only incredible to experience but are of some of the best quality. On the flip side that's why Im so anti certain companies. They want to deliver games that seem so sterile and cut content to sell to customers in the game stores.

I lump the GAAS, loot boxes and micotransactions into the same pile because they all exist together in one form or another.

The devs who came from the mobile game model really played s hand in getting the attention of the suits.

TekoIie1883d ago (Edited 1883d ago )

"I lump the GAAS, loot boxes and micotransactions into the same pile because they all exist together in one form or another."

I would disagree slightly there. GaaS model does not require loot boxes or MT's to work and a few good examples off the top of my head would be Total War: Warhammer 2 and Total War: Rome 2. TW:R2 was at launch considered to be one of the worst TW games of all time but because of mod support, updates and we'll timed free and paid content releases it has a strong community and is now a highly recommended game.

TW:W2 is the opposite at launch and is maybe the best TW game of all time and treats it's previous instalment as an expansion in a way (basically if you own the previous game it merges the maps to a degree). Like Rome 2 it's recieved great mod support, lots of updates along with free and paid content.

GaaS by itself isn't bad and in some ways I dislike lumping it altogether with MT's and
Loot boxes. I agree that many of the games that make use of the service have something questionable mixed into the model but the obvious answer there is stop supporting those games. You can in some ways see RE2 and DMC5 making use of the model too.

Hardiman1883d ago (Edited 1883d ago )

Doesn't require them and I get what you are saying but but I'd argue it's fertile ground for them. That's what loot boxes/micro transactions are about. Extending profits. Monthly subs are the same thing. Cheaper games to create but games that maximize profits. It doesn't take much imagination to see where this leads and why some companies push for subscriptions!

The same massive corps that all too often push micro transactions want the industry to be subscriptions based. Let's just say they come from the same mindset.

You are correct in that GAAS isn't bad in and of itself but again I don't see games like GOW, Spider-Man, HZD, Red Dead 2, Uncharted, Sekiro, TLOU, Zelda and any of the other high quality SP games existing if it's just GAAS. No I see games like Fallout 76, Anthem, State of Decay, Sea of Theives, Fortnite etc.

TekoIie1882d ago (Edited 1882d ago )

"You are correct in that GAAS isn't bad in and of itself but again I don't see games like GOW, Spider-Man, HZD, Red Dead 2, Uncharted, Sekiro, TLOU, Zelda and any of the other high quality SP games existing if it's just GAAS. No I see games like Fallout 76, Anthem, State of Decay, Sea of Theives, Fortnite etc."

Your list is actually very interesting because some of those SP games can actually be seen as using the GaaS model or at the very least portions of it in the eyes of some. To my knowledge Spider-Man, TLoU, Uncharted 3+4 and Zelda all had a season pass which can very easily be considered as something that comes under GaaS in that it creates an additional revenue stream beyond the inital purchase.

A lot of the DLC for games like Uncharted 3 and The Last of Us can very easily be categorized as Micro-transactions. Cosmetics definitely come under the MT umbrella so why are these games exempt from the criticism but not others? And are these games exempt from the term but not the others you listed? Also why would you rather not see games like Dota 2, Splatoon 2, Halo 3, Diablo 3, Apex Legends etc.? Point being there are many top tier games that are using the GaaS model and many top tier SP games doing the exact same.

UltraNova1882d ago (Edited 1882d ago )

This logic can be applied to the recent upheaval about an easy mode in Sekiro. Guy A, spends X amount of time grinding it out until he/she finally overcomes the difficulty and "gits gud". Guy, spends 1/3 of the time beating the game without breaking a sweat because of an easy mode( analogy: paid progression in online games). Both brag about beating the game. You get the rest...

BlackIceJoe1882d ago

Microtransactions are the worst thing that has happened to video games this generation and because of them now games are being designed with them in mind.

1882d ago
CrimsonWing691882d ago

Here’s the thing, until people stop buying them they will always exist. It’s a market and a multi-billion dollar one at that.

If people didn’t buy them then publishers wouldn’t waste their time on them.

UltraNova1882d ago

If they didn't add them people wouldn't buy them and get addicted to them. There is always two sides on a coin.

CrimsonWing691882d ago

But my point is that people feed it. People need to learn some self-control. It'd be like if people start getting pissed at publishers because people are addicted to video games or getting mad at card makers because people waste their money on collecting cards.

rpvenom1882d ago

@Crimonswing69

This is the same concept of a casino.. do you think that casino's benefit people in general? No.. majority of people go there to lose money.. if they didn't exist.. or people didn't have access to it.. then we'd be better off.. but the reality is some can control or afford to lose the money.. while most cant.. and most cant even control that addiction or desire to gamble.. it's because of greed that people are willing to ruin other's lives to make a profit.. dont get me wrong.. i go to the casino's sometime just to hang out with my friends and maybe spend $100.. but i have some self control.. most people dont.

off topic but i see both casino's and microtransactions as a way of corporations to take advantage of consumers stupidity

Lord_Sloth1882d ago

So long as they're just cosmetic or can be obtained for free in game idc.

Show all comments (14)
70°

EA Sports Fifa 18 Joins EA Access Vault

Last year's Football/Soccer simulation, Fifa 18 has now joined the EA Access vault as a title that's free for those that subscribe to the EA service on Xbox One consoles.

Read Full Story >>
gamerheadquarters.com