290°

The Nintendo Switch isn't a new idea — it's been around since 1994

Nintendo's long history of streaming handheld games to your TV.

skydragoonityx2624d ago

I remember having this, playing my gameboy games on my console. Those where the days

2622d ago
rainslacker2622d ago (Edited 2622d ago )

I remember playing my TG-16 console games on my Turbo Express. That was the first hand held that had the same power as it's console counterpart.

Required two separate consoles of course, but was a similar concept as what's being talked about in this article. Actually that was more applicable to the Switch now, because this didn't play home console games.

darthv722621d ago

totally agree. The Express was what I would play military madness on all the time. Until the caps went bad...

There is also the Sega nomad which is both the portable as well as console in one. And it too supports local multiplayer so yeah... Nintendo is just taking an old idea and making it new again.

rainslacker2621d ago

God, Military Madneess was one of the most fun games I've ever played. So addictive.:)

I never knew about the nomad when it first came out. I only found out about it years later when I was getting more into collecting. But I do have one now, but the screen crapped out on me a few years ago. Haven't gotten around to fixing it. Nifty little system though.:)

godashram2623d ago

If you go that route.... NEC with the PC Engine/GT and TurboGrafx 16/Turbo Express did this before Nintendo, with the same card based games on both console and portable. Sega followed afterwards with the Sega Nomad that allowed the same games on both Genesis/Megadrive and Nomad. Nintendo with the Super Gameboy put portable games on your TV, NEC and Sega put your TV games on a portable, which is more like the Switch.

Nivekki2622d ago

And there hasn't been a console maker that has made it relevent since then. Remarkable,

MRMagoo1232622d ago (Edited 2622d ago )

and there still hasn't been one yet. even more remarkable.

ocelot072622d ago

More recently the Neo Geo X.

conanlifts2622d ago

The difference between switch and every other device preceeding it is the adaptive gpu. No other device before has had a gpu that ramps up its output by more than double. But otherwise i think most gamers understand that other devices have allowed portable games to be played on a tv.

343_Guilty_Spark2622d ago

Why is performance then better undocked?

conanlifts2622d ago (Edited 2622d ago )

This is only on Zelda, which has frame drops while docked, but it also runs at higher settings and resolution. Fast rmx, I am setsuna are examples of increased resolution and graphics while docked without issues. Mario kart 8 has been examined and also performs at higher resolution without issues while docked.
Also it has been reported there is a firmware problem that saps some of the gpu power, which might explain why there are frame drops in zelda or it might simply need an update to fix the problem.
If it were a trend with all titles i would agree with you, but it's only an issue in 1 title. Regardless my comment is accurate. It has a scaleable gpu tgat increases when docked. This is well known and reported.

xMANB3ARP1G2622d ago

sd11 your right but you were replying to a troll just a FYI

Show all comments (31)
120°

AMD Could Revolutionize Handheld Gaming In 2024

Shaz from GL writes: "AMD could spur the beginning of a new era in handheld gaming with their upcoming APUs"

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
rlow123h ago

To me the most important hardware is the battery. Doesn’t matter how powerful the chips are.

ABizzel122h ago

Eh…. It’s a combination of multiple things.

The battery is hugely important as it allows you to have ideally 4 - 5 hour gaming sessions.

The more powerful the processor the more games developers can share to the handheld, nd of course the better said games perform.

From there display, software, and ergonomics matter, as a good display/software will allow games to be more vivid, run at variable fps 30/40/60 ideally, and good ergonomics means it’s comfortable to play for said 4 - 5 hours. Everything else is gravy at that point.

redrum063h ago

Of course it matters how powerful the chips are for it to be future proof. Don't you want to be able to play new games?

Neonridr2h ago

the Switch proves that you don't need the most cutting edge power out there to be successful.

RaiderNation2h ago

@Neonrdr that doesn't prove anything because only Nintendo could get away with that. Their games aren't the most complex/graphically ambitious and Nintendo fans don't care.

Vits1h ago

@Neonridr

If anything, the Switch proves the exact point "redrum06" was making. Yes, it might be successful, but it's definitely not future-proof. Just look at how many games and franchises completely skip the platform.

Marcus Fenix4h ago

There’s no way you’re getting that 40CU 16-core APU in a handheld. That’s too hot and power hungry for that. The highest end APU they’re suggesting is going to end up in gaming laptops that can cool a 100W chip.

Jingsing4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I think these articles get things a little out of perspective, Steam Deck has sold around 3 million and Switch has sold 140 million. But if you are browsing certain parts internet you'd think the Steam Deck had sold over 100 million. If articles are going to continue to circulate like this and continue to put the Steam Deck in the same arena then I'm comfortable calling the device a flop.

Neonridr2h ago

Steam Deck, while considerably more popular due to it's lower barrier of entry, is still a niche device with the likes of the ROG Ally and others.

I own one and it's really nice to be able to play some games on the go or in bed, but it'll never fully compete with a system like the Switch.

Skuletor1h ago

Especially when they're not in the same price range, the Switch is considerably cheaper.

gold_drake15m ago

sure but theres still a limit to what u can put in there ha. power consumption would be the biggest hurdle. and cooling.

70°

Activision team is opening a new game studio in Poland 'Elsewhere Entertainment' to build new AAA IP

Microsoft's Activision subsidiary announced today that it is opening a new game development studio to take advantage of the huge talent pool growing in Poland. It'll be the second Activision studio based in the region, joining Infinity Ward Krakow, although this studio is, in fact, not working on Call of Duty.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Psychonaut8535m ago

They’re not working on Call of Duty? Give it time.

210°

Ubisoft to Focus on "Return to Leadership" in Open World Genre, Expand Live Service Experiences

Ubisoft says they are focusing on two "core verticals," and that's to return as a leader in the open world genre, and live service games.

enkiduxiv1d 17h ago

Calling Ubisoft a leader in open world gaming at any point in time would be like calling Dollar General a leader in retail.

excaliburps1d 6h ago

Well, to be fair, they did pump out good open world games before. It was used as a template so much that people now know what it means when you say it's like an Ubi open world collectahon.

shinoff21831d 3h ago

What though? I can't think of one game they had where I liked anything about it. Atleast since the ps3/360 Gen

Kornholic1d 3h ago

If they have never been the leader in open world gaming, then explain me this: why does almost every open world game follow the same tired old Ubisoft open world formula?

Follow the Leader.

Aphrodia15h ago

YO dont' talk bad about the General. There'll be problems...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 15h ago
isarai1d 16h ago

You were never the leader bro 🤣

shinoff21831d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

I don't think they were ever the leader tbh. I've never really cared for any of their open world games. I do wanna try watch dogs 2 because it looks like it's set in San Fran. Looked interesting

Show all comments (36)