100°

Incoming Bad Company update brings maps, bug fixes and trophies

Remember BattleField: Bad Company? Of course you do. Some of you are probably still playing it. If you aren't, then you soon might be because the game is due to get a shot in the arm before too long. After running a contest through which players could decide on which map pack DICE should start working on first, a post has gone up on the official blog to let us know that there will be other content coming when the map pack drops.

There's no indication on when that'll be, or if it'll cost us anything, but the accompanying patch will be free, at least. With this patch DICE are looking to fix several bugs, such as server lag and VOIP issues. There will also be various gameplay tweaks. Not only that, but three weapons, previously only obtainable through pre-ordering, playing the demo or signing up to the newsletter, will be made available to everyone for free. Check out the full list of fixes and tweaks at the official blog.

Finally (saving the best til last) the patch will add trophy support to the game. PS3 gamers are being spoilt by all these free, content patches. Not that we're complaining. We hope to find out when this'll hit soon.

Read Full Story >>
ps3fanboy.com
sak5005724d ago

I dont know why ps3 owners are not playing it cuz i'm loving it and can't get enough. Only 5 achievements left out of 50 but again 2 of them are single player related and i can't move away from teh awesome Mulitplay. I can't even go back to playing cod4 even on their double up xp weekend. Forget socom try this one.

DavidMacDougall5724d ago

Your adding the wrong people my list if full of people who play it.
Some play it 24/7

Ju5724d ago

That game is actually my CoD4 substitute. CoD4 never worked online for me, but this one works great. I love the destruction, and its the first game which made me play the multiplayer more then SP. Have to finish the campaign yet, and then I'll jump back for more MP. I was wondering why they had no trophies, because their "reward" system would map so perfectly to trophies. Great news about the update!

And, well, I somewhat agree. Its underrated on the PS3. I think that had to do with a to close release to MGS4, IMO.

Close_Second5724d ago (Edited 5724d ago )

...of lag.

I found B:BC multi-player incredibly fun but a lack of dedicated servers in this part of the world (i.e. New Zealand, Australia) means that every game you play is laggy.

I have no problem with EA not supporting the game in this neck of the woods but that information should be stated in black and white when you go and buy the game.

Oh yes, why is it that yet another game that has such a strong multi-player mode features such a substandard lobby system. Its even worse than the one for COD4!!!

BattleAxe5724d ago (Edited 5724d ago )

To release a bug fix patch nearly 3 months after the release of the game is totally unacceptable.

Got tired of:

-Freezing issues
-Crappy voice chat
-They released the game with only the Attack and Defend mode and then a month and a half later they come out with a crappy game mode called Conquest which you could only play on 4 maps.
-squads of 4 are too small
-the ballistics are terrible, it takes way too many shots to kill someone.
-The game lobbys don't even out the number of people very well alot of times.
- Poor selection of weapons (ie: the XM8 is available in every class except as a Sniper Rifle and Shot Gun.

Thats why people on the PS3 aren't playing this game. I bought the game at launch and traded it in last month. I was so disappointed in DICE for releasing half a game.BattleField isn't even in CoD 4s league.

The controls in CoD4 are way more responsive and graphically CoD4 blows this game out of the water. Not to mention that the weapons perform more realistically in CoD4 and there is a better selection of weapons in CoD 4.

After my experience I say screw Battlefield, because M.A.G. will crush this game when it comes out.

Hopefully Mirrors Edge isn't as buggy as BattleField. Its a DICE game and I might not buy it because of the crap they did with this game.

Ju5724d ago

I haven't had a single freezing issue yet. Maybe I was just lucky. And I do not agree about the visuals. The visuals are amazing - with destruction. I don't rate CoD4 too high, though. Everything is static there, so, well, obviously they used the power elsewhere.

The rest I can understand, and it really takes time to get used to. I also think its a bit unbalanced. You stick you head out a bit and you're dead, while you empty a whole magazine in the other direction. Also, it seams the AI always knows where you are, even if you flank them around a rock or bushes. But if you adjust your gameplay a bit, and take fully advantage of destruction, then it plays great.

I usually die a lot when I switch from another game. Takes a couple of minutes and I'm back on track. The "level reset" system is a bit, aehem, unusual in the SP mode. Sometimes they reset you far back. And if you need a vehicle to get back were you were, that's sometimes annoying (combined that every vehicle disappears in every "respawn" because you've used it in your previous turn - you might start walking at some point).

But still, I think the visuals are top notch with the best out there so far. And not a single slow down or hick up. They just should have invested a bit more in game design and playability, I agree.

BattleAxe5724d ago

I should have stated that my comments were purely for the Multi-Player part of the game. This is where the freezing issues happen. When they started happening to me I started looking at the message boards on the EA website and also on the Playstation website and saw that It was a huge problem that DICE refused to aknowledge.

The Single player campaign was easy. I finished it within 2 days. My whole thing is that compared to GRAW2, Rainbow Six Vegas 1+2 and Call of Duty 4, Battlefield Bad Company is Half of a game. When you look at the amount of game modes and maps that all of those games came with compared to BattleField, it just doesn't compare. Then you add all of the technical issues and the fact that DICE has dragged their feet in fixing those issues, for me theres just no value or quality. I can't justify supporting a lazy developer especially when the game costs $60. Don't get me wrong, the graphics were good and the destructable environments were cool, but that doesn't make a game great on its own.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5724d ago
DavidMacDougall5724d ago

Sweet cant wait for that freezing to be fixed and dont dare blame it on my internet again EA its your servers

5724d ago Replies(1)
alakazzam5724d ago

kwl cant wait, im sure il get the platinum for this, unlike warhawk (gereral 275000 points, me 10000 lol)

chrisnick5724d ago

im playing the whole thing again........platinum trophies aren't that easy to get.

alakazzam5724d ago

the uncharted one was pretty easy

Show all comments (38)
110°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

90°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow2d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1821d 21h ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie1d 11h ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow1d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

1d 6h ago
Hereandthere1d 2h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 2h ago
Notellin1d 7h ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

1d 6h ago
Hereandthere1d 2h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow12h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere1d 2h ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow12h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX2d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney7h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody1d 23h ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno1d 22h ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Sheppard7t31d 21h ago

How did Sony kill the series?

Inverno1d 20h ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

1d 6h ago
fsfsxii1d 7h ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno1d 6h ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)