760°

Far Cry 2: Can You RUN It?

GameXtract writes "A couple of weeks ago we reported that Far Cry 2 was in fact not as demanding as some gamer would have thought. We listed the full requirements, but we know some of our readers are too lazy to match the requirement list to their system specs. In good news for your laziness System Requirement Lab's Can You RUN it has been updated with Far Cry 2. The process is as simple as selecting it from the list, and then watching it do its magic. It will then open up a report for you indicating if your computer can play Far Cry 2. I accidentally tried this on my laptop, and I thought I would definitely receive an epic fail from the report (Which I did). Surprisingly I received a pass in every area except for the graphic card where my tablet Dell Latitude XI did not have 3.0 shaders. You can test out your computer to see if it will run Far Cry 2 or implode on once you launch this exe. Link below!"

Get the full info, and link after the jump.

Read Full Story >>
gamextract.com
BigKev455729d ago

Epic fail reply Charmers. The question clearly states, "Can you RUN it?" And yes you can on a PS3 or X360. PC gaming is dead anyways.

Winter47th5729d ago (Edited 5729d ago )

Although I can run it well, I'll still get the PS3 version.
http://img160.imageshack.us...

PC ain't really my thing this gen.

f7897905729d ago

It can look better and have better controls with the mouse.

Winter47th5729d ago (Edited 5729d ago )

Cause most of my friends are on PS3, so i can play MP with'em, plus I'll wait a couple'a months till all those great mods start showing.

Yeah, playing the game with all those bells and whistles cranked up to the max is great but, I'll pass for now.

As for the controls, once you use the same controller design for 3 generations now, you're bound to be pretty good at it :D

snakeater35729d ago

your avatar....

"get me everyone...."

"sir? what do you mean everyone?"

"EEEVVVEEERRRYYYOOOONNNN EEEEE!!!!!"

Winter47th5729d ago

" I AIN'T GOT THE TIIIME, FOR THIS MICKEY MOUSE BULLLLSH!T" HAHA glad someone appreciate villains as much as i do :D

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5729d ago
MrWonderful5729d ago

sure i can on the console i get it on.

Charmers5729d ago

So why did you bother replying here then ? Obviously if you have a console it will run the game at 1280 x 720 at medium settings. This is for people with PC's that want to know if they can run the game at settings like 1680 x 1050 with high settings.

S-T-F-U5729d ago

Passed with flying colours :)

DA_SHREDDER5729d ago

I have a ps3. Also,, I wouldn't play this garbage on my baby anyways.

Show all comments (48)
90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox428d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever426d ago (Edited 426d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88426d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai427d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle426d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE426d ago (Edited 426d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy425d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE425d ago (Edited 425d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
220°

10 Old Games With Outstanding Graphics

GF365: "There are some games with extraordinary visuals that impress us to this day. Here are old games with outstanding graphics."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
ShwaaMan473d ago

Bioshock still looks fantastic, one of my all time favorites.

Yui_Suzumiya473d ago

Beyond: Two Souls on PS3 can compete with modern day graphics.

SonyStyled473d ago (Edited 473d ago )

Same as Killzone 2 and 3, uncharted 2 and 3, Infamous 2, Heavy Rain, Resistance 3

jasonismoney473d ago

I wish this was entirely true, but you might want to load up Killzone 2 and Resistance 3 again.

SonyStyled473d ago

@jason I watched some gameplay videos of KZ2 and R3 on my full screen. They are on par or succeed graphically to the first person shooters mentioned in the article that also launched on the seventh generation of consoles. Try the same and see what you think

cthulhucultist472d ago

Killzone 3 was super impressive! I could not believe the graphics back then as I was regularly pausing the game to stand in awe looking at the surroundings! Resistance however did not impress me that much. Heavy rain is also another amazing graphically speaking game. It almost felt next gen

Fist4achin473d ago

I always thought the first 3 Gears of War games looked great and still hold up for today.

SonyStyled473d ago

They did for their day. I recently played gears judgement with on the 360 and the draw distance was so blurry. The characters up close look great though

JEECE473d ago

Far Cry 2 was awesome. In addition to having demonstrably better physics and AI than later games in the series, it had a lot of design decisions that, criticized at the time, have since been praised in games like BOTW and Dark Souls.

iNcRiMiNaTi473d ago

It might not be super amazing by today's standard but I thought Mgs3 looked really good

JEECE473d ago

In terms of art style it still holds up.

Show all comments (13)
430°

Far Cry’s best game gets brutally realistic as mod remakes Ubisoft FPS

The Far Cry series’ best game – not Far Cry 6 – just got more brutal and realistic thanks a mod than revamps and remakes the classic Ubisoft open-world FPS

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
lonewolf10595d ago

Far Cry 2 where your guns never ever jammed until you got into a gunfight is their best? I disagree.

MIDGETonSTILTS17595d ago

I liked 3 more.

The malaria angle was more annoying than immersive.

And, the enemy AI had too good of eyesight to allow any stealth. They’d spot you a literal half mile away, I hated it.

lonewolf10595d ago

Yeah, some weird mechanics for sure, some did really enjoy it, I certainly didn't.

bloop594d ago (Edited 594d ago )

The map was designed badly and an absolute pain to navigate from what I can remember too. You ended up having to go to the same few places all the time and there was a huge inaccessible area between them that you had to go around.

It definitely had the best physics system of the entire franchise, but a lot of the mechanics took the enjoyment out of it.

LordoftheCritics595d ago

It was fun for its time but a bunch of those systems today won't survive a launch weekend.

Profchaos595d ago

I'd say it was their most ambitious and had the best setting to date next to the original island.

But gameplay wise it was clunky and maybe it was released to early if the teams had modern systems to build it on the game would have been much better less corridors more open and less gaurd outposts that auto regen

Knushwood Butt595d ago

How do you use guns when not in a gunfight? Shooting trees?

lonewolf10594d ago

Yes and you could do that for hours in FC2 with a gun and it wouldn't jam, not hard to grasp is it.

Knushwood Butt594d ago

I see.

I haven't spent hours shooting trees.

I must try it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 594d ago
MajorLazer595d ago

Love Far Cry 2 on Infamous difficulty.

Hikoran595d ago

This should be an opinion piece. Not news.

Gwiz595d ago

Blood Dragon is much better.

Pedrof595d ago

Far Cry 2 may certainly not be the most "fun" game in the series but from a narrative standpoint it definitely is the most interesting of the bunch. FC2 couldn't be further away from the pointless fragfests that the following episodes turned out to be.

Show all comments (29)