980°

Square Enix President Shocked by The Quality of PS4 Exclusive Spider-Man; Surprised by God of War

Square Enix President Yosuke Matsuda is a gamer, as he demonstrated multiple times. He isn’t shy about showing off his gameplay online, and he often mentions his appreciation for western games. In an interview in the latest issue of Weekly Famitsu, he talked about E3 and the games that impressed him the most.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
ShadowKnight2865d ago (Edited 2865d ago )

Both games will be a big hit for Sony

Shubhendu_Singh2865d ago

GOW simply blew me away. Love the new direction.

and correct me if I'm wrong, previous Spiderman projects were all by Activision and presumably with they tight schedule and rushed attitude going into those games.

Though Sony is known for giving the appropriate money and time to any of their projects. I have no doubts this game will drown every Spidey game before it by a long long shot.
Next someone make a space exploration game with Silver Surfer please.

Yui_Suzumiya2865d ago

Yeah I think Spiderman contract with Activision ended if I'm not mistaken, hence the Sony game and possibility of a Telltale game (all we know is that it's Marvel related at this point).

_-EDMIX-_2864d ago

Absolutely agree. I'm shocked at all the new direction of older Ips this E3 from God of War to Resident Evil to Zelda this E3 is like some sort of resurgence of reboots lol

-Foxtrot2864d ago

This is why I really want James Bond to be made by Sony instead of Activision. The trailer alone for Spiderman shits on anything Activision has done imagine what Sony could do for James Bond.

Either that or NaughtyDogs next game should be James Bond inspired like how Uncharted was Indiana Jones inspired. Get their own theme songs and intros along with a good British secret agent character and they'll be good to go.

IamTylerDurden12864d ago

Activision Spidey games are forced to be movie tie in games.

Sony was given permission from Marvel, but it can not be a movie tie in game (thank goodness). Presumably, Marvel allowed this bc Sony is allowing Spidey to appear in other Marvel movies.

Finally a great looking Spidey game. Unfortunate for xbox fans and pc gamers, but great for the 50m PS4 owners.

kneon2864d ago

@-Foxtrot

That would be too close to James Bond, it would be called a Bond rip-off, and rightfully so. How about going back to the original real James Bond

https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2864d ago
Chevalier2864d ago

@Tyler

" Activision Spidey games are forced to be movie tie in games. "

Shattered Dimensions and Web of Shadows were based off movies?! Seems if anything Activision didn't put money into the projects if anything.

WelkinCole2864d ago

I was honestly more impressed with Sipiderman4 trailer than Death Stranded that showed just before it.

Fullmetalevolust2865d ago

Talk about two major titles about to hit the PS4.

UltraNova2864d ago (Edited 2864d ago )

If Spidey Ps4 turns out to be good I will not be surpriced to see a 50% spike in ps4's sales the month it comes out. Double that if they release it along the new Spiderman movie reboot!

As for the new GoW... well what can I say, if that wasnt the perfect re-imagination done and presented right then i dont know what the hell it was!

CaitSith2864d ago

I feel like, releasing it the same day as the Spiderman movie, gives the impression to the consumer that it's a movie tie-in, when it's not. I also equate such moves synonymous with other movie tie-in games' overall quality, which is bad. So I think, if Sony's focused on quality, they should release it when it's ready.

UltraNova2864d ago

Agreed. But then this is 2016, if Sony cant get the message out-being Spiderman the ps4 game is a AAA standalone entry then they need to take some marketing lessons asap.

morganfell2864d ago

@CaitSith,

I understand your concern but the average gamer that makes purchases doesn't care if it appears to be a movie tie in - even though this game is not. That is one of the reasons they want it. The seasoned aware gamer will get it regardless of the release date because of the subject material and/or the pedigree of the development studio. Just because they decide to maximize sales by timing the release date will not prevent the intelligent gamer from purchasing. Particularly when they have stated the game is not bound to MCU thus letting us know that it is its own particular animal.

CaitSith2864d ago (Edited 2864d ago )

@UltraNova

The fact it's Spiderman they're dealing with effectively broadens their market, potentially to people who are fans of the comic series but are not 'gamers', so I think Sony shouldn't worry about that aspect in trying to sell the product. The only thing they have to market, as I've said before, is it's distinguishing quality from other bargain bin movie tie-in games.

EDIT: Actually, I have a cousin that's getting a PS4 because of this game, and he's a big Marvel fan (big is a huge understatement).

@morganfell

Agreed; and to reach out to these 'average' gamers*, and to potentially keep them within the market, they have to have exposure to high quality games, and there's no better way to do that than with Spiderman. Taking that into account, if Sony really cares for this industry and it's bottom line, the outcome of this game will show their true colours as to whether or not they care about, and want to show, quality to potential customers, or if they're just out for a quick cash grab. But since Insomniac's behind the game, we all know the answer to that.

*Hopefully you and I have the same understanding of what an 'average' gamer is.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2864d ago
IamTylerDurden12864d ago

GoW and an exclusive Spider-man are about as big as it gets. These are massive system selling games that will help maintain Sony's dominant stance.

The amount of huge exclusives still to come is jaw dropping for PS4.

No Man's Sky (rated as the most anticipated game)

GT Sport (biggest racing franchise in games)

Horizon Zero Dawn (game of show 2015 e3)

Persona 5 (it's Persona)

God of War (game of show 2016 e3)

Spider-man (exclusive AAA Spidey game from Insomniac)

Days Gone (new ip, AAA open world from Bend, e3 show closer)

Death Stranding (Kojima)

Then we other AAA exclusives and big games such as...

Nioh (Dark Souls with Samurai, spectacular demo already released)

Dreams (Mm's follow up to LBP)

Gravity Rush 2 (Japan Studios PS4 follow up to the excellent Gravity Rush)

WiLD (open world game with a Far Cry Primal setting, from the makers of Beyond Good n Evil)

The Forest

Rigs

Detroit

JEECE2864d ago

Agree for the most part, although I think GT Sport may have lower sales numbers than some people think. It isn't going to have as much of a fleshed-out single player as other entries, it hasn't been marketed super well, and it isn't a numbered sequel (this matters). I'm sure it will sell well, but I don't think it will touch the sales of 1-5.

I'm also not sure how well Horizon will do. It is massively anticipated by the people who frequent video game sites, but that isn't most console owners. I'm sure it will have a really big first week due to hardcore PS fans, but it usually takes several great entries in a series before it reaches mainstream, system-selling success (see: Uncharted, Elder Scrolls (console-wise), Battlefield (console-wise), The Souls Series, Far Cry, etc). I hope to be wrong though; great advertising could certainly go a long way.

Mystogan2865d ago

Spiderman is definitely a huge hit in the nuts to Xbox. Unless Microsoft can get Ironman or Superman.

Xavior_Reigns2865d ago

Those two have terrible track records in games, MS would be wise to steer clear.

Rimeskeem2865d ago (Edited 2864d ago )

If anything MS will pay Rocksteady for an exclusive Batman game.

EDIT: it's very unlikely knowing that Sony currently has Rocksteady making exclusive VR but I'm just putting the idea out there.

Mystogan2865d ago (Edited 2865d ago )

So does spiderman. Only good spiderman games were ps2 era. Even then. They should take the challenge. Both Superman and Ironman games can be incredible IF done right. Imagine a VR Ironman game where you're actually in the suit. Or a superman game with destruction like crackdown 3.

_-EDMIX-_2864d ago

@rime- I do not see Warner Brothers okay about a license anywhere else or even allowing one of their own teams to create a title for one platform I don't really know why a company would do business that way..

medman2864d ago (Edited 2864d ago )

@Rimeskeem
I find it highly unlikely that Microsoft will be in the business of buying 3rd party exclusivity anymore, seeing as how all their first party games are coming to pc now. It would make less financial sense for them to do that now than it ever did. Sure, they would be keeping it out of the hands of some ps4/Neo owners, but people like me that game on pc as well as console would just pick up the "exclusive" on pc, negating much of the benefit of having exclusivity to begin with.

The only true exclusives left are on pc, ps4, and what will be the NX, where you actually have to own the system to play the game. Microsoft is leaving that behind for a different strategy of getting their software into the hands of more gamers, so I believe they will leave the paying for exclusivity strategy behind as well.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2864d ago
xfiles20992865d ago ShowReplies(9)
thatguyhayat2865d ago

Yeaaah superman owned by warner brothers so thats definetly a no. And i think it was marvel who came to sony with the spiderman game? I think i read that somewhere unless im wrong. But marvels going into the game business supporting best devs. This whole time i thought it would be sucker punch

Yui_Suzumiya2865d ago

Speaking of Suckered Punch, I wonder what the devil they're cooking up.

Mystogan2865d ago

Why is it a no? They can license it.

Darkfist_Flames2864d ago

I hope sucker punch still working on another Infamous game, and not a licensed game

rainslacker2865d ago

They would need something akin to Xmen, be an open world game with numerous different styles of play, and a way to co-op, along with an online component to go against Spider-Man. Batman and Spider-Man are some of the few comic book video games which get people excited, and MS won't get Batman. Spider-Man just screams great game play if it's done right, because it can be very diverse. Everything else is going to be marginal at best. Even if they're popular comics, they don't have a history of doing well as a video games, and many don't translate well. I could see maybe a Wolverine game doing quite well if done properly, but beyond that, I think a company really has to go to great lengths to make a satisfying game based on a comic book.

xfiles20992865d ago

Here is the thing Microsoft has no first party studios really who is going to make a Superhero game for them,What Turn 10 going to make Forza meets Avengers Oh I know Forza The Avengers Racing adventure. Microsoft buys first party games. Marvel already stated that they want partners that treat there games like it was a first party exclusive they are not interested in Money They want partners who are passionate about the game and comic and project they are working on. That right there leaves out Microsoft They are not a company that can be trusted with a Marvel or DC flagship title

Angeljuice2865d ago

Somebody could always come out with some kind of "create a hero/villain" game.
With a good enough character creation mode people could either create new heroes or recreate famous ones.

That's one way around licencing issues.

rainslacker2864d ago (Edited 2864d ago )

@Angel

DCUO is kind of like that in a way...although not quite as "create your own" as I assume you are implying.

However, it is a matter of IP appeal. Sure, anyone could make a superhero game. Doesn't mean it's going to have the mass appeal that a Spiderman or Batman game would.

For instance, Infamous, allows you to pick a side, and is what I would consider super-hero/villian-ish. But despite being a popular Sony IP, it has nowhere near the mainstream appeal as licensed material. Crackdown is kind of a superhero game, although I'm not sure the level with which you can create your own character. Again, despite being a popular IP(now more than ever), it's appeal is going to pale in comparison to any licensed product....except maybe Aquaman.....hate that guy.:-P

@xfiles

MS doesn't really need a 1st party studio to make the game. Insomniac isn't a Sony 1st party studio, but they're making the game for Sony, for exclusive release. MS could do the same. For the purpose of my comic, they just need the license to be able to make a super hero game. While MS has the money to afford such a thing, if they managed to snag one that has broad appeal and huge mainstream recognition, the costs involved probably wouldn't be worth it to them just to have something to go against this one game from Sony...although Sony apparently has more than one planned going forward.

Superman, an example given by the OP, has that appeal, but not in the gaming segment, and honestly, the costs to license are going to be pretty damn high.

Other than that, I agree with Marvel IP's. They seem to be taking great care with how they handle their franchises. Some slip ups here and there, but what they're doing is resonating quite well, and while I can't speak for how DC would feel about such things, I think they also see how taking care with their IP's is a more profitable path going forward, because Marvel has shown that there is a huge market for quality comic book licensed content.

Zorkaz2864d ago

I think Sony own Ironman and the Avengers now, but I might be wrong. Microsoft will be able to do any DC heroes though. I'd love to see the Arrow or Superman ...

Kaneki-Ken2864d ago

Wrong, they allow to use those characters/ appear in Sony Spider man movies. Other hand, Warner Bros are making DC games themselves

Exvalos2864d ago

Oh man the last ironman games where such trash, ironman needs to retire his gaming

javauns2864d ago

lol the reason he shocked is cause he knows ps4 best studio couldn't get heir franchise game to look so good but the second and 3rd can? something isnt right there. but time will tell. i wonder if they'll ever make a spiderman game where the suit is made of nanotech like in a few of the universes?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2864d ago
NapalmSanctuary2865d ago

I'll be shocked by the quality on "Twisted Metal: World Tour Part Dos" when they announce it, then I'll probably be disappointed when they make the driving too fast and too easy which will force them to make every weapon homing, reducing the series, yet again, to a back seat driver combat game... Spider-Man looks cool though.

Artemidorus2865d ago

But it's E3 so a downgrade is to be expected, anyone who disagrees doesn't have a clue how this works.....

Rimeskeem2865d ago (Edited 2865d ago )

No, that's Ubisofts job. We gotta be honest here. BF1 looks great with Alpha gameplay, Battlefront looked amazing, Uncharted was jaw dropping, FF15 demo looked astonishing. It really is only Ubisoft who downgrades. So far every game I have played that isn't Ubisoft has looked as good as ever when they showed gameplay of it.

LordMaim2864d ago

Anyone who says "anyone who disagrees is X", isn't confident in their argument.

Artemidorus2864d ago

Considering it's usually facts, i wouldn't need any confidence to provide the truth.

Enjoy the future downgrade.

Trez12342864d ago

That's ubisoft and microsoft's job. Since the killzone 2 trailer Sony has been careful with showing their games and there have been alot of their games that got better after the first gameplay footage. I just find it funny how people point fingers at ubisoft alone tho. The downgrade on QB was massive and maybe the biggest downgrade this gen but somehow it went kinda undetected ( I like the game tho).

Majin-vegeta2864d ago

Funny thing is....no PS4 exclusive has had a downgrade try again :).

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2864d ago
Show all comments (88)
60°

Take-Two CEO on GTA VI release, upswing in mobile gaming

Take-Two Interactive CEO Strauss Zelnick joins 'Money Movers' to discuss the company's quarterly earnings results, how confident Zelnick is in the guidance for fall 2025, and much more.

140°

Take-Two CEO: We're So Focused on Delivering More Value Than We Charge

Take-Two head honcho Strauss Zelnick states every time they establish a price, they want to make sure it's "good news for consumers."

Petebloodyonion1d 8h ago

It's the why we close servers after 2 years, why we re-use the same assets every year, and why we bundle our game with enjoyable microtransactions.

neutralgamer19921d 6h ago

Running digital casinos in every game

Rebel_Scum1d ago

Re-using assets is not a bad thing tbh. Development is all about re-using code, assets and components.

neutralgamer19921d 6h ago

Can you please focus on delivering enough quality content to justify the $70 asking price? While I appreciate the idea of over-delivering, it's essential to ensure that the base content itself is worth it. I have concerns that GTA6 might have less single-player content because most of the focus seems to be shifting towards online play and microtransactions

Inverno1d 5h ago

The sleaze oozes out of these gaming CEOs faces. It's honestly disturbing how distorted people look when you've realized how money obsessed they really are. He gives off "in one ear and straight out the other" vibes.

jambola1d 5h ago

I really don't get it
like
do they think anyone believes what they say?
is it that being in charge surrounds you by so many yesmen that they get deluded into thinking everyone is like that?

JackBNimble18h ago(Edited 18h ago)

Well if you look at the last 10 years you will notice there wasn't as single paid dlc. Every update was free whether you want to complain about sharkcards or not.

They're going to make billions on this game especially if they keep the same formula as last in regards to updates.

Good-Smurf1d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

Selling Shark cards and removing content are not exactly "good news for consumers" lol.
The last time they released any DLC worth playing was 15 years ago.
GTA V is so broken and unbalanced that people would rather do stupid cringey stunts with than do heists.

JackBNimble18h ago

I'm sure the player base would disagree, and gta5 is still being supported, much longer then most games, after all I bought gta5 day 1 on ps3....

Show all comments (11)
70°

Nintendo’s new job opening hints at innovative packaging for future products

Nintendo of America has posted a fascinating new job opening that could signal significant changes for the company’s future products.

Read Full Story >>
mynintendonews.com