190°

Forbes: Microsoft And Sony May Have To Kill Consoles To Save Them

The death of consoles has been greatly exaggerated. Here at Forbes, we talked a whole lot about the end of the living room box just before the launch of the PS4 and Xbox One. The story goes like this: the traditional concept of a console is outdated and under siege from mobile gaming, microconsoles, streaming and even PCs. The PS4 and Xbox One are dinosaurs, that argument says, and the niche they used to occupy simply isn’t theirs anymore. The PS4 (and also the Xbox One, to a lesser degree) roundly proved that arguement wrong, proving that people do indeed want a gaming box to sit underneath their TVs, even here in 2016. Consoles aren’t dying — they’re stronger than ever.

The thing is, it’s still happening. Consoles are dying, and Microsoft and Sony are the ones killing them.

thorstein2964d ago

Oh Forbes. Hire someone who knows gaming.

Eonjay2963d ago

I imagine PlayStation executives pull up Forbes for a good laugh whenever things get stale around the office.

Wintersun6162963d ago

I'm starting to think forbes is a comedy site. Every time I read anything from them, I can't stop laughing.

Deadpooled2963d ago (Edited 2963d ago )

Forbes = The Daily Mail of Gaming

3-4-52963d ago

Forbes is one of the worst when it comes to video game news.

Constant speculation and getting things wrong.

It's like some 7th grader who's only played Candy Crush is writing about video games for them all the time.

Stick to what you know Forbes....video games is not that.

Dabigsiebowski2963d ago

PS4 one of the best selling consoles ever = needs to be saved.

rainslacker2963d ago (Edited 2963d ago )

"Here at Forbes, we talked a whole lot about the end of the living room box just before the launch of the PS4 and Xbox One."

Yep, lots of talk. They were wrong...in a big way in fact.

Now to save what doesn't need saving, MS and Sony have to kill them off to allow forbes to validate their own BS.

Makes sense.

gabbieleguartes2963d ago

Yeah and their stupid full page ad is so awful.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2963d ago
uth112964d ago

Streaming is hardly a threat to consoles at this point

Mobile attracts different kinds of games and different kinds of gamers

Who really games on microconsoles? Even if they did, they are still consoles!

PC has coexisted with consoles for 35 years now, and PC gaming had its ups and downs. Why would it suddenly be a threat?

Consoles have never followed "Moore's Law" as closely PC has, instead they make big jumps after 5-7 years. So why the urgency to suddenly get into more frequent upgrade cycled, especially at a time when Intel has admitted Moore's law is slowing down?

PS4 is breaking records, and even XB1 is selling at a faster pace than last gen. Yet both MS and Sony are making questionable moves that may make the death of consoles a self-fulfilling prophecy.

ThePope2963d ago (Edited 2963d ago )

I think the issue is the word choice; are MS and Sony "killing" consoles? Or are they evolving them? I don't think more frequent updates are the answer, nor do I think we will see frequent updates to a any degree really.

I honestly believe the current consoles were designed on the cheap. What Sony and MS didn't realize (or perhaps care about if they could see it coming) was how fast and to what extent PC gaming would outshine console gaming. I don't care how good the best looking console game is it could and will (if it comes to PC) always look better on PC.

Now what I'm about to say I'm going to say without actually being a PC gamer, so bare with me. If the X1 and PS4 came out with the latest titan 6000 card, 16 Gb of GDDR5 ram, Dolby Atmos surround card, and a 2 TB SSD card. We would not be having this convo. The console would have been $600 but it would have played games at the latest (perhaps not full 4K) visuals.

I think what PS4 and X1 sales have proved is that people only care so much about graphics. But I think these consoles are feeling pressure from the PC faithful and the compare videos might lend itself to why.

ApocalypseShadow2963d ago (Edited 2963d ago )

I logged in just to disagree with you. Consoles aren't and have never been PCs. Consoles have never outdone PC graphics. From all the way back from playing doom, out of this world,flashback,wing commander,etc,etc, the PC version was always superior to the console version.

Consoles have always been plug and play and closed platforms. Everyone is equal, developers can fully optimize. So PS4 and Xbox one were never trying to outdo PC. But they are better than their previous consoles. It's the only stable model that lasts for years. Every other sold technology confuses the consumer on what to buy because there's so many versions of the same thing.

The problem is the PC infestation consoles have from PC elitists who aren't satisfied with what they have now. They are always looking for the greener grass and never getting it. And second, SOME console gamers who got more power than last gen, but still unsatisfied because of their ADD mentality.quick to jump to the next game,quick to trade in as if it's a race to be the first to play something.

All that PC card, terabyte this and that BS console gamers don't care about and never will. They just care about popping the game in and playing.

Also, Sony tried the "everything and the kitchen sink" thing last gen and gamers complained it was too expensive to buy. And developers complained it was too hard to program on multiple cores but now multiple cores are in every technology basically showing that developers wanted it easy for them and that's what we got this gen. It showed which programmers were weak and who really knew their math.

ThePope2963d ago

@apocalypse

Umm I'm a console gamer. Haven't even owned a PC that could play a 10 year old game for 10 years. Consoe gamers want plug and play yes. But I think gamers and the big two wish they would have made them a bit more powerful. Plain and simple. That's why there is all this talk about the .5s.

Last gen Sony didn't try everything and the sink. They tried a very unique set up that was very expensive and proved super difficult to program for. If the current gen consoles were $600 and had $600 worth of VALUE I think people would be ok with it.

You may want to,read my post again becauS from the sound of yours I must have said so,etching that sent you into a rage. I think PC is showing console gamers what they could have had for a few more bucks. I mean the PC gamers on this site say so. And many of them build PCs.

GamingTruth2963d ago (Edited 2963d ago )

then if that were so we would already see even last gen exclusive game graphics on pc, which there is none to speak of on pc, pc cant do uncharted 4 graphics til proven otherwise

consoles are outdoing pc graphics even now apocalypse with exclusives vs anything on pc

ApocalypseShadow2963d ago

Oh I'm not mad at you. And I got what you were saying. I'm just saying, even if consoles came out with better graphics, the infestation of PC elitist mentality would say consoles are being left behind by PC no matter what the power increase was. When it was never about keeping up. Only improving on what worked the previous gen.

So I got from your previous post you're a console gamer.I didn't miss it. But as a console gamer, you shouldn't care about all that tech from PC when it doesn't matter. Gameplay and fun matter. If that's you, more power to you.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2963d ago
GamerGT2963d ago

I agree with your comment about streaming hardly being a threat to consoles. Main reason being is i know from owning a PS4 and PS3 and I would assume the same for an XBOX One, that they all stream content. Games, movies, shows. music in some degree, Netflix. And you could even utilize the Web browser if you wanted to. But it's a convenience factor to have that in one box in your bedroom for example as my setup is. Do you want to do that with a PC? I don't have cable in the bedroom setup yet but the wifi works fine. It's the setup that has worked perfectly for the past several years for me anyway. It's replaced the Blu-ray / Dvd player and soon the cable box. But to navigate to those functions as a PC setup to your TV might lose that convenience factor. If you're single and a nerd like my alter ego self then that would work for me.

Eonjay2963d ago

For something that is dying... it sure does look alive and well. Perhaps we have different definitions of dying...

iceman062963d ago

I guess we all die a little bit everyday!?! lol Forbes is predicting cardiac arrest when it seems to be natural causes after a long productive life...closely followed by reincarnation.

Niv2963d ago

Everyone's hating on this gen and unsatified with res and fps.
Forbes is correct

Eonjay2963d ago (Edited 2963d ago )

No they don't. People enjoy their consoles just fine. Its just that PC enthusiasts want to remind everyone that they spent $1000 on their system. And they don't want you to enjoy your gaming experience unless you pay up too.

ILostMyMind2963d ago

The fact that this generation beat all sales records show otherwise.

frostypants2963d ago (Edited 2963d ago )

This isn't Forbes. This is some scrub posting as a "contributor" to their site. It's like one of those stupid iReports on CNN.

http://www.poynter.org/2012...

Show all comments (54)
340°

Microsoft's quest for short-term $$$ is doing long-term damage to Windows, Surface, Xbox, and beyond

Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation, and it all revolves around Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood's plans to increase every department's margins.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Brazz15h ago

"The plan to move Xbox games to other platforms is codenamed "Latitude" internally, and I know there's debate and unease at Microsoft about whether or not this is a good idea. More upcoming Microsoft-owned games slated for PlayStation are already being developed. At least for now, they're potentially obvious games you'd most likely expect. And yes, while it's true Microsoft is a prolific publisher on PlayStation already, it has typically revolved around specific franchises like Minecraft. From what I've heard, Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation, and it all revolves around Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood's mandate to increase every department's margins. "

Yeah, they are going to kill Xbox hardware.

Xeofate13h ago

"Yeah, they are going to kill Xbox hardware."

It's for the best.

Quit stringing along xbox fans and screwing over PlayStation owners.

crazyCoconuts8h ago

Take good care of those Xboxes if you have 'em ...

outsider16248h ago

An Xbox game on a Playstation. Never in my years of gaming did i ever thought this was gonna happen.

jznrpg3h ago

It is dying anyway so doesn’t make much of a difference

VersusDMC3h ago

No way can they get rid of the hardware as probably 90% of game pass subscribers are hardware users.

Highly doubtful those users will move to PC or Cloud to subscribe there and the competition (Sony and Nin) will never have gamepass on their system.

If they want to keep the current subscribers, they need to keep releasing new hardware.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3h ago
gold_drake14h ago

i think it will kill off the xbox brand. windows will be fine.

but there is and would be a chance that xbox might be killed off in the future. if they fail to make the money they put in. imo.

S2Killinit11h ago

They wont kill it, but they will go fully PC while keeping xbox as a brand, and go multiplatform for the most part. They will also work tirelessly to diminish console gaming’s importance.

PRIMORDUS8h ago

It would be best if Xbox goes the way of Sega, just make and publish games. I know I myself will not support them at all with buying games from them, you all can. 🙃

ChasterMies7h ago

The Xbox brand will live for the games. I don’t expect Microsoft to entirely drop out of gaming hardware. They make Surface tablets and laptops. They’ll make Xbox branded hardware for those that want it.

shadowT14h ago

"Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation"

Forza and Starfield next?

Skuletor12h ago

Starfield would be no surprise and there's the rumor that it will come to Playstation after the Shattered Space DLC, Forza (along with Halo and Gears of War) I find less likely but I wouldn't be surprised if they eventually end up on PlayStation too, especially if Xbox give up on hardware and go the Sega route.

shinoff218312h ago

Not to worried about forza. I'd rather see others like what inxile and obsidian are working on. Starfield sounds like it needs more time in the oven so let it cook first imo. If starfield and it's a small if does release on ps it'll be in the fall around the time for dlc or right at the dlc and come packaged with it.

-Foxtrot13h ago

In the words of Phil Spencer when he was talking about Nintendo last year

“It's just taking a long time for Microsoft to see that their future exists off of their own hardware"

S2Killinit11h ago

Yup. MS are a cancer to console gaming.

Aloymetal11h ago

100%!!
I wonder what happened to that dude that was always here posting those court articles with cartoons about MS spending all those billions in studios. He suddenly disappeared, I guess he doesn't like bad news when the green brand is in trouble. No new articles from him as of late...

PRIMORDUS8h ago

Yup, and it's only going to keep spreading.

Outside_ofthe_Box9h ago

Phil Spencer's words always comes back to bite him lol

12h agoReplies(7)
Show all comments (59)
130°

Microsoft's Absurd Antics Have Me Scared For Dishonored And Arkane Lyon's Future

With Arkane Austin no more and Lyon living for who knows how long, the superb Dishonored is in serious danger; Microsoft cannot be trusted.

Relientk772d ago

I love the Dishonored series so much and really want Dishonored 3. Microsoft better not screw this up.

JEECE2d ago

I mean, I think the fans will probably kill Arkane Lyon by cooking up reasons to hate whatever they do next without playing it. I've never seen a game so artificially disliked as Deathloop.

thesoftware7302d ago

Lol, why don't we just say, we are worried about all studios owned by MS now. They will keep closing studios until they have none left ...🙄

Skuletor1d 22h ago

Just merge them all into a single studio, have it churn out a single Call of Duty every year and call it a day, lol.

Barlos1d 22h ago

Don't be scared, you'll be fine.

Skuletor1d 22h ago

It's exputer, fine is one word I would not associate with them.

Profchaos1d 22h ago

I think it's becoming clear based on matt bootys comments there's no future for any IP that can't sell above 10 million within the launch window. But is also a small game that gives them prestige

/S it's beyond a joke right now

Show all comments (10)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic18814d ago (Edited 4d ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus233d ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

rokos3d ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb333d ago

i think you are really missing the point

VariantAEC3d ago

@romulus23
That is not why MS buys studios. They might continue to buy because it's about taking that sweet sweet IP out of the corporate husks of their acquisitions.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3d ago
SonyStyled4d ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

4d ago Replies(2)
ChasterMies3d ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear213d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3d ago
jwillj2k44d ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot4d ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

VariantAEC3d ago

Years?

Try several decades, and in the gaming space 2.3 decades.

Jon615863d ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

jwillj2k43d ago (Edited 3d ago )

This absolutely does NOT happen all the time. Let me know the last time 1 company with a terrible product track record spent 100 billion onto acquire MULTIPLE successful companies in under a year only to shut them down and stop making their products regardless of how successful they were. Not merge them, completely shut them down.

And you can’t use Microsoft in your example.

Notellin3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Class action lawsuit? The law is on their side and protects them at all costs. There are no rules to protect the people at the bottom.

jwillj2k43d ago

Not true when it comes to mass layoff do your research.

RNTody4d ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead3d ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage3d ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast4d ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn19794d ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn19793d ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage3d ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (68)