RPG Site Writes: "The demo we played did a great deal to kill my skepticism about the concept of the game - we had great fun with Triforce Heroes, the three of us shouting out instructions to each other, getting frustrated, and at one point deliberately killing each other. It scratches that classic Nintendo itch in that it's just damn good fun.
The worry with Triforce Heroes sits with the execution - the core of the game is three-player only, with puzzles devised that way. If there's two of you, it's as useless as one, opening up only a competitive arena mode to you. Worse, if somebody drops out - that's a game over."
The average Zelda sequel is unique, creative, and emblematic of everything that makes the franchise so engrossing. Then there’s Tri Force Heroes.
They should have just given us Four Swords Adventures 2. They already had a winning formula for co op, not sure why they tried to change it.
Alex from Link-Cable writes: "But of course even the shiniest rupee can get scuffed every once in a while and the Zelda series is not immune from boring, lame or just plain bad games."
With a port of Professor Layton confirmed for iOS platforms, we know Nintendo is willing to loosen their grip and let older titles breath new life. Here are the 10 Nintendo games we would like to see come to mobile platforms.
After playing this at the Best Buy demo I agree. It was challenging and very fun.
Online makes it more appealing. No friends at home. :(
"the core of the game is three-player only, with puzzles devised that way. If there's two of you, it's as useless as one, opening up only a competitive arena mode to you. Worse, if somebody drops out - that's a game over"
Three player only? This game is going to fail hard.
Seems great. Nintendo actually had good to great games coming IN 2015 at E3.
While I know many of us are disappointed that it appears 2016 won't have much ... at least in 2015 .... Nintendo does have some nice exclusives on Wii U and 3DS coming.
No 2 player... why... that makes zero sense.