780°

Hands-on: Microsoft’s HoloLens is flat-out magical

It looked for every bit like the holographic projection we saw depicted in Star Wars and Total Recall. Except that's shortchanging Microsoft's work, because these virtual objects were in fact far more convincing than the washed out, translucent message R2D2 projected, and much better than Sharon Stone's virtual tennis coach. The images were bright, saturated, and reasonably opaque, giving the virtual objects a real feeling of solidity.

Read Full Story >>
arstechnica.com
3407d ago Replies(6)
no_more_heroes3407d ago

It seems people are generally impressed with it.

Metallox3407d ago

I was genuinely impressed by it, that teaser was amazing, and I never say this stuff about technological devices. Hopefully Microsoft can turn it good, I don't want other Kinect because the HoloLens look promising.

Well, perhaps I'm exaggerating, but I really like the idea.

freshslicepizza3407d ago

yes, except for the usual people who bash everything that microsoft does have now simply vanished. kinda nice.

personally i think it's a cool concept and is more interesting outside of gaming.

k3rn3ll3406d ago

oh dont worry, if MS has a mis-step with this, no matter how small, they will be back in full force ready to crap on it. Saying, "see, I said all along that this thing was overhyped and destined to be a disaster." Like they alkways do

mkis0073407d ago (Edited 3407d ago )

Im impressed because I thought of it last year, and how cool it would be. Then I see it this week almost exactly as imagined.

Mine though was both VR and AR with the ability to block out the things in the world it didnt want you to see. You could walk down a sidewalk with my version on and know exactly what is around you (safety) while at the same time be in a completely new environment. The sidewalk could be metal, or the wall to your left could be glass, the possibilities !!!

I really think ms knocked this one out of the park as compared to say kinect or project morpheus.

Can't stress it enough how well MS seems to have done on this one.

Edit: upon further reading this may be EXACTLY as I had imagined it.

IcicleTrepan3406d ago

the thing is, they've been working on this for 7 years.

mkis0073406d ago

That is not my point, ice, my point is seeing something that I would have made given the chance made for me, instantly...no waiting involved. There haven't been any real leaks of this.

Its like me wanting a flavor to exists and then finding out a day later it now exists!!

daxter19193407d ago

I am disappointed.

Augmented Reality is an old technology already available on portable console and smartphone and there are already other AR Glasses available.

mkis0073407d ago

these ones according to those who have tried them have no movement shifting, the overlay stays where it is supposed to, that is new

beans3407d ago

How about some links? Not trying to call you out but I would love to see a device this ambitious already out and available. VR itself has been out for many many years but I don't think It's disappointing that companies are trying to bring it to life.

daxter19193406d ago (Edited 3406d ago )

@beans

Look "AR Glasses" on Google

ThinkThink3406d ago

The same could be said about VR Technology. I remember using VR at E3 over 10 years ago. It's all about the content and what you do with it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3406d ago
+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3406d ago
4Sh0w3407d ago

-Good write up from his hands on experience:

"Microsoft calls it holography. I'm not sure if it really is (Wired describes HoloLens' "light engine" as having a "grating," so perhaps it really is using interference patterns to reconstruct light fields rather than providing the same simple stereoscopic 3D found in VR systems), but this is a detail that only pedants will care about. (Though if it is true holography, it should solve the focus issue that many people find with existing 3D systems.)

However it works, HoloLens is an engaging and effective augmented reality system. With HoloLens I saw virtual objects—Minecraft castles, Skype windows, even the surface of Mars—presented over, and spatially integrated with, the real world."

-Very interesting new hardware/tech Microsoft has shown, I'm sure they have a ton of patents in place and aren't going to share any trade secrets but I'd really like more details/explanation on the basics of this tech actually works. Just curious....either way I'd sure like to try those demos.

Naga3407d ago

All registered patents are publicly available for viewing; the rights to use the patent, however are restricted to the owner for a period of 20 years.

Trade secrets are simply that - secrets. Their only protection is found in their secrecy. Think: Coca Cola's recipe.

So if you want to know how a patented device works, you absolutely can. Just in case you didn't know that already. Cheers.

4Sh0w3407d ago

Thanks bro...guess Ill do some research in the next few days to get a basic understanding of whats behind this tech...granted its highly technical stuff but I should be able to sift through it for something understandable.

pompous3406d ago (Edited 3406d ago )

It's nothing more than augmented reality with MS pr spin thrown in. Impressive use of already in used tech we've been using already. Obviously with other tech or other ways to go about the same tech- different patents.

Kavorklestein3406d ago

What a fitting username you have.

rainslacker3406d ago

I really don't think it's holographic at all. The images I've seen are way too solid to be holography. Holograms, no matter how they're produced are not completely opaque, and have a shimmer to them that is perceptible no matter how good the display/projection is. This is a by product of the technology used to create holograms, and unless MS came up with something new, which means this device would be super expensive, there is no reason to believe that this is some magical hologram projection.

My guess is that the images are being super-imposed onto the viewers field of view by the software taking depth fields of all the object(possibly on the pixel level) and making it look integrated into the environment.

That is how AR is done today for the most part, MS just has a twist by taking it off a display screen and sticking on people's heads to be more compelling.

That's a good thing IMO, because AR never stays interesting very long when it's just on a screen. The practical application available with this technology is kind of exciting as a game dev, and I could definitely see it benefits in education or presentations. Only time will tell if devs and gamers will pick it up as a new way to play games.

I'm assuming some things of course, and I may be wrong. If MS comes out with more information on the actual tech involved that negates my assumption then I'll be even more impressed than I already am with the tech.

christocolus3407d ago

cant wait to try it out for myself.

vega2753406d ago

Im with you..I want this but not just for gaming. I hope MS adds GPS support for people who drive out of state this would be awesome for me. Since I do some traveling with my company and they rent me a car.

aviator1893407d ago

damn. pretty much everyone is impressed by hololens.
here's to hoping it's priced right.

Moldiver3407d ago

I think it will be cheaper than VR headsets, personally.

3407d ago
Pandamobile3407d ago

I dunno, there'a lot of on-board processing happening in a device like this. I see this device being more around high-end smartphone range in price.

TFJWM3407d ago

Umm that would be nice but I don't see how it could be cheaper than Google glass

MelvinTheGreat3407d ago

Its tough to say because MS wants the people who play minecraft to buy and they wont buy it is upwards of 1000+ dollars. But on the other had the tech is extremely impressive would seem to be very expensive to make.

Moldiver3406d ago

"Umm that would be nice but I don't see how it could be cheaper than Google glass"

Umm...I said "cheaper than VR headsets". What is it with people on this website having terrible comprehension skills?

hololens does not pack two screens in its visor, or the tech needed to power two screens (one for each eye) The cost of the CPU inside is anybodies guess, but MS have already said its a low power consumption device, So doubt it is running much more than an ARM based chip, especially given the size of the headset.That would make sense. low heat generation and low power consumption are ARM traits. but only MS can clarify those specs. We will just have to wait and see.

TFJWM3406d ago (Edited 3406d ago )

My reading comprehension is fine, thank you. Use common sense... Google glass is over 1k, every indication has been the VR headsets would be priced under 500. Even if they are more than they are are 100% likely to be below the cost of Gglass

Also they have not demoed a working prototype at the size they showed, its alot bigger. So to make it that size anytime soon would increase the price even more

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3406d ago
Show all comments (151)
170°

New and improved ASUS ROG Ally X battery life is just what it needs to compete with the Steam Deck

Yet another leak for the ASUS ROG Ally X points towards as much as 8 hours of battery, but how does that compare to the competition?

Vits4d ago

Honestly, I really like this updated version. But it doesn't solve the biggest flaw that the original had for me: the Z1 Extreme APU. Yes, it's an extremely powerful part, but it is not part of AMD's Adrenalin driver update program, so it's dependent on Asus for driver updates. And unfortunately, Asus doesn't have a stellar record of support for their devices.

Goodguy014d ago

Up to 8 hours basically just means the least demanding games. AAA gaming at highest wattage would probably be about 2-3 hours which is good compared to just about 1 hour with the current ally. The OLED Deck can do about 2-3hrs.

mrcatastropheAF1d 17h ago

With much less performance so that makes sense.

The Steamdeck shines at the lower TDP end but gets absolutely mopped at the high end.

Similar longevity with much better performance is a big win for the Ally X

Killa782d ago

Too bad Asus are all awful company.

PRIMORDUS2d ago

They used to be the best when it comes to motherboards, now I will never buy anything from them again.

Firebird3602d ago

8 hrs yea right. Running tetris?

Skuletor2d ago

Only after setting the screen brightness to the lowest level, of course.

Notellin1d 19h ago

They tested the battery life watching a game of Tetris in 360p. Running Tetris natively brought the number down slightly to 1 hour and 38 minutes. 😂

Asuka2d ago

Nope. The only improvements I want to hear is better customer support. Otherwise, I can't be bothered.

Show all comments (16)
60°

Best GPU for Homeworld 3 - top picks & reviews

Jack writes: "Our guide to the best GPUs for Homeworld 3 talks you through some of today's best options from Nvidia, AMD, and Intel - for various budgets."

Michiel19895d ago

opinion piece? it's an advertisement and these articles shouldn't be here.
Advertisement on top of advertisements

70°

How EA & Xbox Are Defining Gaming's Bleak Future

Xbox and EA have recently made baffling moves that define how bleak the future of the gaming industry is with major companies at the helm. Ryan Bates from "Last Word on Gaming" posits in this op-ed that maybe it's not ineptitude, but intention.

Read Full Story >>
lastwordongaming.com
Profchaos5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Name someone that isn't trying to look us these days maybe cdpr.

Take two, ubi and yes even PlayStation are pushing us to own nothing and be happy with our live service ad injected games on a sub so they can raise prices at will and take access away when they see fit.

If it keeps up I'll be a full time retro gamer and this industry will be crashing hard

As rediculas as it sounds we need government reforms to defend consumer rights

gold_drake2d ago

i can tell you that the government or any government has our backs on this. the glo al trend goes to digital.

wait until money is digital only. we are already on the way there.