220°

Six Things Microsoft Could Have Bought For The Price Of Mojang

Console Monster writes: "Following weeks of speculation and rumours, Microsoft announced that they would be acquiring Minecraft developer Mojang for a whopping $2.5 billion (£1.5 billion).

In a statement that accompanied the announcement, the Xbox firm revealed that they were expecting to break-even on the acquisition as early as July 2015.

However, what else could Microsoft have purchased for the same price? Console Monster investigates."

Read Full Story >>
consolemonster.com
Hellsvacancy3556d ago

There I was thinking it was going to be a serious article, how wrong was I

user65409483555d ago

Thanks. I won't waste my time reading it then.

Hellsvacancy3555d ago

#2 231 million copies of Ride to Hell: Retribution

Yep, this article is FAR from serious

hazelamy3555d ago

or if they paid what ride to hell retribution is worth, about 12 billion copies. ^_^

sikandar2013555d ago

Sinceriously Don't ever share this type of article!!
I checked even after reading ur comment but really wasted my time.. -_-

3-4-53555d ago

* They could have bought the Clippers.

HugoDrax3555d ago

Bubble for you sir +, hilarious.

Gotcha53555d ago

Former Mircosoft CEO Steve Ballmer already own the LA Clippers.

Pogmathoin3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

SMH

@Ausbo, below, the Cylons had a plan too, but that did not work out too well....

Death3555d ago

2.5 billion McDoubles to be passed out and ended hunger in the world.

For an hour.

Fatty3555d ago

I'll take 4 please! Gotta have energy to make it to dialysis today.

Fatty3554d ago

My wife called me "pleasantly plump" just before her bones mysteriously all shattered when I rolled over in bed. No clue how that could have happened. RIP in peace my chunky love.

Ausbo3555d ago

You know. We all say they could buy this or that and I am one of the people who wish they invested this in games, but Microsoft didnt make billions of dollars a year making stupid moves.
they know what they are doing. They have a plan.

LordMaim3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Microsoft Bob, Windows ME, Windows Vista, Windows 8, Zune, Surface, Kinect. Microsoft is not infallible. Not every product is a winner.

Death3555d ago

Windows 7 is a reworked Vista. I wasn't a huge fan of Vista, but without it we wouldn't have had W7. Windows 8 on my gaming rig is never going to happen. Windows 8 on Surface works very well. It's also used in Windows Phone and in the Xbox One. Microsoft is looking to create one experience across a broad range of products. Surface marketshare is very low, but it is marketshare Microsoft didn't have before the device launched. It has also cost Microsoft money even though the tablet generated a billion dollars in revenue last year. Not having a presence in the tablet market would hurt Windows 8 sales though. They are in a tough spot trying to retain relevance in a rapidly changing marketplace. With Apples surge in sales along with Android devices, Windows and traditional PC's are needed less.

Volkama3555d ago

@Death Windows 8 is fine on a gaming rig, assuming it is purely a gaming rig. You get some reasonable performance gains over 7, and the interface is adequate for launching games.

Windows 7 is far better if you need a proper desktop environment, but that's not really necessary for gaming.

Soc53554d ago

Like the Xbox one plan? Unless their plan was to lose market share I don't think it's going well. But seriously they could have invested more heavily into the Xbox ones design(eliminating these silly 30fps-60fps 1080p debates) and saved all the money they are spending now trying to make up for it. I'm one of the people that they would have had giving them money instead of sitting on the fence waiting, due to their plan. I've always seen them as a company that throws money at problems rather than focus on prevention.

Show all comments (38)
80°

The Xbox showcase brought the E3 magic

After having to prove itself for years, Xbox doubled down and pulled it off..

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
GaboonViper18h ago

Yep Xbox absolutely knocked it out of the park with that stunning show, it was everything a gaming showcase should be, games games and games, well done team Xbox.

CrimsonWing693h ago

It really did. Like I came out of that with the hype for new games I haven’t felt since… well the better years of E3.

monkey6023h ago

It was without a doubt one of the better showcases in years. There was plenty there that excited me. Something has been lacking in years on all platforms

EasilyTheBest1h ago

It was an amazing showcase I loved everything about it. Can't wait to play some of those games.
What's going on. 4 comments & no negatives yet. Wow, what's going on with N4G.

ThinkThink34m ago(Edited 33m ago)

Show was so good, it made me forget about that blue dragon rumor until the next day. Too many games to process.

320°

Sony Wishes Its State Of Play Was As Impressive As The Xbox Showcase

While the Sony State of Play had a critical lack of first-party titles and new stuff, Xbox came in hard and delivered one hell of an event.

Goodguy0119h ago

SoPs usually are quite underwhelming. Xbox did a great job and hope Sony learns

Cacabunga9h ago

It was a great show, but still a multiplateform show. xbox needed to give a sign of life, and they did. Sony on the other hand showed some console exclusives..
State of play was light yes that’s clear, but Sony is still planning to deliver console exclusives.

romulus238h ago(Edited 8h ago)

The following games from the showcase are multi-plat and also coming to PlayStation and there may be more so perhaps what Sony learned was to let MS spend the money on advertising games for them.

Assassin’s Creed Shadows
Atomfall
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Clair Obscur: Expeditions 33
DOOM: The Dark Ages
Dragon Age: The Veilguard
Fallout 76: Skyline Valley
Flintlock: The Siege of Dawn
Life Is Strange: Double Exposure
MechaBreak
Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater
Mixtape
Sea of Thieves: Season 13
WUCHANG: Fallen Feathers

Kayser817h ago

romulus23:
they are advertising GamePass which the none subscribers have to pay 70$ for it.

Hello_World6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Buyers on PS help make Gamepass games even more profit by paying retail price, while Xbox gamers get all on day one using subscription. Huge difference.

ocelot071h ago(Edited 1h ago)

@Hello_World

You just made it sound like real life. Playstation = Hard working people who have to pay taxes.

Xbox = Jobless bums who claim universal credit benifits rely on the working class people to pay taxes so they can get free money.

Hello_World1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

@ocelot7

PlayStation equals hard working people because Sony isn't able to provide a day one subscription model?

If you want to fork over $1,000 to play these games and believe that's a good idea, you can. But don't hold it against others that are provided multiple options to play all these games.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1h ago
blackblades6h ago

Sony been doing it before MS has for years, so they dont need to learn. If the time isnt right then the time isnt right.

-Foxtrot6h ago

I hope they learn aswell BUT looking at both sides at least Sony isn’t announcing games to show off again, and again, and again over a couple of years

While a good show there was a lot at Microsoft’s conference that were announced and shown off years ago. If Sony sticks to only showing off games when they are going to be released the same year then I kind of understand it but if they don’t then I’d be flabbergasted by it

1Victor5h ago

Let Sony do its thing when they drop the ball for gen and a half of duds shows then they’ll be even with Xbox and we should worry till then they earn it.
All that been said congratulations to Microsoft for finally doing the minimum of having good looking games coming soon took 100 billion to do it but hey gotta spend money to make money or so someone broke once said.

AsimLionheart4h ago

It was as much of a PlayStation Showcase as it was an Xbox Showcase. Most of the games they showed have been confirmed to be coming to PlayStation. Furthermore, even the ones they did not announce coming to Playstation yet are rumored to be coming to PlayStation in the near future. Sony will announce their first party games when the time is right. No point in announcing them 5 years in advance as MS did in 2020.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1h ago
italiangamer19h ago

It's embarrassing how "professional videogaming journalism" has fallen off.
Article written by a 13 years old full of acne.

Rebel_Scum7h ago

Gotta start somewhere. Especially with computers and AI taking jobs from fast food joints and supermarkets which traditionally hire teens.

isarai16h ago

I think people need to be aware that purpose of State of Play is updates on small scale and 3rd party games, their big scale showings are PlayStation Showcase.

16h ago
Terry_B9h ago

Approved this silly submission of an "opinion article" with the last 2 votes it needed to have a laugh at the upcoming comments.

Seriously, console war shit like this one should be banned from n4g.

Profchaos8h ago

I've noticed that console wait flame bait is the only thing getting approved lately with other articles taking a few days to show up after not getting approved

Terry_B7h ago

Aye. Usually I just use the "how submissions with most approvals" choice ..look what they are and approve. Wish we would have way more reviews here instead of opinion articles. So many of them are just bait.

dumahim23m ago

They get written, approved, and many comments because that's what draws attention. Want it to stop, get people to stop clicking and commenting.

OWCY4h ago

Ironic coming from you who have been a ps lover and xbox hater on this site since day 1

peppeaccardo9h ago

One one side a company that has brought real innovation in videos games with the first truly 3d graphics for mass entertainment, handheld devices, VR, great francises ... on the other side the Netflix of video games, and so .... who wants to be who? Let's stay focus and play some games kids.

DivineHand12538m ago

Rubbish. All 3 companies have brought innovation to the games industry. In fact, the Xbox 360 was so impactful that it shaped the feature set of gaming consoles to this day with Xbox Live, 3rd party apps, communication features, etc. Nintendo has always been innovative with recent additions being motion controls from the Wii and the portability of the Nintendo Switch. That led to devices like the steam deck, ROG, and the other nearly hundred handhelds.

Show all comments (45)
240°

Is Xbox Going Multi-Platform The Right Decision For The Console Market?

Shahmeer from eXputer: "The new Xbox strategy to go multi-platform could eventually change console gaming as we know it, and I am concerned."

Bathyj1d 4h ago

Can we stop pretending that Xbox has any great influence over the console market?

All they can do is try and steer their own Destiny. They have very little to do with what the other players in the console market are doing.

And yes, going 3rd party is pretty much their only option and is good for them.

RaidenBlack1d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

Still whatever little direct competition they're offering against Sony ... that'd be gone, which is never good for consumers.
I know Sony will continue to apease the gamers but without any proper competition in same space, they might not work at the fullest efficiency.
(Taking into account, thats generally been agreed here, that Nintendo has long been not the direct competitor to either MS or Sony)

xHeavYx1d ago

The " without any proper competition in same space, they (Sony) might not work at the fullest efficiency" narrative has been proven false for years. Let's stop pretending that, in terms of games, Xbox has been any competition to Playstation.

fsfsxii1d ago

Sony had 0 competition for most of its playstation business, and they still succeeded, the only thing xbox introduced was paid online and dlc

maniacmayhem1d ago (Edited 1d ago )

Sony had little to no competition during the PS2 era and they have an iconic catalog.

I don't think Sony needs competition in the console space to still release great games. It would be the games that would be competing against each other.

Einhander197223h ago

Xbox does not need to exist for PlayStation to have competition.

They compete with Nintendo, PC, streaming and countless other devices.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 23h ago
neutralgamer199223h ago

Yes release games on other platforms

Your own gamers still get the games day one on GP. So GP will grow and stay stabilize

By releasing the games on PC,PlayStation and next switch they can get $70 for their games.

MS didn't invest 100 billion for nothing. This way Xbox generates way more revenue

GhostScholar15h ago

And Sony is doing the same thing whether you want to admit it or not.

anast1d 3h ago

The show was like a sub-show for Sony. All these games are coming to PS5.

1d 3h ago
outsider16241d 3h ago

You gotta admit though..xbox showcase was actually really great.

RpgSama1d 3h ago

I mean, yes, it was an Activision, Blizzard, Bethesda presentation, they just so happened to buy all of those publishers, nothing we would not have seen on any other award show if they had not bought developers that were and STILL are developing multiplatform games.

If you remove them you are left with Microsoft game studios, another Fable, Another Gears, Perfect Dark which for me didn't look all that great, Avowed, Age of mythology and south of midnight (might be missing something I guess)

anast1d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

No better than any other show. There weren't any major new announcements, which is what everyone has been complaining about. The bar shouldn't get lowered for a trillion dollar company.

crazyCoconuts1d 2h ago

"another Fable, another Gears, Perfect Dark"?
That's a lot of pretty great "anothers".
I could use a few of those "anothers" from Sony right now.

helicoptergirl1d ago

Yes it was a really great showcase that Xbox had. Multiplats and all. Overall it was really cool

Terry_B1d ago

for pc and playstation..yes it was. Not a single reason was given to buy an xbox.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1d ago
thesoftware7301d 2h ago

anast,

"All these games are coming to PS5."

Very disingenuous statement... Some, but not all.

Oh, so that is the new narrative, "sub-show for Sony." lol, wow.

The sad part is that you are clearly and fully aware that it is very unlikely for any 1hr and 30min gaming presentation show to showcase ALL Exclusives, it just doesn't happen.

And don't you think it sad that MS had a better Sony showing than Sony? If I were you, I wouldn't consider that a flex, lol.?

anast23h ago

They are coming to PS5, the ones that matter of course.

There is nothing sad here. You might need to start your argument without an emotive.

I don't think they had a better showing. Unless we lower the bar for only Xbox.

crazyCoconuts1d 2h ago

None of us really know how much they're going third party. They're still ACTING like they want to protect the platform - no mention of PS5 in their show, still marketing the console, still using the Xbox logo.
Yeah Phil acknowledged more is coming to PS5. But is that Indiana Jones? Perfect Dark? Gears?
If they keep those key properties in their stable it's not accurate to label them as simply 3rd party.
They may very well still be in the game after all...

anast23h ago

@Coconut

Sony did the same in their last. They showed games that were already announced.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 23h ago
Giga_Gaia1d 3h ago

We need to stop pretending like Xbox matters and has any influence in the industry.

By entering the industry, Microsoft made it worst, everything bad in the industry can be tied to them (like paid online and DLCs). The industry would be better off if they had never been in it.

Before you say Sony would have no competition, they would still have PC and Nintendo. As they are right now, Microsoft are not competition, they don't actually matter.

crazyCoconuts1d 1h ago

I think you're mostly right. They've been failing on console and will most likely drop out.
But the concern a lot of us had was that they would use their $ to win monopolistically. They've already bought a huge number of big studios. Going multi-platform would alleviate that concern.
But they could still turn the screws, this game isn't over quite yet... They're sending mixed signals.

CrimsonWing691d 3h ago

I think in Xbox’s direness it is, but let’s not pretend like they don’t understand the value of exclusiveness to their platform. Not every damn Xbox game is coming to PS5 and the stuff that has hit have either been GaaS games or games that didn’t exactly sell gamgbusters and are extremely niche.

When Halo, Gears, Forza, Perfect Dark, Fable, etc. start coming to PS5 then that’s pretty massive and also diminishes any reason to own an Xbox.

LucasRuinedChildhood1d 3h ago

Doom isn't niche. It was heavily implied that all Bethesda games, outside of games with contractual agreements and the existing multiplayer games, would all be exclusive to Xbox.

CrimsonWing691d 2h ago (Edited 1d 1h ago )

Ok, sorry, Doom is the exception.

My point is Xbox is still keeping exclusives for their bigger games. What’s been released are GaaS: Sea of Thieves, Grounded aka Honey I Shrunk the Kids, and then niche stuff like Pentiment and Hi-Fi Rush. Then you got Doom coming out, which is an outlier, I suppose.

crazyCoconuts1d 1h ago

It's not niche but it's not everything.
MS has got a HUGE cache of IP and studios now

Scissorman1d 3h ago

It's the only decision. Hardware sales are on a sharp decline and Game Pass growth has stagnated.

Show all comments (38)