Grown Folks Talk3562d ago

Bridge scene looks like the scrapped Rainbow Six Patriots trailer.

guitarded773562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

Screw MS... Tomb Raider exclusive? Screw MS. Develop your own exclusives... stop buying out well known 3rd party. Jerks. Yeah, I said it.

Sorry, I'm pissed. MS gamers should be just as pissed. MS is spending major money for devs to not make games for other consoles when they could be spending that money on developing REAL exclusives.

MysticStrummer3562d ago

The CoD bundle and the TR announcement were the two big items imo. Neither one will propel XB1 over PS4 but they will help.

I still say TR will come to PS4 eventually, but we'll see. Doesn't matter either way to me.

Drasill3562d ago

What about all the exclusives Sony has bought from third parties over the years (Final Fantasy VII-XII, Heavy Rain, Beyond Two Souls, Infamous before they bought Sucker Punch. You need a history lesson if you don't realize that Sony is the king of buying third party exclusives.

BiggerBoss3562d ago

@drasill, heavy rain, beyond, and infamous were NOT third party. They were second party and published by Sony. Obviously games published by Sony wouldn't be on Xbox...

SniperControl3562d ago

Dammit, i really want to get a X1, but nothing i have seen is pushing me enough to buy one.

Disappointed with Quantum Break, i thought people were saying this was a genre defining game, all i saw was another cover shooter.

guitarded773562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

@ Drasill

When anyone does it, I'm against it. But Sony did NOT buy Final Fantasy. Final Fantasy left Nintendo platforms for Sony platforms because Nintendo were sticking with carts, and Sony was offering the capacity of CD's. There is a difference from devs following tech, and devs taking a paycheck to not make a game for a platform.

Like BiggerBoss said, Quantum Dream was developing for Sony... they were never "coming" to other platforms. I can't think of one instance where Sony has done this. I could be wrong, but I don't think there is one.

ABizzel13562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

@Guitarded77

I must say I completely agree with you, and this is getting ridiculous. I'll have my XBO this weekend, as I've been saying, but this deal makes absolutely no sense, and what makes it even more insulting is when these weak @$$ developers continue to try and spin things like, oh we see the most potential working with MS as a partner for support, knowing it's about the money.

No multiplatform developer is going to make their game exclusive, unless there is enough financial backing to make it worthwhile. Even worse, no multiplatform developer is going to take a game that sold best on PS3, and then have the PS4 version sell almost 3x more than the XBO version, and that they allowed to run with much better performance to be exclusive on the lower sell and weaker console, especially when that game was established on a specific console to begin with.

This is BS to every PlayStation and PC gamer, and honestly this is just completely trashy from both sides of it. MS is running a business and it's common practice to want to beat your opponent, but make your own exclusives. Stop buying 3rd parties, "multiplatform IPs" to fluff your game library. If you spent time investing in yourself instead of others you wouldn't have to worry about your gaming library being segregated.

As you said it's wrong for anyone to do it. The DLC crap is simply annoying but doesn't change the fact that both parties still get the game. The timed exclusive crap and this are complete BS, and it harkens back to that Nintendo article complaining about 3rd parties having complete control over Xbox and PS. Obviously we see exactly which console manufacturer is allowing this to happen.

NewMonday3562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

@ABizzel1
after Dead Rising and Ryse I don't know why MS bother, everybody knows by this point any 3rd party "exclusive" on the X1 is timed

can wait for Tomb Raider to come to PS4/PS3, the previous game was fun but nothing to make me rush to grab the next one day1.

-----------------

that Sunset Overdrive cut-scene is so utterly stupid and cringe inducing, did an 8 year old write that?

FITgamer3562d ago

@Drasill he is upset because it's a 3rd party exclusive from a franchise that was previous multi-platform. I don't mind 3rd party exclusives, but that is shady no matter which company is doing it.

Codewow3562d ago

@OP Why don't you rage at the devs for taking the 'dirty money'.

guitarded773562d ago

@ Codewow

Because I doubt it was the dev... most likely the pub (Square-Enix). And I blame whoever took the payoff just as much for the "problem". I say "problem" because this helps no gamers... only hurts some.

VforVideogames3562d ago

Uncharted has real competition.

TheSaint3562d ago

'Games, games, games' became 'bundles, bundles, bundles'.

darthv723562d ago

guitar...just get an x1 and you wont feel left out of any game that is announced as exclusive ever again.

Its a game system, not a picket line. Even the most diehard of holdouts will give in at some point.

dmeador3562d ago

Then buy an X1 if you want to play it. Thats the point. Some consoles have games that the other doesn't. They are paying them to focus on their console.

Starks3562d ago

It's cool. Microsoft didn't had much in their exclusives anyway, so they'll just buy out a 3rd party one.

Pain3562d ago Show
SilentNegotiator3562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

Paying for a game that was coming to Xbox anyway for 1 year of exclusivity...

-_-

mikeslemonade3562d ago

I disagree with all of you. Companies should buy more exclusives to differentiate from the rest of the competition. Exclusives are better for gamers. Back in the day these exclusives like Tomb Raider, Final Fantasy, DMC, RE etc. would get in the high 8s or low 9s for meta score.

Now these multiplats are getting from high 7s to mid 8s, so exclusives are better for gamers because the developer can focus just making one version.

Clown_Syndr0me3562d ago

I see your point but at the end of the day, I dont care. I have PS4 and X1 so I wont miss a single great game this generation. Couldnt care less what console I play it on, whos outselling who, yadda yadda yadda.

ALLWRONG3562d ago

Why would MS gamers be pissed about Tomb Raider exclusive?

Sitdown3562d ago

Either through first party or purchased third party exclusive I get games...why should I be upset again?

S2Killinit3562d ago

@guitarded77
have to agree with you. but I've said this before, MS's plan is not to aim for gamers, we are just the stepping stone for them to reach the casuals. they sort of made a mess this generation when they announced their actual plans a bit too openly for the gamer's liking and it got them in trouble. truth is, MS only buys exclusives because they dont plan to cater to core gamers for any whole generation. therefore, it makes more sense for them to buy exclusivity at the beginning of each generation when the instal bases are small, then they switch to casuals anyway.

Pogmathoin3562d ago

I understand you biggerboss, you mean like No Mans Sky... 3rd party exclusive?

sAVAge_bEaST3561d ago (Edited 3561d ago )

tHatS, WHY.. we the Game.rs. say

Rally against M$ ,

our beloved pass time has (tried to be) hijacked, by money grubbing hoes, before bros.

-truth

+ Show (21) more repliesLast reply 3561d ago
mochachino3562d ago

Again, instead of funding its own exclusives, MS is paying money for a game that xone gamers would have been able to play regardless. So instead of having 2 games, Tomb Raider and an some real exclusive, all there is Tomb Raider...which they would have had before.

Third party exclusives result in no additional content. It's just using game making budgets to prevent other gamers from accessing something that they would have had.

It's a lose lose for all parties. Nobody should be supporting these practices.

Stuff like this is why I ditched my 360 for PS4. Nothing personal MS, but I hope it fails just for the sake of the industry. I was planning on getting an xone at some point but MS is still the same little sh'.. I can't support these practices.

Xb1ps43562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

Even if ms had spent that money on a new ip whos to say it would be good anyway? Or sell enough to make that money back..

Some of you are just too self entitled, get both and all that anger will go away..

I mean what gamer really does that? "What! Another 3rd party ex lusive! Im done with this console" just weird....

mochachino3562d ago

@xb1ps4

By your logic why make new games at all because there's a chance they may not be good or successful. We should stop creating new IP's all together right?

Unless MS paid a 3rd party to create a game like Ryse or saved a dead or dying project, every gamer should be against 3rd party exclusives. They create no new content.

Would you rather have two new games with the competition being able to play one, or just one new game. Are people that much of a fanboy that they rather sacrifice they're own gaming options to spite the competition.

MS has some very talented studio's, they're fully capable of putting out something that I'm sure many gamers would love, but to just give up because their a chance of failure is ridiculous.

Sony put out a lot of exclusives last and many were mediocre, but from that they also produced some true masterpieces which are regarded as some the best games of all time. As a gamer, I prefer those business practices imo.

Manic20143561d ago

To be fair we don't know the full story in why it has gone exclusive, it may be MS funded the game, or Square did not want to compete with uncharted next holiday so they made MS an offer. All in all MS end game is to provide Xbox gamers with killer exclusives, which hopefully after this is mostly first party. Same goes for Sony with No Mans Sky.

NZLAnonymous3561d ago (Edited 3561d ago )

Microsoft pays to have 3rd party games exclusives on their console so people who are on PlayStation to buy the Xbox One to play a franchise that they already like

Its a smart strategy , quit bitching

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3561d ago
scark923562d ago

I found the Rainbow Six Patriots gameplay to be more exciting to be honest.

Grown Folks Talk3562d ago

And why must there always be a Mitchell?

nevin13562d ago

This is Europe's version of E3?

Volkama3562d ago

Closest thing, but it's a public event.

Gr1mmyshadows3562d ago

damn I gotta admit that COD xbox bundle looks badass and 1TB HDD. might have to trade my XB1 just for that new Xbox

Grown Folks Talk3562d ago

I'm considering trading one of mine towards the white console, or if there's a similar Quantum Break bundle.

sprinterboy3562d ago

35 mins in and only seen multiplats

falviousuk3562d ago

35 minutes in and only seen games

Volkama3562d ago

35mins in and I don't know what I've seen some things but not got any volume. Did it just say the next Tomb Raider game is exclusive? :|

Show all comments (119)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic18812d ago (Edited 2d ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus231d 15h ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

KwietStorm_BLM1d 7h ago

So you do understand it or..?

rokos1d 5h ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb331d 4h ago

i think you are really missing the point

VariantAEC19h ago

@romulus23
That is not why MS buys studios. They might continue to buy because it's about taking that sweet sweet IP out of the corporate husks of their acquisitions.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 19h ago
SonyStyled1d 20h ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

1d 18h ago Replies(2)
ChasterMies1d 8h ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear211d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 19h ago
jwillj2k42d ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex1d 23h ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot1d 23h ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

VariantAEC19h ago

Years?

Try several decades, and in the gaming space 2.3 decades.

Jon615861d 4h ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

jwillj2k423h ago(Edited 23h ago)

This absolutely does NOT happen all the time. Let me know the last time 1 company with a terrible product track record spent 100 billion onto acquire MULTIPLE successful companies in under a year only to shut them down and stop making their products regardless of how successful they were. Not merge them, completely shut them down.

And you can’t use Microsoft in your example.

Notellin23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

Class action lawsuit? The law is on their side and protects them at all costs. There are no rules to protect the people at the bottom.

jwillj2k423h ago

Not true when it comes to mass layoff do your research.

RNTody1d 23h ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead1d 13h ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya1d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage1d 6h ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast1d 23h ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn19791d 22h ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel1d 14h ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage1d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn19791d 3h ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage1d 6h ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (68)
90°

Microsoft Opening Xbox Mobile Game Store in July

The Xbox brand is expanding, as an Xbox mobile game store is opening this coming July where Microsoft will brings its "first-party portfolio."

Jin_Sakai3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

“Bond adds that they will start on the web”

This will go nowhere.

Nice knowing you Xbox. This is what happens when the house never gets cleaned.

MrDead3d ago

The only this MS is expanding is the amount of feculence it sprays on everyone who just want to enjoy gaming and make games.

The best thing MS can do for the gaming industry is leave and never return.

XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Good luck with this even it might not succeed.

Show all comments (7)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel4d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1823d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie2d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
Notellin2d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow1d 15h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere2d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow1d 15h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX3d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney1d 10h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno3d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno3d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

2d ago
fsfsxii2d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno2d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)