770°

Far Cry 2: PS3/360 comparison

Widgamer.com has a new HD video showing both the PlayStation 3 and the Xbox 360 versions of Far Cry 2. Good news, it looks awesome even if it's not on PC.

Read Full Story >>
widgamer.com
Relcom5830d ago (Edited 5830d ago )

is taking forever to load.

OMG just watched the vid, and crap that looked sick. When he blew that car up that was chasing him i yelled WOAH. Oh and both versions absolutley the same.

InMyOpinion5830d ago

Both versions look great and that's what matters. The physics look awesome.

madestar5830d ago (Edited 5830d ago )

ps3 looks like there's more stuff going on, on-screen... paper flying, boards collapsing, boxes tumbling, explosions are bigger, tires flying.... all i seen going on in the 360 clips is tires being moved around and ok explosions that don't look good as ps3's... also ps3 black/shadow colors look better

and i might add.. ps3 explosions looks like it last longer than 360 explosions.. you can see 360 explosions just fades away quickly

Relcom5830d ago

Watching that guy who was on fire was just perfect. I don't see to many people on fire but i'm sure thats what it would look like.

pharmd5830d ago

i think it looks great regardless of console..... another great FPS on the way :D

poopface15829d ago

Mine is better, no Mine is better. Grow up. This game isnt even close to released yet and we already got comparisons.

dan-boy5829d ago

the game engine for far-cry2 is pretty damn good, and if behind killzones, it's only by a whisker....good job ubi, let's hope it plays well on-line though.

that looks great great on both consoles! just reading some of the comments on here...laughable!

perhaps people see things differently?! coz both versions looked identical!

ZeroBlitz5829d ago

Very lame fanboyism. I prefer the PS3 and that's the only console I have, but what's wrong with you?

Other than that, the physics and graphics look amazing. Looks like it'll be a great game as long as they can keep the long walks from being boring.

madestar5829d ago

why the disagrees???? i only spoke the truth

GameDev5829d ago

"
1.2 -
ps3 looks like there's more stuff going on, on-screen... paper flying, boards collapsing, boxes tumbling, explosions are bigger, tires flying.... all i seen going on in the 360 clips is tires being moved around and ok explosions that don't look good as ps3's... also ps3 black/shadow colors look better

and i might add.. ps3 explosions looks like it last longer than 360 explosions.. you can see 360 explosions just fades away quickly
"

it was pretty much the exact same post I was going to make, if they didn't want us to compare they wouldn't show them together. Like you Im not here to blow sunshine up the beehind of certain console owners just cause they get butthurt over the truth.

dan-boy5829d ago (Edited 5829d ago )

i didn't actually get a stop-watch out and time the explosions, but i couldn't really see much difference. could the ps3's last a bit longer because the frame rate did seem to stutter, and it was definately not running as smooth as the 360 version!

i dont know? in all honsety, they look identical graphically! even if the "explosions" are slightly longer, or there was a few more "sheets of paper" in air(we didn't see that bit in the 360 version so how could you tell there was more paper in the ps3 version?????), it's an achievement on both consoles!

i cant see why fanboys need this little victories.

yanikins1115829d ago

@Dan-boy

Gotta disagree man. Yeah farcry2 looks good. Really f***ing good, particlarly for a multiplat, but it aint kz2. I cant put my finger on it but theres just something about fc2 that isnt up to it. Pretty though.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5829d ago
fermcr5830d ago (Edited 5830d ago )

Yep ... here we go again... more comparisons.

Well i guess i have you say this... THE PC VERSION WILL BE THE BEST, AND IT'S THAT ONE I AM GETTING.

At least it will be in FULL HD (oops i was not going to say that... it just come out :) )

dexterwang5829d ago

Agree with above... FPS on PC FTW!

Statix5829d ago

More like, "don't have to spend a fortune on videocard and multi-core CPU" to run the same game, ftw ;)

Bolts5829d ago

Since when is a $1200-1500 PC a fortune? Oh and you can download mods for the PC version instead of getting ripped off for DLC. Basically the PC end all the pointless fanboyish about which version is the best. In the rare case when the PC version isn't better today, it will be better in a few months from now. It always, always win.

Statix5829d ago (Edited 5829d ago )

It may not be a fortune per se, but compare it to spending $200-400 right now, and play this and other great games like MGS4, RE5, Resistance 2, Killzone 2, GTAIV and GoW2 (when they come out, not 10+ months later), and so on. The more economical choice seems pretty clear to me.

fermcr5829d ago (Edited 5829d ago )

If you do not have money to buy a $1200-1500 PC ... you can buy a $500 PC ... you can play games in the same resolution that are on consoles. And PC games are cheaper.

@Statix "MGS4, RE5, Resistance 2, Killzone 2, GTAIV and GoW2"

Out of those games, i would only like 3 games from the list
Killzone 2, GTAIV and GoW2 (GTAIV and GoW2 sooner or later are coming to PC). Other games that i would like on the PC are LBP, Uncharted and the god of wars series... the rest, you can keep it.

As for the other way around, i bet you would also like some PC exclusive going to consoles. It go's both ways. The PC has more then enough games that are exclusive, wished by the consoles fanboys.

Statix5828d ago

It's unfortunate that you don't care for games such as RE5 and MGS4, (both of which will both probably get 10/10's out the yin-yang), but most gamers do. It's your loss. On the other hand, I honestly don't care about anything that's available for PC. I couldn't think of one game if you put a gun to my head.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5828d ago
SUP3R5830d ago (Edited 5830d ago )

The 360 version looks really crisp and bright while the PS3 version looks "warm" which I guess translates to a more natural look?
I'm going to leave this one up to performance since both are on par graphically IMO.
Might I also add that the physics engine is freakin amazing!

mistertwoturbo5830d ago

Same thing was said about GTA IV.

Perhaps Far Cry 2 on the PS3 might be running in a lower resolution.

I'm just theorizing. Disagree all you want folks.

Fishy Fingers5830d ago

Compare them when they're on the store shelf. Still early days.

Violater5830d ago (Edited 5830d ago )

Both look good to me, then again I don't have my pair of fanboy glasses with me today.
Hopefully we get to see some more interesting settings.

Doctor Phil5830d ago

Unfortunately, I think you are right in your thesis. God d@mn awful if true, huh?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5830d ago
jkhan5830d ago

I am downloading it. Oh god i hope both versions are equal. Otherwise we are in for a catfight:|

Ashton5830d ago

it's taking forever to stream or download.

Show all comments (225)
90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox428d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever426d ago (Edited 426d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88426d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai428d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle426d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE426d ago (Edited 426d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy425d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE425d ago (Edited 425d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
220°

10 Old Games With Outstanding Graphics

GF365: "There are some games with extraordinary visuals that impress us to this day. Here are old games with outstanding graphics."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
ShwaaMan473d ago

Bioshock still looks fantastic, one of my all time favorites.

Yui_Suzumiya473d ago

Beyond: Two Souls on PS3 can compete with modern day graphics.

SonyStyled473d ago (Edited 473d ago )

Same as Killzone 2 and 3, uncharted 2 and 3, Infamous 2, Heavy Rain, Resistance 3

jasonismoney473d ago

I wish this was entirely true, but you might want to load up Killzone 2 and Resistance 3 again.

SonyStyled473d ago

@jason I watched some gameplay videos of KZ2 and R3 on my full screen. They are on par or succeed graphically to the first person shooters mentioned in the article that also launched on the seventh generation of consoles. Try the same and see what you think

cthulhucultist473d ago

Killzone 3 was super impressive! I could not believe the graphics back then as I was regularly pausing the game to stand in awe looking at the surroundings! Resistance however did not impress me that much. Heavy rain is also another amazing graphically speaking game. It almost felt next gen

Fist4achin473d ago

I always thought the first 3 Gears of War games looked great and still hold up for today.

SonyStyled473d ago

They did for their day. I recently played gears judgement with on the 360 and the draw distance was so blurry. The characters up close look great though

JEECE473d ago

Far Cry 2 was awesome. In addition to having demonstrably better physics and AI than later games in the series, it had a lot of design decisions that, criticized at the time, have since been praised in games like BOTW and Dark Souls.

iNcRiMiNaTi473d ago

It might not be super amazing by today's standard but I thought Mgs3 looked really good

JEECE473d ago

In terms of art style it still holds up.

Show all comments (13)
430°

Far Cry’s best game gets brutally realistic as mod remakes Ubisoft FPS

The Far Cry series’ best game – not Far Cry 6 – just got more brutal and realistic thanks a mod than revamps and remakes the classic Ubisoft open-world FPS

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
lonewolf10595d ago

Far Cry 2 where your guns never ever jammed until you got into a gunfight is their best? I disagree.

MIDGETonSTILTS17595d ago

I liked 3 more.

The malaria angle was more annoying than immersive.

And, the enemy AI had too good of eyesight to allow any stealth. They’d spot you a literal half mile away, I hated it.

lonewolf10595d ago

Yeah, some weird mechanics for sure, some did really enjoy it, I certainly didn't.

bloop595d ago (Edited 595d ago )

The map was designed badly and an absolute pain to navigate from what I can remember too. You ended up having to go to the same few places all the time and there was a huge inaccessible area between them that you had to go around.

It definitely had the best physics system of the entire franchise, but a lot of the mechanics took the enjoyment out of it.

LordoftheCritics595d ago

It was fun for its time but a bunch of those systems today won't survive a launch weekend.

Profchaos595d ago

I'd say it was their most ambitious and had the best setting to date next to the original island.

But gameplay wise it was clunky and maybe it was released to early if the teams had modern systems to build it on the game would have been much better less corridors more open and less gaurd outposts that auto regen

Knushwood Butt595d ago

How do you use guns when not in a gunfight? Shooting trees?

lonewolf10595d ago

Yes and you could do that for hours in FC2 with a gun and it wouldn't jam, not hard to grasp is it.

Knushwood Butt595d ago

I see.

I haven't spent hours shooting trees.

I must try it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 595d ago
MajorLazer595d ago

Love Far Cry 2 on Infamous difficulty.

Hikoran595d ago

This should be an opinion piece. Not news.

Gwiz595d ago

Blood Dragon is much better.

Pedrof595d ago

Far Cry 2 may certainly not be the most "fun" game in the series but from a narrative standpoint it definitely is the most interesting of the bunch. FC2 couldn't be further away from the pointless fragfests that the following episodes turned out to be.

Show all comments (29)