90°

Far Cry’s 10th Birthday

David Martin: "It’s unassuming launch in 2004 proved to be quite a big deal. Far Cry was here, and it’s the best looking PC game ever. You also needed top of the line hardware to get it running it’s best, thus cementing Crytek’s reputation of needing to upgrade everything in your computer anytime they released a game. Their tradition of great lighting, ridiculous amounts of foliage and stupidly large areas all started here."

Read Full Story >>
thegamejar.com
MadLad3724d ago

Still say that the original was the best. At least for its time. Far Cry 3 was fun, but it got monotonous after a while. The original still holds up fairly well by today's standards too.

WeAreLegion3724d ago

Unless you're playing the PS3/360 port of the original. They screwed it up. BAD!

jetlian3724d ago

how so? i got it on 360 haven't played yet

ATi_Elite3724d ago (Edited 3724d ago )

FarCry OMG ALL time classic game. so fun and got progressively harder near the end. Such an excellent game as it gave you another taste of the Sandbox gamestyle.

2004 what a year Half Life 2 FarCry Doom3 Star Wars Battelfront Grand Theft Auto San Andreas Counter-Strike: Source, Battlefield Vietnam, 2004 was a KILLER year in gaming!

arbitor3653724d ago

too bad it was celebrated with one of the most rushed and crappy HD remakes I have ever seen in my life

GUTZnPAPERCUTZ3724d ago

Happy Birthday Far Cry! You just keep getting better and better!

Yui_Suzumiya3724d ago

Is the HD remake that bad? What kinda issues does it have?

arbitor3653724d ago

it looks like it is running on a 2004 PC at low settings. it struggles to even reach 30fps. there are gameplay and graphical glitches.

i hesitate to even call it an hd remake. no effort was put into "remaking" the game

100°

Far Cry Villains To Appear In A New Comic

This is interesting news for comic and Far Cry fans as something new in the universe for the game is always welcome. Villains from popular Far Cry games are transported into prehistoric times by the priestess Batari, who has pulled them from their lives before they've committed their most heinous crimes.

-Foxtrot63d ago

"Villains from popular Far Cry games are transported into prehistoric times by the priestess Batari"

Why do they make every f****** thing goofier and goofier

Watch Dogs become whacky, Assassins Creed jumped the shark, Ghost Recon become less serious now this

Garethvk63d ago

I think it is the trend. They look around and say ok; what can be done that will not infringe upon the next game and this is what happens. I heard rumors of the next Far Cry offering may be in Alaska and there was also an Online offering coming. So we get this to tide us over.

110°

Far Cry's entire source code has leaked online

Far Cry's source code has popped up online. Entitled "Far Cry 1.34 Complete", the game's entire source code was uploade…

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox448d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever446d ago (Edited 446d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88446d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai448d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle446d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE446d ago (Edited 446d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy445d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE445d ago (Edited 445d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)