130°

Almost Half of HDTV Owners Don't Use HDTV

HD-enabled television sets are all the rage these days, but HD programming itself hasn't yet picked up to the same extent, according to an online survey by ABI Research.

Read Full Story >>
teleclick.ca
Darkiewonder5884d ago

I have a few select channels that are in HD Signal. i'm just waiting for 100% HD ;D

BrianC62345884d ago

I find this report hard to believe. I've seen HDTVs without HD and it isn't that good. If you buy an HDTV you might as well get the channels too. Maybe what this report really says is people who buy cheap HDTVs don't get it. Anyone who buys a nice HDTV is going to want the better video.

JsonHenry5883d ago

Yeah, same here. I would use it for HD television, but even though I have Time Warner's HD package I only get about 10-15 actual HD channels.

scoobs5884d ago

I'm waiting for digital to kick in, in 2009. I'm also not interested in paying for a cable box then paying like $20 a month for 20 hd channels. HD programming is a rip-off right now. Plain and simple.

Archaeox5884d ago

Whats wierd is, my two cousins have Samsung HDTV's. On non cable channels like FOX and KCAL9 and abc, the picture on their 1080p TV's is grainy and color is messed up and crappy

Whereas on my 7 year old Panasonic SDTV the picture on these channels is fine

You could even say, TV producers are working with cable providers to give us a helluva price to pay, after spending thousands on overpriced HDTV's

Meus Renaissance5884d ago

It doesn't sound like they're getting HD at all. The grainy description you gave is consistent to how HDTV sets display SD content

tehReaper5884d ago

Yeah. You have to have some sort of HD receiver. If you just hook it up with the regular SD AV cable, the content doesn't look so great.

clevernickname5884d ago

The situation in Canada is even more grim for those that want to receive HDTV signals in that unless you live close to the border and install a roof top antenna (to pick up over-the-air American HD broadcasts) or are willing to subscribe to digital satellite or cable, you are SOL. Broadcasters in Canada will start broadcasting HDTV over-the-air in select markets starting this summer, but I am not holding my breath.

wallace10005883d ago (Edited 5883d ago )

I know lots of people with HDTVs and only a few have HDTV because it is pricey. Here in Canada you either have the choice of a few satellite providers or one cable provider. Both services cost about $65 a month but the cable provider will charge you between $450-$650 for the HD box and with satellite you have to have a dish on your house (which probably doesn't bother some people) and you have to rent the HD box (around $10 a month)or if you don't want to rent the box there is another company but there programming starts at $79 a month (with free HD box). If you don't watch huge amounts of tv that is pretty pricey. I buy most of the tv shows i like and rent/buy movies. The main reason i have an HDTV is for gaming and movies.

DRUDOG5884d ago

Programming is really lacking (trust me I've had my plasma since returning to the states in '03 and there wasn't anything back then), but at least there is something.

This info might explain why DirecTV has that completely ridiculous ad with the lady saying she didn't know that she needed HD programming when she bought her HD set...WTF? Could be people are buying these sets with no clue about HD or the programming. Can't tell you how excited I get when I see that Comcast has added some more channels...

Show all comments (28)
60°

Best GPU for Homeworld 3 - top picks & reviews

Jack writes: "Our guide to the best GPUs for Homeworld 3 talks you through some of today's best options from Nvidia, AMD, and Intel - for various budgets."

Michiel19898h ago

opinion piece? it's an advertisement and these articles shouldn't be here.
Advertisement on top of advertisements

90°

Two Decades Later, the Original Splinter Cell is Still a Masterpiece

They don't make games like this anymore.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
vgvill21h ago

Too dated in my book. The AI is way too unpredictable to be acceptable today. It's definitely a game of its time.

Jingsing18h ago(Edited 18h ago)

Agreed with those sentiments. The quality of the CPU controlled characters make or break a stealth game and they are pretty poor in all the Splinter Cell games by today's standard. This is what led me to playing Spies vs Mercs all the time in later games just to get a better stealth experience from a real person. Arguably Sony are making better stealth games albeit not Tom Clancy stuff.

TheProfessional14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

You should stick with fortnite or one of the countless bloodborne style games then. What a joke.

rlow115h ago

I had a good time with the game. It is a product of its time. But when it came out it was a must have game for a lot of people. I wish Ubisoft would make another game in the series or at least a reboot.

vgvill12h ago

They are making a remake, I think. I loved the original game when it was released, but I tried to play it again in recent years and just couldn't get on with it. The same with the older Hitman games.

PrecursorOrb12h ago

Yeah chaos theory still holds up though I gotta say. If you’re a fan of the series I highly suggest you go back to that one. Ubi has said they are remaking sc for “modern audiences”. I don’t have a lot of faith for the future of that company

Chocoburger5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Due to the lack of modern stealth games, and me constantly playing the MGS series, I've been looking for alternative stealth games to play, and went back and re-played the SC series recently. I wouldn't call SC1 or SC:PT masterpieces, there are AI issues, they're very much trial-and-error games, and that can lead to a lot of frustration. I also found the stories in this series to be boring, uninteresting, and just sloppily told. Cinematics are also of poor quality for both in-game scenes and CG cut-scenes, the soundtrack didn't leave any impression on me either.

Chaos Theory is better, but there was still a lot of room for improvement, and Double Agent (old gen ver.) was a sloppy mess that ended up a regression from CT. But still, at least they tried back then, these days Ubi-junk doesn't even try to make good games!

70°

How EA & Xbox Are Defining Gaming's Bleak Future

Xbox and EA have recently made baffling moves that define how bleak the future of the gaming industry is with major companies at the helm. Ryan Bates from "Last Word on Gaming" posits in this op-ed that maybe it's not ineptitude, but intention.

Read Full Story >>
lastwordongaming.com
Profchaos20h ago(Edited 20h ago)

Name someone that isn't trying to look us these days maybe cdpr.

Take two, ubi and yes even PlayStation are pushing us to own nothing and be happy with our live service ad injected games on a sub so they can raise prices at will and take access away when they see fit.

If it keeps up I'll be a full time retro gamer and this industry will be crashing hard

As rediculas as it sounds we need government reforms to defend consumer rights