1090°

Have Sony finally beat the Pirates?

If you are type or person who doesn't pay for games and has Killzone 3 installed on your custom firmware 3.55 PS3, I have news for you.

Read Full Story >>
thegamingpod.blogspot.com
Nitrowolf24748d ago (Edited 4748d ago )

Good. From what i was hearing games would ship with 3.60 but would release a patch that was under 3.55, making it boot able.

hiredhelp4748d ago

This is brilliant news. unfortunatly this will be short lived.

trust me when i say the groups can try to change ths file so you can run the game. like changing the fw

frostypants4748d ago

Software and network security are not wars that ever end. It requires constant efforts. Yes, hackers will figure out a way around this, only to be undermined again by Sony...and on and on...

SilentNegotiator4748d ago (Edited 4748d ago )

As is the nature of technology, there is no "finally"

The battle against hackers/pirates will never end. They will continue to find ways around to steal and continue to inflate their self-righteous egos. Sony must always be on their toes and be making improvements regardless of whether or not they see attack.

edit: I guess frosty pretty much beat me to it...

DaTruth4748d ago

You may have won the battle, but you haven't won the war!

Wish I could remember who said that. Cobra Commander? Megatron? Oh well!

I_find_it_funny4747d ago

unfortunately there's nothing final in this hacker shit

MintBerryCrunch4747d ago

but why would a pirate ever want to update their game...that would be like breaking the 1st sacred rule of pirating anything, which is updating the software you D/L

RedDevils4747d ago

this is a cat and mouse game

ZBlacktt4747d ago

Best thing Sony could do is make a virus that detects CFW after the update. Then it fries the PS3 mother board. They'll send a message, a costly one, lol.

Nitrowolf24747d ago

@Mint

true, but this is good news since developers no longer need to release patches made with 3.55. Brink is 3.6 but since they released a patch for 3.55, well it's no longer protected

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4747d ago
saladthieves4748d ago (Edited 4748d ago )

The thing is pirates will find a way around this, but by the time they do, let's hope Sony will have another countermeasure in place for them to get pissed at. Let's just say that Sony just shot a canon at the pirate's ship and it's sinking. They are aborting the ship with as much people and resources as they can, and calling for help. By the time help arrives, it might be too late.

the_best_player4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

More like the Pirates are shooting Sonys ship, but Sonys Patches are too fast.

nopunctuation4747d ago

Sony beat the pirates a long time ago because no one wants to wait 20 hours for a 50gb game to download. Blu ray is the pirate deterrent as long as comcast internet exists.

Shane Kim4747d ago

Can't argue with that. The games are too big and it would take days to DL it with my connection.

nanometric4747d ago

Lucky me with my 100 Mbit/s optical connection or up to 12 MB/s irl.

ProGrasTiNation4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

LOL...FTP for the win....3mins to DL a 1g file,so you do the maths.....also you can get a KZ3 torrent with all the 3d removed & it shrinks in size buy an awful lot..lol
& P.S....sony doing this to updates of old games will give someone the motive to go break their last line of defence..lol

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4747d ago
Vherostar4747d ago

At least they are getting closer to it and lasted longer than MS and Nintendo ever did. When it came to anti-piracy this gen Sony did do a good job I think its the longest console in existence without piracy. The reason PSN gets hacked though is these hackers got really annoyed as Sony have closed up the hole in games so they attacked them for it as they want free games. If the original hack was never found I doubt PSN would ever have been hacked.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4747d ago
Godmars2904748d ago (Edited 4748d ago )

Well, hackers are too busy trying to ruin PSN, so I doubt they have any time to crack the latest update. Just have to wait and see.

Hide_Out4748d ago

There are different types of hackers, people like Anon want to disrupt the service Sony offers, then there are other hackers who pirate software by getting around the encryption process.

Jezuz4748d ago

Not all hackers want to hack PSN

femshep4747d ago

either way all hackers are still scumbags with no lives

silvacrest4748d ago

PS3 hackers just want to get games for free, that includes getting on PSN

asshats like anonymous are on some pointless crusade and dont care if they hurt your average joe in the process

Mikeyy4747d ago

I agree and thats the truth.

Nobody knows why Anon is sticking there nose where it doesnt belong. All theve succeeded in doing is getting the core gamer to hate their guts.

Hide_Out4747d ago

Not all "hackers" want that, I wanted the ability to have Linux back on MY PS3 and play games online.

I don't agree with the piracy issue or the attack on Sony and it's customers.

DragonKnight4747d ago

Hide_Out: Two things. Did you bother using Linux when it was around? Because less than 1% of the userbase actually used it, and of those who did most were under contract and had special PS3's given to them by Sony, and would have not updated the PS3 and are still using Linux to this day.

Second, the capitalization of the word "MY" in your comment suggests you're one of those pro hacker individuals who don't understand what your true ownership is. You bought a piece of hardware. You are entitled to turn your PS3 into the grill the trolls used to always call it before it started crushing the competition. You can scratch the outer casing with a box cutter, you can set it on fire, you can throw it off the tallest free standing structure in the world. You can do those things because you own the physical product.

You DO NOT, however, own the software. You DID NOT pay for the software, you paid for a LICENSE to USE the software. Every single piece of software that exists comes with a LICENSE agreement you must agree to in order to gain use of it. When you click agree, you agree to knowing that you have a license to use the software. Now, if you can remove the OS that is on the PS3 entirely and put your own OS on it, then by all means do so. Sony can't stop you from doing that. They CAN, however, stop you from using THEIR proprietary software in a method it was never intended to be used for, especially if it hinders their ability to be compensated monetarily for their hard work.

All you pro hacker individuals need to get that fact clear and in your minds instead of having a mind like a siv. YOU DO NOT OWN THE PS3 OPERATING SOFTWARE!! Understand? YOUR PS3 is a piece of plastic, silicon, some metals and glue. Turn it into a toaster and Sony can't touch you. But the OS is not yours to do with as you please.

Dread4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

@dragonknight

the problem is that at the begining Sony was using the OS capabilitis as part of the their marketing strategies..in other words they were telling the consumers before they puschased the machine that it included OS. So if a consumer bought the machine with OS then they should have a right to keep it. The fact that only a few people use it is not a valid justification to make unilateral changes.

imaigne for example that you bought the original Playstaiton 3 which had BC and then after two years they create a firmware that takes tha capability out of the machine.. that is theft..and people would be justified in wanting their money back.

I know everyone here defends Sony no matter what, but regardless of the company if they sell u something they do not have the right to take it away from you.

4747d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4747d ago
ProGrasTiNation4747d ago

Anyone who thinks like you is a sheep...researchers dont give a fuck about psn,just injustitce buy greedy company's

Godmars2904747d ago

People really took this as a serious statement? Really?

silvacrest4747d ago

dont assume your actual intentions can be easily translated in text form

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4747d ago
hiredhelp4748d ago

actually hes right there are very differnt types of hackers.

you may need to do some reserach you be supprised how many of hackers are not ruthless like what we have seen lately.
but just do this for hobby like cracking games.and other software. not all hackers are setout to hack into other computers to exploit them and gain controll for there own selfish reasons.

gamingdroid4748d ago

If you modified anything in your life beyond what it was intended for, you were a hacker!

As gamers I'm disgusted at how many of you stereotype, but then turn around and complain about Fox News doing the exact same thing to you.

DragonKnight4747d ago

When has Fox News been responsible for preventing millions of people from enjoying a basic function of their entertainment experience? I mean besides being a cancerous tumor on television airwaves?

Fox News are sensationalists, border line racists, and a disgrace to real journalism. But their "stereotyping" never prevented me from changing the channel and watching something else. But hackers prevented me from using PSN for a month.

Hackers bring their reputation on themselves. And if the hacking community doesn't like being stereotyped as they are, then maybe they should help find the ones responsible for tarnishing their reputation and help bring them to justice. As the saying goes, the only way evil can triumph is if good men sit by and do nothing.

gamingdroid4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

"But their "stereotyping" never prevented me from changing the channel and watching something else. But hackers prevented me from using PSN for a month."

So you are justifying stereotyping a group of people simply because a few of them prevented you from playing some games? Ignoring the simple fact that who is responsible is unclear yet it most likely was monetary motivated.

You are quick to point fingers, so I hope you are pointing fingers at Sony as well for not securing their network.

Well, I guess you could say gamers bring their reputation on themselves, why should Fox News actually try and find out. Seemingly you are as ignorant as they are (if not naive).

Finally, hackers didn't prevent you from using any other online network, it was just another system a way. Xbox Live, PC online and Wii was functioning just fine. If you can change your channel I'm sure you can change your system.

Good men don't mistakenly blame innocent people!

DragonKnight4747d ago

"So you are justifying stereotyping a group of people simply because a few of them prevented you from playing some games? Ignoring the simple fact that who is responsible is unclear yet it most likely was monetary motivated."

Yes, I am justifying it because, again, Hackers are responsible for their own reputations. The fact remains that such a fight hackers put up to defend themselves wouldn't be necessary if A) What they were/are doing is legal (it's not) and B) They would aid in finding those responsible for giving hackers a bad name. It doesn't matter if it was 1 person doing it or 100. They use the hacker banner and thus should answer to the hacker community. But do you see anyone coming forth and actually doing anything about it besides Sony? No. Why? Because hackers live in a double standard world. GeoHot proved it perfectly. "I don't condone piracy", so by your logic he's a good hacker. And yet he released everything anyone could ever need to pirate. Did hackers who are supposedly "good" come forward and denounce his actions and try to help Sony in preventing piracy? No. Instead they came forth and b*tched when Sony took their rightful legal action. Like I said, you don't want to be labeled a deviant who performs illegal acts, then do something about it. The hacker community is responsible for its own reputation.

"You are quick to point fingers, so I hope you are pointing fingers at Sony as well for not securing their network."

I have no reason to point fingers at Sony for being hacked for 2 reasons. A) Everything gets hacked. The Pentagon has been hacked, banks have been hacked, online stores have been hacked, credit card companies have been hacked. You don't point the finger at the victim, you point it at the criminal. B) Where's your proof that Sony had poor security? Oh, are you talking about that "expert" who read reports from months back but admitted he had no clue as to Sony's present security measures? Are you forgetting that it was proven that Sony had up-to-date security and that CC information (which is more valuable than the addresses, names, and phone numbers that are all part of public record and found on google) was encrypted? I guess you forgot about that and just wanted to spew media misinformation and sensationalism. Like Fox News does.

"Well, I guess you could say gamers bring their reputation on themselves, why should Fox News actually try and find out. Seemingly you are as ignorant as they are (if not naive)."

Gamers ARE responsible for their own reputation. But unlike hackers, we actually speak out when some loser tries to blame his killing spree on GTA. Or when Jack Thomson tried to bring down all gaming altogether. Gamers speak out loud and proud when we are attacked. Just watch Attack of the Show for example. Any time there is a controversy about a game, you'll see people like Sessler fighting against the ill-conceived notion that games promote violence. You'll see gamers make petitions against politicians trying to rally against gaming. Look at Australia and how their rating system bans games. I've seen many stories of gamers trying to come together and make a change in that arena. We don't just sit back and let society label us as outcasts or violent individuals. We stand up and let the world know that we enjoy a form of entertainment, and people who claim that a game made them shoot someone are lying and just plain dumb.

DragonKnight4747d ago

"Finally, hackers didn't prevent you from using any other online network, it was just another system a way. Xbox Live, PC online and Wii was functioning just fine. If you can change your channel I'm sure you can change your system."

I sure can. And I have a Wii, and a PC. But unlike television, which has multiple stations playing the same show sometimes, most people will not go out and buy the same game for 4 platforms. So because of hackers, I was unable to input my online code for Mortal Kombat, and thus was not able to activate that feature. Because of hackers, I could not get some help from some Demon's Souls friends to obtain certain weapons. Because of hackers, I couldn't play my DC Universe Online game. Hackers stopped PSN. At least with television, I still have a working television no matter what Fox News says. And therein lies a great flaw in your counter. Fox News can't affect television, but hackers affected online gameplay for millions. Your sympathy for people who don't give a damn of the consequences they will bring about is naive, short-sighted, and disgusting.

"Good men don't mistakenly blame innocent people!"

Lol, the irony of your statement makes me laugh. You sit there and blame Sony for being hacked, then have the unmitigated gall to make such a statement. I dare say that's the tactic of a fanboy. A new breed of fanboy has emerged on N4G since this PSN situation, that being the hacker fanboy. I see you're part of the club.

gamingdroid4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

I think it is pointless to discuss with somebody that isn't interested in reasoning, beyond pushing his views to protect another company.

I will leave you with this without actually countering every single of your arguments (as you aren't interested in the truth anyhow, just to blame):

a) Sony is partly to blame and they are definitely not innocent. The way the acted caused the attention. Furthermore, because companies being hacked is common doesn't mean you are relieved of your responsibility. Being hacked and potentially losing credit card/birth dates is quite uncommon considering the number of users.

b) There is no question the specific hackers that did it is responsible and guilty.

c) Hackers aren't a collective organized group of people, no more than a hobbyist is! You would say (at least I hope you don't) because there is a higher crime rate among black men, therefore all black men are criminals! It is therefore the black men's responsibility to uphold their own reputation, despite the fact that no one of them is responsible for the entire "race" reputation.

To me you come across one of those people that actually would believe Fox News when the tables are turned around and convenient instead of looking at the facts to push your own beliefs and agenda.

Bottom line, you are just upset that your game time was disrupted and you want to blame somebody and it is convenient to just blanket blame a group. It's naive, ignorant and irresponsible.

I don't bother with people like that and hope you don't have kids.

DragonKnight4747d ago

@gamingdroid: It is a common occurrence for one without a valid argument to resort to personally attacking someone because they can't come up with an actual decent point. So go on continuing you are correct (you're not) and go on attacking people for disproving you. You merely come off as petty and childish.

Have a good day.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4747d ago
LoveMyKids4748d ago Show
4748d ago Replies(3)
Show all comments (98)
160°

Sony shares big new PS Plus stat, but not the one we want to see

PlayStation Plus has improved the split of PS4 and PS5 players on its priciest tiers, but Sony continues to hide total subscriber numbers.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
mandf6h ago

lol acting like it’s equivalent to ms numbers

Mr Logic6h ago

Uh...They're definitely not equivalent.

"Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass service now has 34 million subscribers."

"the total number of PS Plus subscribers across all tiers was 47.4 million"

darthv725h ago(Edited 5h ago)

That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN.

bloop2h ago

That's not the "gotcha" you think it is Darth.

darthv721h ago

^^it's not supposed to be bloop.... it's just an interesting observation.

shinoff21834h ago(Edited 4h ago)

What. Definitely more os plus subscribers but that makes sense due to actual console sales

Darth the difference between the bases are huge your right but you gotta think. Ps players buy more games, where as the Xbox base relies on gamepass for their gaming. So it makes perfect sense

darthv724h ago(Edited 4h ago)

What makes perfect sense though? You say PS players buy more games... so then logically there should be more PS+ subscribers given the increased number of online multiplayer games in the PS4 generation alone. The PS4 was the first time that + was required for online play much like Gold was for 360 users.

Keep in mind we are talking subscribers, not simply XB/PS users. I assume you meant to say offline single player games, which is most likely true as well. That gen also saw a significant increase in games with an online component comparted to the previous gen.

victorMaje4h ago

I for one will be going back to essential at the next renewal. When I feel a game is good & right up my alley, I’ll check trusted reviews & just buy it.

jznrpg2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

I have the top tier until 2028 as they gave me a massive discount for all the years I had left but I’ll most likely go to essential as well. I buy my games but my kids do use the service occasionally. They do prefer to own their games as well since any game can leave the rental service at some point and they don’t like that idea. They mostly use it to demo games then ask me to buy games if they really like it.

meganick2h ago

I would like to see Sony add a fourth tier of PS Plus for people who just want to be able to play games online without any of the perks like monthly games, store discounts, or anything like that, and it should cost $20 annually, $30 maximum. There’s no way I’m paying $80 just to play games online. Even the original $60 fee was too much, and I would often wait for sales to re-up my subscription.

300°

Sony Says The PS5 Is Its “Most Profitable Generation To-Date"

During Sony’s recent business segment meeting and investor presentation regarding its game and network services, the PlayStation company revealed that PlayStation 5 is the company’s “most profitable generation to-date.”

It’s the top slide of the presentation, showing that in its first four years, the PS5 generation has already hit $106 billion in sales, having almost caught up to the PS4’s total $107 billion generated.

Operating income for the PS5 generation has also already surpassed that of the PS4, having now reached $10 billion.

ApocalypseShadow1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

I wouldn't doubt it. They released a high quality system. A lot of high quality games from themselves and their support of 3rd party developers and indies. They released many high quality remakes and remasters. They released a high quality GaaS game going against the naysayers thinking Sony would abandon single player games. And they most likely are profiting a lot more than PS1, PS2 PS4 and the loss leading PS3 that drained all their profits.

Now, I'll wait to see what's cooking tomorrow. But can you use some of those profits to better support your high quality VR headset? Because, by supporting it, you can sell more games and more systems and make more profits?

jznrpg1d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

I want RPGs for PSVR2! Good ones of course

shinoff21831d 19h ago

If it had some rpgs I would buy right fking now. It looks dope and alot of fun, but it's biggest game resident evil 4(maybe) I've got no interest in. I'm not a fan of racing games, even with that metro game coming i was never much into that series. Rpgs would be fantastic.

MrNinosan1d 17h ago

Lemme know if ya wanna play some Zenith 🙌
Bought it at release, but haven't played it more than 1-2 hours but for sure on my "todo list".

Cacabunga1d 16h ago

Normal when they released mostly cross gen games so far. That’s a lot of money saved..
We haven’t seen what PS5 can do yet. 4years in and PS4 games still look great to me. The gen leap isn’t quite there yet.

--Onilink--1d 18h ago

The interesting metric for me is the $106billion in operating income/profit (not sales as mentioned in the article) reaching the same as the PS4 did with only half the consoles sold.

In particular because they all are supposed to be making the most per hardware sold after a few years when manufacturing costs are down.

So even putting inflation aside(and the higher console price), it is interesting that they could reach PS4 $ with just half the consoles sold.

Maybe there is more to the metric thats whats seen at face value, but they have clearly been making a lot more money than before on the software side (with also less games released I suppose, given its only been half the generation so far)

VersusDMC1d 18h ago

The bulk of the money has to be coming from the 30% cut on all games and microtransactions. Especially on all the free to play juggernauts like genshin, apex, fortnight, etc.

--Onilink--1d 15h ago (Edited 1d 15h ago )

@Versus

They are definitely making a lot on that for sure (which the $70 price increase factors into as well), but its not like many of those games werent around for the PS4 too.

They might be counting the gen as a whole and not just PS5 itself (so extra profit from PC sales, whatever that may be)

PS+ price increase and different tiers probably amount to part of that too.

But in general, its still quite a surprising metric. Half the time, half the consoles sold, less first party games released so far and still already making more of a profit than last gen is quite something, and as mentioned, there is probably more to it that we dont know, after all, since we are talking about operating income, all the expenses they have also factor into it, so it is also possible that they have found ways to significantly reduce that + all the means of increased revenue that appear to be factoring into the equation

All in all, just an interesting situation from a business perspective

porkChop1d 14h ago

It's for the whole generation, so it would likely be including PC. They also make much more profit on digital sales vs retail, and digital is far more prominent these days. The generation also started at the height of COVID when everyone was home, spending far more money on gaming/hobbies. It makes a lot of sense for this gen to be more profitable.

Abnor_Mal1d 20h ago

This will surely shut up all the new trolling accounts trying to spread lies and non facts in other articles comment sections before this article is posted.

Hofstaderman1d 18h ago (Edited 1d 18h ago )

Obscurely, those trolls or troll will not show in these articles as the truth is contradictory to his or their orchard-sized daily dose of copium and hopium.

Tacoboto1d 18h ago

Or... They're intentionally trolling you guys specifically. Because they know it upsets you so easily.

Name-dropping Orchard, after this many months? How long has it been and he's still in your thoughts?

Elda1d 18h ago (Edited 1d 18h ago )

I'm quite sure the individual is reading these positive comments downvoting & seething at the same time. Edit: It just downvoted my comment...lol!!

Hofstaderman1d 17h ago

No I'm entertained by this individual. I love unhinged people, they are so interesting lol.

repsahj1d 19h ago

Wow! I am super impressed that in just 4 years, ps5 already caught up to the PS4's. Congratulations.

JackBNimble1d ago

That happens when half of your games are cross platform. I'm still waiting to see what the ps5 is capable of, because they sure haven't pushed any limits.

And where are all these ps5 exclusive games?

sagapo1d 18h ago

Not really surprised as Sony barely has any competition at the moment.

Show all comments (47)
150°

Sony CEO says although AI "has been used for creation," it's "not a substitute for human creativity"

"AI is not a substitute for human creativity. We position it as a technology that supports creativity. Creativity resides in people. We will continue to contribute to people's creativity through technology," the CEO said.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
1nsomniac8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

...not yet but 100% within the next 10 years!

..Then Sony will use it like the drop of a hat. They're no different to the others.

isarai8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

They used to be 😞 sure it was always a business, and money's always the priority, but they used to have a very strong stance on supporting artists and creativity. "Dont f#@k with the artist" was a phrase they touted a few times back in the ps1-ps3 era, a philosophy carried over from their music branch PlayStation was created from. It's not COMPLETELY gone, but it's barely there compared to what it was back then, i just want them to return to that.

Eonjay7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

I am highly encouraged by their statement about human creativity. "Dont f#@k with the artist" is exactly what they are saying. But at the same time, I don't think people understand that Sony is a corporation. If they don't realize growth, they don't get to exist. When you say 'Sony', you are talking about a bunch of investors. To speak about them any other way is a illogical and incorrect. They haven't changed. They have been a group of investors since they became a public business.

isarai7d ago

Ugh, i really wish people would stop gambling people's livelihoods by turning a project/game into their political soapbox. Im all for statements and having your own opinion, but there's more people working on this than just druckman, ham fisting your political beliefs onto just seems inconsiderate for everyone elses job security when it can result in a failure due to people avoiding it for that reason.

I play games for escape, im so tired of nearly every AAA game blatantly dragging real world issues to shove in my face when I'm trying to take a break from it all. They don't even bother to be subtle about it, quite the opposite, it's blasted and force fed to you and it's just getting exhausting

Einhander19727d ago

People are taking a whole interview and cutting it down to clips that make him look bad and take what he actually was saying out of context. For example he also said things like this AI has "ethical issues we need to address"

-Foxtrot7d ago

@Einhander

Why defend him at this point?

It’s not taking things out of context, he said what he said.

Old ND would never talk about soulless AI taking over so many creative things they are well known for. The whole “ethical issues” is just a good PR spin people who push this crap fall back on to make their statements not seem as bad. So many AI lovers do this.

AI has no place is so many creative based things.

Einhander19727d ago

Well yeah, because everyone else is using it so they need to stay competitive. It's the same as paid online, they didn't want to go that route but their competition was making so much money they needed to add paid online just to keep up.

RaiderNation7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

AI will never replace humans in game development in terms of conceptualizing new games. Humans still need to come up with the ideas and what they want to implement. However much of the day to day menial coding could be AI driven to reduce production time and team size. I could also see AI being used for bug testing/optimization that could lead to better quality games at launch. I'm actually very optimistic about how AI can positively impact game development.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 7d ago
XiNatsuDragnel8d ago

Good statement but hopefully this holds up

NotoriousWhiz7d ago

People that aren't software developers just don't understand the benefits of AI. People who's only exposure to A.I is the Terminator movie and other related sci fi films won't understand the benefits it provides.

It's not about replacing human labor. It's about making human labor easier.

Many years ago, I had laser eye surgery done. It was performed by a robot. The doctor took my measurements and calibrated the machine to make sure it would do what needed be done. And then the robot corrected my vision in 10 seconds.

15 years later and I still have 20/20 vision.

Eonjay7d ago

AI in and of itself is not a 'bad'. Money is bad. Money is evil, and corporations will do whatever they can to get more of it. They will find ways to implement AI to replace as may jobs as possible. This isn't even up for debate. It is the charge of the corporation to maximize returns for the investors. They have no choice. I'm a developer and I know that my job will absolutely be replaced. Therefore, I have decided to become an AI dev. AI has a lot of potential to help us solve problem on a scale most can't even imagine. The issue, as ever is that our monetary system only ever allows us to focus on greed and fiscal growth.

But I am a pragmatist. Perhaps an AI model can be built to help protect us from our most dangerous instincts and habits. And perhaps Congress can pass laws to protect us from people who would use AI to manipulate and control us (spoiler: they wont).

RaiderNation6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Progress is inevitable. Nobody driving cars today is complaining that the horse and buggy is no longer around. Yes, some jobs will be lost but guess what? With innovation comes new job opportunities. It's how the cycle of the job market works.