740°

PlayStation 3 Games That Lost Their Exclusivity: A Trip Down Memory Lane [Gallery]

GB: "When the PlayStation 3 was launched all those years back it boasted an unbelievable line up of exclusives. Most of the franchises that made their debut on the PlayStation 2 had a sequel promised exclusively for the PlayStation 3 but as you know things were not always rosy for Sony back then, especially when the Xbox 360 was selling like hot cakes. This meant that a number of high profiles exclusives went multiplatform. Today we go down memory lane and take a look at those games."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
vsr4867d ago (Edited 4867d ago )

If sony had locked those games, The console war would have beed end 2008-2009.! Like PS1/PS2 era(No silly fanboy wars on those era)

What a missed opportunity! But Sony is a Phoenix. Now they are winning!

These multiplat games are been reduced their quality and quantity(bluray game = DVD game + extra DLC).

Anarki4867d ago

I think you meant Blu-ray game > DVD game lol

Yeah, Sony are really coming out winning these past few years with all the exclusive games they're getting.

Bell Boy4867d ago

Your kidding right, I remember many a dreamcast owner saying how poor the ps2 was compared to the dreamcast.

The only difference in the fanboy console wars now is more nutters call themselves gaming journalists via blogs and spew bs morning noon and night

Commander_TK4867d ago

If Sony would've secured the exclusivity of AC1, time-exclusivity of GTA4 and not drop the funding of L.A. Noire, they would've probably been ahead of the 360 in terms of sales.

Side-note: Although if they hadn't dropped funding L.A. Noire, Agent would've been multiplat, but still... Looking at how amazing L.A. Noire is going to be, it was still a stupid move.

Lawliet4867d ago

Look at those games are pretty Meh. This list is rubbish.

FFXIII didn't live up to expectation neither did the overrated GTAIV better than its predecessor. No point keeping DMC4 exclusive since the whole series and the fanbase live with the Playstation brand. Tekken and especially VF5 has and will never get much attention in America. Not even SF could because those games have no guns.

The only game that perhaps would have make real boost is Assassins Creed. The game is on PC platform, so it will never be an "exclusive". Still if its PS3 exclusive it won't deserve more than a 9.

ABizzel14867d ago

This list is awful. Having those games exclusive would have helped Sony, but only Assassin's Creed, GTA, and FF13 moved consoles sales. Tekken, Virtua Fighter, DMC did nothing for either console. LA Noire isn't out yet, so we can't say anything about it.

smoothdude4867d ago

I am glad that these games went multiplat as it means more people can enjoy them. Besides they will never get Killzone 3, Little Big Planet 2, or Uncharted 3!!!

ShinMaster4867d ago (Edited 4867d ago )

* Grand Theft Auto was never exclusive in the first place. The games have seen releases on both PC and Xbox before. Don't know why people keep bringing it up. Besides, I don't think Sony was about to pay $50 million on timed-DLC alone.

* Neither was Assassin's Creed. Ubisoft kinda wanted to make it a PS3 game, but Sony wasn't interested in an exclusive deal with Ubisoft.

* And about LA Noire. Rockstar said not to get it confused with the secret PS3 exclusive they are working on(now revealed to be Agent).

None of these were confirmed exclusives.
Unlike certain games on 360 which were confirmed "exclusive" and ended up being only "timed".

[Waits for "Xbox 360 Games That Lost Exclusivity" article... if it even gets approved here)

Washington-Capitals4867d ago

Yes i will also agree that that PS3 has the best games library of any console on the market right now.
But I dont know about you guys, but some of the best games this generation are also multiplatform like Call of Duty 4 and Red Dead Redemption. You play the games not the console.

Snake Raiser4867d ago

Sony should have gone with the most aggressive business strategies that they could. Lower starting price (even just 50 bucks would help), pay for games, DLC, pay for online, pay for advertising. They should have tried to just knock out MS in one hit. I'm not sure it would have worked, but it would have gone better than what they actually did.

paintsville4866d ago

Now they are winning???????
Ugh, your math skills are a little off there pal. World wide installed base puts Wii first, 360 second, and ps3 third. It's been that way since the ps3 launch and still is. That's not winning, that's third.

Shubhankar4866d ago

I don't really see how they're winning. Last in everything but exclusives doesn't exactly qualify as 'winning.'

ShinMaster4865d ago

If you did your math right, you would know that the PS3 sells more and faster than 360.

I don't see how "places" apply hear, considering they started at different times.
I'm guessing you also believe that in Rally the first car out is the fastest and the winner. lol

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 4865d ago
TBM4867d ago

the fighting games i didn't care about, but i've played all of those on my ps3 with the exception of LA Noire which i will must likely end up playing on my ps3 too.

losing them to multiplatform status is not that big a deal imo.

siyrobbo4867d ago

Assasins creed was never PS3 exclusive, it was actually first announced for 360 at e3 2005 but it was known then as 'project assasin'

lil Titan4867d ago

these so called journalist better be glad the internet is here instead of me reading this in a newpaper or physical material or i might just whipped my a$$ with this article...oh wait theres the print button

Seferoth754866d ago

The proper word is wipe. Unless you really think they'll feel bad about you beating yourself with a newspaper.

lil Titan4866d ago

they might feel bad lol just a slip of the keys people knew what i meant, whats done is done

HolyOrangeCows4867d ago

"LA Noire...This is perhaps the biggest game loss that the PS3 had"
And this is the one on the list immediately after GTA4? What are they smoking?

Iroquois_Pliskin4867d ago

o well Sony still has lots of exclusives, if all those games were exclusive poor xbox wouldnt have that many games

showtimefolks4867d ago

Ac1 could have been nice but with growing install base for both ps3/xbox360 why cut yourself the profit even with timed exclusive. and sony have said many times they will not pay for times exclusive and i don't blame them since i rather see that money being invested into a new IP or a AAA sequel

DMC 4 problem is that some of these IP's were ps2 exclusive when it came to next-gen and MS's check it was hard to say no

FF 13 same thing too much money from MS and SE would have to let go of a huge install base which doesn't make sense but i bet it had more to do with MS's checks

NOW THIS IS A GOOD ONE GTA series sony had exclusive rights to when rockstar came to them sony for some reason let them out of that deal. but in return i guess sony got agent and i bet you that a few more games too

LA:N sony funded the game with 20million of its own bucks lol and wheb the game was shoing no progress at all sony stopped the fucding part of it to think about it in between RS again came to sony to get the rights to LA:N

and from all this sony get's AGENT which will not be timed exclusive. its very smart if you think about it yes having those games exclusive would be nice but sony still gets gta4/la:n plus they get one exclusive game from ROCKSTAR NORTH the same production team behind gta series so imagine how great agent can be when it comes out in 2012 when ps3's install base should be over 60million how big of a blow would taht be for MS now that's a real question?

Tekken 6 i mean really it wasn't a good game

Virtua Fighter 5 yeh but i don't think its a system seller

end of the day its about whether one side is willing to pay a lot to get something early and the other willing to invest that money into its own brand and still get the titles one paid extra for

madpuppy4867d ago

Not a bad article, What is even better is they got rid of that d@mn annoying video player that automatically started with "audio ON" on every page!!!

punkpop1014867d ago

Damn right because they forget what they promised and what they gave to gamers.Still remember my friends selling their ps3 because they found out that Dragon Quest IX and X was not coming to the ps3.

meluvulongtime4866d ago

I think there's only 2 titles that would have made a huge difference in sales for Sony if they were PS3 exclusives. GTA IV and FFXIII. They both would have driven sales of the PS3 simply on namesake. Another hit and miss for Sony was RDR. I heard rumors that they had passed on it for an exclusive and instead opted for Agent. Hopefully Agent delivers

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4865d ago
BIGTRIN4867d ago

What an amazing trip! Loved Devil May Cry 4!@!

Iroquois_Pliskin4867d ago

wow 14 disagrees? its his own opinion... so now hes lying to himself :/?

Blacktric4866d ago

No. That means people don't agree with him. Why do everyone here think that disagrees mean go f*ck yourself? If I didn't like Devil May Cry 4, I will press the disagree button. What am I gonna do? Give him an agree?

Seferoth754866d ago

So you don't agree that he loved it?
That is just retarded. Nowhere did he bring up your feelings for the game so at no point do you need to agree or disagree with him. Simple concept really.

Blacktric4866d ago

For the love of God. It's not about him. Not everyone clicks the disagree button just because they think his feelings for the game are right or wrong. They do it because they didn't like the game. It's simple. Stop trying so hard to insult people.

halocursed4867d ago

I am seriously gutted about L.A Noire not being an exclusive, I hope that we didn't loose much textures coz Rockstar decided to make it multi-platform.

jony_dols4867d ago

Even though I own both consoles,
the only game that I wished stayed exclusive to the PS3 was L.A Noire.

I hope to god, that the 360 hasn't held back the development of the title....because it really does look amazing.

siyrobbo4867d ago

if it does blame sony, they passed on the opportunity to keep it ps3 exclusive. Though we dont know what the game looked like before rockstar got involved, could have changed dramatically

TreMillz4867d ago (Edited 4867d ago )

you do know that L.A. Noire was a tradeoff right? Its basically like this GTA4 is ps3 exclusive, ms throws cash we want it too, R* says ok and sorry sony but you can have this- L.A. Noire, ms hey we want that too!!! throws more cash, R* ehh...ok, sorry sony but we promise you can have this- Agent. Where is Agent? who the hell knows....

Dark_king4867d ago

@TreMillz actually L.A Noire was not a trade off.The devs let everyone know it wasn't part of the deal they had with Sony to let GTA4 go.The deal was for 2 or 3 new IPs and they specifically mentioned that L.A Noire was not one of them

GrandTheftZamboni4867d ago

@TreMillz

MS has deep pockets. It's like how it happened with IBM. Sony: we need a chip. IBM: 500 million! MS: we need one, too! IBM: 1 billion!

4867d ago Replies(3)
EXID4867d ago

meh. plenty more where they came from~

Show all comments (143)
200°

Sony shares big new PS Plus stat, but not the one we want to see

PlayStation Plus has improved the split of PS4 and PS5 players on its priciest tiers, but Sony continues to hide total subscriber numbers.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
mandf11d ago

lol acting like it’s equivalent to ms numbers

Mr Logic11d ago

Uh...They're definitely not equivalent.

"Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass service now has 34 million subscribers."

"the total number of PS Plus subscribers across all tiers was 47.4 million"

darthv7211d ago (Edited 11d ago )

That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN.

bloop11d ago

That's not the "gotcha" you think it is Darth.

darthv7211d ago

^^it's not supposed to be bloop.... it's just an interesting observation.

Einhander197211d ago

darthv72

"That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN."

Have you ever heard of a PC before? I hear they are pretty popular.

fr0sty10d ago

MS started lumping gold subscribers in with those GP numbers... keep in mind.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
shinoff218311d ago (Edited 11d ago )

What. Definitely more os plus subscribers but that makes sense due to actual console sales

Darth the difference between the bases are huge your right but you gotta think. Ps players buy more games, where as the Xbox base relies on gamepass for their gaming. So it makes perfect sense

darthv7211d ago (Edited 11d ago )

What makes perfect sense though? You say PS players buy more games... so then logically there should be more PS+ subscribers given the increased number of online multiplayer games in the PS4 generation alone. The PS4 was the first time that + was required for online play much like Gold was for 360 users.

Keep in mind we are talking subscribers, not simply XB/PS users. I assume you meant to say offline single player games, which is most likely true as well. That gen also saw a significant increase in games with an online component comparted to the previous gen.

victorMaje11d ago

I for one will be going back to essential at the next renewal. When I feel a game is good & right up my alley, I’ll check trusted reviews & just buy it.

jznrpg11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I have the top tier until 2028 as they gave me a massive discount for all the years I had left but I’ll most likely go to essential as well. I buy my games but my kids do use the service occasionally. They do prefer to own their games as well since any game can leave the rental service at some point and they don’t like that idea. They mostly use it to demo games then ask me to buy games if they really like it.

RedDevils11d ago

For me, I will cancel it all together but unfortunately I still have it till 2030 lol

meganick11d ago

I would like to see Sony add a fourth tier of PS Plus for people who just want to be able to play games online without any of the perks like monthly games, store discounts, or anything like that, and it should cost $20 annually, $30 maximum. There’s no way I’m paying $80 just to play games online. Even the original $60 fee was too much, and I would often wait for sales to re-up my subscription.

P_Bomb11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Essential is too expensive, I agree. We’ve got one Essential and one Premium sub. Dropping the Premium when it expires.

gamerz10d ago

Just let my subscription lapse for the first time since 2010. Will sub again every now and then for a month or so to access my old ps+ games but for me it's the end of an era.

DivineHand12510d ago

Let those numbers continue to drop because it is now too expensive. $80 per year just to play online. I noticed they didn't offer any discounts on the subscription or controllers during this year's days of play for the first time in many years and they will feel it when people choose not to renew.

My subscription will lapse next month and it will stay that way until further notice.

KevtheDuff10d ago

There were savings on subs and controllers here in the UK? I bought a controller yesterday in the sale..
It would be weird if those deals were not in other territories too?

300°

Sony Says The PS5 Is Its “Most Profitable Generation To-Date"

During Sony’s recent business segment meeting and investor presentation regarding its game and network services, the PlayStation company revealed that PlayStation 5 is the company’s “most profitable generation to-date.”

It’s the top slide of the presentation, showing that in its first four years, the PS5 generation has already hit $106 billion in sales, having almost caught up to the PS4’s total $107 billion generated.

Operating income for the PS5 generation has also already surpassed that of the PS4, having now reached $10 billion.

ApocalypseShadow13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

I wouldn't doubt it. They released a high quality system. A lot of high quality games from themselves and their support of 3rd party developers and indies. They released many high quality remakes and remasters. They released a high quality GaaS game going against the naysayers thinking Sony would abandon single player games. And they most likely are profiting a lot more than PS1, PS2 PS4 and the loss leading PS3 that drained all their profits.

Now, I'll wait to see what's cooking tomorrow. But can you use some of those profits to better support your high quality VR headset? Because, by supporting it, you can sell more games and more systems and make more profits?

jznrpg13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

I want RPGs for PSVR2! Good ones of course

shinoff218312d ago

If it had some rpgs I would buy right fking now. It looks dope and alot of fun, but it's biggest game resident evil 4(maybe) I've got no interest in. I'm not a fan of racing games, even with that metro game coming i was never much into that series. Rpgs would be fantastic.

MrNinosan12d ago

Lemme know if ya wanna play some Zenith 🙌
Bought it at release, but haven't played it more than 1-2 hours but for sure on my "todo list".

Cacabunga12d ago

Normal when they released mostly cross gen games so far. That’s a lot of money saved..
We haven’t seen what PS5 can do yet. 4years in and PS4 games still look great to me. The gen leap isn’t quite there yet.

--Onilink--12d ago

The interesting metric for me is the $106billion in operating income/profit (not sales as mentioned in the article) reaching the same as the PS4 did with only half the consoles sold.

In particular because they all are supposed to be making the most per hardware sold after a few years when manufacturing costs are down.

So even putting inflation aside(and the higher console price), it is interesting that they could reach PS4 $ with just half the consoles sold.

Maybe there is more to the metric thats whats seen at face value, but they have clearly been making a lot more money than before on the software side (with also less games released I suppose, given its only been half the generation so far)

VersusDMC12d ago

The bulk of the money has to be coming from the 30% cut on all games and microtransactions. Especially on all the free to play juggernauts like genshin, apex, fortnight, etc.

--Onilink--12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@Versus

They are definitely making a lot on that for sure (which the $70 price increase factors into as well), but its not like many of those games werent around for the PS4 too.

They might be counting the gen as a whole and not just PS5 itself (so extra profit from PC sales, whatever that may be)

PS+ price increase and different tiers probably amount to part of that too.

But in general, its still quite a surprising metric. Half the time, half the consoles sold, less first party games released so far and still already making more of a profit than last gen is quite something, and as mentioned, there is probably more to it that we dont know, after all, since we are talking about operating income, all the expenses they have also factor into it, so it is also possible that they have found ways to significantly reduce that + all the means of increased revenue that appear to be factoring into the equation

All in all, just an interesting situation from a business perspective

porkChop12d ago

It's for the whole generation, so it would likely be including PC. They also make much more profit on digital sales vs retail, and digital is far more prominent these days. The generation also started at the height of COVID when everyone was home, spending far more money on gaming/hobbies. It makes a lot of sense for this gen to be more profitable.

Abnor_Mal12d ago

This will surely shut up all the new trolling accounts trying to spread lies and non facts in other articles comment sections before this article is posted.

Hofstaderman12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Obscurely, those trolls or troll will not show in these articles as the truth is contradictory to his or their orchard-sized daily dose of copium and hopium.

Tacoboto12d ago

Or... They're intentionally trolling you guys specifically. Because they know it upsets you so easily.

Name-dropping Orchard, after this many months? How long has it been and he's still in your thoughts?

Elda12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I'm quite sure the individual is reading these positive comments downvoting & seething at the same time. Edit: It just downvoted my comment...lol!!

Hofstaderman12d ago

No I'm entertained by this individual. I love unhinged people, they are so interesting lol.

repsahj12d ago

Wow! I am super impressed that in just 4 years, ps5 already caught up to the PS4's. Congratulations.

JackBNimble12d ago

That happens when half of your games are cross platform. I'm still waiting to see what the ps5 is capable of, because they sure haven't pushed any limits.

And where are all these ps5 exclusive games?

sagapo12d ago

Not really surprised as Sony barely has any competition at the moment.

Show all comments (47)
150°

Sony CEO says although AI "has been used for creation," it's "not a substitute for human creativity"

"AI is not a substitute for human creativity. We position it as a technology that supports creativity. Creativity resides in people. We will continue to contribute to people's creativity through technology," the CEO said.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
1nsomniac19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

...not yet but 100% within the next 10 years!

..Then Sony will use it like the drop of a hat. They're no different to the others.

isarai19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

They used to be 😞 sure it was always a business, and money's always the priority, but they used to have a very strong stance on supporting artists and creativity. "Dont f#@k with the artist" was a phrase they touted a few times back in the ps1-ps3 era, a philosophy carried over from their music branch PlayStation was created from. It's not COMPLETELY gone, but it's barely there compared to what it was back then, i just want them to return to that.

Eonjay18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

I am highly encouraged by their statement about human creativity. "Dont f#@k with the artist" is exactly what they are saying. But at the same time, I don't think people understand that Sony is a corporation. If they don't realize growth, they don't get to exist. When you say 'Sony', you are talking about a bunch of investors. To speak about them any other way is a illogical and incorrect. They haven't changed. They have been a group of investors since they became a public business.

isarai18d ago

Ugh, i really wish people would stop gambling people's livelihoods by turning a project/game into their political soapbox. Im all for statements and having your own opinion, but there's more people working on this than just druckman, ham fisting your political beliefs onto just seems inconsiderate for everyone elses job security when it can result in a failure due to people avoiding it for that reason.

I play games for escape, im so tired of nearly every AAA game blatantly dragging real world issues to shove in my face when I'm trying to take a break from it all. They don't even bother to be subtle about it, quite the opposite, it's blasted and force fed to you and it's just getting exhausting

Einhander197218d ago

People are taking a whole interview and cutting it down to clips that make him look bad and take what he actually was saying out of context. For example he also said things like this AI has "ethical issues we need to address"

-Foxtrot18d ago

@Einhander

Why defend him at this point?

It’s not taking things out of context, he said what he said.

Old ND would never talk about soulless AI taking over so many creative things they are well known for. The whole “ethical issues” is just a good PR spin people who push this crap fall back on to make their statements not seem as bad. So many AI lovers do this.

AI has no place is so many creative based things.

Einhander197218d ago

Well yeah, because everyone else is using it so they need to stay competitive. It's the same as paid online, they didn't want to go that route but their competition was making so much money they needed to add paid online just to keep up.

RaiderNation18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

AI will never replace humans in game development in terms of conceptualizing new games. Humans still need to come up with the ideas and what they want to implement. However much of the day to day menial coding could be AI driven to reduce production time and team size. I could also see AI being used for bug testing/optimization that could lead to better quality games at launch. I'm actually very optimistic about how AI can positively impact game development.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 18d ago
XiNatsuDragnel19d ago

Good statement but hopefully this holds up

NotoriousWhiz18d ago

People that aren't software developers just don't understand the benefits of AI. People who's only exposure to A.I is the Terminator movie and other related sci fi films won't understand the benefits it provides.

It's not about replacing human labor. It's about making human labor easier.

Many years ago, I had laser eye surgery done. It was performed by a robot. The doctor took my measurements and calibrated the machine to make sure it would do what needed be done. And then the robot corrected my vision in 10 seconds.

15 years later and I still have 20/20 vision.

Eonjay18d ago

AI in and of itself is not a 'bad'. Money is bad. Money is evil, and corporations will do whatever they can to get more of it. They will find ways to implement AI to replace as may jobs as possible. This isn't even up for debate. It is the charge of the corporation to maximize returns for the investors. They have no choice. I'm a developer and I know that my job will absolutely be replaced. Therefore, I have decided to become an AI dev. AI has a lot of potential to help us solve problem on a scale most can't even imagine. The issue, as ever is that our monetary system only ever allows us to focus on greed and fiscal growth.

But I am a pragmatist. Perhaps an AI model can be built to help protect us from our most dangerous instincts and habits. And perhaps Congress can pass laws to protect us from people who would use AI to manipulate and control us (spoiler: they wont).

RaiderNation17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

Progress is inevitable. Nobody driving cars today is complaining that the horse and buggy is no longer around. Yes, some jobs will be lost but guess what? With innovation comes new job opportunities. It's how the cycle of the job market works.